SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

62,498 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and Intel Arc A550M form a mobile computing package that targets a specific niche: sustained professional productivity with a significant graphics boost for creative and gaming tasks. The CPU is a 10-core, 20-thread Zen 5 part running at a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is Intel’s discrete Arc A550M, an 8 GB GDDR6 solution. The combined system sits at the 90th percentile of all laptop configurations in the database, indicating that this pairing delivers top-tier performance for a portable device. However, it is critical to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; therefore, all specific gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Gorgon Point codename, and manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip features 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The hybrid design leverages a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, as indicated by the generation string, allowing the processor to balance raw performance with power efficiency. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache, which is a moderate amount for feeding 20 threads. The die size is 233 mm², and the chip supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, yielding a maximum theoretical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

In synthetic workloads, the CPU’s Passmark multithread score is 31,485, with a single-thread score of 4,168. The integer math score of 107,173 and floating-point math score of 66,824 highlight robust arithmetic capability, while the extended instructions score of 26,441 suggests strong SIMD and encryption-acceleration performance. Specifically, the data encryption score of 19,308 and data compression score of 385,174 indicate that the CPU handles file archiving and cryptography tasks exceptionally well for a mobile part. The physics score of 1,747 and prime number finding score of 126 are relatively lower, but these are often less representative of real-world productivity than the integer and floating-point workloads.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 62,498, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tested. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is virtually neck-and-neck with the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which scores 62,738, a delta of -0.4%. It also trails the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 by 0.5% (62,839) and the Intel Core i7-13790F by 0.9% (63,080). However, it leads the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 1.1% (61,841). This data suggests that the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is positioned at the top tier of mobile and even some desktop processors, making it suitable for heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and software compilation, despite its modest 28 W TDP. The efficiency of the 4 nm process is evident; it matches the performance of high-power desktop chips while consuming a fraction of the power.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operations pipelines (ROPs). The graphics card operates at a base clock of 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory is provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps, which yields a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated DirectX Raytracing, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc A550M scores 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 49,737. This places the GPU in the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The compute capabilities are solid: the FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 16.79 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio, which is beneficial for AI inference and certain creative workloads that utilize half-precision. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s, allowing for high fill rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

The nearest rivals to the Arc A550M are telling. It is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957) and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4% (50,951) but leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% (48,477). This is a remarkable positioning, as the Arc A550M is a mobile part competing with high-end desktop cards from previous generations. For rendering and 3D workloads, the data suggests that the GPU can handle complex scenes, though the 8 GB VRAM capacity might be a limiting factor for extremely large textures or 4K rendering projects. The 224 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming and mid-range creative tasks, but it is not in the same league as the wider-bus desktop counterparts.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: With an estimated GPU performance rivaling the desktop RX 6800 XT, the Arc A550M is capable of driving high-refresh 1080p displays in most titles. The 86th percentile GPU score suggests that esports and older AAA games will run at high frame rates, though specific FPS figures are estimates. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra textures but may require adjustments at 1440p.

Streaming: The Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465’s 20 threads and excellent integer math score (107,173) provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU’s data compression score of 385,174 also indicates fast handling of stream buffers. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics offer a fallback, but the discrete Arc GPU handles the rendering load.

Video Editing: The combination of a 93rd percentile CPU and 86th percentile GPU is potent for video editing. The CPU’s floating-point math score (66,824) accelerates effects and transitions, while the GPU’s FP16 throughput (16.79 TFLOPS) speeds up previews and exports in software that supports half-precision. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with multi-track timelines.

3D Rendering: The GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 power make it suitable for real-time viewports and final-frame rendering in applications like Blender, though the 8 GB VRAM may cap scene complexity. The CPU’s multithread score of 31,485 ensures that CPU-based renderers like Cycles will also perform well, matching desktop i9-class chips.

Software Development: The 20-thread CPU with a 93rd percentile rank excels at compiling large codebases. The data encryption score of 19,308 and extended instructions score of 26,441 are particularly relevant for workloads involving cryptography and SIMD-optimized algorithms. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments.

Student and Office Work: The 28 W TDP CPU ensures long battery life and quiet operation, while the integrated Radeon 890M handles light graphics tasks without engaging the discrete GPU. For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, the single-thread score of 4,168 ensures snappy responsiveness, and the 20 threads handle multitasking with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is built for the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile BGA package, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for the discrete GPU and a high-speed NVMe SSD. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring it is not a bottleneck for data transfer.

The system’s power requirements are modest: the CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 60 W, suggesting a combined thermal envelope of around 88 W for the core components. This allows for a thin-and-light laptop chassis with a shared heat pipe solution. The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, but given the low TDPs, a standard 130-150 W laptop power adapter is likely sufficient. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing the system memory to the maximum supported capacity and installing the fastest NVMe Gen 4 SSD available. Because the CPU and GPU are soldered, the only user-accessible upgrades are storage and RAM, provided the laptop manufacturer has socketed these components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Passmark multithread score is 31,485, and the single-thread score is 4,168. The average CPU benchmark score is 62,498, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 49,894, and the Vulkan score is 49,580, with an average of 49,737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 90, indicating that this configuration outperforms 90% of all laptop builds in the database.

The CPU is 0.4% slower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, but 1.1% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900KF. The GPU is 0.4% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 2.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, but 2.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. The combined picture is a laptop that delivers desktop-class performance in both CPU and GPU tasks, making it a rare high-end mobile offering. The CPU’s 93rd percentile rank is exceptional for a 28 W part, and the GPU’s 86th percentile rank is similarly impressive for a 60 W mobile discrete card.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for professionals who need a single laptop for both compute-heavy development and graphics-intensive design. Software developers will benefit from the 20-thread CPU and its 93rd percentile rank, which rivals desktop i9 processors, allowing for rapid code compilation and virtualization. Content creators working with video or 3D graphics will appreciate the GPU’s FP16 throughput of 16.79 TFLOPS, which accelerates rendering pipelines, and the CPU’s floating-point math score of 66,824 for effects processing. Gamers who want a portable system that can run modern titles at high settings will find the 86th percentile GPU sufficient, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s encryption and extended instruction scores for simulation and algorithm work. Small business workstations that require data compression and encryption (scores of 385,174 and 19,308, respectively) will find this platform to be a secure and fast choice for handling sensitive data.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK; therefore, all frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s average score of 49,737 places it in the 86th percentile, and its nearest rival is the desktop AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, which it beats by 2.6%. Based on this, the Arc A550M is estimated to handle 1080p ultra settings in most AAA titles at frame rates between 60 and 100 FPS, depending on the title’s optimization for Intel graphics. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting, with estimated frame rates dropping to 40-70 FPS on ultra. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant are likely to exceed 144 FPS at 1080p high settings, given the high pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s. Ray tracing performance will be modest, as the 16 RT cores are not as powerful as NVIDIA’s dedicated RT hardware, but the support for DirectX 12 Ultimate allows for the feature to be enabled at lower resolutions. Users should expect to adjust settings from ultra to high for a smoother experience in the most demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop configuration?

A: The combined system percentile is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KF in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has an average benchmark score of 62,498, which is 1.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900KF’s score of 61,841.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU platform?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A550M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and how does it compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49,737, which is 2.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT’s score of 48,477.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how many threads does it have?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and supports 20 threads via 10 cores.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable on this platform?

A: No, the CPU is mounted on AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile BGA socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU, which is the dominant component in this pairing. The CPU’s 93rd percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU’s 86th percentile rank, indicating that the processor is the stronger of the two. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data encryption, and multithreaded productivity, the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 will be the limiting factor only if the software is single-threaded; otherwise, it will drive performance. The GPU is the bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering scenarios, where its 86th percentile rank and 8 GB VRAM may cap performance. In gaming, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,168 ensures that it can feed the GPU effectively at 1080p, meaning the Arc A550M will typically be the limiting factor for frame rates. However, at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive simulation games, the CPU may become the bottleneck. The FPS scaling is expected to be smooth, with the CPU rarely causing stutters due to its 20 threads. For creative workloads that use both components, such as video editing with GPU-accelerated effects, the balance is more even, but the GPU’s lower VRAM capacity will limit the complexity of compositions that can be handled without spilling to system memory. Overall, this is a CPU-first platform with a capable discrete GPU, making it a better fit for compute-heavy tasks than for pure high-end gaming at maximum settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds