SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

35,719 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific mobile configuration designed for thin-and-light laptops. This combination places the system in the 78th percentile overall, with the CPU performing at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile. The data indicates a processor that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks paired with a discrete graphics solution that delivers entry-level gaming and accelerated content creation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket designed for thin-and-light laptops. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Krackan Point architecture based on Zen 5, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 195 mm². Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, providing a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the processor itself. This is sufficient for connecting the discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs, though the exact allocation depends on the laptop manufacturer's design. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics provides a fallback display output and can handle basic rendering tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially saving power.

The system's thermal and power envelope is modest, with the CPU rated at 28 W TDP and the GPU at 25 W. This combined thermal budget of approximately 53 W for the core silicon means most laptops using this pairing will use a relatively compact cooling solution. The absence of a suggested PSU figure in the data reflects the mobile nature of this build, where power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply and battery system rather than a user-selectable PSU.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU has headroom relative to the GPU. The CPU's 85th percentile rank versus the GPU's 70th percentile rank indicates that users who want more graphics performance could potentially pair the CPU with a stronger GPU in a future laptop purchase. However, since this is a mobile configuration, the upgrade path is limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping individual components. The platform's support for both DDR5 and LPDDR5X gives manufacturers flexibility in memory implementation, but end users should verify the specific memory configuration in their chosen laptop model.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a processor that performs strongly in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 14278.5 points in multi-core and 1954 points in single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2336.5 points multi-core and 247 points single-core. These scores place the CPU in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms roughly 85% of all processors in the database.

The nearest rivals provide context for these scores. The Intel Core 7 250H scores 35728 average points, essentially identical to this CPU's 35719 average benchmark score with a 0% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H scores 35670 points, just 0.1% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35802 points, putting the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at -0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X scores 35909 points, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 trailing by 0.5%. These results show that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 sits squarely in the performance tier of mainstream desktop and mobile processors, despite being a 28 W mobile part.

PassMark results further characterize the CPU's capabilities. The multi-thread score is 23994, the single-thread score is 3872, and the average benchmark score is 35719. In specific workloads, the CPU achieves 84868 in integer math, 51639 in floating-point math, 281834 in data compression, and 14462 in data encryption. The extended instructions score is 19955, and the physics score is 1318. The random string sorting score is 31071, and the find prime numbers score is 81.

The GPU benchmarks show more modest performance. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Intel Arc A350M scores 24546, and in Vulkan it scores 24747. The average benchmark score is 24647, placing the GPU in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 24744 points (-0.4% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 points (-0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24442 points (+0.8% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 points (+1.5% delta). This places the Arc A350M in the range of desktop GPUs from several generations ago, suggesting it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's socket and can it be upgraded?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. Any upgrade would require replacing the entire laptop.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core 7 250H?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Intel Core 7 250H scoring 35728 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scoring 35719, a delta of 0%. This indicates performance parity between the two processors.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A350M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features. It also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X scores 35909 in average benchmark score, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 35719, resulting in a -0.5% delta. This means the mobile CPU performs nearly as well as the desktop part despite its much lower 28 W TDP.

Q: Is the GPU performance adequate for modern gaming?

A: The GPU's 70th percentile rank and its proximity to desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 590 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles, but it will struggle with high-refresh or high-resolution gaming due to its 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combination of an 85th percentile CPU with a 70th percentile GPU creates a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance. In processor-intensive workloads such as data compression, integer math, and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23994 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 demonstrate strong computational throughput that will outpace the GPU's capabilities in most scenarios.

The GPU becomes the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks, particularly gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. With a 4 GB VRAM capacity and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, the Arc A350M will constrain performance in modern games at higher resolutions or with high-quality textures. The GPU's benchmark scores, which place it near the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, suggest that frame rates will be limited by the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

The CPU's integrated Radeon 860M graphics adds another layer of balance considerations. For light workloads, the system can use the integrated graphics to save power, but for gaming, the discrete GPU is necessary. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between the CPU and the integrated graphics, while the discrete GPU has its own dedicated 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, so memory contention is less of a concern when using the Arc A350M.

In practical terms, the CPU's performance headroom means that users will rarely see CPU-induced frame drops in gaming. The GPU will be the limiting factor in most games, and users should expect to adjust settings to achieve playable frame rates. For productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will handle most of the computational load, with the GPU providing acceleration for specific tasks like effects rendering or encoding.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Krackan Point codename. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 195 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 28 W. This power efficiency is remarkable given the performance data, which shows the CPU competing with desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a total of 8 MB of L3 cache. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 and single-core score of 1954 indicate strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The single-core performance is particularly important for everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and software development, where responsive single-threaded performance is critical.

The PassMark results paint a detailed picture of the CPU's workload-specific capabilities. The data compression score of 281834 is exceptional, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and data storage workloads. The encryption score of 14462 indicates capable cryptographic performance, which is important for VPNs, secure communications, and encrypted storage. The extended instructions score of 19955 shows solid SIMD performance for scientific computing and media processing.

The 85th percentile ranking places this CPU in the upper tier of all processors, and the near-identical scores to the Intel Core 7 250H and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H confirm its competitive position. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering tasks without becoming the bottleneck. The 16 threads allow for efficient parallel processing, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance when needed.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this CPU+GPU pairing are mobile professionals who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks with occasional light gaming or GPU-accelerated work. The 85th percentile CPU performance makes this suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts processing large datasets, and content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23994 and data compression score of 281834 support these use cases.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's performance for running simulations, compiling code, and running virtual machines. The 16 threads provide ample parallelism for these workloads, and the 28 W TDP means the laptop will have reasonable battery life for all-day use on campus. The ECC memory support is an additional benefit for research work where data accuracy is paramount.

Small business workstations that require reliable performance for office productivity, financial modeling, and database management will find this configuration adequate. The CPU's single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures responsive application performance, while the multi-thread capabilities handle batch processing tasks efficiently. The integrated Radeon 860M provides a backup display output if the discrete GPU encounters issues.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are the primary gaming audience for this configuration. The GPU's 70th percentile rank and its benchmark scores near the RX 590 indicate it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at playable frame rates. Users who prioritize CPU performance for streaming or recording gameplay will benefit from the strong multi-threaded scores, though the GPU will limit maximum game settings.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is limited by the GPU. The Arc A350M's benchmark scores place it near desktop GPUs like the RX 590 and GTX 1630, which typically deliver 60-90 FPS in esports titles at 1080p with medium settings, but will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding AAA games. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for high-refresh gaming, as modern games often require more memory at higher settings.

Streaming is a viable use case due to the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, and the GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern streaming software. The 16 threads allow for efficient simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 84868 and floating-point math score of 51639 indicate strong performance in video processing tasks. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit the complexity of projects that can be edited smoothly.

3D rendering in Blender or similar applications will leverage the CPU's multi-threaded performance effectively. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 translates to reasonable render times for single frames or short animations. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering and final frame rendering through OpenCL, though its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to dedicated desktop GPUs.

Software development is a strong use case for this configuration. The CPU's 16 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, and the data compression score of 281834 helps with source control operations and build artifact management. The single-thread performance of 3872 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions and quick test runs.

For student and office work, this system provides more than adequate performance. The CPU's single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking, while the 28 W TDP contributes to long battery life. The integrated Radeon 860M can handle display output and light graphics tasks, preserving battery when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mobile processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU in a laptop form factor. The build class is explicitly defined as "laptop," meaning all components are integrated into a portable chassis with no user-upgradeable parts beyond standard storage and memory modules where the manufacturer allows access.

The combined percentile ranking is 78th, placing this system in the upper-middle tier of all benchmarked configurations. The CPU's 85th percentile is the stronger component, while the GPU's 70th percentile drags the overall ranking slightly. This creates a system that excels in productivity and CPU-intensive tasks but is only average for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The CPU's production status is listed as "Active," while the GPU is marked as "End-of-life," indicating that the GPU is an older design. The GPU was released on 2022-03-29, while the CPU was released on 2025-01-05, making this a pairing of a current-generation CPU with a previous-generation GPU. This is a common configuration in mid-range laptops where manufacturers pair the latest CPUs with older discrete GPUs to hit specific price points or thermal targets.

For the target user, this build represents a balanced mobile workstation with gaming capabilities. The CPU's performance is sufficient for professional workloads, and the GPU provides acceleration for graphics tasks and light gaming. The system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and need a discrete GPU for occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated applications, rather than gamers seeking high frame rates or content creators requiring heavy GPU rendering.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, using the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The die contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a significant limitation for modern gaming, as many current titles require more than 4 GB of VRAM at 1080p with high-quality textures. The 64-bit bus width also constrains memory bandwidth compared to wider-bus GPUs, which can impact performance in memory-intensive scenes.

The GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operations units. It also includes 6 ray tracing cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing support through DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places the GPU in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable for a mobile discrete GPU. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at -0.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at +0.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at +1.5%. These comparisons indicate that the Arc A350M performs similarly to desktop GPUs from the RX 500 and GTX 1600 series, which were mid-range offerings from several years ago.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's capabilities are modest. The 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for basic 3D rendering, but complex scenes with heavy geometry or high-resolution textures will be limited by the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth. The ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the GPU's overall performance will limit the complexity of ray-traced scenes that can be rendered in real-time.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings of the individual components.

The gaming performance of this system is primarily constrained by the Intel Arc A350M GPU. Based on its benchmark scores, which place it near the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, the GPU is capable of running most games at 1080p with medium settings. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends should achieve 60-100 FPS at 1080p medium, given the GPU's 70th percentile rank and its performance relative to known desktop GPUs.

For AAA games, users should expect 30-60 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, depending on the specific title and optimization. Games with heavy VRAM usage or demanding graphics features will be particularly limited by the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, but enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce frame rates due to the GPU's overall compute performance.

The CPU's strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by the 3872 PassMark single-thread score, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. Even in CPU-intensive games like simulation titles or strategy games, the 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample processing power. The 5.00 GHz boost clock helps in games that are sensitive to single-threaded performance.

For users considering this system for gaming, the expectations should be set appropriately. This is not a high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming laptop. It is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings with playable frame rates, and it will handle older titles and less demanding games at higher settings. Users who want to play the latest AAA games at high settings or high refresh rates should look for configurations with more powerful GPUs.