SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G

63,331 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and Intel Arc A380 combination represents a desktop build anchored by a high-end CPU and an entry-level discrete GPU. The processor is a significant performer, sitting in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card is a more modest component, ranking in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing creates a system where the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU will be the primary constraint for graphics-intensive tasks. As the data does not include measured FPS for this specific combination, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that utilizes a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 8 MB of L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performance with a Passmark multithread score of 30422. The single-thread score is 4309, indicating robust per-core performance that is beneficial for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The processor achieves an average benchmark score of 63331, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This places it in a highly competitive tier, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, which scores 63173, a negligible 0.2% difference. It also edges out the Intel Core i7-13790F (63080, 0.4% slower) and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839, 0.8% slower), while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores slightly higher at 63765, making the 450G 0.7% slower than that part.

The data shows a processor that is exceptionally well-rounded. The high integer math score of 99732 and floating-point math score of 63683 suggest strong computational capabilities for both general-purpose and scientific workloads. The data compression score of 402831 and encryption score of 18937 indicate that the CPU can handle data-heavy tasks efficiently. The extended instructions score of 28223 and the ability to find prime numbers at a rate of 87 (per the Passmark test) further underscore its processing power. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks like video rendering or software compilation with ease, while also providing the snappy responsiveness expected from a high-end desktop part in single-threaded applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination; therefore, all gaming performance figures here are estimated based on the individual benchmark scores of the components. The Intel Arc A380's Passmark G3D score is 6252, which places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. This score suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in many titles, but it will struggle with maximum settings or higher resolutions in demanding games.

The CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4309 and a multithread score of 30422, ensuring that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Estimated performance at 1080p resolution on ultra settings would likely see frame rates below 60 FPS in modern AAA titles, as the GPU's performance class is near that of the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which has a similar average score of 8458 (1.2% slower). In less demanding or older games, the A380 might be able to achieve playable frame rates, but the data suggests its performance is limited. At 1440p or 4K, the A380's 6 GB of VRAM and 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth would become a significant limiting factor, and ultra settings would likely be unplayable. The data indicates that for a consistent 60+ FPS experience, users would need to lower graphical settings or resolution.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not well-supported by the data. The Intel Arc A380's GPU benchmark scores are too low to consistently drive high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles, making a high-refresh-rate monitor a poor investment for this build. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4309 is capable, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 6252 will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a multithread score of 30422 provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU can handle x264 encoding, which is demanding, but the performance of the Arc A380 in the game itself will still be a constraint on overall stream quality and game settings.

Video Editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU's high performance, with an average score of 63331 and a strong floating-point math score of 63683, suggests it will handle video editing timelines and effects processing very smoothly. However, the GPU's compute score of 2762 and its 44th percentile ranking mean that GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow, potentially making this a CPU-centric editing workflow.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU is the star here. The multithread score of 30422 will accelerate CPU-based rendering engines significantly. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is present, but its performance in the 44th percentile indicates that GPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles will be slower than on more powerful graphics cards, making this a CPU-centric rendering system.

Software Development: The CPU is excellent for this workload. A high single-thread score of 4309 ensures fast compilation of single files, while the 16 threads and 30422 multithread score will significantly reduce the time required for full project builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, except for shader compilation, where the Arc A380's performance is adequate.

Student and Office Work: This system is overpowered for standard office tasks. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance means applications like word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers will run without any lag. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics in the CPU are more than sufficient for these tasks, and the discrete GPU would only be necessary for more graphics-intensive work, which this class of user is unlikely to perform.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a significant imbalance in this pairing. The CPU, with a 93rd percentile ranking, is a top-tier performer. The GPU, in the 44th percentile, is an entry-level model. This means the GPU will be the bottleneck in almost any graphics-intensive workload, including gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU will be left waiting for the GPU to keep up, meaning its potential is not fully utilized in these scenarios.

The CPU's Passmark G3D score of 6252 is the defining constraint for frame rates. In contrast, the CPU's single-thread score of 4309 is high enough that it will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, even with a more powerful GPU. The data suggests that the CPU is future-proof for an upgrade, while the GPU is the current limiting component. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its performance, confirming that its capabilities are at the top of the current market, while the GPU's nearest rivals are similarly placed in the lower-midrange segment, confirming its entry-level status.

FAQ

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 450G achieves a Passmark single-thread score of 4309, indicating strong per-core performance for everyday applications and games that rely on fewer cores.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 450G has an average benchmark score of 63331, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX's score of 63173.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A380?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s, provided by 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: Does the data support running games at ultra settings on this build?

A: No, the data does not. With no measured FPS data, estimates based on the GPU's 6252 Passmark G3D score and its 44th percentile ranking suggest that ultra settings in modern games will result in low frame rates.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has a TDP of 65 W, and the Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the performance bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU scores in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU scores in the 44th percentile, making the GPU the limiting component in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this build?

A: This CPU and GPU pairing has a combined percentile ranking of 69 out of 100.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks but have a limited need for high-end gaming or GPU computing. The data suggests it is an excellent choice for software developers, as the CPU's 16 threads and 30422 multithread score will accelerate compilation times significantly. It is also a strong option for students or small business workstations where office applications and web browsing are the primary tasks, as the CPU's 93rd percentile performance ensures a fluid experience.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will also benefit from the powerful processor. However, gamers targeting high settings at 1080p or higher resolutions should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 44th percentile performance is inadequate for that purpose. This is a system for a user who needs a top-tier CPU for work and is willing to accept entry-level gaming or GPU acceleration capabilities. The CPU's 93rd percentile rank and the GPU's 44th percentile rank clearly define this as a CPU-first system.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G delivers an average benchmark score of 63331, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to that of its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, which scores 63173, a mere 0.2% difference. The CPU also outperforms the Intel Core i7-13790F (63080) by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839) by 0.8%, while trailing the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (63765) by 0.7%. Specific Passmark sub-scores include a multithread score of 30422 and a single-thread score of 4309.

The Intel Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. This places it in direct competition with the AMD FirePro W5170M, which scores 8595 (0.4% faster), and ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462) by 1.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458) by 1.2%, and the AMD Radeon 880M (8436) by 1.4%. Its key benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224, and a Passmark G3D score of 6252.

The combined picture is of a high-performing CPU paired with an entry-level GPU. The system's combined percentile is 69, which is dragged down by the GPU's lower score. The CPU's performance is at the top of its class, while the GPU's performance is only in the lower-midrange of the market.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system. The pairing consists of AMD's Ryzen AI 7 450G processor and Intel's Arc A380 graphics card. The CPU is a high-end, 8-core, 16-thread processor built on a 4 nm process, while the GPU is an entry-level, end-of-life product based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The overall tier of this build, as defined by its 69th combined percentile, is mid-range, but this is a misleading metric as the two components are not balanced.

The CPU is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, making it one of the most powerful processors available. The GPU is in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, placing it in the lower half of the performance spectrum. This is a CPU-centric build where the processor is the primary driver of performance, and the GPU is a secondary component that provides basic graphics output and light gaming capability. The build is a desktop system, meaning it is intended for stationary use in a tower or similar case.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The GPU features 8 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores listed. It is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The card has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps.

The A380's benchmark scores are modest. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 6252 and a Passmark GPU compute score of 2762. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 808. Its performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which is 1.2% slower, and the AMD Radeon 880M, which is 1.4% slower. For rendering, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is its theoretical ceiling, but the low scores indicate that real-world rendering performance will be limited. The 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is also a constraint for high-resolution textures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation desktop socket. It supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, and it has 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The CPU also has ECC memory support and an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. The platform is modern and offers a clear upgrade path, as users could potentially move to a more powerful Ryzen processor on the same socket in the future.

The Intel Arc A380 is an end-of-life product, and its successor is Battlemage. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and requires a 250 W power supply, according to the suggested PSU. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, so the total system power draw is relatively low. The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be the graphics card, as the CPU has significant headroom. A more powerful GPU would allow the system to take full advantage of the CPU's 93rd percentile performance in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4309 and multithread score of 30422 suggest it would not be a bottleneck for a much faster GPU.