SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

46,030 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 + Intel Arc A770M

This pairing combines AMD's latest Zen 5 mobile flagship with Intel's top-tier Arc 7 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 62nd percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined system percentile of 76. This is a high-performance mobile platform designed for demanding workloads, though the GPU component is notably less dominant than the CPU in relative terms.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Point codename, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The processor features 12 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 233 mm², this chip represents AMD's current-generation mobile flagship.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports high-bandwidth access patterns for both productivity and creative workloads. The CPU is rated at a 28 W TDP, which is remarkably efficient for a 12-core, 24-thread processor, though this figure represents the base power envelope rather than peak boost power.

Benchmark results show strong multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21812 places this chip in serious desktop-replacement territory, while the single-core score of 1988 indicates excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench results reinforce this picture with a multicore score of 13957 and a single-core score of 2084. The PassMark multithread score of 32916 and single-thread score of 3867 both confirm the processor's balanced capabilities.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 46030 places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062, just 0.1% ahead), the AMD EPYC 4364P (45970, 0.1% behind), the Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098, 0.1% behind), and the AMD EPYC 7303 (45960, 0.2% behind). This clustering indicates that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 delivers performance essentially identical to a previous-generation Intel HX-series flagship and current server-class parts, which is remarkable for a 28 W mobile processor.

Specialized workloads show particular strengths. The PassMark data compression score of 404918 demonstrates excellent throughput for archiving and database operations. Data encryption at 20802 and extended instructions at 29269 indicate robust cryptographic and SIMD performance. Floating-point math at 75153 and integer math at 121754 both show strong computational throughput, while random string sorting at 44552 and physics at 1819 round out a comprehensive performance profile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate performance, as measured by its average benchmark score of 46030, places it at the 89th percentile of all processors. This is a top-tier mobile CPU that competes directly with desktop-class parts. The nearest rival comparison shows less than 0.2% separation from four different processors, indicating that this CPU sits in an extremely competitive performance band.

The Intel Arc A770M GPU, meanwhile, achieves an average benchmark score of 18383, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18373, 0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro D500 (18533, 0.8% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, 1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, 1.2% behind). This places the Arc A770M in the upper-midrange segment of mobile graphics, roughly comparable to an RTX 3060 Mobile.

The combined system percentile of 76 reflects the substantial gap between CPU and GPU performance tiers. The CPU is a top-11% part, while the GPU is a top-38% part. This imbalance means the system's overall gaming performance will be constrained by the GPU, while CPU-bound productivity tasks will run at near-flagship levels.

In synthetic GPU benchmarks, the Arc A770M scores 2278 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 89494 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 74422 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark suite shows DirectX 9 at 178, DirectX 10 at 56, DirectX 11 at 69, and DirectX 12 at 70. The G3D score of 11774 and GPU compute score of 4778 provide additional context, with the G2D score of 711 indicating adequate 2D performance for desktop compositing.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Arc A770M's 62nd percentile standing means it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings, but it will struggle to maintain very high frame rates in the most demanding titles. The CPU's 89th percentile performance ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations will not bottleneck the GPU at typical gaming resolutions.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21812 providing ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and system tasks. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration allows dedicated encoding threads without compromising game performance.

Video editing applications will leverage both the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1988) and its multi-core capabilities. The PassMark floating-point math score of 75153 indicates robust processing for filter operations and color grading, while the 16 GB GPU memory provides substantial scratch space for preview rendering.

3D rendering performance is driven primarily by the CPU's 21812 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which handles CPU-based render engines competently. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc A770M's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and its 62nd percentile standing among GPUs, making this a capable but not flagship rendering platform.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high single-core performance, with the Geekbench single-core score of 2084 accelerating compilation tasks and code analysis. The PassMark integer math score of 121754 and data compression score of 404918 support faster builds and version control operations.

Student and office workloads are amply served by this configuration. The CPU's efficiency at 28 W TDP means sustained battery-friendly performance, while the GPU's 16 GB memory handles any graphics-accelerated productivity tasks with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 3867 ensures snappy application response in everyday use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket designed for the Strix Point generation. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and the system bus interface for the GPU is PCIe 4.0 x16.

The 28 W CPU TDP combined with the 120 W GPU TDP gives a combined base power draw of 148 W. This is a moderate power envelope for a high-performance laptop, suggesting that a well-designed power delivery system can handle sustained workloads without excessive thermal throttling. The GPU is marked as end-of-life production status, which may affect long-term driver support and availability.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom. The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile placement leaves significant performance on the table relative to the CPU's 89th percentile. However, the mobile form factor limits upgradeability, so users should consider this system's performance profile as fixed for its lifetime.

The platform's DDR5 memory support provides a solid foundation for future software demands, and the 16 GB GPU memory will remain relevant for several years. The PCIe Gen 4 x16 interface for the GPU provides ample bandwidth for current workloads and leaves room for future GPU upgrades in other chassis configurations.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p resolution will find the Arc A770M sufficient for most titles, while the CPU ensures no processor bottleneck at any resolution. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes this system ideal for content creators who run CPU-intensive applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

Developers writing code, compiling large projects, and running virtual machines will benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread configuration. The PassMark data encryption score of 20802 provides confidence for security-focused workloads. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded performance for simulations and data analysis.

Small business workstations handling databases, spreadsheets, and document processing will find the data compression score of 404918 particularly useful. The system's 76th combined percentile places it in the upper tier of laptop performance, suitable for professionals who need desktop-class performance in a portable package.

The CPU's 4 nm process node and 28 W TDP make this an efficient choice for mobile professionals who need sustained performance without frequent charging. The 16 GB GPU memory provides headroom for large datasets in scientific computing and data visualization applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile standing and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with 1440p gaming possible at medium to high settings depending on the optimization of the game.

The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB GDDR6 memory provide ample bandwidth for modern game assets and textures. The 32 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance will vary significantly by title. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest gaming APIs.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1988 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that game logic and physics calculations will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. For esports titles that favor CPU performance, this system should deliver very high frame rates at 1080p. For AAA titles with heavy GPU demands, the system will perform more like a mid-range gaming laptop.

Frame rates will be GPU-limited in graphically intensive titles, and users should expect performance in line with the RTX 3060 Mobile class of graphics solutions. The CPU's performance headroom means that future game titles with more demanding CPU requirements will be handled competently.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip from the Alchemist generation. Manufactured on a 6 nm process from TSMC, the chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a large, complex GPU designed for high-performance mobile graphics.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 1650 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory capacity is generous for a mobile GPU and supports large textures and datasets without overflow.

Compute resources include 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. The 32 ray tracing cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects. The pixel rate of 262.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 524.8 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities. FP32 performance is rated at 16.79 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 33.59 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The GPU's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics software. The 120 W TDP is moderate for a high-performance mobile GPU. Benchmark scores show the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494, with Vulkan at 74422. The 62nd percentile standing places this GPU in the upper-midrange tier, capable of solid 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46030.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has an average benchmark score of 18383, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 3060 Mobile's score of 18159.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is this system suitable for ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A770M includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has an end-of-life production status, which may affect long-term driver support availability.

Q: What is the combined system performance percentile?

A: This CPU-GPU combination achieves a combined percentile of 76 among all systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU components. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile creates a system where the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46030 is over 2.5 times the GPU's 18383, though these are different types of benchmarks and not directly comparable.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at standard resolutions. The 62nd percentile GPU performance will constrain frame rates, while the 89th percentile CPU will have significant headroom. This means users can expect GPU-bound behavior in most games, with the CPU rarely becoming the limiting factor.

For CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the system will be CPU-bound with the GPU providing adequate acceleration for graphics-related tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 32916 indicates serious compute capability, while the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS provides solid but not exceptional compute throughput.

The 28 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP combination means the system's power delivery and cooling must handle a combined 148 W base draw. This is manageable for a laptop design, and the CPU's efficiency at 4 nm process node helps maintain sustained performance under load.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor with Intel's Arc A770M discrete GPU. The CPU represents AMD's current-generation mobile flagship from the Ryzen AI 300 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture at a 4 nm process node. The GPU is Intel's high-end mobile offering from the Alchemist generation, built on a 6 nm process.

The combined system percentile of 76 places this configuration in the upper tier of laptop performance, though the GPU component is noticeably weaker than the CPU. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes it a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU's 62nd percentile places it in the upper-midrange of mobile graphics.

The system is best characterized as CPU-dominant, with exceptional processor performance for productivity and creative workloads, paired with solid but not flagship gaming performance. The 12-core, 24-thread CPU with 5.10 GHz boost clock provides desktop-class compute capability, while the GPU's 16 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure smooth operation in graphics-accelerated applications.

This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU performance for professional workloads while still wanting a capable discrete GPU for gaming and graphics tasks. The system occupies an interesting niche between productivity-focused laptops and gaming machines, offering strong performance in both domains without excelling at either extreme.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds