SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

46,030 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop-class pairing that combines a high-end 12-core mobile processor with a modest entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile against all tested processors, while the GPU holds the 74th percentile position against all tested graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 82. This is a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component, and the data indicates the GPU will frequently be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. It is important to note that there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all performance expectations for gaming must be treated as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The processor features 12 cores and 24 threads, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores in a hybrid layout. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.10 GHz, all within a 28 W TDP. This combination of high boost clocks and a modest power envelope is characteristic of a premium mobile processor designed for thin-and-light laptops that still require significant compute capability.

The benchmark scores confirm the processor’s strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21812 in the multicore test and 1988 in the single-core test. The single-core result of 1988 indicates excellent responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks, such as web browsing or office applications. The multicore score of 21812 is substantial for a 28 W part, reflecting the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture. In Geekbench, the processor achieves 13957 in multicore and 2084 in single-core, reinforcing the same pattern of strong all-core throughput and competitive per-core speed.

The PassMark suite provides further granularity. The multithread score is 32916, and the single-thread score is 3867. The floating-point math score of 75153 and integer math score of 121754 suggest robust scientific and general arithmetic capability. Data compression scores 404918, while encryption scores 20802; the compression figure is particularly high, indicating strong performance for archiving and data management workloads. The extended instructions score of 29269 points to capable SIMD performance, which will benefit multimedia processing. The physics score of 1819 and prime numbers score of 122 are lower, but these are less indicative of typical productivity tasks. The average benchmark score across all tests is 46030, placing the CPU at the 89th percentile.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the data shows the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is effectively tied with several strong processors. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-13900HX. It is also 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7303. This places the mobile chip on par with both high-end laptop parts and server-class processors in terms of average benchmark score, which is an exceptional result for a 28 W mobile CPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-128 chip and belonging to the Alchemist generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1550 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The TDP is 35 W, which is low and appropriate for a thin laptop.

The GPU contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware support for DirectX Raytracing, a feature that was previously limited to higher-end discrete GPUs. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 8.397 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. It supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for its bus interface. The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications.

In benchmark testing, the GPU scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, giving an average benchmark score of 29175. This places the GPU at the 74th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of results: it is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and 0.1% behind the AMD FirePro W8000, while it is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a notable constraint; while sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings in many current titles, it will limit texture quality and resolution in VRAM-heavy scenarios. The presence of ray tracing cores is a positive, but the raw compute power is modest, so ray tracing performance will be limited compared to higher-tier GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, indicating it outperforms 82% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900HX?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an average benchmark score of 46030, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900HX's average score of 46098.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, achieved with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware support for DirectX Raytracing, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU's average score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 470's average score of 28996.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the GPU is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Who Should Build It

This laptop-class build is suited for users who need substantial CPU processing power but can accept entry-level discrete graphics. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it an excellent choice for developers compiling code, students running data analysis software, and small business users juggling multiple demanding applications. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21812 and Geekbench multicore score of 13957 indicate that the processor can handle heavy parallel workloads without issue.

Content creators who work with video encoding or software rendering will benefit from the CPU’s throughput, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 74th percentile ranking will limit acceleration in GPU-dependent tasks. Gamers at 1080p who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity and are willing to lower settings will find this system adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming will be disappointed. The GPU’s ray tracing cores are present, but with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray tracing will be a feature to use sparingly.

This pairing is not intended for users who require high-end gaming performance or professional 3D rendering on the GPU. Instead, it targets a mobile workstation class where the CPU is the primary engine, and the GPU provides a baseline level of graphics acceleration for everyday tasks and light gaming. The end-of-life status of the GPU is also a consideration, as it suggests this specific configuration may be from an older laptop model. The 28 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP make this an efficient combination for battery life in a portable chassis.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. In a laptop, the upgrade path is inherently limited. The socket and form factor dictate that neither the CPU nor the GPU can be upgraded in most designs; they are soldered to the motherboard. The primary upgrade for a user would be increasing system memory or storage, subject to the laptop’s available slots.

The CPU’s TDP is 28 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 35 W, so the total power draw for the core compute components is modest. The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, but given the low TDPs, a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. There is no headroom for overclocking, as the CPU’s multiplier is locked. A sensible next upgrade for a user with this laptop would be to move to a newer platform with a more recent GPU, as the Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life and its 4 GB VRAM will increasingly become a bottleneck for modern titles. The CPU’s memory support for LPDDR5X suggests a future platform would also use high-bandwidth memory, continuing the trend of integrated performance.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Arc A370M. The database contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for this pairing, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 29175 and its 74th percentile ranking indicate it is a mid-to-low tier graphics solution. With 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the expected performance at 1080p with ultra settings would be modest, likely struggling to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles.

The CPU’s high single-core score of 1988 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor is not a bottleneck in gaming; it can feed frames quickly. The limiting factor will be the GPU. For esports titles, which are often less demanding, the GPU should provide playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings. For AAA games, the estimate would be lower, with the user needing to lower settings to medium or high to achieve smooth performance. The presence of ray tracing cores will not translate to high ray tracing performance due to the limited compute power, so users should expect to disable this feature for playable frame rates. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative expectations, not guarantees.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 achieves an average benchmark score of 46030, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 21812 for multicore and 1988 for single-core. Geekbench scores are 13957 for multicore and 2084 for single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 32916, and the single-thread score is 3867. The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676, and its Vulkan score is 28673.

The combined percentile for this build is 82, indicating that this pairing outperforms 82% of all tested combinations. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (0.1% slower), the AMD EPYC 4364P (0.1% faster), the Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.1% faster), and the AMD EPYC 7303 (0.2% faster). The GPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% faster), the AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% slower). The data shows a clear disparity: the CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is an entry-level part, which shapes the entire character of this build.

Build Overview

This build consists of an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 CPU paired with an Intel Arc A370M GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz and a 28 W TDP. The GPU is an Intel Arc A370M with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, 1024 shading units, and 8 ray tracing cores, running at a 35 W TDP. The combined percentile of 82 places this system in the upper tier of all tested builds. However, the individual percentiles tell a more nuanced story: the CPU is at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is at the 74th percentile.

This is a CPU-centric laptop build. The processor is designed for high-performance computing tasks, with benchmark scores that rival server-class parts. The GPU is adequate for basic graphics tasks and light gaming but is not a high-performance gaming solution. The build class is clearly laptop, meaning the components are integrated and not user-upgradeable. The overall tier is strong for productivity and development, but modest for gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates an imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and average score of 46030 are substantially higher than the GPU’s 74th percentile and average score of 29175. This suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most workloads that rely on graphics processing. In gaming, the CPU can provide high frame generation, but the GPU will limit the final frame rate, particularly at higher resolutions or with demanding settings.

In compute workloads that are CPU-bound, such as code compilation, data compression (score of 404918), or floating-point math, the CPU will perform excellently. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding using the GPU, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will also cap texture sizes and resolutions, exacerbating the bottleneck in VRAM-intensive games. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is adequate, but the GPU’s lower 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a further constraint on its performance. The data shows that for a balanced experience, the GPU would need to be significantly more powerful to match the CPU’s capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 1988 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM will limit frame rates. Gamers should expect to run titles at 1080p with medium settings to approach high frame rates; the GPU is not suited for high-refresh at ultra settings.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21812 can handle game streaming and encoding simultaneously. The GPU’s encoder is present, but its modest compute performance means software encoding on the CPU may be preferable for quality.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario, with a PassMark multithread score of 32916 and strong integer and floating-point math scores. The GPU will accelerate effects, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit timeline complexity and preview resolution.

3D rendering: This is a mixed scenario. CPU-based rendering will be fast, leveraging the high multicore score. GPU-based rendering will be slow due to the Arc A370M’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, making it unsuitable for professional rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU is ideal for this task. Its high single-thread and multithread scores, along with a data compression score of 404918, make it excellent for compiling, running virtual machines, and handling large codebases.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic tasks, but the efficiency of the 28 W CPU and 35 W GPU means long battery life. The 89th percentile CPU ensures that even the most demanding spreadsheets or data analysis tools will run smoothly, while the GPU is more than enough for desktop rendering and video playback.