SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

35,719 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically from the Krackan Point family. It operates on a 4 nm TSMC process node with a die size of 195 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 28 watts. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. This processor sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs benchmarked, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 35719 places it in direct competition with several notable desktop and mobile parts, with a negligible 0% delta from the Intel Core 7 250H and a 0.1% advantage over the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H. It also trades blows with desktop chips like the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, trailing the latter by a mere 0.5%.

The benchmark results paint a detailed picture of the CPU’s capabilities across various workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multicore score of 14278.5 and a singlecore score of 1954. The multicore figure suggests strong sustained performance for demanding productivity tasks, while the singlecore score indicates solid responsiveness for everyday applications. Cinebench R15 results show a multicore score of 2336.5 and a singlecore score of 247. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: a multithread score of 23994 and a single-thread score of 3872 confirm balanced performance across both lightly and heavily threaded workloads. The processor excels particularly in integer math with a score of 84868 and floating-point math with a score of 51639, suggesting robust computational throughput for scientific and engineering applications. Data compression performance is notably high at 281834, while data encryption scores 14462. The processor handles extended instructions well, scoring 19955, and demonstrates reasonable physics processing with a score of 1318. Random string sorting achieves 31071, and the find prime numbers test yields a score of 81, which is a lower score in this specific benchmark. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics provides a capable baseline for systems without a discrete GPU, though this particular build includes a dedicated graphics solution.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is designed for the mobile segment, fitting into the AMD Socket FP8. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a total memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for professional workstations that require data integrity. For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the processor itself. This platform supports a capable air cooler for the 28-watt TDP, ensuring that thermal management is not a significant constraint in a well-designed laptop chassis. The processor is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, a family that leverages both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores to balance performance and efficiency. The production status is listed as active, with a release date of January 2025.

Looking at the upgrade path, the FP8 socket is a laptop-specific platform, meaning that user upgrades are typically not possible in the traditional sense; the processor is soldered to the motherboard. The sensible next upgrade for a user on this platform would be to a higher-tier processor within the same Ryzen AI PRO 300 family, though the data does not specify which models exist. The platform’s support for modern memory types like DDR5 and LPDDR5X ensures that the memory subsystem is not a bottleneck. The 28-watt TDP is efficient, and the integrated Radeon 860M provides a fallback for basic graphics tasks, but the discrete Intel Arc A370M handles the heavy lifting. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for modern storage and discrete GPU connectivity. For users looking to build a new system from scratch, this platform is exclusive to laptops, so the upgrade path is limited to the lifespan of the machine itself. The combination of ECC memory support and a professional PRO series designation suggests that this is targeted at business and professional mobile workstations.

The benchmark data shows that this CPU is exceptionally well-rounded. Its 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper echelon of processors, making it suitable for a wide range of demanding tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 is competitive with desktop-class processors, indicating that it can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation without significant slowdowns. The single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 3872, ensures that day-to-day tasks and applications that rely on single-core speed will feel snappy. The data compression and encryption scores are particularly strong, making this a good fit for database management, file archiving, and secure communications. The floating-point math score of 51639 suggests excellent performance in scientific simulations and financial modeling. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the performance is virtually identical to the Intel Core 7 250H and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, meaning that users will not see a meaningful difference between these options in real-world workloads. The slight 0.5% deficit to the desktop AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is negligible, especially considering the power efficiency advantage of this mobile part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is built for the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform standard. This socket is designed for laptops and compact mobile workstations, meaning that the processor is generally not user-replaceable. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is a high-bandwidth memory subsystem that can feed the 8-core, 16-thread processor effectively, preventing memory from becoming a bottleneck in most workloads. The support for ECC memory is a notable feature, as it is typically reserved for server or professional workstation platforms, enhancing system stability for long-running computations. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which can be used for high-speed NVMe SSDs and the discrete GPU. The 28-watt TDP is remarkably efficient, allowing for thin-and-light laptop designs that do not require aggressive cooling solutions. A capable air cooler is sufficient to manage thermals under sustained load, and the system’s power delivery does not necessitate a high-wattage PSU, keeping the overall power envelope low.

The integrated Radeon 860M graphics in the CPU serve as a low-power fallback for basic display output and light 2D workloads, but the system in question also includes a discrete Intel Arc A370M GPU. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface for the GPU is adequate for the A370M’s bandwidth requirements. For a user considering a sensible next upgrade, the primary limitation is the soldered nature of the CPU in most mobile designs. Within the same platform generation, a future processor with more cores or higher clocks could theoretically be installed if the laptop manufacturer supports it, but this is rare in practice. The platform is otherwise forward-looking, with support for the latest memory standards and PCIe Gen 4, ensuring that it will not be a bottleneck for storage devices or peripherals for years to come. The combination of a 28-watt CPU and a 35-watt GPU creates a balanced power draw that is well-suited for a portable workstation that can be used for extended periods on battery power. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient to support both the CPU’s compute tasks and the GPU’s need for data transfer over the system bus, though the discrete GPU has its own dedicated 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU and GPU pairing is defined by the processor’s strong showing and the discrete GPU’s mid-range capabilities. The CPU alone holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35719. This score is nearly identical to its closest rivals: the Intel Core 7 250H (35728, 0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (35670, 0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802, -0.2% delta). The processor even comes within 0.5% of the desktop AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, a high-performance desktop chip. This indicates that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a top-tier mobile processor that can handle the most demanding productivity and creative workloads. In specific tests, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 is particularly impressive for a 28-watt part, suggesting that it can sustain high performance over extended rendering or encoding sessions. The single-core score of 1954 in the same test ensures that the system feels responsive in everyday tasks.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. It is closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, -0.1% delta) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, -0.1% delta). It holds a slight edge over the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% delta). The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676, and its Vulkan score is 28673, indicating solid compute performance for a mobile dGPU. The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 80, reflecting a well-balanced system where the CPU is slightly stronger than the GPU. The data shows no measured FPS figures for this exact combination, meaning that all gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, while the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate to high settings in most titles. The overall picture is of a competent mid-range gaming and productivity laptop that is stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side.

Who Should Build It

This system, comprising the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Intel Arc A370M, is a mobile laptop build. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for professionals who require high multi-threaded performance for demanding applications. Content creators, particularly video editors, will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5, which indicates fast rendering and export times. Software developers will appreciate the strong integer math score of 84868 and the data compression score of 281834, which are relevant for compiling code, managing large repositories, and handling data serialization. Students and small business workstations will find the processor’s efficiency and performance well-suited for multitasking, running virtual machines, and office productivity suites. The ECC memory support is a key feature for professionals working with large datasets in fields like finance, science, and engineering, where data integrity is paramount.

The discrete Intel Arc A370M, with its 74th percentile ranking, targets users who need more graphics performance than an integrated GPU but do not require high-end gaming or rendering. This makes the system suitable for gamers at 1080p resolution who are willing to adjust settings to achieve playable frame rates. For users in the gaming segment, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 3872, ensures that the system will not be CPU-limited in most titles. The GPU’s 4 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may be a limitation in some newer titles at higher quality settings. The combined 80th percentile ranking indicates that this is a well-rounded system for its class, suitable for users who want a single machine capable of both productivity and entertainment. The laptop form factor, indicated by the build class, makes it a portable option for users who need to work and play on the go. The 28-watt CPU and 35-watt GPU together create a power-efficient platform, making it ideal for students and business travelers who prioritize battery life without sacrificing performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 3872, is more than capable of driving high frame rates in eSports titles. The Intel Arc A370M, however, will be the limiting factor at high refresh rates, and the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking suggests it is better suited for 60 FPS gaming at 1080p rather than pushing 144 Hz in demanding titles. Users can expect smooth performance in competitive games with lower graphical settings.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 is well-equipped to handle game streaming. The processor can encode video using software encoding while the game runs on the GPU, as the high multi-threaded performance provides ample headroom for both tasks without significant frame drops. The data encryption score of 14462 also suggests efficient handling of stream data.

Video Editing: The strong multicore performance of the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 makes this a capable machine for video editing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5 will result in faster timeline rendering and export times for 1080p and even some 4K projects. The GPU’s 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects and previews, though it is not a high-end rendering powerhouse.

3D Rendering: For 3D rendering workloads, the CPU’s performance is the primary asset. The floating-point math score of 51639 and the overall multithread score of 23994 indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender will be efficient. The Intel Arc A370M’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides some acceleration for GPU rendering, but its 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes.

Software Development: Developers will find this system highly responsive. The high integer math score of 84868 speeds up code compilation, and the data compression score of 281834 is beneficial for handling large codebases and version control operations. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread performance ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and Office Work: For students and office workers, this system is overkill for basic tasks, but the performance headroom means it will remain smooth under heavy multitasking. The 85th percentile CPU ranking ensures that spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing will be instantaneous, and the efficient 28-watt TDP contributes to good battery life for all-day use on campus or in the office.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Arc A370M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 29175 suggest that it performs similarly to desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 470. Based on this, users can expect playable frame rates at 1080p resolution in most modern titles, with settings adjusted to medium or high. In lighter eSports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the strong single-thread performance of the CPU (PassMark score of 3872) will ensure high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS. In more demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and users may need to lower settings to achieve a stable 60 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM is a consideration for texture quality; ultra textures in some games may exceed this limit, causing stuttering or reduced performance. Overall, the system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with the expectation of 60 FPS in most titles and lower frame rates in the most graphically intensive games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and average score of 35719 contrast with the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and average score of 29175. This imbalance indicates that the processor is rarely the limiting factor in workloads, particularly in gaming. In CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 will perform at a high level, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14278.5. The GPU, however, will be the primary constraint in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the Intel Arc A370M will likely be the bottleneck, preventing the system from achieving frame rates that the CPU could otherwise support. The FPS scaling in games will be determined by the GPU’s capabilities; while the CPU can push high frame rates in less demanding titles, the GPU will cap performance in more graphically intense scenarios. This is a common balance in laptops, where the CPU is often a high-performance part with a mid-range GPU to manage thermals and power consumption. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this balance, indicating that the system is well-matched for its intended purpose of general productivity and moderate gaming. In non-gaming workloads that use both CPU and GPU, such as video editing with GPU acceleration, the CPU will handle the heavy lifting while the GPU assists with effects and rendering, and the system will not experience significant bottlenecks.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350?

A: The processor holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35719, placing it in the upper tier of processors and nearly matching desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, which it trails by just 0.5%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 29175 and sits in the 74th percentile. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, with a -0.1% delta, and is 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in professional workstation platforms, ensuring data integrity for critical computations.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 watts. This low combined power draw makes the system efficient and suitable for thin-and-light laptop designs.

Q: Is there measured gaming performance data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this specific combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Q: What kind of memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the architecture of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically from the Alchemist generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process node by TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 157 mm² and a transistor count of 7,200 million. The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also has 8 ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. The theoretical pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 8.397 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 35 watts and connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Its production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022.

In benchmark tests, the Intel Arc A370M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673. Its average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This performance level makes it comparable to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and the AMD FirePro W8000, both of which have average scores around 29197 and 29211, respectively. It is also slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides a baseline level of compute capability for tasks like GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Adobe Premiere Pro. The 8 ray tracing cores offer support for real-time ray tracing, though the overall performance level means that users will need to rely on upscaling technologies to maintain playable frame rates in ray-traced titles. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with medium to high textures, but it is a limiting factor for 4K textures or large 3D scenes. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the GPU’s compute capabilities, ensuring that data transfer is not a severe bottleneck. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking indicates that it is a mid-range part, suitable for mainstream gaming and entry-level creative work, but it is not designed for high-end 1440p or 4K gaming.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mobile processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a high-performance, power-efficient part from the Zen 5 generation, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile solution from Intel’s Alchemist line. The combined percentile ranking for this pairing is 80, reflecting a system that is well above average in overall performance. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking is the stronger component, indicating that the system excels in processor-intensive tasks, while the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking provides competent graphics performance for 1080p gaming and light creative workloads. This is a balanced laptop configuration for users who need a versatile machine for productivity, software development, and moderate gaming. The 28-watt CPU and 35-watt GPU create a power-efficient platform that is well-suited for portable use, offering a good balance between performance and battery life. The system occupies a mid-to-upper tier in the laptop market, outperforming a majority of other mobile systems while not reaching the heights of high-end gaming or mobile workstation configurations with more powerful GPUs. The pairing of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU is a sensible choice for a professional laptop, ensuring that demanding computational tasks are handled with ease while maintaining a reasonable cost and power profile for the graphics subsystem.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds