SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

32,662 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This database entry examines the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 paired with the Intel Arc A370M. This is a mobile configuration designed for a specific balance of processing power and graphical capability. The data indicates a system that excels in productivity and multi-threaded workloads, while offering a baseline for modern gaming at conservative settings. The processor is a clear strength, while the dedicated graphics card provides a step up from typical integrated solutions, though it is not designed for high-end gaming. The following analysis is based solely on the provided benchmark data for this specific combination.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this configuration is not the primary target. The Intel Arc A370M's benchmark scores place it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 29175. This suggests it can handle esports titles at 1080p, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit its ability to maintain high frame rates in demanding AAA titles at high detail settings. Users seeking 144Hz or higher refresh rates in modern games would need to rely on lower graphical presets and less demanding titles.

Streaming and content creation are a mixed bag. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is a capable encoding processor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794 is strong for a 28W TDP chip, indicating it can handle the CPU load of encoding a stream while running a game. However, the Arc A370M is not a powerhouse for GPU-accelerated rendering, so tasks like video editing will rely heavily on the CPU's performance. The processor's Passmark multi-thread score of 22125 supports its ability to handle these concurrent workloads.

For video editing, the system's performance is defined by the processor. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's high single-thread score of 1958 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive timeline scrubbing and effects application. The multi-core score of 13794 will accelerate final renders, though the GPU's contribution to this process will be limited. This is a system for editing 1080p or light 4K footage, not for heavy motion graphics or complex multi-layer compositions. The data suggests a capable, but not professional-grade, editing workstation.

3D rendering is a CPU-centric task where this processor shines. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2023 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794 indicate solid performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The Arc A370M's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane will be slower than dedicated workstation cards. This system is best suited for architectural visualization or product design on a budget.

Software development is a strong use case for this processor. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's Passmark data encryption score of 13264 and integer math score of 77414 indicate strong performance for compilation and code processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the 16 MB of combined L2/L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. This is a solid machine for a developer who needs to run virtual machines, containers, and a full IDE without significant slowdown.

For student and office work, this is an overqualified but excellent choice. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's Passmark single-thread score of 3862 ensures snappy application launches and fluid multitasking in office suites, web browsers, and communication tools. The 28W TDP of the processor and 35W TDP of the GPU are efficient, likely contributing to good battery life in a laptop. This system would handle spreadsheet analysis, document writing, and research with ease, providing a smooth experience for years to come.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture shows a system anchored by its processor. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 achieves an average benchmark score of 32662, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, showing it outperforms a significant majority of desktop and mobile processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, scores 32697, which is only 0.1% higher, making the performance difference negligible. The processor is also slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.5%.

The graphics component, the Intel Arc A370M, presents a different profile. Its average benchmark score is 29175, and its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 74th. This indicates it is a mid-range performer. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197, a difference of only 0.1%. Interestingly, the data shows the Arc A370M is 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in this particular benchmark, despite the latter being a much larger and more powerful chip in the broader market.

The combined system percentile is 79, which reflects a balance where the CPU is the dominant contributor. The processor's high percentile ranking (83) is dragged down slightly by the GPU's lower (74) percentile. This suggests that in a balanced workload, the GPU will be the first component to reach its limit. The data points to a system that is significantly more powerful in multi-threaded processing than in graphics rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the processor is not upgradeable in a traditional desktop sense; the entire laptop or mini-PC would need to be replaced to change the CPU. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, which is a modern standard, and the memory bus is dual-channel, providing a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is sufficient to feed the processor's 8 cores.

The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is the standard for a mobile processor to connect to a dedicated GPU and NVMe storage. The Intel Arc A370M itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is more than enough for its bandwidth requirements. For storage, the system supports fast NVMe drives, ensuring quick boot times and application loading.

There is no suggested PSU listed for this build, which is typical for a laptop where the power delivery is integrated into the system. The CPU's TDP is 28W, and the GPU's TDP is 35W, totaling 63W for the core components. This is a low-power configuration, meaning a laptop with this setup would not require a massive power brick and would likely have reasonable battery life. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be adding more RAM, as the dual-channel support can benefit from higher capacity, and upgrading storage to a larger NVMe drive.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for mobile professionals and students who need substantial CPU performance for demanding applications. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 83rd percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile code, data analysts who process large datasets, and engineers running simulations. The Passmark physics score of 1257 and floating-point math score of 46996 support these use cases.

For gamers, this system targets those playing at 1080p with medium settings or less demanding esports titles. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile ranking shows it is not a high-end gaming GPU, but it can provide playable frame rates in many games. This is not the right choice for a user with a 1440p or 4K high-refresh monitor for gaming, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a significant limiting factor.

Content creators working with code, documents, or light photo editing will find this system responsive. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794 will make exporting projects faster than on a dual-core machine. However, video editors working with high-bitrate 4K footage or complex motion graphics should look for a system with a more powerful GPU. The small business user creating presentations, spreadsheets, and managing communications will find this system overkill, but it offers a smooth, future-proof experience.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point. It is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which uses a hybrid design of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4nm process by TSMC, which contributes to its efficiency. The base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz, allowing for strong single-thread performance when needed.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a highly capable mobile processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794 shows it can handle heavy parallel workloads, placing it in a position to rival desktop processors from a few generations ago. The single-core score of 1958 in the same test is excellent, ensuring that everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications run with high responsiveness. The Passmark single-thread score of 3862 confirms this.

The processor's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout is typical for a modern high-performance chip. The Passmark data compression score of 256603 and the data encryption score of 13264 indicate strong performance in these specialized tasks, which are relevant for file archiving and security applications. The processor's overall average benchmark score of 32662 places it in the top 17% of all CPUs, which is a very strong position for a mobile part.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a dedicated mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, from the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6nm process and contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and can boost to 2050 MHz. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 8 ray tracing cores.

Memory is a critical aspect of this GPU's performance profile. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest amount of bandwidth and capacity, which will be the primary bottleneck in modern games that require more VRAM or have high texture requirements. The GPU's FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, which is a mid-range figure for a dedicated mobile GPU.

In terms of benchmark results, the Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 29175. This performance makes it a significant step up from the integrated Radeon 880M graphics in the processor, but it is not in the same league as high-end mobile GPUs. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the limited memory bandwidth and compute power mean that ray tracing effects will likely need to be used sparingly for playable frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear imbalance in this system, with the CPU being significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile ranking shows a 9-point gap in relative performance. This means that in a gaming scenario, the Intel Arc A370M will almost certainly be the limiting factor, preventing the CPU from reaching its full potential in frame rate generation.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, 3D rendering, and data processing, the GPU will be mostly idle, and the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 will be the primary driver of performance. The system will feel very responsive in these tasks. However, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated video encoding, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and the CPU's performance advantage will be less apparent.

This is a common configuration for a "productivity-first" laptop that can also handle some gaming. The system is not balanced for high-end gaming, but it is balanced for a user who spends most of their time in demanding CPU applications and occasionally plays games at moderate settings. The performance is defined by the CPU, and the GPU is there to provide a better-than-integrated graphics experience.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H?

A: The data shows they are essentially tied in performance. The AMD processor has an average benchmark score of 32662, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, making the Intel part only 0.1% faster.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU has 4 GB of memory and a 64-bit bus, resulting in a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is insufficient for the demands of 4K gaming, and its benchmark scores place it at the 74th percentile, indicating mid-range 1080p performance.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and GPU in this system?

A: The CPU is the stronger component. It sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This means for most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Q: What kind of memory does this platform support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing up to 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, but primarily through the CPU. The processor's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794 is strong for rendering. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M an end-of-life product?

A: Yes, according to the fact pack, its production status is listed as "End-of-life," and it was released in early 2022.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components and should be treated as expectations, not measured results. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be limited by the Arc A370M.

In less demanding esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive or League of Legends, the combination of a strong single-threaded CPU and the dedicated GPU could reasonably expect to achieve high frame rates at 1080p with high settings. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3862 ensures that the game logic and physics are processed quickly.

For more demanding AAA games such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Valhalla, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth of the Arc A370M will be a significant constraint. At 1080p with high settings, players should expect frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range. To achieve smoother performance closer to 60 FPS, players would need to lower graphical presets to medium or low, which reduces the texture and geometry load on the GPU.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU will be heavily strained. The memory bandwidth will be a bottleneck, and players should expect to run games at low settings to maintain playable frame rates, likely in the 30-40 FPS range for most modern titles. This is not a 1440p gaming system. The estimates are that it is a capable 1080p gaming GPU for medium settings, and an excellent choice for older or less demanding games.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds