SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

34,222 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Intel Arc A550M

This laptop-class pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 5-based Ryzen AI 7 350 processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU, landing at the 85th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU holds the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. The data shows a balanced mid-high tier mobile platform, though no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only platform, meaning the CPU is soldered and not user-upgradeable in the traditional sense. The platform supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel interface, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is sufficient for feeding the 8-core processor's workloads, though it falls well short of what the discrete GPU can access through its own dedicated memory.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the processor itself. This is the same PCIe generation used by the Intel Arc A550M GPU, which connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The matching PCIe generations mean no bandwidth bottleneck at the interface level between the CPU and GPU. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics offer a fallback display output should the discrete GPU encounter driver issues, though the Arc A550M is clearly the primary rendering solution.

The GPU's 60 W TDP is modest for a discrete mobile graphics card, and the CPU's 28 W TDP keeps the total package within reach of typical laptop power delivery systems. The absence of a suggested PSU rating reflects the mobile nature of this build — end users are not selecting power supplies. The practical upgrade path is limited: the FP8 socket ties the user to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, and the Arc A550M is an end-of-life product. A sensible next upgrade would involve a complete platform change rather than incremental component swaps. For users seeking more graphics headroom, the data shows the GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 2.6% higher average score, indicating headroom exists in the desktop segment, but that would require abandoning the laptop form factor entirely.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined 85th percentile ranking suggests the CPU and GPU are reasonably well matched, but the individual percentile positions reveal which component carries the heavier load. The GPU's 86th percentile sits two points above the CPU's 84th percentile, indicating the processor is the marginal limiting factor in most workloads. However, the delta is small — just two percentile points — so neither component dramatically starves the other.

Looking at the nearest rival data, the CPU's average benchmark score of 34222 places it within 0.4% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 4244P (0% delta). This tight clustering means the Ryzen AI 7 350 is firmly in a performance tier where small architectural differences, not core counts, separate competitors. The GPU's average score of 49737 sits 0.4% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 2.6% above the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — a wide spread that shows the Arc A550M punching above what its 8 GB memory size might suggest.

For gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread performance of 1958 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2164 in Geekbench single-core indicates adequate headroom for most game engines, which typically rely on one to four threads. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become the primary constraint at higher resolutions and detail settings. In CPU-heavy titles like real-time strategy or simulation games, the processor's multi-thread score of 16014.5 in Cinebench R23 will matter more. The data suggests a balanced pairing where the bottleneck shifts depending on workload type rather than one component dominating all scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU ranking and FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS indicate capability for 1080p high-refresh gaming in esports titles, though the 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture-heavy AAA games at higher settings. The CPU's single-core scores are sufficient to keep frame pacing consistent.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide a solid foundation for encoding and gaming simultaneously, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 24935. The 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance on the GPU suggests it can also offload some compute tasks, though no dedicated encoder hardware is specified in the data.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 11676 and Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 16014.5 indicate strong performance for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units accelerate effects and color grading, though 8 GB VRAM may require proxy workflows for 4K projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide capable real-time viewport performance, while the CPU's 16 threads handle CPU-based rendering. The PassMark floating-point math score of 53230 shows good computational throughput for physics simulations and ray tracing calculations on the CPU side.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 85651 and data compression score of 304089 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and database workloads. The 16 threads allow parallel builds to complete efficiently, and the 84th CPU percentile places this comfortably above typical developer laptops.

Student and office work: The 28 W TDP CPU and 60 W GPU keep power consumption moderate for a laptop, and the CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3834 handles everyday productivity with ease. The integrated Radeon 860M provides a low-power graphics option for extended battery work, while the discrete GPU remains available for heavier tasks.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a laptop buyer needing a single system that covers both productivity and gaming without excelling at either extreme. The 84th CPU percentile and 86th GPU percentile place this configuration in the upper-mid tier, suitable for gamers playing at 1080p with high settings in most titles, as indicated by the GPU's benchmark position near the RTX 5070 Ti (-0.4% delta). Content creators working with 1080p or moderate 4K video will find the 16 threads and 8 GB VRAM adequate, though the 8 GB memory size is a clear ceiling for large 3D scenes.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's strong integer and compression scores, making this a viable workstation for code compilation and data processing. Students and office workers gain from the efficient 28 W CPU TDP, which enables longer battery life during lectures or meetings, while the discrete GPU handles occasional gaming or creative workloads. Small business workstations requiring multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets, databases, or light rendering will find the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 24935 sufficient. The laptop class designation means this is not a desktop replacement for extreme workloads; users needing sustained all-core rendering or 4K gaming at maximum settings should look at higher-tier configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16014.5 and single-core score of 1958, placing it at the 84th percentile among all processors. Its Geekbench results show 11676 multi-core and 2164 single-core. The average benchmark score of 34222 places it in a tight pack with the AMD EPYC 4244P (34220, 0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260, -0.1% delta), while slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (34083, 0.4% delta). The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 24935, single-thread of 3834, and strong auxiliary results including 304089 in data compression, 85651 in integer math, and 53230 in floating-point math.

The GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580, with an average benchmark score of 49737 at the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (-0.4% delta), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 (-0.5% delta). The GPU sits 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). Combined, this pairing ranks at the 85th percentile, indicating the whole is slightly less than the sum of its parts — the CPU and GPU individually sit at 84th and 86th percentiles respectively, so neither fully compensates for the other's limitations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture at 6 nm, manufactured by TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory runs across a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Pixel throughput reaches 131.2 GPixel/s, and texture throughput hits 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern game APIs. The 60 W TDP is remarkably low for the performance level indicated by the 86th percentile ranking, which suggests excellent efficiency relative to desktop rivals like the RX 6800 XT.

The benchmark scores show the GPU performing within 0.5% of the RTX 5070 Ti in average score, a desktop card that draws significantly more power. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint — 128-bit bus width limits the memory bandwidth compared to wider-bus competitors, and 8 GB capacity may cause texture swapping in large scenes. The RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 figure indicates rasterization remains the GPU's strength. The end-of-life production status suggests this GPU is at the tail end of its lifecycle, though its benchmark position keeps it competitive.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% lower average score) suggest strong 1080p performance in most titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1958 and Geekbench single-core of 2164 indicate it can feed the GPU adequately in frame-rate-limited scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, estimated performance places this pairing in the 60-100 FPS range for AAA titles based on the GPU's compute throughput and the CPU's single-thread capability, though the 8 GB VRAM may reduce texture quality settings in memory-heavy games. Esports titles at 1080p should exceed 144 FPS given the GPU's 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate and the CPU's strong single-thread performance. At 1440p, the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity become limiting factors, with estimated frame rates dropping into the 40-70 FPS range for demanding titles. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking ensures it is not the bottleneck at these resolutions. These estimates should be treated as rough guidance — actual performance depends heavily on game optimization, driver maturity, and laptop cooling solutions.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 use?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform socket. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in the traditional desktop sense.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 350 supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with a total bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and type?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M's average benchmark score of 49737 is 0.4% lower than the RTX 5070 Ti's 49957, placing the two cards in a near-identical performance tier despite the Arc's lower 60 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI 7 350 includes the Radeon 860M integrated GPU, which can serve as a low-power display output when the discrete Arc A550M is not needed.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The CPU+GPU combination ranks at the 85th percentile among all build combinations in the database, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and GPU at the 86th percentile individually.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the Intel Arc A550M is marked as end-of-life, meaning Intel has ceased production of this GPU. The CPU remains in active production.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Krackan Point codename, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 195 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, within a 28 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16014.5 and single-core score of 1958, with Geekbench scores of 11676 multi-core and 2164 single-core. The PassMark suite yields a multi-thread score of 24935 and single-thread score of 3834. The 84th percentile ranking places it alongside desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (-0.1% delta) and the AMD EPYC 4244P (0% delta), which is remarkable for a mobile chip at just 28 W TDP. The data compression score of 304089 and integer math score of 85651 indicate strong throughput for data-intensive workloads, while the floating-point score of 53230 supports scientific and rendering tasks.

The architecture combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, as indicated by the generation field "Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)," which allows the processor to balance performance and efficiency depending on workload demands. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is high for a 28 W part, suggesting effective thermal management is required to sustain peak performance. The L3 cache of 8 MB is modest by desktop standards but adequate for the mobile segment, and the lack of ECC memory support positions this as a consumer rather than workstation processor. The Radeon 860M integrated GPU provides a functional fallback for basic graphics tasks without activating the discrete GPU.

Build Overview

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop-class configuration aimed at users who need a single mobile system for both productivity and gaming. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 86th percentile, and their combination achieves the 85th percentile overall. This tight clustering indicates a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a 5.00 GHz boost clock handles multi-threaded workloads effectively, as shown by the 16014.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB GDDR6 memory provide solid 1080p gaming capability.

The 28 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP keep total power consumption moderate for a laptop, enabling thinner chassis designs and reasonable battery life. The 4 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process both come from TSMC, indicating mature manufacturing. The Arc A550M's end-of-life status is a consideration for long-term support, though its benchmark position near the RTX 5070 Ti (-0.4% delta) shows it remains competitive. This build targets the upper-mid tier of mobile computing, suitable for gamers at 1080p, content creators working with moderate-resolution media, developers compiling code, and students needing a versatile machine. It is not designed for extreme 4K gaming or professional-grade rendering, where the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus would become limiting factors.