SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

32,662 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc A570M form a laptop platform that targets the high-performance mobile segment, with the combined component pair ranking in the 86th percentile of all tested build combinations. The CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability for a 28 W part, while the GPU delivers desktop-class compute performance in a mobile form factor, making this configuration a versatile choice for both productivity and creative workloads. The data indicates a balanced system where the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking place both components in the upper tier, though the architecture of each component reveals distinct strengths and limitations that define the system’s overall character.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Point codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. The CPU features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power of 28 W, indicating a focus on efficiency for thin-and-light laptops. The processor’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3, which is modest compared to desktop parts but appropriate for the mobile segment. The chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory via a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support, which is notable for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

Benchmark results show the CPU achieving a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794 and a single-core score of 1958. The multi-core score indicates that the 8-core/16-thread configuration scales well under all-core loads, placing the chip in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The single-core score of 1958 reflects the Zen 5 architecture’s strong IPC (instructions per clock) improvements, which benefit latency-sensitive tasks such as gaming and general responsiveness. PassMark results further detail the CPU’s character: the multi-thread score of 22125 and integer math score of 77414 highlight strong sustained throughput for parallel workloads, while the floating-point math score of 46996 and extended instructions score of 18029 suggest competent performance for scientific and encryption tasks. The data encryption score of 13264 and data compression score of 256603 indicate the CPU handles security and archival workloads effectively, which is relevant for enterprise environments.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 shows a negligible performance delta. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H by only 0.1%, matches the Intel Core i5-14600T within 0.1%, and sits 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F. The closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, is 0.5% faster on average. These sub-1% differences mean that in real-world applications, the CPU is statistically tied with these alternatives, and the decision between them should be based on platform features, power efficiency, and integrated graphics rather than raw compute. The 28 W TDP is the standout feature here, as it allows this level of performance in a power envelope that enables slim chassis designs without active cooling compromises.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32662, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, which signals it outperforms roughly 83% of processors in the database. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined platform percentile is 86, indicating that the pairing of these two components yields a system that outperforms 86% of tested build combinations in the database. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, has an average score of 32697, which is just 0.1% higher, confirming that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is essentially performance-equivalent to one of Intel’s flagship mobile parts.

Looking at the GPU’s rivals, the Intel Arc A570M’s OpenCL score of 58239 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop GPU, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM. It trails the NVIDIA P102-100 by 0.5% and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 0.7%. These comparisons are striking because they show the Arc A570M, a mobile GPU with a 75 W TDP, performing within a fraction of a percentage point of desktop parts that consume significantly more power. The combined picture is one of a system that punches above its weight class: the CPU is mid-high tier for mobile, but the GPU’s compute performance rivals desktop offerings, making the platform particularly suitable for GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering and machine learning inference.

The Cinebench R15 scores of 2023 (multi-core) and 271 (single-core) are lower than the R23 scores due to the older benchmark’s shorter workload, but they follow the same pattern. PassMark’s single-thread score of 3862 and physics score of 1257 indicate that the CPU can handle older, lightly-threaded games and physics simulations competently, though it will not lead the charts in these specific metrics. The find prime numbers score of 76 is a raw integer throughput test where the CPU’s modest L3 cache may be a limiting factor, but this does not translate to a meaningful deficit in typical applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the GPU in compute-heavy scenarios but favors the CPU in gaming at lower resolutions. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking suggest that the GPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers, meaning that in most workloads the GPU will be the limiting factor when both are fully utilized. However, the CPU’s single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1958 and PassMark single-thread score of 3862, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios without creating a significant bottleneck.

For gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance is the gating factor for frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the Arc A570M’s compute capabilities are high enough that the system will be GPU-bound in most modern games at ultra settings. The GPU’s pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s indicate that it can push a high volume of pixels and textures, which is essential for high-resolution rendering. In contrast, for 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck, as the rendering load scales with resolution, and the CPU’s relative performance becomes less relevant.

The data shows that the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794, is adequate for content creation tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, but the GPU’s compute capability will accelerate these workloads significantly. For example, video encoding and rendering can be offloaded to the GPU’s 2048 shading units and 16 RT cores, which will reduce the CPU’s workload and prevent it from becoming the primary limiter. Conversely, in software development tasks like compilation, the CPU’s multi-thread score will be the deciding factor, and the GPU will remain largely idle, making the CPU the bottleneck in these scenarios.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this platform is a mobile professional who needs a single device for both demanding compute tasks and modern gaming. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking make this a suitable choice for content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and graphic design, where the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 provides substantial acceleration for rendering and effects. The CPU’s ECC memory support and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth make it viable for small business workstations that handle sensitive data and require error-free computation.

Gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p will find the system capable, though the lack of measured FPS data means performance estimates are based on the GPU’s compute scores and the CPU’s single-thread performance. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for modern game titles that utilize multi-threading, and the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for current game assets at these resolutions. Students and developers will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread performance for compilation and simulation tasks, while the integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback for light tasks when the discrete GPU is disabled to save power.

The platform is not ideal for users who prioritize maximum CPU performance in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, as the 28 W TDP limits sustained all-core clocks, and the CPU’s average score is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, which has a higher power budget. However, for users who value portability and battery life without sacrificing compute capability, this pairing is uniquely well-suited. The 4 nm process node and 28 W TDP mean the CPU can run in a slim chassis, while the GPU’s 75 W TDP suggests a laptop with adequate cooling but not a bulky desktop replacement.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform, meaning upgrades are limited to replacing the entire motherboard or the laptop itself. The memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X via a dual-channel bus means that users can configure the system with up to the maximum supported capacity, but the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed characteristic of the platform. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes for the CPU provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is the bus interface for the Intel Arc A570M, and leaves headroom for other peripherals like NVMe SSDs.

The GPU has a TDP of 75 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 28 W, resulting in a combined thermal load of 103 W for the core components. The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, but the combined TDP indicates that a laptop power adapter in the 130-150 W range would be sufficient to run the system at full load. The GPU’s memory clock is 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps, and the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is adequate for the GPU’s compute capabilities but not exceptional.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase the system memory to the maximum supported by the dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X configuration, as the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared between the CPU and the integrated Radeon 880M graphics when the discrete GPU is not in use. For the GPU, an upgrade would require a new laptop, as the Arc A570M is an integrated component (IGP slot width). The GPU’s 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units are fixed, but the 6 nm process node and 11,500 million transistors suggest that the architecture is mature and the performance is well-characterized.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is a primary use case, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3862 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1958 indicate that it can handle high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s compute score of 58239 suggests it can render frames at high rates at 1080p, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, which can handle encoding overhead while the GPU manages rendering. The GPU’s 16 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which can improve visual fidelity in supported games without a massive performance hit, but the 75 W TDP limits the sustained boost clock of 1300 MHz.

Video editing is accelerated by the GPU’s 2048 shading units and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which can handle effects and color grading in real-time. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 13794 in Cinebench R23 ensures that timeline scrubbing and export tasks are responsive, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents data transfer bottlenecks.

3D rendering leverages the GPU’s 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance and 16 RT cores for ray-traced renders, while the CPU’s multi-thread score of 22125 in PassMark handles the geometry and physics calculations. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for moderate-sized scenes.

Software development relies on the CPU’s multi-thread score for compilation, with the 16 threads and 8 MB of L3 cache providing adequate parallel throughput. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 is useful for compute in scientific and data analysis workloads, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU’s single-thread performance and the integrated Radeon 880M graphics, which can handle productivity applications and 4K video playback. The 28 W TDP allows for long battery life in a portable chassis, and the 4 nm process node ensures efficiency.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, and is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process node. The chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 900 MHz, and the boost clock is 1300 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz that translates to 14 Gbps effective data rate. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is configured on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 10.65 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating that it can accelerate half-precision workloads like machine learning inference. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, which are strong figures for a 75 W mobile part. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest games and applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s memory and compute requirements.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, which is remarkable for a mobile part. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58392, a delta of only 0.3%, meaning the Arc A570M is within 0.3% of a high-end desktop GPU from the previous generation. The GPU also outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 0.3% and is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA P102-100. This indicates that for compute workloads, the Arc A570M offers desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor, making it a strong choice for GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing. The 16 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, which is a feature typically reserved for higher-tier GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc A570M?

A: The combined platform percentile is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of tested build combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32662, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s score of 32697, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and its closest rival?

A: The GPU is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, and its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 0.3% higher.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and process node?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, which contributes to its efficiency.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the combination of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc A570M, so all FPS figures provided here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1958 and PassMark single-thread score of 3862 indicate that the processor can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at 1080p resolution where the CPU’s IPC is the limiting factor. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which is in the 88th percentile, suggests that the Arc A570M can render frames at high settings in modern titles, but the lack of measured data means these expectations are qualitative.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the system is likely to be GPU-bound in most titles, given the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for current game assets, though future titles with higher texture requirements may approach this limit. At 1440p, the GPU’s pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s will be challenged, and frame rates will be lower than at 1080p, but the system should still be playable at high settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become a bottleneck, and users should expect to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads ensure that multi-threaded game engines are well-served, and the single-thread performance prevents the CPU from being a bottleneck in most scenarios. Overall, this platform is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with the GPU’s compute capabilities providing headroom for future titles.