SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

37,093 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 paired with the Intel Arc A350M is an unusual cross-vendor combination: a current-generation Zen 5 mobile processor sitting at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, joined by an entry-level Alchemist discrete GPU at the 70th percentile. Together the pairing lands at a combined 78th percentile, which tells you immediately what kind of machine this is — CPU-forward, GPU-modest, built for work first and light rendering second. One important caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded gameplay runs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this pairing is unambiguous: the GPU. With the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 70th, the Arc A350M is the weaker half of the duo by a clear margin, and the gap widens further in gaming-specific workloads. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2010 and a multi-core score of 16054 — figures that put it in desktop-replacement territory for responsiveness — while the A350M's compute throughput tops out at 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 with 768 shading units. That is a modest rendering engine attached to a genuinely quick processor.

The practical consequence is that this combination will be CPU-starved in the opposite direction most builders expect: the processor will spend much of its time waiting on the GPU in graphics workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios — code compilation, compression, encryption — the picture inverts, and the A350M contributes little. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 24779 and single-thread score of 3955 show it can carry productivity loads alone, while the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 and OpenCL score of 24546 indicate mid-range-class throughput that will not embarrass itself but will not push high-refresh gaming either.

Memory bandwidth is another telling data point. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X support delivers 89.6 GB/s to the system, while the GPU gets 112.0 GB/s across its own 64-bit GDDR6 bus. Neither figure is generous by discrete-desktop standards, which reinforces the conclusion that high-resolution, texture-heavy rendering is where this pairing runs out of headroom first.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side is the star. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 averages 37093 across its benchmark suite, sitting within a rounding error of its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37112 (a 0.1 percent gap), the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117 (-0.1 percent), the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135 (-0.1 percent), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 (-0.2 percent). In other words, this 28-watt mobile chip trades blows with mainstream desktop-class silicon — a remarkable efficiency story told entirely by the numbers.

Individual results reinforce that. Cinebench R15 shows 2457 multi-core and 220 single-core; R23 shows 16054 and 2010 respectively. The single-core figures are the standout: a 2010 R23 single-core score means snappy application launches, fast per-thread responsiveness, and strong performance in software that refuses to parallelize. The Passmark subtests fill in the workload map: integer math at 86227, floating point at 52971, data compression at 294298, encryption at 14925, string sorting at 32344, physics at 1337, and extended instructions at 20778. The compression and encryption numbers in particular point to capable file-handling and security workloads.

The GPU side averages 24647 across Geekbench OpenCL (24546) and Vulkan (24747). Its rivals cluster tightly: the AMD Radeon RX 590 sits at 24744 (-0.4 percent), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (-0.5 percent), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24442 (0.8 percent behind the A350M), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 (1.5 percent behind). That the A350M scores alongside cards like the RX 6600 XT and RTX A5000 Mobile in these compute tests is notable for a 25-watt part with 4 GB of VRAM — but compute parity is not gaming parity, and the 64-bit bus and small frame buffer remain the limiting factors in real rendering.

The combined percentile of 78 summarizes the build: above the global average, driven primarily by the processor.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination good for gaming?

A: Moderately. The GPU sits at the 70th percentile with 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth — enough for lighter titles and reduced settings, but the CPU at the 85th percentile will be underutilized in demanding games. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, so expectations are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to desktop chips?

A: Its average score of 37093 is within 0.2 percent of the Intel Core i9-12900T, Intel Core i7-13700, AMD Ryzen 7 160, and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H — effectively indistinguishable in aggregate performance despite a 28 W TDP.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the system have?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X at 89.6 GB/s; the GPU has its own 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus delivering 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes — the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 lists ECC support, which is relevant for workstation and business deployments where data integrity matters.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No. The Intel Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is an active part. Replacement availability for the GPU side should factor into long-term planning.

Q: What ray tracing hardware is available?

A: The Arc A350M includes 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, so ray tracing is hardware-accelerated — though at this performance tier, expect it only in lighter titles.

Q: Is there integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: Yes. The CPU integrates Radeon 860M graphics, which covers display output and basic workloads if the discrete GPU is unused or unavailable.

Who Should Build It

Because this is a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop), the relevant audience is buyers of mobile workstations and thin productivity machines, not desktop assemblers. The data points toward three profiles.

First, business professionals: the "PRO" branding, ECC support, and a Passmark encryption score of 14925 make this a defensible corporate fleet machine for document work, video calls, and secure data handling. Second, developers: 8 cores and 16 threads with a 16054 R23 multi-core score handle compilation and container workloads credibly, and the 2010 single-core score keeps interactive tooling responsive. Third, students and general users who want a fast, efficient daily driver with light gaming capability on the side — the GPU's positioning near the RX 590 and GTX 1630 in compute scores suggests older or lighter titles are the realistic target.

What this pairing is not: a creator rig for 4K video editing or a high-refresh gaming machine. The 4 GB VRAM buffer and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 ceiling rule that out. Anyone whose workload is GPU-weighted — rendering, heavy streaming encodes, modern AAA gaming — should look up the stack.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor from the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, mixing Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores on the "Gorgon Point" design. It is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, measures 195 mm², and fits Socket FP8. Clocks span 2.00 GHz base to 5.10 GHz boost — a wide range that reflects the 28 W TDP envelope and the efficiency-focused design.

The cache hierarchy gives each core 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, with 8 MB of shared L3. That modest L3 pool is typical of mobile parts and shows in workloads with large working sets, but the per-core L2 helps compensate. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus at 89.6 GB/s, and the platform exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes.

What the benchmarks mean in practice: the R23 multi-core score of 16054 with 16 threads indicates roughly balanced throughput scaling — this is a chip that uses all its threads, not one that empties out past eight. The single-thread Passmark of 3955 and R23 single-core of 2010 place everyday interactivity — browser tabs, office suites, IDEs — firmly in the fast lane. The Passmark multithread result of 24779 confirms sustained multi-core output that rivals full-desktop parts like the i7-13700 at essentially identical average scores. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is not part of the story; the value here is efficiency, not overclocking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

As an FP8 mobile socket, this is not a user-upgradable CPU platform in the desktop sense — the upgrade path runs through whole-system replacement or the next machine, not a chip swap. Within the platform itself, the practical upgrades are memory and storage: dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X at up to 89.6 GB/s means populating both channels is essential, since single-channel operation would halve that figure and directly hurt both CPU throughput and iGPU fallback performance.

PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes supports a fast NVMe drive plus peripherals; the Arc A350M itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for a card of this class. Power planning is simple on paper: a 28 W CPU TDP plus a 25 W GPU TDP puts combined board power well under what any laptop chassis designed for this pair would deliver, and the IGP-slot GPU requires no power connectors. The suggestedPsu field is empty precisely because this is an integrated mobile design — thermal design, not PSU selection, is the constraint that matters.

The sensible next upgrade is generational: the CPU is active and current, while the GPU is end-of-life. When replacement time comes, the GPU is the half of this pairing that has already aged out, and any successor system should prioritize a larger frame buffer and wider memory bus — the 4 GB / 64-bit configuration is the spec most likely to be the binding constraint over the machine's life.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level Alchemist part: the DG2-128 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die at 45.9M transistors per mm². The render config is 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 6 RT cores, producing a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. Clocks run from 1150 MHz base to 2200 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem defines the card: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus at 112.0 GB/s. For rendering, that is the number to watch. Compute throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 (and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 at 2:1) is respectable for 25 W, and the Geekbench scores — 24747 Vulkan, 24546 OpenCL — put it in the same compute bracket as the RX 6600 XT and RTX A5000 Mobile. But compute tests fit in small buffers; games do not. Texture-heavy scenes and higher resolutions will exhaust 4 GB quickly, and the narrow bus limits how fast data can be refilled.

For rendering work specifically — viewport display, light GPU compute, hardware-accelerated encode-adjacent tasks — the A350M is serviceable. DirectX 12 Ultimate support means modern API features are available, and the RT cores give it a ray tracing capability that raw ALU counts would not suggest. The realistic verdict: a capable assistant GPU for a compute-strong mobile CPU, not a primary rendering engine. Estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured runs, gaming performance should sit in the lighter-title band, with settings reductions expected in anything demanding.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing — a current AMD Ryzen AI PRO 400 mobile processor with an Intel Arc 3 Mobile discrete GPU. Its identity is best read from the three percentile figures: CPU at 85, GPU at 70, combined at 78. That is an upper-mid-tier overall machine with a distinctly asymmetric character. The processor punches at desktop-rival levels (average score 37093, statistically tied with the i9-12900T and i7-13700), while the GPU delivers entry-tier rendering (average 24647, bracketed by the GTX 1630 and RX 6600 XT).

The cross-vendor nature of the pairing is worth noting: AMD CPU, Intel GPU, plus AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics as a third rendering option. For a business mobile workstation, that diversity is workable; for a gaming machine, the GPU is the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. Not the strong suit. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM, 64-bit bus, and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 place it near the GTX 1630 and RX 590 in compute terms; estimated from the benchmark scores, lighter esports-style titles are the realistic fit, and the 85th-percentile CPU will be heavily underutilized in demanding games.

Streaming. Partially viable. The 16054 R23 multi-core score leaves headroom for game-plus-encode workloads at modest resolutions, but with no measured FPS data for this combination and a GPU-side ceiling, single-PC streaming should stay at low output settings.

Video editing. Light editing yes, heavy timelines no. CPU-side responsiveness (2010 R23 single-core, 3955 Passmark single-thread) keeps scrubbing and timeline work fluid, while the compression score of 294298 helps with file handling — but 4 GB of VRAM limits GPU-accelerated effects and preview at higher resolutions.

3D rendering. Entry-level. The OpenCL score of 24546 and 6 RT cores give the A350M a foothold in GPU rendering, and it benchmarks alongside the RX 6600 XT in compute, but the frame buffer constrains scene size. CPU-based rendering with 16 threads is the safer path here.

Software development. A clear strength. Compilation scales with the 24779 Passmark multithread result, virtualization and containers benefit from 16 threads, and the single-core figures keep IDEs responsive. This is arguably the workload the pairing is built around.

Student and office work. Excellent fit. The 28 W TDP enables thin-and-light chassis, the Radeon 860M provides a display fallback, ECC support adds business-grade reliability, and everyday tasks are limited by nothing in this configuration — the CPU outruns the workload, and that is exactly what you want in a daily driver.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds