SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

46,030 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Arc A550M combination is a laptop-class build that pairs a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 Strix Point processor with an Intel Xe-HPG Alchemist mobile GPU. The CPU posts an average benchmark score of 46030, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 lands in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 88, indicating a high overall tier. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than from direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process and uses the Zen 5 architecture with a Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It provides 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The processor carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The die measures 233 mm², and the chip runs at a 28 W TDP. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X through a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 4 is provided with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated Radeon 890M GPU is also present, though the system pairs the CPU with the discrete Intel Arc A550M.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strength across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 it scores 21812 multi-core and 1988 single-core; in Cinebench R15 it scores 3334 multi-core and 301 single-core. Geekbench results are 13957 multi-core and 2084 single-core. PassMark multithread is 32916, single-thread is 3867, and singlethread also 3867. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46030 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly packed: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (0.1% lower), the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098 (0.1% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7303 scores 45960 (0.2% higher). This means the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 effectively trades blows with desktop-class and high-end mobile processors, despite being a 28 W part.

The single-core scores — 1988 in Cinebench R23 and 2084 in Geekbench — indicate strong per-thread performance for a mobile chip. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz supports that, and the 89th percentile overall confirms the CPU can handle demanding workloads without being the primary limiter. For real workloads, the 24 threads and high single-core speed translate to fast compilation, responsive general computing, and heavy multi-threaded tasks like rendering or video encoding, while the 28 W TDP makes sustained performance feasible in a thin laptop chassis.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile suggest a pairing capable of driving 1080p high-refresh gaming. The 12-core, 24-thread CPU with a 5.10 GHz boost avoids processor bottlenecks at high frame rates, and the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern titles. FPS figures are estimates, but the hardware profile points to solid 1080p high-refresh performance.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-core strength, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21812 and Geekbench multi-core of 13957, allows simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The GPU's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units also handle encoding tasks. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate headroom for streaming overlays and background tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 121754 and floating-point math of 75153 indicate strong processing for codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and FP16 of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) accelerate effects and previews. A 12-core CPU with 24 threads and the 86th-percentile GPU form a capable mobile editing platform.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21812 shows the CPU can handle CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs provide raw throughput for GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for many scenes, and the 16 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible engines.

Software development: The 12 cores, 24 threads, and 16 MB L3 cache speed up compilation. PassMark data compression of 404918 and data encryption of 20802 indicate strong integer and cryptographic performance. The 89th-percentile CPU ranking means large codebases compile in parallel without stalling.

Student and office work: The 28 W TDP and 12-core design deliver responsive performance for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 890M is available when the discrete GPU is idle, and the CPU's single-thread score of 2084 in Geekbench ensures snappy UI interaction. The low TDP also extends battery life, though no battery figures are in the data.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M uses the DG2-512 chip, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The Xe-HPG architecture is from the Alchemist generation, specifically Arc 5 Mobile. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, plus 16 ray-tracing cores. Base clock is 900 MHz and boost is 2050 MHz; memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective. Memory is 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, texture rate 262.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU runs at a 60 W TDP and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, with a slot width of IGP. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life.

Benchmarks show the GPU scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are very close: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 (0.4% higher), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (2.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477 (2.6% lower). This places the Arc A550M in a performance band that overlaps with high-end desktop GPUs from the previous generation.

The 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p high-settings gaming, while the 16 RT cores provide ray-traced effects in supported titles. The 60 W TDP is modest for a discrete GPU, and the 6 nm process helps keep it within a laptop's thermal envelope. The 89th percentile CPU pairing means the GPU is not likely to be heavily bottlenecked by the processor in most workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 86th percentile and the CPU's 89th percentile indicate a balanced mobile platform. For 1080p ultra settings, the Arc A550M's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 224 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, though exact numbers cannot be stated. For 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may limit performance in VRAM-heavy titles, but the 60 W TDP and 16 RT cores still provide reasonable throughput. At 4K, the 128-bit bus and 8 GB capacity will likely bottleneck, and users should expect reduced settings.

The GPU's nearest rival data reinforce this: the Arc A550M sits within 0.4% of the RTX 5070 Ti's average score, within 0.5% of the RX Vega 64, and within 2.4% of the RX 6900 XT, while being 2.6% faster than the RX 6800 XT. These comparisons suggest the GPU performs at a level that can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p with adjustments. Because no measured FPS are available, these statements remain qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentiles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, placing the build in the 88th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A550M support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU reports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How much memory does the Arc A550M have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 60 W.

Q: Is the Arc A550M still in production?

A: No, the Arc A550M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is marked as active.

Q: What is the CPU's release date?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 was released on June 30, 2024.

Who Should Build It

This build suits gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh gaming, as the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile provide a balanced foundation. The CPU's 12 cores, 24 threads, and 5.10 GHz boost clock make it strong for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes; the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21812 and Geekbench multi-core of 13957 show heavy multi-thread capability. Software developers will benefit from the 16 MB L3 cache and high integer performance, with PassMark integer math at 121754 and data encryption at 20802. Students and office workers get a responsive 12-core CPU with a 28 W TDP, which is efficient for daily tasks. Small business workstations that need mobile performance without a massive power draw can use this pairing for productivity and light GPU-accelerated workloads. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth make it a fit for 1080p gaming, while the CPU's single-thread score of 2084 in Geekbench ensures quick application launches and responsive multitasking.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46030, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062, 0.1% lower), the AMD EPYC 4364P (45970, 0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098, 0.1% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7303 (45960, 0.2% higher). The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% lower), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50959, 2.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 2.6% higher). The combined percentile is 88, which reflects a build that is near the top of the database. The CPU is slightly above the GPU in percentile, indicating the processor is slightly stronger than the graphics card, but both are within a few percentage points of each other. The CPU's average score of 46030 is within 0.2% of its nearest rivals, and the GPU's average score of 49737 is within 2.6% of its closest competitor, making this a tightly matched pair.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as the buildClass field indicates, combining the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is a 6 nm Xe-HPG Alchemist part with a 60 W TDP. The overall tier is high: the combined percentile of 88 places this build in the top 12% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are close, indicating a well-balanced pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46030 and the GPU's 49737 both rank in the upper percentiles, confirming this is a capable laptop-class system. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 24 threads, combined with the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory, create a platform that handles both compute and graphics workloads with a strong performance tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance is good: the CPU sits at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile, a gap of 3 percentile points. This suggests that in CPU-bound tasks, the CPU will be the stronger component, while in GPU-bound tasks the GPU will be the limiting factor, but not by a large margin. In gaming, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth will likely be the first constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU's 12 cores and high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2084) will handle frame pacing. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21812 indicates it can drive heavy compute, and the GPU's FP32 of 8.397 TFLOPS adds GPU acceleration. The CPU's TDP of 28 W and GPU's 60 W mean the system can scale across a wide range of tasks, but the GPU's end-of-life status and 8 GB VRAM suggest that future AAA titles at high settings may stress the graphics memory. The benchmark scores indicate that the CPU is the slightly more powerful component, so in gaming the GPU is more likely to limit performance, especially at 1440p and above.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a laptop-specific socket. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel interface, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU has a 60 W TDP, while the CPU is 28 W, and the suggested PSU is not specified, so the power delivery headroom is not quantified in the data. Because the GPU is listed as end-of-life, a sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a newer mobile GPU that fits the same PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, though no specific model is named in the FACT PACK. The CPU is active and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, so a system with this CPU has a modern memory and I/O foundation. A sensible next upgrade for a laptop build would be to a more recent GPU, but the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide a solid base for the foreseeable future. The integrated Radeon 890M GPU in the CPU can also serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled or unavailable.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds