SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

62,498 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific tier of mobile computing, targeting users who prioritize processor throughput over graphical fidelity. This laptop-class combination sits at the 82nd percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of existing hardware, though its strengths are distinctly lopsided toward CPU-centric tasks. The data shows a processor that competes with high-end desktop parts from a previous generation, paired with a modest entry-level discrete GPU that is now end-of-life.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is a 10-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically from the "Gorgon Point" codename generation. It operates within a 28-watt TDP envelope, a figure that underscores its efficiency-focused mobile design. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a die size of 233 mm². Clock speeds range from a 2.00 GHz base to a 5.00 GHz boost, allowing for significant single-thread performance when workloads demand it.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a highly capable processor. Its average benchmark score of 62,498 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, a remarkable position for a mobile part. In single-thread performance, it scores 4,168, demonstrating strong responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-threaded score of 31,485 indicates substantial parallel processing capability, further supported by an integer math score of 107,173 and a floating-point math score of 66,824. Data compression tasks score 385,174, suggesting excellent throughput for archiving and file management, while encryption performance hits 19,308. The extended instructions score of 26,441 confirms that modern SIMD workloads are well-handled.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is positioned in a tight competitive cluster. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX by a mere 0.4%, with an average score difference of just 240 points. Similarly, it is 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The gap widens slightly against the Intel Core i7-13790F, where it is 0.9% slower. However, it leads the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 1.1%, a notable result given that the i9 is a high-end desktop part. These figures suggest the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 delivers desktop-class computational power in a mobile form factor, making it ideal for demanding productivity, software compilation, and content creation workloads where CPU cores are the primary resource.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform fundamentals for this CPU are built around the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket that offers limited user upgradeability. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 10-core processor without significant bottlenecks in most applications, though it is not class-leading. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, ensuring fast connectivity for NVMe storage and discrete GPUs. Notably, ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for this market segment.

The integrated Radeon 890M graphics provide a fallback for video output and light graphical tasks, though the system is designed to pair with the discrete Intel Arc A350M. The GPU itself has a 25-watt TDP and requires a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The suggested PSU field is null, which is common for mobile platforms where power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power brick and motherboard VRM design. The CPU's 28-watt TDP and the GPU's 25-watt TDP combine for a modest total power draw, suggesting that a capable air cooler and a standard laptop power adapter are sufficient. A sensible next upgrade within this platform is limited; the primary enhancements would be increasing memory capacity or swapping the storage drive for a larger NVMe SSD, as the CPU and GPU are soldered or otherwise fixed in most implementations.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KF?

A: Benchmark results indicate the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is 1.1% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900KF in average benchmark score, despite being a mobile processor with a 28-watt TDP.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to this CPU?

A: The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory, yielding a total memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the performance percentile of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The Intel Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,647.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The CPU is fabricated on a 4 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm².

Q: Which GPU is closest in performance to the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 590 is the nearest rival, with the Arc A350M trailing it by just 0.4% in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The CPU can boost up to 5.00 GHz from a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A350M, with an average benchmark score of 24,647 and a 70th percentile ranking, is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming. Its performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, meaning it can handle esports titles at high frame rates, but it will likely struggle to maintain high refresh rates in demanding AAA games at maximum settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,168 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The 10-core, 20-thread CPU is well-suited for streaming. The multi-thread score of 31,485 provides ample headroom to encode video while gaming, and the data encryption score of 19,308 indicates that hardware-accelerated encoding will be efficient. The GPU's 6 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate allow for hardware encoding via Intel Quick Sync, offloading the streaming workload from the CPU.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both CPU and GPU power. The CPU's high multi-thread score of 31,485 will accelerate timeline rendering and effect processing, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance assists with GPU-accelerated effects and previews. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU may be a limiting factor for very large projects or high-resolution source footage, but the overall system should handle 1080p and moderate 4K editing tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. A score of 66,824 in floating-point math and 107,173 in integer math indicates strong ray tracing and geometry processing capabilities in CPU-based renderers. The GPU, while not a rendering powerhouse, provides 6 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported applications. The 70th percentile GPU score suggests it can handle viewport rendering and light GPU-accelerated final renders, but heavy production rendering should be CPU-driven.

Software development: The processor excels in compilation tasks. The high integer math score and strong multi-thread performance mean code compilation, test execution, and virtual machine management will be responsive. The 16 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the 93rd CPU percentile ensures that developer workflows remain fluid even with multiple background services running.

Student and office work: For productivity applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this system is overqualified. The single-thread score of 4,168 ensures snappy interface responsiveness, while the 28-watt CPU TDP and 25-watt GPU TDP contribute to excellent battery life potential. The integrated Radeon 890M can handle video playback and light graphical tasks, further extending battery life when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a clear CPU-heavy balance. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile. This 23-point gap indicates that the Intel Arc A350M will be the primary limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU is likely to deliver frame times faster than the GPU can render them, meaning the GPU will be at or near 100% utilization while the CPU waits. This is a favorable scenario for consistency, as it prevents CPU-induced stutters.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D scene processing, the GPU will be largely idle. The CPU's multi-thread score of 31,485 versus the GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS highlights this disparity. The 1.1% lead over the Intel Core i9-13900KF in CPU benchmarks reinforces that the processor is the dominant component. The GPU's nearest rival delta of -0.4% against the Radeon RX 590 shows it is a mid-pack performer, but it will cap the system's overall gaming potential. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus (providing 112.0 GB/s) are additional bottlenecks in modern games that increasingly require more video memory at higher resolutions and texture quality settings.

Who Should Build It

This platform is best suited for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive. Software developers will appreciate the 10-core, 20-thread configuration and high integer math scores for rapid builds and test suites. Data analysts and scientists will benefit from the floating-point performance and data compression scores for processing large datasets. Video editors working primarily with 1080p footage will find the CPU handles timeline scrubbing and export efficiently, with the GPU providing adequate acceleration for effects. Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations, compile code, or use virtual machines will find the CPU performance far exceeds typical student laptops. Small business workstations handling accounting, database management, or office productivity will have substantial headroom. However, gamers seeking high-fidelity experiences or 3D artists relying on GPU rendering should look elsewhere, as the Arc A350M will be the limiting factor in those scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and its position relative to known rivals.

Based on the Intel Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24,647 and its 70th percentile ranking, gaming performance is expected to be entry-level. The GPU is 0.4% slower than an AMD Radeon RX 590 and 1.5% faster than an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This places it in the class of a capable 1080p gaming GPU for esports and older titles. Expect playable frame rates in games like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends at high settings. For modern AAA games, users should expect to lower settings to medium or low to achieve 60 FPS at 1080p. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a significant constraint in newer titles, potentially requiring reduced texture quality. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but performance will be severely impacted at 1080p with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,168 will ensure that the GPU is the performance limiter in almost all gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU. The pairing represents an asymmetrical performance profile: a top-tier CPU (93rd percentile) matched with a mid-tier GPU (70th percentile). The combined percentile of 82 reflects the system's overall standing, but this figure is heavily weighted by the CPU's dominance. The Intel Arc A350M is an end-of-life product (production status: End-of-life), released initially in early 2022, while the CPU is active and was released in early 2026. This suggests the platform is designed for productivity and general-purpose computing, with gaming and graphics as secondary considerations. The 28-watt CPU TDP and 25-watt GPU TDP indicate a power-efficient system, likely found in thin-and-light or compact laptops.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 achieves an average benchmark score of 62,498, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, showing it is faster than 93% of all processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, scores 62,738, a difference of -0.4%. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62,839 (-0.5%), and the Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080 (-0.9%). It is faster than the Intel Core i9-13900KF, which scores 61,841 (1.1% delta). This data confirms the CPU is a high-end performer, competitive with desktop parts from the previous generation.

The Intel Arc A350M posts an average benchmark score of 24,647, landing in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range result. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744) by -0.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763) by -0.5%. It leads the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277) by 1.5%. In compute benchmarks, it scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Vulkan, showing consistent performance across different compute APIs.

The combined picture is a system with exceptional compute capability for CPU-bound tasks, but modest graphics performance. The 82nd combined percentile is respectable, but it is essentially a CPU-driven score. The GPU will not bottleneck the CPU in productivity workloads, but it will limit gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds