SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

37,093 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, and manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It pairs with the Intel Arc A370M, a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, produced on a 6 nm node. This combination sits in the laptop class, with a combined percentile of 80 against all CPU and GPU pairings. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from the FACT PACK, which contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the provided benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 presents a hybrid configuration of eight cores and sixteen threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock reaching 5.10 GHz. The architecture is Zen 5, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, and the die size is 195 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3, which is modest for a modern processor but adequate for the mobile segment. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, with ECC memory support enabled. The processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, has a TDP of 28 watts, and integrates a Radeon 860M GPU, though the dedicated Arc A370M handles graphics in this build.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 85th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 37093 across a wide range of tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16054 in multi-core and 2010 in single-core, while in Cinebench R15 it achieves 2457 multi-core and 220 single-core. These numbers indicate strong multi-threaded performance for a 28-watt part, especially considering the high boost clock. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 24779, a single-thread score of 3955, and specific workloads like integer math at 86227, floating-point math at 52971, and data compression at 294298. The physics test scores 1337, and extended instructions hit 20778, while find prime numbers scores 84. The nearest rivals, based on average score, include the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37112 with a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117 with -0.1%, the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135 with -0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 with -0.2%. This means the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is effectively tied with these desktop-class and high-end mobile parts, trailing by less than 0.2% in every case. For real workloads, this translates to snappy compilation times, fluid multitasking with many browser tabs or virtual machines, and responsive productivity applications. The single-core score of 2010 in Cinebench R23 suggests that lightly threaded tasks like spreadsheet recalculations or web rendering will feel immediate, while the multi-core score of 16054 indicates the CPU can handle video encoding or 3D scene assembly without stalling.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly contains no measured FPS data for any game or resolution for this CPU+GPU pairing; the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. Consequently, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The Intel Arc A370M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3955 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2010, is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. Given that the GPU sits in the 74th percentile, the estimated gaming experience is suited for 1080p at medium to high settings in less demanding titles, but at ultra settings, frame rates will likely fall below 60 FPS in modern AAA games. The GPU’s 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limits texture-heavy workloads, so high-resolution textures may cause stuttering or reduced frame rates. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the 1024 shading units and boost clock of 2050 MHz could deliver playable frame rates at 1080p, but the lack of measured data means these are qualitative estimates. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads ensure that background tasks like streaming or Discord do not interfere with gaming, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for modern games at high detail. In summary, treat the gaming figures as approximations—expect a competent 1080p experience for older or lighter games, but do not plan for high-refresh 1440p gaming on ultra presets.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and the Intel Arc A370M is defined by the GPU’s 74th percentile versus the CPU’s 85th percentile, with the combined percentile at 80. This delta of 11 percentile points indicates that the CPU is notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is to its own peers. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (PassMark score of 294298) or integer math (86227), the processor will perform at a level comparable to the Intel Core i7-13700, which has an average score of 37135, a delta of -0.1%. However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering that leverage the Arc’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, the A370M will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are modest for modern titles, so even with the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3955 in PassMark, frame rates will cap out based on the GPU’s ability to fill pixels and sample textures. The 4 GB VRAM, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, further constrains performance in games that exceed this memory pool, causing the system to rely on slower system memory. For productivity, the balance shifts: the CPU’s 16054 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles video encoding and code compilation efficiently, while the GPU’s 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units accelerate certain rendering tasks but will not match the CPU’s relative strength. The FPS scaling, though unmeasured, would likely show diminishing returns at higher resolutions because the GPU’s 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB capacity become increasingly inadequate. Therefore, the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, and any upgrade path should prioritize a more capable GPU to unlock the CPU’s full potential.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balanced laptop for mixed workloads, where the CPU’s high percentile (85) and the GPU’s adequate 74th percentile (74) cover a range of tasks. Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings will find the A370M sufficient for older titles or competitive shooters, but those seeking 1440p ultra settings will be disappointed, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are below the threshold for such demands. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and 16054 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which expedites export times, while the GPU’s 8 RT cores can assist with effects in compatible software. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the CPU’s 86227 integer math score and 24779 PassMark multi-thread score, making this a productive machine for build servers and test runs. Students and small business workers handling documents, spreadsheets, and web applications will find the single-core performance (3955 PassMark single-thread) more than adequate, and the 28-watt TDP ensures efficient battery life during long study or work sessions. The integrated Radeon 860M offers a fallback for light graphics tasks, but the discrete Arc GPU is the primary driver for any visual work. This is not a workstation for heavy 3D rendering, as the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 is below what serious renderers require, but it can handle light modeling and previews. Overall, the target user is a mobile professional who prioritizes CPU throughput and occasional gaming, not a hardcore gamer or a professional render farm operator.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 16054 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and its average benchmark score is 37093, which is -0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37112, -0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117, -0.1% behind the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135, and -0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161. This means it is statistically tied with these processors, trailing by no more than 0.2%.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures in modern games.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning this laptop configuration outperforms 80% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the benchmark database. The CPU alone sits at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile.

Q: Does the FACT PACK include any measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.10 GHz, and the TDP is 28 watts. This high boost clock contributes to its strong single-thread score of 2010 in Cinebench R23.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores.

Q: Which component is the performance bottleneck in this build?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck, as indicated by its 74th percentile compared to the CPU’s 85th percentile. In gaming, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates, while the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for most tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on the DG2-128 chip using a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, effective 14 Gbps. The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The shading units number 1024, with 64 texture mapping units and 32 render output units, and it includes 8 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 35 watts, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern game APIs.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 29175 and a percentile rank of 74 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 with a delta of -0.1%, the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 with -0.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 with a delta of 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28874 with a delta of 1%. This indicates the A370M is slightly behind the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, but ahead of the RX 470 and RX 6800M in these tests. For rendering, the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 will handle light 3D workloads, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard cap for large scenes or high-resolution textures. The 8 RT cores enable some ray-traced effects, but performance will be modest given the overall compute power. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant constraint for memory-intensive tasks, such as 4K video editing or complex shader compilation. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of 2022-03-29, so driver optimizations may be limited compared to newer architectures. For a laptop, the 35-watt TDP is reasonable, but the GPU’s 74th percentile means it is a mid-tier part, not a high-performance solution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results show a consistent picture of strong multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 16054 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the single-core score of 2010 supports fast response in everyday tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24779 and single-thread score of 3955 reinforce this, with the CPU’s average benchmark score of 37093 nearly identical to its nearest rivals, all within -0.2% delta. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 give it an average of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile. The combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pair is 80, indicating that the whole system outpaces 80% of tested configurations. The pairRankByFps is null because no FPS data exists, so this combined percentile is based solely on CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not gaming measurements.

When interpreting these scores, the CPU’s 85th percentile means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, including many desktop parts, in synthetic workloads. The GPU’s 74th percentile is respectable but not exceptional, meaning it sits above average but below high-end mobile GPUs. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles (11 points) suggests an imbalance where the CPU is more capable than the GPU. In combined workloads, such as gaming with background streaming, the CPU’s 16 threads will handle encoding and processing without stealing cycles from the game, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates. The closeness of the CPU’s rivals—all within 0.2% of its average score—means that in real-world tasks, this processor is interchangeable with the Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i7-13700, or AMD Ryzen 7 7735H. The GPU’s rivals are similarly close, with deltas ranging from -0.1% to 1%, so swapping the A370M for an RX 470 or RX 6800M would produce nearly identical benchmark results.

Build Overview

This build pairs an AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, an 8-core, 16-thread mobile CPU from the Zen 5 architecture, with an Intel Arc A370M, a 4 GB discrete GPU from the Xe-HPG architecture. The build class is laptop, meaning this is intended for portable use, and the combined percentile of 80 indicates it is a solid mid-to-upper-tier configuration. The CPU is a 28-watt part with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the GPU is a 35-watt part with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, making this a power-efficient pairing suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 74th percentile show that the processor is the stronger component, but the GPU is still above average, providing adequate graphics for most tasks. The overall tier is defined by the 80th percentile combined rank, which places this build ahead of 80% of alternatives in the database, but it is not a top-tier gaming or rendering machine. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 860M offers a fallback, but the Arc A370M is the primary graphics solution. With no measured FPS data, the gaming capability is estimated from the GPU’s benchmark scores, suggesting 1080p gaming at moderate settings is achievable. This is a balanced mobile workstation for professionals who need CPU-intensive compute, with enough GPU power for light gaming or acceleration in creative apps.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M’s 74th percentile and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can drive 1080p at high refresh rates in esports titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit modern AAA games. The CPU’s 3955 single-thread score ensures no bottleneck, but estimated frame rates will vary widely by game; expect 60+ FPS in lighter titles and sub-60 in demanding ones.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 24779 PassMark multi-thread score provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s 1024 shading units may struggle with the combined load. The lack of measured data means streaming quality is an estimate, but the CPU’s high percentile suggests it can handle the encoding overhead without significant FPS drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16054 and PassMark data compression score of 294298 indicate strong export and rendering performance for 1080p or 1440p footage. The GPU’s 8 RT cores can accelerate effects in compatible editors, but the 4 GB VRAM may be insufficient for complex timelines with many layers.

3D rendering: With 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores, the GPU can handle basic 3D scenes, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for high-poly models or large textures. The CPU’s 8 cores will assist in scene preparation, but professional-grade rendering will be slow; this is not a render farm machine.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 86227 and extended instructions score of 20778 make it excellent for code compilation and running multiple virtual machines. The 16 threads reduce build times, and the 28-watt TDP means sustained workloads won’t cause thermal throttling in a laptop chassis.

Student and office work: Single-thread performance of 3955 in PassMark and 2010 in Cinebench R23 makes everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing feel instant. The integrated Radeon 860M provides a backup for displays, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports rapid multitasking without lag.

The overall picture is a laptop that prioritizes CPU compute power, with a GPU that provides adequate but not spectacular graphics. It suits users who spend most of their time in productivity or development tools, with occasional gaming or light creative work.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds