SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

32,662 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc A530M pairing represents a highly capable laptop configuration, landing in the 84th percentile for combined performance. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for demanding productivity tasks, while the GPU provides solid 1080p-class rendering capabilities with modern feature support. Benchmark data shows this is a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other, making it well-suited for a broad range of professional and creative workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is built on the Zen 5 architecture using a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 233 mm². It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU has a 28 W TDP, which is a modest power envelope for a mobile processor, yet it still achieves strong performance. Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support, which is notable for data-integrity-sensitive workloads.

The processor scores 13,794 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,958 in single-core. These results place it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,662. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, scores 32,697, a negligible difference of -0.1%. This puts the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in a statistical tie with a well-known high-end mobile chip from Intel. The single-core score of 1,958 is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity, while the multi-core score of 13,794 suggests substantial capability for compilation, rendering, and data analysis tasks.

The PassMark suite provides further detail. The chip scores 77,414 in integer math and 46,996 in floating-point math, showing balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data compression scores 256,603, which is a very high figure, pointing to strong performance in archiving and file management workflows. Encryption scores 13,264, and extended instructions score 18,029, indicating robust support for modern cryptographic and vectorized workloads. The multi-thread score of 22,125 is competitive with desktop-class chips, while the single-thread score of 3,862 confirms the architecture's efficiency. The physics score of 1,257 and prime number finding score of 76 are lower, suggesting that the CPU prioritizes throughput in common tasks over specialized physics simulations. Overall, this is a high-end mobile CPU that competes directly with top-tier Intel and AMD offerings from the same generation, as evidenced by the near-zero deltaPct against its closest rivals.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm TSMC process with a transistor count of 11,500 million on a 269 mm² die. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 1,536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The chip includes 12 RT cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, a key feature for modern gaming and 3D rendering applications.

The A530M delivers a pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute performance is 3.994 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 7.987 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming titles. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a TDP of 65 W. The slot width is listed as IGP, indicating that this is an integrated-style solution likely soldered to the motherboard, with display outputs being portable device dependent.

In Geekbench compute benchmarks, the Arc A530M scores 49,735 in OpenCL and 43,492 in Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 46,614, placing it in the 85th percentile among all GPUs. This is a strong result, putting it just ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which scores 46,601 with a 0% deltaPct. It also edges out the NVIDIA RTX A2000, which scores 46,043, meaning the Arc A530M is 1.2% faster. The Vulkan score is lower than OpenCL, which is typical for drivers in non-gaming compute workloads, but both figures indicate a GPU capable of handling substantial parallel processing. The 12 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support mean that hardware ray tracing is available, though the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests that ray-traced effects will need to be used judiciously at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and mid-level 3D rendering tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this CPU and GPU pairing is one of balanced, high-end performance. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 achieves an average benchmark score of 32,662, sitting in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and Intel Core i5-14600T, both scoring 32,697 and 32,707 respectively, with deltaPct values of -0.1% against the AMD chip. This confirms that the CPU is directly comparable to these popular alternatives, with performance differences well within the margin of error. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is behind by -0.5%, showing that the newer Zen 5 architecture provides a measurable, if small, uplift over the previous generation.

The Intel Arc A530M achieves an average benchmark score of 46,614, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46,601, with a deltaPct of 0%, meaning they are effectively identical in performance. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1.2% behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 6550M is 0.2% behind. This places the Arc A530M in a distinct performance tier, just above entry-level discrete GPUs and below mid-range desktop cards. The GPU’s 85th percentile rank is slightly higher than the CPU’s 83rd, indicating that the graphics component is marginally stronger relative to its peers.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All performance estimates must be inferred from the synthetic benchmark scores. Given the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1,958 in Cinebench R23, it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The GPU’s 3.994 TFLOPS and 224 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p in esports titles, and for 60 FPS gaming in many AAA titles at medium-to-high settings. The combined percentile of 84 suggests that this laptop will outperform roughly 84% of all systems in the benchmark database, making it a premium configuration for its class.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data indicates this is a capable 1080p performer. The GPU’s 85th percentile rank and 224 GB/s bandwidth support smooth frame rates in competitive titles, while the CPU’s 3,862 single-thread PassMark score ensures that the processor can feed the GPU efficiently. Users should expect high frame rates in esports titles, though AAA games with heavy ray tracing may require settings adjustments due to the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Streaming is a strong use case for this laptop. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,794, meaning there is ample headroom to encode video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 256,603 also indicates fast handling of stream encoding overhead, while the integrated Radeon 880M GPU could theoretically offload some encoding tasks, though the discrete Arc A530M also supports modern encoding features.

Video editing workflows will benefit from the balanced CPU and GPU. The CPU’s floating-point math score of 46,996 accelerates color grading and effects, while the GPU’s 49,735 OpenCL score speeds up rendering and timeline scrubbing. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing timelines with moderate effects, and the 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth ensures quick data transfer between system memory and the GPU.

3D rendering is heavily dependent on both components. The CPU’s 13,794 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 will handle CPU-based rendering engines like Blender’s Cycles well, while the GPU’s 12 RT cores and 3.994 TFLOPS provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based rendering. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is a limiting factor for very large scenes, but for typical projects, this pairing offers a solid balance of CPU and GPU rendering power.

Software development is a primary strength of this configuration. The CPU’s 77,414 integer math score and 22,125 multi-thread PassMark score indicate excellent compilation performance, and the 256,603 data compression score speeds up packaging and dependency management. The single-thread score of 3,862 ensures fast IDE responsiveness and code indexing.

For students and office work, this laptop is overqualified but efficient. The 28 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP allow for reasonable battery life in light tasks, while the sheer performance headroom means that even complex spreadsheets, virtual machines, or data analysis in Python will run smoothly. The ECC memory support is a bonus for students in scientific computing fields.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an average benchmark score of 32,662, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s score of 32,697. The performance difference is negligible, making them equivalent in real-world tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A530M sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 85% of the GPUs in the database. This places it in the upper mid-range tier for mobile graphics.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A530M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 12 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600M?

A: The Arc A530M has an average benchmark score of 46,614, which is exactly 0% different from the RX 5600M’s score of 46,601. The two GPUs are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and core configuration?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is based on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific laptop configuration?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance assessments must be estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores provided.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is ideal for gamers seeking a high-refresh 1080p experience. The GPU’s 85th percentile rank and 8 GB VRAM are well-matched to 1080p gaming at high settings, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures no bottlenecking in CPU-bound titles. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find the balanced CPU and GPU performance suitable for rendering and effects work, though 4K or heavily ray-traced scenes may require compromises.

Software developers are a primary target audience. The CPU’s 22,125 multi-thread PassMark score and 77,414 integer math score make compilation fast, while the 16 threads allow for parallel builds and running multiple virtual machines simultaneously. Students in engineering or data science fields will benefit from the ECC memory support and the 256,603 data compression score, which speeds up large data handling. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for office suites, financial modeling, or light CAD work will find this configuration exceeds requirements, with the added security of ECC memory for data integrity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is typically soldered to the motherboard and is not user-upgradeable. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support, though the memory is likely also soldered or limited to SO-DIMM slots depending on the specific laptop design. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is more than sufficient for the Arc A530M’s bandwidth needs.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase the amount of system memory, as the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a shared resource. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a more likely bottleneck than the CPU in gaming, so users seeking higher performance would need to consider a laptop with a higher-tier GPU, such as those in the 90th percentile or above. The 28 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP leave no headroom for overclocking, as the multiplier is locked and the cooling solution is designed for these specific power envelopes. Users should ensure the laptop’s power adapter delivers sufficient wattage, though no specific PSU recommendation is provided in the data.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field, pairing the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 with the Intel Arc A530M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor based on Zen 5, while the GPU is an upper-mid-range mobile graphics solution based on Xe-HPG. The combined performance percentile is 84, meaning this system outperforms 84% of all configurations in the benchmark database. This places it in the upper tier of laptop performance, suitable for demanding professional work and high-end gaming at 1080p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is quite even. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 85th, a difference of only 2 percentage points. This symmetry suggests that for most mixed workloads, neither component will consistently hold back the other. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data analysis, or spreadsheet processing, the CPU will be the primary driver, with the GPU idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming or 3D rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,794 is strong enough to drive the GPU to its full potential in gaming. The GPU’s 3.994 TFLOPS is a mid-range figure, so in graphically intensive titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will be the bottleneck, which is the expected behavior for a balanced system. In less demanding esports titles, the CPU’s 3,862 single-thread score will allow for very high frame rates, potentially exceeding the GPU’s output at higher settings. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is a potential bottleneck for future games with high-resolution textures, but for current titles, this configuration offers a well-matched pairing where the CPU and GPU can both operate near their full potential without significant imbalance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds