SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

32,662 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific tier of mobile computing where CPU efficiency and integrated-class graphics converge. The data shows this combination sits at the 77th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of laptop configurations while remaining firmly in the ultraportable and thin-and-light segment. The CPU is the clear dominant component, with an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU’s 70th percentile position makes it the limiting factor for graphically intensive tasks. This is a laptop-class build designed for productivity-first users who need occasional gaming and content creation capability rather than a dedicated gaming machine.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with a Strix Point codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 performance cores with Zen 5c efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The processor operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 28 W TDP that positions it for efficient mobile workloads rather than sustained high-performance computing. The die size measures 233 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results indicate this CPU delivers strong single-threaded and multithreaded performance for its power class. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 13794 points in multicore and 1958 points in single-core tests. The single-core score of 1958 places it competitively against desktop processors with higher TDPs, which is notable for a 28 W mobile part. The Cinebench R15 results show 2023 points multicore and 271 points single-core, confirming consistent performance across different benchmark versions. PassMark results further characterize the processor’s strengths: a multithread score of 22125, a single-thread score of 3862, and specialized workloads including data compression at 256603, data encryption at 13264, extended instructions at 18029, floating-point math at 46996, integer math at 77414, physics at 1257, and random string sorting at 28390.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 32662, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkably tight competition. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 on average, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the AMD chip is essentially tied with Intel’s high-end mobile offering. Similarly, the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (-0.5%). This grouping of rivals within a 0.5% performance band demonstrates that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 delivers parity with several competing architectures, including Intel’s hybrid designs and older AMD desktop parts. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle everyday productivity tasks, software development, and content creation without becoming a bottleneck, provided the workload does not exceed the 8-core/16-thread configuration or the 28 W power envelope.

The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel interface, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is included, which is a professional-grade feature typically found in workstation platforms. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, sufficient for a discrete GPU and high-speed NVMe storage. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is not needed or is powered down to save energy.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and the Intel Arc A350M heavily favors the CPU in terms of relative performance. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking creates a clear hierarchy: the processor is the stronger component, and the GPU will limit performance in graphics-bound scenarios. The combined percentile of 77 is pulled down from the CPU’s 83 by the GPU’s lower position, indicating that the graphics solution is the bottleneck for applications that rely on GPU compute or rendering.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 places it just below its nearest rivals, with deltas that show it is competitive but not dominant. The AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 (+0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 (+1.5%). This means the Arc A350M performs within a narrow band around these desktop and mobile GPUs, and the data shows that the CPU will not be the limiting factor in any GPU-intensive workload. Instead, the GPU will cap frame rates and rendering times, with the CPU having substantial headroom to feed the graphics pipeline.

For CPU-bound tasks such as data compression, encryption, or integer-heavy calculations, the processor will operate at full potential, and the GPU will remain idle or minimally engaged. For GPU-bound tasks such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the CPU will often wait on the GPU, and the overall system performance will track the Arc A350M’s capabilities. The FPS scaling data is not measured for this exact combination, but the percentile gap of 13 points between the two components suggests that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary limiter, and the CPU’s extra performance will not translate into proportional frame rate increases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU benchmark scores provide a comprehensive picture of this build’s capabilities. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13794 demonstrates strong multithreaded performance for a 28 W part, while the single-core score of 1958 shows excellent per-thread efficiency. The PassMark average benchmark score of 32662 places it in the 83rd percentile, meaning it outperforms 83% of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rival comparisons show the processor is within 0.5% of four different CPUs, making it effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core i5-14600T, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

The GPU’s Geekbench scores are 24546 for OpenCL and 24747 for Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival analysis shows it is slightly slower than the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, but slightly faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. The deltas range from -0.5% to +1.5%, indicating that the Arc A350M sits in a competitive mid-range position, roughly equivalent to a desktop RX 590 or GTX 1630 in raw compute performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates in the top 17% of all processors, while the GPU operates in the top 30% of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this imbalance, with the overall system ranking being dragged down by the GPU. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads such as compilation, data analysis, or virtualization, this build will feel responsive and capable. For users who prioritize GPU-heavy workloads such as gaming, video editing, or 3D rendering, the system will feel adequate but not exceptional, with performance roughly matching a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket designed for thin-and-light laptops. This socket is not user-upgradeable in most implementations, as the CPU is typically soldered to the motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel interface with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported for data integrity in professional workloads. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which provides adequate bandwidth for the discrete GPU and storage devices.

The Intel Arc A350M has a TDP of 25 W, which is slightly lower than the CPU’s 28 W TDP, meaning the combined thermal load is modest and suitable for a slim chassis. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, but given the low TDPs of both components, the power supply requirements for a laptop are dictated by the battery and charger rather than a desktop PSU. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status, with a release date of 2022-03-29, while the CPU is active with a release date of 2025-01-05.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on memory capacity and speed, since the CPU and GPU are both soldered down in most laptop designs. Upgrading from 16 GB to 32 GB of DDR5 or LPDDR5X would benefit multitasking and large dataset workloads. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes support high-speed NVMe SSDs, so adding or replacing storage with a Gen 4 drive would improve load times and file transfer speeds. For external connectivity, the GPU’s display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the available ports depend on the specific laptop implementation rather than the GPU itself.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a portable laptop with strong CPU performance and moderate GPU capability. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and near-parity with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and Intel Core i5-14600T make it suitable for software developers who compile code, students who run virtual machines, and small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity suites. The PassMark data compression score of 256603 and integer math score of 77414 indicate strong performance for file archiving, data processing, and general computational tasks.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with medium to low settings will find the GPU adequate for esports titles and older games, though the data does not include measured FPS figures for this combination. Content creators who work with photos, light video editing, or 2D animation will benefit from the CPU’s multithreaded performance, while the GPU’s 70th percentile position means it can handle GPU-accelerated effects but will struggle with complex 3D scenes. The laptop class designation means this is not a desktop replacement, but rather a device for users who prioritize portability alongside computational capability. The CPU’s 28 W TDP and the GPU’s 25 W TDP together enable a thin and light form factor with decent battery life, making this suitable for professionals who travel frequently and need a reliable workstation on the go.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, with a generation designation of Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile). It uses the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units, with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The tensor core count is not listed, but the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating full support for modern graphics APIs including hardware ray tracing.

The memory configuration consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz and an effective speed of 14 Gbps. This yields a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is a significant constraint for a GPU that must render textures and geometry at higher resolutions. The base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, delivering a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

In Geekbench tests, the GPU scores 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable for an entry-level mobile part. The nearest rivals show it is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, while being slightly faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. For rendering workloads, this means the GPU can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, basic 3D modeling, and video encoding, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures. The ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for supported games, but the overall compute power is modest, so ray tracing performance will be limited.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc A350M in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative positioning of the components.

Based on the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and its similarity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GTX 1630, users can expect playable frame rates at 1080p resolution for esports titles such as competitive shooters and MOBAs, where the CPU’s strong single-core performance will help maintain high minimum frame rates. For AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will require reduced texture quality and resolution scaling to maintain acceptable performance. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads ensure that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenes.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in modern titles, and settings will need to be lowered significantly. The memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is a limiting factor, as higher resolutions require more data to be transferred between the VRAM and the GPU cores. The ray tracing cores are present but the overall compute power is insufficient for ray-traced effects at playable frame rates in most games. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming solution for medium settings, with the CPU ensuring smooth performance in CPU-bound scenarios and the GPU determining the visual fidelity ceiling.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, an 8-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level Xe-HPG mobile GPU, in a laptop-class configuration. The CPU is a recent 2025 release with active production status, while the GPU was released in 2022 and is now end-of-life. The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper quartile of all builds, but the imbalance between the CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 70th percentile means the overall tier is defined by the graphics solution.

The CPU provides top-tier mobile processing power that rivals desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-14600T, while the GPU offers mid-range graphics performance comparable to a desktop RX 590. This pairing is best suited for productivity workloads where the CPU delivers exceptional performance, with gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks being secondary considerations. The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP make this an efficient combination for a thin-and-light laptop, and the platform supports DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with ECC and PCIe Gen 4 storage. This is not a gaming laptop or a workstation GPU configuration, but rather a balanced ultraportable that excels at CPU-intensive tasks and provides acceptable graphics for casual use.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking relative to other processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an average benchmark score of 32662, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. It is within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core i5-14600T, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU scores 24647 on average, at the 70th percentile. It is 0.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630.

Q: What is the combined system percentile and what does it mean?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 77% of all builds in the database. The CPU is the stronger component at 83rd percentile, while the GPU sits at 70th percentile, making the GPU the limiting factor.

Q: What memory types and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel interface, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported for error correction in professional workloads.

Q: Is the GPU capable of hardware ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing support. However, the FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS limits ray tracing performance in practice.

Q: What are the release dates and production status of the components?

A: The CPU was released on 2025-01-05 and is in active production. The GPU was released on 2022-03-29 and is marked as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer being manufactured.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds