SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450

39,485 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a high-tier laptop configuration, with a combined percentile ranking of 88. Benchmark data shows a CPU that trades blows with desktop-class processors and a GPU whose compute performance aligns with high-end discrete cards, though no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination. This analysis relies strictly on synthetic benchmark scores to estimate real-world capability.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU integrates 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. Its silicon contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz for 14 Gbps effective data rate. This configuration delivers a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s.

Memory configuration is substantial for a mobile part. The A570M features 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is critical for rendering workloads, as texture streaming and frame buffer operations scale directly with available memory throughput. The 8 GB capacity similarly matters for modern game assets and GPU-accelerated compute tasks that exceed the smaller pools found in entry-level discrete GPUs.

Compute throughput is defined by an FP32 rating of 5.325 TFLOPS and an FP16 rating of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The FP16 performance is particularly relevant for AI inference and mixed-precision rendering paths that leverage reduced precision. The GPU includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects. API support is comprehensive, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 listed. No tensor core count is specified in the data, but the Xe-HPG architecture implements matrix acceleration through dedicated execution units.

The sole GPU benchmark available is Geekbench OpenCL, returning a score of 58,239. This places the A570M in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival comparisons are illuminating. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, a delta of -0.3 percent against the A570M. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, with a delta of +0.3 percent. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 at -0.5 percent, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 at -0.7 percent. The data shows the A570M sits within a single percentage point of these four competitors, indicating benchmark parity with a broad range of discrete GPUs despite the massive differences in power envelopes and memory architectures.

For rendering, the OpenCL score reflects raw compute throughput. The A570M's position at the 88th percentile suggests it can handle demanding GPU-accelerated workloads, including 3D rendering engines that offload to OpenCL or DirectX compute paths. The combination of 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture sets and complex scenes, though the 128-bit bus imposes some latency penalty compared to wider-memory designs. The 16 ray tracing cores enable real-time ray tracing effects in supported titles, but the modest boost clock of 1300 MHz means sustained ray tracing performance will be limited by thermal and power constraints typical of laptop implementations.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark suite shows a processor with strong multi-core and single-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 18,316 multi-core and 2,038 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results are 2,713 multi-core and 215 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 26,350, single-thread of 3,901, integer math at 88,531, floating point math at 54,447, extended instructions at 22,400, and data compression at 315,906. The average benchmark score is 39,485, placing the CPU in the 87th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals show tight clustering. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS averages 39,603 with a delta of -0.3 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS averages 39,325 with a delta of +0.4 percent. The AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39,215 at +0.7 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D averages 39,768 at -0.7 percent. These deltas indicate the Ryzen AI 7 450 is statistically indistinguishable from these four processors in aggregate benchmark performance, despite the 9800X3D being a desktop-class part with a dedicated 3D V-Cache.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 sits at the 88th percentile. Combined with the CPU's 87th percentile, the pairing produces a combined percentile of 88. The interpretation is clear: this is a balanced high-end laptop configuration where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's multi-core scores suggest sustained productivity workloads will perform at a level comparable to recent desktop processors, while the GPU's compute score indicates it can accelerate rendering and compute tasks without creating a severe bottleneck.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316 positions the CPU for demanding multi-threaded applications. The single-core score of 2,038 ensures responsive single-threaded performance. The PassMark integer math score of 88,531 and floating point score of 54,447 further corroborate balanced arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 315,906 is notably high, suggesting efficient memory subsystem utilization and strong execution engine performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All frame rate figures discussed below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Based on the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 and its 88th percentile ranking, the Arc A570M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for high-quality textures at 1080p and 1440p, though ultra settings at 4K may exceed the memory pool in some titles. The 224 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-throughput rendering, but the 128-bit bus width may limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive games.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316 indicates strong game logic and physics processing capability. Single-thread performance of 2,038 in Cinebench R23 ensures that games relying heavily on a single main thread will not be severely CPU-limited. In CPU-bound scenarios, the Ryzen AI 7 450 should maintain high frame rates, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor in graphically intensive scenes.

For esports titles and lighter games, the combination should support high refresh rate gameplay at 1080p. For AAA games at ultra settings, players should expect stable frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range at 1080p, with lower performance at 1440p. The ray tracing cores enable RT effects, but the 1300 MHz boost clock suggests RT workloads will incur a significant performance penalty compared to rasterized rendering. The 16 RT cores are present, but their throughput is constrained by the overall compute rate of 5.325 TFLOPS FP32.

At 4K resolution, the A570M's 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth will likely become limiting factors. Estimated frame rates at 4K ultra would be substantially lower than 1080p, possibly below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The absence of measured data means these are estimates, but the synthetic scores provide a reasonable foundation for these expectations.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU percentiles are nearly identical: 87th for the CPU and 88th for the GPU. This parity suggests a well-balanced pairing for general workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload type.

In CPU-intensive tasks such as video encoding, software compilation, and multi-threaded productivity, the Ryzen AI 7 450 is the primary driver. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26,350 indicate that the CPU can handle substantial parallel workloads without the GPU becoming a limiting factor. The GPU's OpenCL score is irrelevant for these tasks, meaning the CPU's 87th percentile position defines the ceiling.

In GPU-intensive tasks such as 3D rendering, the Arc A570M becomes the bottleneck. Its 88th percentile position means it is slightly above the CPU in relative performance, but the absolute compute throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 will limit frame rates in graphically demanding games and rendering workloads. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,901 in PassMark) ensures it can feed the GPU without stalling, but the GPU's rasterization and compute rates will set the performance floor.

For gaming, the balance depends on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance of 2,038 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS and 224 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in GPU-bound scenes. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck, as the pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are finite resources that scale with resolution.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but informative. The GPU's nearest rival comparisons show the A570M within 0.7 percent of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL compute. In gaming, the RX 6950 XT is a high-end desktop card, but the A570M's lower boost clock and narrower memory bus will produce lower frame rates in practice. The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show parity with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, a desktop gaming flagship, but the mobile power envelope of 28 W TDP will limit sustained performance.

The practical bottleneck analysis: for productivity and compute workloads, the CPU's 87th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are so close that neither component will consistently dominate. For gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at resolutions above 1080p. For CPU-heavy tasks like data compression (315,906 PassMark score), the CPU is the sole determinant, and the GPU's role is minimal.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The processor is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz, within a TDP of 28 W. The socket is AMD FP8, and the memory interface supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. This L3 capacity is modest compared to some desktop parts, but the Zen 5 architecture's efficiency compensates. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 860M, which provides a fallback display output but is not the primary GPU in this pairing.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches above its mobile classification. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316 is competitive with desktop processors from the same era. The single-core score of 2,038 indicates excellent per-thread performance, with the 5.10 GHz boost clock driving responsiveness in lightly-threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,901 corroborates this strength.

For real workloads, the implications are direct. Software compilation will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggesting strong parallel compilation throughput. Video encoding and transcoding will leverage the multi-core capability, particularly in x264 or x265 encodes that scale across threads. Data compression score of 315,906 in PassMark indicates efficient memory access patterns and strong execution unit utilization. The floating point score of 54,447 supports scientific computing and financial modeling workloads that rely on double-precision arithmetic.

The nearest rival comparisons show the Ryzen AI 7 450 at -0.3 percent versus the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and +0.4 percent versus the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. These are established mobile processors, and the near-identical scores confirm that the Ryzen AI 7 450 is a worthy successor in the mobile performance segment. The comparison to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D (-0.7 percent) is notable: a desktop gaming processor with 3D V-Cache is only marginally ahead in aggregate benchmark performance, though the 9800X3D would outperform in gaming-specific workloads.

The 28 W TDP is a defining characteristic. This power envelope allows the processor to fit in thin-and-light laptops while delivering desktop-class multi-threaded performance. However, sustained workloads may trigger thermal throttling, and the 5.10 GHz boost clock is likely achievable only in short bursts. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is adequate for the 8-core design, though it may limit performance in memory-bound workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, with the CPU at the 87th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average benchmark score of 39,485, which is 0.7 percent lower than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's average score of 39,768.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A570M?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Ryzen AI 7 450 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the FP32 compute throughput of the Intel Arc A570M?

A: The GPU delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance, with FP16 rated at 10.65 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

Q: Which component is more likely to bottleneck in gaming at 1440p?

A: The GPU is the likely bottleneck at 1440p. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 2,038 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS and 224 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in graphically intensive scenes.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU pairing. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on synthetic benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU horsepower in a mobile form factor. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking, driven by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316, makes this suitable for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or process large datasets. The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score of 58,239 supports GPU-accelerated rendering and compute tasks, though users requiring sustained heavy GPU workloads may find the 75 W TDP limiting.

Gamers at 1080p will find this configuration capable of high-quality gaming, with the 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth handling modern titles at high settings. The 16 ray tracing cores enable RT effects, but the 1300 MHz boost clock means performance will be moderate. Gamers at 1440p should expect playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU's compute throughput will struggle with ultra settings in AAA games.

Software developers will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 88,531 supporting rapid compilation. The single-thread performance of 3,901 in PassMark ensures fast interactive development. Students and small business users handling office workloads will find the CPU's efficiency and the GPU's compute capability more than sufficient, though the 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP indicate a power-conscious design.

The 4 nm CPU and 6 nm GPU process nodes contribute to a thermally efficient system. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X, which is adequate for most productivity tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is appropriate for 1080p gaming and moderate 3D rendering, but users working with 4K textures or large AI models may require more memory.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 mobile processor with the Intel Arc A570M discrete GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 part with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture discrete card with a 75 W TDP. The overall tier is high, with a combined percentile of 88.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 39,485 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This is a near-perfect balance of compute capability. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, is only 0.7 percent ahead in aggregate benchmark score, indicating that this mobile processor rivals a desktop flagship. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, is only 0.3 percent ahead in OpenCL compute, though the desktop card's higher power envelope would yield better sustained performance.

The pairing is suited for a premium laptop chassis that can dissipate the combined 103 W of CPU and GPU TDP. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 1300 MHz boost clock indicate a system designed for burst performance, not sustained heavy loads. The memory configuration of 8 GB GDDR6 with 224 GB/s bandwidth for the GPU and dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s for the CPU provides adequate bandwidth for the respective workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 2,038 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance enable high frame rates at 1080p in esports and lighter titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth support high texture quality, though the 1300 MHz boost clock may limit sustained high-refresh performance in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316, can handle x264 encoding while gaming. The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance also support hardware-accelerated encoding and streaming workloads, reducing the CPU load.

Video editing: The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,350 and data compression score of 315,906 indicate strong video editing performance. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 accelerates effects rendering and timeline scrubbing. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, though 4K projects may benefit from more memory.

3D rendering: The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 RT cores support GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that leverage OpenCL or DirectX compute. The CPU's 18,316 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures CPU-based rendering engines have adequate processing power. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 88,531 and single-thread score of 3,901 support rapid code compilation and responsive IDE interaction. The 16 threads handle parallel builds effectively, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces cache-miss penalties during compilation.

Student and office work: The CPU's 28 W TDP and the system's overall efficiency make this suitable for all-day portable use. The Radeon 860M integrated graphics provides a fallback display output with reduced power consumption. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,901 ensures snappy office application performance, while the GPU's compute capability handles occasional rendering or data visualization tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds