SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 445

26,936 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop-class pairing built around the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 processor and the Intel Arc A370M graphics solution. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component rather than direct frame-rate captures. The data shows the CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, and their combined configuration ranks in the 77th percentile overall.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK provides no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing, the following FPS expectations are estimates built from the benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The Intel Arc A370M delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, placing it just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH in average benchmark score and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470. These results indicate a GPU that can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most modern titles, though the 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest playable frame rates in esports and lighter titles, but demanding AAA games will likely require lowered settings. The 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs provide enough throughput for consistent 30-60 FPS in many games at 1080p medium, yet the 8 RT cores offer only entry-level ray tracing capability. Moving to 1440p, the data implies a significant drop-off; the narrow 64-bit memory bus becomes the limiting factor, and ultra settings would likely produce sub-30 FPS in graphically intensive releases. At 4K, this pairing is not viable for gaming beyond very old or pixel-art games, as the memory bandwidth and compute capacity fall far short of what modern titles demand.

The CPU side supports this gaming profile well. The Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 1806 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is strong for a mobile part, and its 4.60 GHz boost clock ensures the GPU is not starved of draw calls. In CPU-bound scenarios like large multiplayer battles or simulation games, the 6-core/12-thread configuration with Zen 5 architecture provides ample headroom. The overall picture is a laptop that can serve as a competent 1080p gaming machine with settings adjustments, but it is not built for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming; the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and the absence of any measured FPS data reinforce the need for conservative expectations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 26936, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1370P, scores 26900, a delta of just 0.1%, meaning the Ryzen AI 7 445 is statistically tied with that part. The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U trails at 26849 (0.3% behind), while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G leads at 27051 (0.4% ahead). The Intel Core i9-9900K, a desktop part, sits 0.6% above at 27097. This clustering shows the Ryzen AI 7 445 is right at the top of its mobile performance class, matching or slightly beating several desktop CPUs from previous generations.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 10590 combined with the single-core score of 1806 reveals a balanced design. The Passmark multi-thread score of 18115 and single-thread score of 3591 reinforce this, showing the chip can handle both heavily threaded workloads and latency-sensitive tasks. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 places it at the 74th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29197, a negligible 0.1% difference, and the AMD FirePro W8000 matches at 29211. The AMD Radeon RX 470 is only 0.6% behind at 28996, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, a far more powerful part, scores 28874, which is 1% below — a reminder that benchmark averages can obscure real-world tier differences.

The combined percentile of 77 indicates that this pairing sits above the majority of laptop configurations in the database. The CPU's performance is the stronger pillar; it outclasses its direct rivals by small margins and provides a solid foundation. The GPU, while respectable, is the weaker link in the pairing. The data suggests that in CPU-bound tasks, this laptop will perform near the top of its class, while in GPU-bound workloads, it will land in the upper-middle tier.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process node, with the codename Gorgon Point and the Ryzen AI 400 generation designation. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. This is a modest L3 amount for a modern CPU, but the high boost clock helps compensate in single-threaded tasks.

The CPU's TDP is 28 W, which is typical for a mobile part, and it supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and points toward workstation or small-business use cases. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a backup display option, though the discrete Arc A370M handles gaming duties.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1806 is high for a 28 W part, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3591 confirms excellent per-core performance. This translates to snappy application launches, responsive spreadsheets, and smooth web browsing. The multicore scores — 10590 in Cinebench R23 and 18115 in Passmark multi-thread — are solid for 6 cores, but they trail the scores of higher-core-count rivals. The Passmark data compression score of 215812 and integer math score of 58332 indicate strong number-crunching ability, while the floating-point math score of 39362 shows competent scientific workloads. The encryption score of 10519 and extended instructions score of 15826 are adequate for security-focused tasks.

The 79th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms roughly four out of five CPUs in the database, which is impressive for a mobile chip. The near-tie with the Intel Core i9-9900K, a desktop part from a higher power envelope, speaks to the efficiency of Zen 5. For real workloads, this means a laptop with this CPU can handle compile times, video encoding, and multitasking without bottlenecking, provided the GPU is not the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute cannot sustain high-refresh (144 Hz or above) gaming at 1080p in modern titles. The A370M is 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in average benchmark score, but that delta is misleading; the RX 6800M is a high-end part, and the A370M's 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus severely limit frame rates in demanding games. Esports titles at 1080p low settings could approach 144 FPS, but the data does not support consistent high-refresh performance in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a 18115 Passmark multi-thread score, can handle software encoding at 1080p while gaming, though the GPU's limited headroom means game performance will suffer. The 28 W TDP keeps thermals manageable, and the 215812 data compression score suggests efficient encoding workflows. However, the lack of a dedicated encoder on the A370M means the CPU must do all the heavy lifting, which will impact frame rates.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10590 and Passmark integer math score of 58332 indicate this CPU can handle 1080p video editing timelines with ease, including color grading and effects. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are adequate for 1080p proxy editing but will struggle with 4K timelines or heavy GPU-accelerated effects. Export times will be CPU-bound, and the 79th percentile CPU ranking means exports will be faster than most laptops.

3D rendering: The CPU's 10590 Cinebench R23 multicore score places it near the Intel Core i7-1370P, which is a capable rendering chip. For CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software, this laptop will deliver solid results. GPU-based rendering is limited by the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, which are insufficient for complex scenes. The 157 mm² die size and 7,200 million transistors on the GPU hint at its modest compute capacity.

Software development: The CPU's single-core score of 3591 in Passmark and 1806 in Cinebench R23 means fast compilation of small-to-medium projects. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 4 MB L3 cache, while small, does not significantly hamper typical developer workloads. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large codebases in memory. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong choice for a developer laptop.

Student and office work: The 28 W TDP and 2.00 GHz base clock ensure long battery life, while the 79th percentile CPU ranking delivers snappy productivity. Spreadsheets, word processing, and web apps will run without any perceptible lag. The integrated Radeon 840M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for power savings. The 4 MB L3 cache is sufficient for office multitasking, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive work.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc A370M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute means ray tracing performance will be modest, and settings will need to be lowered for playable frame rates.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process node, with the codename Gorgon Point. This is part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-1370P?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 445 has an average benchmark score of 26936, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-1370P's 26900. This makes them statistically equivalent in overall performance, though the AMD chip does so at a 28 W TDP.

Q: What memory does this laptop pairing support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported, which is a feature not found on all mobile chips.

Q: Is the GPU considered high-end?

A: No. The Intel Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in this specific metric, but it is a 35 W entry-level mobile part with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Can this laptop handle 4K gaming?

A: The data suggests not. The GPU has only 4 GB of VRAM on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate is insufficient for 4K rendering in modern games. Even at 1440p, ultra settings would likely produce sub-30 FPS in demanding titles.

Q: What is the CPU's release date?

A: The CPU's release date is listed as January 4, 2026, and its production status is Active. The GPU, in contrast, was released on March 29, 2022, and is now End-of-life.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits gamers who primarily play at 1080p and are willing to adjust settings from ultra to medium or high for demanding titles. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM mean that esports and older games will run well, but the latest AAA releases will require compromises. Content creators working with 1080p video or CPU-based rendering will find the 79th percentile CPU performance more than adequate, though GPU-accelerated workloads will be limited. Developers compiling code and running virtual machines will benefit from the 12 threads and 18115 Passmark multi-thread score, while the 28 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool. Students and office workers who need a responsive machine for productivity tasks, web browsing, and document work will find the single-core performance of 3591 in Passmark more than sufficient. Small business workstations that value the ECC memory support and the CPU's reliability features will also find this a sensible fit, provided their workloads do not demand high-end GPU compute.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an unbalanced pairing where the CPU outclasses the GPU. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, and the combined percentile is 77. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor; the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will cap frame rates well before the CPU's 4.60 GHz boost clock becomes a constraint. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1806 ensures that draw calls and game logic are processed quickly, but the GPU cannot translate that into high frame rates at ultra settings. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, video encoding, or data processing, the GPU is nearly irrelevant, and the CPU's 10590 Cinebench R23 multicore score becomes the primary performance driver. The FPS scaling from 1080p to higher resolutions will show steep drops because the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel rate are fixed constraints; lowering resolution does not increase the GPU's compute capacity. The 28 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP also indicate a thermal balance, but the performance ceiling is firmly set by the GPU in graphics workloads and by the 6-core CPU in heavily threaded tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 mobile processor with the Intel Arc A370M mobile graphics chip. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 5 part on a 4 nm process, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture chip with 1024 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 77 places this build above the majority of laptop configurations in the database, with the CPU being the stronger component. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26936 puts it at the 79th percentile, and the GPU's 29175 average score puts it at the 74th percentile. This is a mid-to-upper-tier laptop pairing for productivity and light gaming, not a high-end gaming or workstation machine. The CPU's near-tie with the Intel Core i7-1370P and its 0.4% deficit to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G show it is competitive with mainstream desktop chips from previous generations, while the GPU's 1% lead over the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in average score is a statistical artifact that does not reflect real-world gaming tiers.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, so any memory upgrade must respect the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth limit and the motherboard's soldered or slot-based design. The CPU's PCIe support is Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), which is sufficient for the Arc A370M's PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W and no suggested PSU is listed, but in a laptop, power delivery is fixed by the system design; there is no practical user upgrade for the GPU in this class. The CPU's TDP is 28 W, and its 4 nm process ensures efficient power draw, so the platform's thermal headroom is modest. A sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be increasing system memory if the design allows it, as the CPU's dual-channel support and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth can benefit from higher-capacity modules. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe drives, which would improve load times and system responsiveness. There is no CPU upgrade path on Socket FP8 as it is a mobile platform, and the GPU is end-of-life (production status for the A370M is listed as End-of-life), so users should view this as a fixed configuration. The platform's strengths — ECC memory support, 28 W TDP, and 79th percentile CPU — make it a reliable workhorse, but the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage rather than CPU or GPU swaps.