SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

35,719 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a mobile platform built on the Krackan Point architecture and Alchemist graphics. The CPU, with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU, with a 75 W TDP, are designed for portable devices, as indicated by the build class. The combined percentile of 87 places this configuration in the upper tier of all systems, though precise frame rate data is not available for this specific combination. The following analysis is grounded entirely in the provided benchmark scores, percentile rankings, and architectural specifications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A570M GPU, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. This score places it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, indicating robust raw compute capabilities. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means performance is an estimate. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3872 ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be consistent, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput of the GPU is the primary determinant for frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s Zen 5 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads provides a solid foundation for encoding and broadcasting. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 indicates strong multi-threaded capability for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. However, the GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores listed in the fact pack, and its RT cores (16) are present but not a substitute for a dedicated encoder. The data suggests that software encoding via the CPU is viable, given its 16 threads, but the lack of measured streaming benchmarks means the experience is inferred from the CPU’s 85th percentile standing.

Video Editing: In non-linear editing applications, the combination of high single-core and multi-core performance is critical. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1954 and multicore score of 14278.5 place it at the 85th percentile, nearly identical to the Intel Core 7 250H (deltaPct 0) and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (deltaPct 0.1). The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3), accelerates effects rendering and timeline previews. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timelines, but 4K multi-layer projects may exceed this capacity, as the bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is moderate.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 excels with a PassMark multithread score of 23994 and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2336.5. These numbers indicate that the CPU is capable of handling complex scenes, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS suggests that GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane will be limited by the Arc A570M’s compute throughput. The GPU’s 16 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, but the 1300 MHz boost clock and 2048 shading units are modest for heavy path tracing workloads. The CPU’s data encryption score of 14462 and extended instructions score of 19955 further support its role in complex simulation tasks.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from high single-thread performance and rapid data handling. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3872 is robust, and its data compression score of 281834 indicates fast build artifact handling. The L3 cache of 8 MB is small by modern standards, but the 4 nm process node and 5.00 GHz boost clock mitigate latency. The GPU’s role here is minimal, but the system’s PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU allows for fast NVMe storage access, which is critical for large codebases. The 85th percentile CPU ranking confirms it is above average for development workloads.

Student and Office Work: For productivity suites, web browsing, and document processing, the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 84868 and floating point math score of 51639 demonstrate rapid calculation ability. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics provide a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle, but the Arc A570M is overkill for this segment. The system’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s (DDR5, LPDDR5X) ensures smooth multitasking with many open applications. The CPU’s 28 W TDP and the GPU’s 75 W TDP combine for a power envelope that is efficient for all-day battery life, though the exact power draw is not measured in the data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing exhibits a clear balance where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their respective performance percentiles (85th for CPU, 88th for GPU). This alignment suggests that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other in mixed workloads. In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor for frame rates at higher resolutions, given its 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB VRAM. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3872 and boost clock of 5.00 GHz are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s become the primary constraints.

In CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU’s 16 threads are the bottleneck, as the GPU’s compute is not fully utilized. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, indicating that the CPU is competitive but not class-leading. Conversely, in GPU-accelerated workloads like OpenCL compute, the Arc A570M’s 58239 score is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, but the CPU may wait on the GPU’s output.

The memory subsystem is a potential bottleneck. The CPU supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the GPU has its own 224.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth. For shared workloads that require data transfer between CPU and GPU, the PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface for the GPU (and 16 lanes for the CPU) provides adequate bandwidth, but the 8 MB L3 cache on the CPU is small, which could cause cache misses in data-heavy applications. The data shows that the CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1318 and find prime numbers score of 81 are low relative to other metrics, suggesting that physics simulation and certain integer workloads may be less efficient.

Overall, the system is well-balanced for a laptop, with the GPU slightly ahead in percentile ranking. The combined percentile of 87 supports this view, indicating that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts for general-purpose use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35719, with a percentile of 85 among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 250H, scores 35728 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is statistically tied with it. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H scores 35670, putting the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 slightly ahead (deltaPct 0.1). In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35802, placing the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 behind by -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X scores 35909, a -0.5% delta. These margins are negligible, indicating that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a mid-high-tier mobile CPU that matches desktop parts from previous generations.

In specific benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 and single-core score of 1954 are strong. The PassMark multithread score of 23994 and single-thread score of 3872 corroborate this. The data compression score of 281834 is exceptional, while the data encryption score of 14462 is moderate. The extended instructions score of 19955 and floating point math score of 51639 are above average. The integer math score of 84868 shows strong arithmetic throughput.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58239, with a percentile of 88 among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58392, placing the Arc A570M behind by -0.3%. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085, with the Arc A570M ahead by 0.3%. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528, a -0.5% delta, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, a -0.7% delta. The Arc A570M’s OpenCL score of 58239 is thus comparable to a high-end desktop GPU from the previous generation, despite being a mobile part.

The combined picture is one of consistency: both components sit in the 85-88th percentile range, and the system’s combined percentile of 87 reflects this. The lack of measured FPS data means these scores are the primary indicators of performance, and they suggest a capable gaming and productivity laptop.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: The Arc A570M’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with its 88th percentile OpenCL score, make it suitable for high settings at 1080p. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures that frame rates are not limited by the processor in most titles. However, the lack of measured FPS data means that exact performance is an estimate, and users should expect performance comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (deltaPct 0.3) and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3).

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 handles rendering tasks, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 accelerates effects. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for high-resolution textures, but for 1080p and 1440p projects, this system is adequate.

Software Developers: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3872 and data compression score of 281834 make it ideal for compilation and code analysis. The PCIe Gen 4 interface supports fast storage, and the 16 threads allow for parallel build processes.

Students and Office Workers: The system’s efficiency (28 W CPU TDP, 75 W GPU TDP) and strong integrated graphics (Radeon 860M) make it a versatile choice for productivity. The 85th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking, and the GPU is more than sufficient for any non-gaming tasks.

Small Business Workstations: The ECC memory support (true) and dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X memory make this suitable for data integrity and reliability. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 23994 supports database and virtualization workloads, while the GPU is available for compute tasks if needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits upgradeability to other FP8 processors, but the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is already a high-tier part. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported, which is rare for mobile platforms.

The GPU is an integrated part of the system (slot width: IGP) but uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This suggests that the GPU is soldered and not upgradeable. The system’s PSU headroom is not specified (suggested Psu is null), but the CPU TDP of 28 W and GPU TDP of 75 W indicate a total power draw of around 103 W, which is manageable for a laptop.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase memory capacity, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU allows for adding a high-speed NVMe SSD, which would improve load times and data transfer. The GPU cannot be upgraded, so any future graphics improvement would require a new system. The CPU’s production status is Active, and its release date is 2025-01-05, so it is a current-generation part.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average benchmark score of 35719, which is 0% different from the Intel Core 7 250H (35728), 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (35670), -0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802), and -0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (35909).

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which is -0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085). This places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X. The GPU has a dedicated bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class hardware, making it suitable for data-sensitive applications.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 87, indicating that this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 87% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s compute capability?

A: The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores. Its FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1).

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Krackan Point. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is strong in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1954 and multicore score of 14278.5 are indicative of a capable mobile CPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 3872 is high, while the multithread score of 23994 is robust. The data compression score of 281834 is particularly notable, suggesting excellent performance in archiving and data transfer tasks.

The CPU’s data encryption score of 14462 and extended instructions score of 19955 indicate good support for cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The floating point math score of 51639 and integer math score of 84868 show balanced arithmetic capability. However, the physics score of 1318 and find prime numbers score of 81 are lower, suggesting that certain specialized workloads may not be as efficient.

The 85th percentile ranking places this CPU in the upper 15% of all CPUs, making it competitive with desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, which it trails by only -0.5%. The memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X with ECC is a professional-grade feature. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics provide a fallback for display, but the discrete GPU is the primary graphics solution.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 with the Intel Arc A570M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the build class. The CPU is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is a mobile part with a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of all builds, indicating that it is a high-performance laptop configuration.

The CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting that the system is well-matched for balanced workloads. The CPU is based on the Zen 5 architecture, which is current-generation, and the GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, which is also current. The system’s overall performance is comparable to desktop systems from a few years ago, as evidenced by the GPU’s proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3).

The build is designed for portability without sacrificing performance. The CPU’s 4 nm process node and the GPU’s 6 nm process node contribute to power efficiency. The lack of measured FPS data is a caveat, but the benchmark scores suggest that this is a gaming-capable laptop that can also handle productivity and creative workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data indicates that the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, at the 88th percentile, suggests that it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most titles, but games with large textures may require lowering settings. The GPU’s 16 RT cores support ray tracing, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is not high enough for demanding ray-traced effects at high resolutions.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3872 and boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensure that it can keep up with the GPU in most games. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 indicates that the CPU will not bottleneck in multi-threaded game engines. Based on the GPU’s similarity to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (deltaPct 0.3) and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3), users can expect frame rates in the range of those cards, but exact numbers are not available.

For esports titles at 1080p, the system should easily exceed 60 FPS on high settings. For AAA games, 60 FPS at medium-to-high settings is a reasonable estimate. At 1440p, the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate will limit performance, and users may need to reduce settings to achieve playable frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and is part of the Arc 5 Mobile generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process node by TSMC, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with a TDP of 75 W.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective speed of 14 Gbps. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also has 16 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, but no tensor cores are listed.

The compute capabilities are defined by the FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop design.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places the GPU at the 88th percentile, which is a strong showing for a mobile part. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, deltaPct -0.3) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, deltaPct 0.3). This indicates that the Arc A570M offers desktop-class compute performance in a mobile form factor.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 16 RT cores support ray-traced effects, but the modest boost clock of 1300 MHz and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are not ideal for heavy compute tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most workloads, but the 128-bit bus limits memory bandwidth compared to higher-end cards. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds