SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

34,222 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Arc A570M form a mobile pairing that targets the upper mid-range of laptop performance. The processor, built on the Zen 5 architecture, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput, while the discrete GPU provides dedicated graphics capability that places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This combination is designed for users who need more than integrated graphics but do not require top-tier enthusiast hardware, and the benchmark data confirms a balanced system with distinct strengths in both CPU-heavy and GPU-accelerated workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-256 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, though it may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions. The memory subsystem is complemented by 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, which produce a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 10.65 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, which positions the card for efficient handling of modern game engines and lighter compute tasks. The GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the overall RT throughput is modest compared to higher-tier cards. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future game APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s data transfer needs, and the display outputs are described as portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integration. The TDP is rated at 75 W, which is typical for a discrete mobile GPU of this class.

The only benchmark score available for the Arc A570M is a Geekbench OpenCL result of 58239. This score places the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of integrated and entry-level discrete solutions. Comparing to its nearest rivals, the data shows a delta of -0.3% against the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, +0.3% against the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, -0.5% against the NVIDIA P102-100, and -0.7% against the AMD Radeon PRO V710. These deltas are all within a narrow band of roughly ±0.7%, meaning the Arc A570M performs essentially on par with these desktop-class cards in OpenCL compute tasks, despite being a mobile part. For rendering workloads, this suggests the GPU can handle 3D rendering and GPU-accelerated effects in applications that leverage OpenCL, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large scene sizes or high-resolution texture sets.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2477 in multicore and 294 in singlecore. The Cinebench R23 results are 16014.5 in multicore and 1958 in singlecore. Geekbench scores are 11676 in multicore and 2164 in singlecore. PassMark tests reveal a broad range of capabilities: data compression at 304089, data encryption at 15244, extended instructions at 21678, find prime numbers at 80, floating point math at 53230, integer math at 85651, multithread at 24935, physics at 1349, random string sorting at 33266, and single thread at 3834. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 34222, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 86, which reflects a system that is consistently above average across both processing and graphics workloads. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 4244P with an average score of 34220 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X at 34260 (-0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34333 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H at 34083 (+0.4%). These deltas are minimal, meaning the Ryzen AI 7 350 performs almost identically to these desktop and mobile chips in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a 28 W mobile part. This is a significant finding: the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture allows it to match older desktop processors in raw throughput.

The combined picture is one of a well-rounded mobile platform. The CPU is strong enough for demanding productivity tasks, and the GPU provides dedicated graphics that are competitive with desktop cards from the previous generation. The data suggests that this pairing is suitable for users who need a single machine for both CPU-intensive work like compiling code or video encoding, and GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering or moderate gaming. The percentile positions — 84 for CPU, 88 for GPU, and 86 combined — indicate that neither component is drastically weaker than the other, which is a good sign for overall system balance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Krackan Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 28 W, which is typical for a mobile processor designed for thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 shared cache. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and it integrates a Radeon 860M GPU. It is not multiplier unlocked, and it does not support ECC memory.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16014.5 is particularly telling. This is a high score for a 28 W mobile chip, and it places the processor in the same performance class as desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which has a much higher power envelope. The single-core score of 1958 in Cinebench R23 and 2164 in Geekbench single-core indicate strong per-thread performance, which is important for applications that are not well-optimized for multi-threading. The PassMark multithread score of 24935 and the integer math score of 85651 suggest that the CPU handles integer-heavy workloads like code compilation and database operations efficiently. The floating point math score of 53230 is also robust, which benefits scientific computing and financial modeling.

The data compression score of 304089 is exceptionally high, indicating that the CPU excels in file archiving and data transfer tasks. The encryption score of 15244 shows solid AES performance for disk encryption and VPN traffic. The physics score of 1349 is moderate, which may reflect the thermal or power constraints of the mobile form factor during sustained physics simulations. For real workloads, this CPU is well-suited for software development, where compile times benefit from the 16 threads and the high integer performance. It is also capable of handling video editing timelines, especially with the integrated Radeon 860M providing a fallback for GPU acceleration. The 8 MB of L3 cache is modest by desktop standards, but it is sufficient for the 8-core configuration, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is appropriate for the dual-channel setup.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

The data indicates that this pairing is ideal for mobile professionals and students who require a laptop that can handle a variety of tasks without compromising on performance. Gamers targeting 1080p resolution will find the Arc A570M capable of delivering playable frame rates in most titles, especially given its 88th percentile ranking. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth gameplay. Users who play at 1440p may need to lower settings, but the GPU’s raw compute power is there, as evidenced by its parity with desktop cards like the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL.

Content creators, particularly those working in video editing and 3D rendering, will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16014.5 and the PassMark multithread score of 24935 indicate that rendering timelines and exporting videos will be reasonably fast. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 suggests that GPU-accelerated effects in editors like DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere Pro will be handled well. Software developers will appreciate the 8 cores and 16 threads for faster build times, and the high data compression score of 304089 is useful for version control operations and packaging. For students, the laptop class form factor combined with the 28 W CPU TDP means good battery life for day-to-day tasks, while still having the horsepower for engineering software or data analysis. Small business workstations that need to run virtual machines or handle large spreadsheets will also find this pairing adequate, as the CPU’s percentile of 84 places it above most mainstream options.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen AI 7 350 and the Arc A570M is generally good, but the data reveals which component will be the bottleneck in specific scenarios. The CPU’s percentile of 84 and the GPU’s percentile of 88 are close, suggesting that neither is severely mismatched. In CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, data compression, or physics simulations, the processor is the primary driver, and its performance is comparable to desktop chips like the Ryzen 7 3700X. The GPU is less relevant in these tasks, and the CPU’s 16 threads will be the limiting factor only if the workload is not parallelized well.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high detail settings, the Arc A570M becomes the limiting component. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 is competitive, but its 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, especially in games with heavy texture streaming or ray tracing effects. The 16 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the overall FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS is not enough to drive high frame rates at 1440p in demanding titles. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most cases, as its single-core performance is strong enough to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations.

The FPS scaling between the two components is not measurable from the data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, one can estimate that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in games with heavy graphics load, while at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU’s performance will become more relevant. For productivity workloads that use both CPU and GPU, such as video rendering with GPU acceleration, the balance is more even, and the system should scale well with increased workload complexity. The combined percentile of 86 indicates that the system is well-matched overall, with no single component dragging down the other by a significant margin.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is mounted on the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, and the memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The TDP of the CPU is 28 W, and the GPU TDP is 75 W, so the total power draw for these components is approximately 103 W, which is well within the range of a typical laptop power adapter. There is no suggested PSU listed for the GPU, but given the mobile class, the system is designed to be powered by an external brick rather than a desktop PSU.

Because this is a laptop build class, the upgrade path is limited. The primary upgrade would be to increase the amount of RAM, provided the laptop has accessible SO-DIMM slots, or to upgrade the storage to a faster NVMe drive, which is supported by the PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU is not upgradeable, and the CPU is fixed. For users looking for more performance, the next sensible upgrade would be to a higher-tier laptop with a more powerful GPU, such as one with more VRAM or higher TFLOPS, or a CPU with more cores. However, within this platform, the data shows that the combination is already well-balanced, and the most impactful upgrade would be to ensure the system has enough RAM (e.g., 32 GB or more) to support the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities in memory-intensive tasks like video editing or running multiple virtual machines.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the Arc A570M’s 88th percentile ranking and OpenCL score of 58239 suggest it can handle esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant at high frame rates, though the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance may limit frame rates in more demanding AAA games. Streaming while gaming is feasible, as the CPU’s 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16014.5 provide ample headroom for encoding, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM ensures that the game itself does not run out of memory. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 24935 for timeline scrubbing and export, and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 accelerates effects and transitions. 3D rendering in Blender or similar software will utilize both components: the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads handle geometry and physics, while the GPU’s 2048 shading units and 5.325 TFLOPS provide OpenCL-based render acceleration. Software development is a strong suit for this CPU, with the high integer math score of 85651 and data compression score of 304089 speeding up compilation and package management. For student and office work, the 28 W TDP and integrated Radeon 860M mean that the discrete GPU can be disabled for battery savings, and the CPU’s single-core score of 2164 in Geekbench is more than adequate for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34222.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to its nearest rival in OpenCL performance?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, indicating near-parity with these desktop cards.

Q: What is the total TDP for the CPU and GPU combined?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, for a combined total of 103 W.

Q: What memory types does the Ryzen AI 7 350 support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the Arc A570M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 350 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Arc A570M. The data for measured FPS at ultra settings is absent, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and OpenCL score of 58239, which is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, suggest that the card can handle 1080p gaming with high settings in most titles. For esports games that are not GPU-intensive, frame rates could exceed 100 FPS, driven by the CPU’s strong single-core performance of 2164 in Geekbench. For AAA games with demanding graphics, frame rates at 1080p ultra would likely average in the 40-60 FPS range, depending on the title’s optimization. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting, and users would need to lower settings to medium or high to maintain playable frame rates. These figures are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by game and laptop cooling solution.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, an 8-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A570M discrete GPU. The CPU is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 86. This places the system in the upper mid-range tier of laptop performance. The pairing is well-balanced, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded throughput for productivity tasks and the GPU delivering dedicated graphics performance that rivals desktop cards from the previous generation. The system is suitable for users who need a versatile laptop for gaming at 1080p, content creation, software development, and general office work. The 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP indicate a power-efficient design that should allow for reasonable battery life, while still delivering the performance needed for demanding applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds