SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

34,222 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific tier of mobile computing, targeting thin-and-light laptops where a balance of CPU throughput and discrete-level graphics is needed. The data shows a system that sits at the 77th percentile overall, indicating a configuration that outperforms the majority of existing laptop hardware. The CPU is the clear performance leader in this pairing, while the GPU provides entry-level discrete graphics capabilities that significantly outpace typical integrated solutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Krackan Point codename, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor operates within a 28 W TDP envelope, making it a highly efficient part for mobile use. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration, combined with a 195 mm² die size, positions it as a mainstream mobile processor designed for sustained productivity.

Benchmark results for the CPU are robust. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 16014.5 points in multi-core and 1958 points in single-core tests. This multi-core score places it in a competitive position among its nearest rivals. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13450HX, which scores an average of 34333, the Ryzen AI 7 350 is only 0.3% behind. Against the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, which scores 34083, the Ryzen AI 7 350 is 0.4% ahead. The data indicates near-identical performance with the AMD EPYC 4244P, as the deltaPct is 0. These results show that the Ryzen AI 7 350 delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 28 W mobile package, making it suitable for demanding workloads like video editing and 3D rendering on the go.

Single-core performance is equally strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2164. This translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark single-thread score of 3834 further confirms this. The processor's ability to hit a 5.00 GHz boost clock is a key factor in these results. For real-world workloads, this means the CPU can handle complex compilation tasks, large spreadsheet calculations, and 3D modeling without significant slowdowns, all while maintaining the thermal profile expected of a modern ultraportable.

The Ryzen AI 7 350 achieves an 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, which is a strong indicator of its overall capability. Its average benchmark score of 34222 is almost identical to that of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, a previous-generation desktop processor, with a deltaPct of -0.1%. This comparison highlights the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture, as it delivers similar throughput to a desktop part while consuming a fraction of the power. The data suggests that for CPU-heavy tasks, this processor will not be the limiting factor in most mobile workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination; the `dataIsMeasured` field is false, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` object is empty. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than empirical results. The Intel Arc A350M's performance is gauged by its Geekbench scores of 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, which place it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs.

Based on these scores, the Arc A350M is positioned as an entry-level discrete GPU. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, has an average score of 24744, making the Arc A350M 0.4% slower. It is also 0.5% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, though this is a professional-grade part. The GPU is 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. These comparisons suggest that the Arc A350M will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most esports titles and older AAA games.

For modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM capacity and 64-bit memory bus will likely be the primary constraints. The 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may cause performance dips in texture-heavy scenes. The GPU's pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are respectable for its class. Users can expect that at 1080p with high settings, frame rates in demanding titles will hover around the 30-50 FPS range, while esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant could see 60-100+ FPS. At 1440p, the GPU would struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in AAA titles, making 1080p the practical resolution for gaming.

The FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS is reasonable for a 25 W GPU. It indicates that the Arc A350M can handle geometry and shader workloads that are typical of games released around its launch period. The presence of 6 RT cores means that ray tracing is technically supported, but the low shader throughput will make ray-traced effects very demanding. Gamers should disable ray tracing for a playable experience. Overall, the gaming experience will be that of a capable 1080p entry-level machine, not a high-end gaming rig.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is designed for the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no traditional upgrade path for the processor itself. Users cannot swap out the CPU for a more powerful part. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel interface, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The memory is also likely soldered or limited in upgradeability depending on the specific laptop design.

The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU. This is sufficient for a discrete GPU and a fast NVMe SSD. The Intel Arc A350M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is well-supported by the CPU's lanes. For storage, users can install PCIe 4.0 SSDs to take advantage of fast load times. The CPU's TDP is 28 W, and the GPU's TDP is 25 W. The `suggestedPsu` field is null, but given the low combined TDP of 53 W, a standard laptop power adapter of 65-100 W will provide ample headroom for the entire system.

Since the CPU and GPU are integrated into the motherboard, the only meaningful upgrade path is to increase the amount of system RAM and storage. Users should prioritize having at least 16 GB of memory for a smooth experience in modern applications and games. The next sensible upgrade for users of this platform is to move to a newer laptop with a more recent CPU and GPU generation. The platform's performance is locked at the time of purchase, so users should buy a configuration with the maximum RAM and storage they can afford from the start.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who need a laptop for a mix of productivity and light gaming. The build class is defined as "laptop," so it is intended for portable use. Given the CPU's strong multi-core performance and the GPU's entry-level capabilities, this system is best suited for students, office workers, and content creators who require portability without sacrificing CPU performance. The 84th percentile CPU rank means that tasks like compiling code, running virtual machines, or processing large datasets will be handled efficiently.

For gamers, this setup is for those who play at 1080p and are willing to adjust settings to medium or high. It is not for enthusiasts seeking high refresh rate gaming at maximum details. The GPU's 70th percentile rank indicates it is better than a majority of GPUs, but it is at the lower end of the discrete GPU market. This system is ideal for a small business workstation where applications like Excel, AutoCAD, or Photoshop are used, and occasional gaming is a secondary requirement.

Content creators who work with 1080p video will find the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads beneficial for rendering timelines. The GPU can assist with hardware encoding and decoding, though it is not a powerhouse for 3D rendering. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's speed for builds and the 16 threads for multi-tasking. The system is a solid choice for a developer who needs to run multiple containers or IDEs simultaneously. It is not a workstation for heavy 3D artists or data scientists training large models, as the GPU lacks the VRAM and compute power for those tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a target scenario. The Intel Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient to drive high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. While esports games may achieve higher frame rates, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit the experience in more demanding games, making a high-refresh monitor (144Hz+) underutilized in most scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. Its strong multi-core performance (16014.5 in Cinebench R23) can handle game encoding via x264 software encoding while maintaining playable frame rates in CPU-light games. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which can offload the work from the CPU. However, the GPU's performance in games is modest, so streaming modern AAA titles at high quality may require lower in-game settings to maintain a smooth stream.

Video Editing: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU is excellent for video editing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16014.5 suggests that 1080p timeline scrubbing and export will be smooth. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM may be a limitation for complex effects or 4K timelines, but for standard 1080p projects, this system is highly capable and efficient.

3D Rendering: This workload is dominated by the CPU. The Ryzen AI 7 350's 84th percentile ranking and high multi-core scores ensure that CPU-based rendering in software like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray will be quick. The GPU, with only 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, will be significantly slower for GPU-accelerated rendering. Users should utilize the CPU for rendering tasks to maximize throughput.

Software Development: The combination of 16 threads and high single-core performance (1958 in Cinebench R23) makes this an ideal development machine. Compilation times will be short, and the ability to run a database server, an IDE, and a web browser simultaneously without slowdowns is supported by the CPU's high Passmark multi-thread score of 24935.

Student and Office Work: This system excels in this scenario. The CPU's efficiency ensures long battery life, while the performance handles spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU is more than capable of accelerating the user interface and handling high-resolution displays. This is a versatile daily driver.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a high-end mobile processor. It ranks in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34222. This places it in direct competition with desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and the Intel Core i5-13450HX.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H in average benchmark score. This indicates that the two processors deliver essentially identical performance in most workloads.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level discrete GPU, ranking in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. It is roughly on par with an AMD Radeon RX 590. For gaming, you should expect playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in older titles, but modern AAA games will require lower settings due to the 4 GB VRAM and limited memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming in this system?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor for gaming. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 70th percentile ranking. The CPU can handle the game logic and physics, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of compute power will cap the frame rates and graphical settings.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, the low shader throughput means that enabling ray tracing will severely impact performance, and it is not recommended for a smooth gaming experience.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration. The maximum memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Can I upgrade the CPU in this laptop later?

A: No, the CPU is designed for the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket. The processor is soldered onto the motherboard, making it non-upgradeable. The system's performance is fixed at the time of purchase.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance is represented by a `combinedPercentile` of 77, indicating that this laptop outperforms 77% of all tested configurations. This is a strong result, driven primarily by the CPU's high ranking. The CPU's average benchmark score is 34222, which places it at the 84th percentile. In contrast, the GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile. The discrepancy in these percentiles highlights that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores of 16014.5 (multi-core) and 1958 (single-core) are indicative of a processor that can handle both parallel and single-threaded workloads effectively. The Geekbench scores of 11676 (multi-core) and 2164 (single-core) reinforce this assessment. The GPU's Geekbench scores of 24546 (OpenCL) and 24747 (Vulkan) show consistent performance across different graphics APIs. The combined picture is a system that excels at productivity and content creation tasks, with gaming being a secondary, less potent capability.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the CPU is statistically tied with the AMD EPYC 4244P, with a deltaPct of 0. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13450HX. It is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H. The GPU is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. It is 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. These figures suggest a well-balanced system where the CPU punches above its weight class, while the GPU provides a solid, though not exceptional, level of graphics performance.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system, defined by the `buildClass` field as "laptop." It pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, with the Intel Arc A350M, a mobile GPU with a 25 W TDP. The total power draw of the core components is low, making it suitable for thin-and-light chassis designs. The CPU is based on the Zen 5 architecture and is part of the "Krackan Point" family, while the GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the "Alchemist" family.

The overall tier of this system is upper-midrange, as indicated by the 77th combined percentile. The CPU is a high-tier part, ranking in the 84th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-tier part, ranking in the 70th percentile. This configuration is best described as a "productivity-first" laptop with gaming capabilities. It is not a gaming laptop by today's standards, but it offers significantly better graphics performance than a typical integrated GPU. The system is best suited for users who need a powerful CPU for work or creative tasks and want the flexibility to play games on the side.

The Intel Arc A350M is marked as "End-of-life" production status, while the CPU is "Active." This means the GPU is a legacy component, but its drivers and support are still maintained. The CPU, being newer (released in 2025-01-05), is a current-generation part. This pairing of a new CPU with a previous-generation GPU is common in laptops to hit a specific price and performance point. The data shows this is a competent combination, with the CPU providing long-term usability and the GPU offering a step up from integrated graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Arc A350M is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads. The CPU's 84th percentile rank is substantially higher than the GPU's 70th percentile rank. In gaming, the CPU provides the data and instructions for the GPU to render. Since the CPU is much faster relative to its peers than the GPU, it will often be waiting for the GPU to finish its work. This means that in CPU-bound games, the CPU will not be the limiting factor, but in GPU-bound games, the GPU will cap the frame rate well below what the CPU could support.

Evidence for this is the FPS scaling. While no direct FPS data exists, the theoretical performance gap is clear. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are the hard limits for graphical fidelity. Even if the CPU could deliver 200 FPS in a game, the GPU will likely cap out at a much lower number due to its shader count and memory constraints. For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU is the primary engine for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, and it is highly capable. The GPU can assist with some compute tasks, but its lower compute power makes it a secondary contributor.

The bottleneck is situational. In a video editing workflow, the CPU handles the timeline and effects processing, while the GPU handles preview rendering and encoding. Here, the CPU is the main driver, and the GPU is sufficient. In gaming, the GPU is the clear limit. Users can expect that lower resolutions and graphical settings will reduce the GPU load, allowing the CPU to push higher frame rates. However, the 4 GB VRAM will become a hard limit at higher resolutions and texture quality settings, regardless of the CPU's power.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed "Alchemist." It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC and features 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. It is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a compact GPU with 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units.

The GPU's performance is measured by its Geekbench scores, with an OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747. Its average benchmark score is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is a much older desktop GPU. The Arc A350M offers 6 dedicated RT cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and is compliant with DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest. It can accelerate workloads in applications that support OpenCL or Vulkan, but it is not a primary rendering solution for professional 3D software. Its pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p gaming. The 4 GB VRAM is the most significant limitation for rendering; large textures or complex scenes will exceed this capacity, leading to stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU is best suited for light to medium graphics workloads, including casual gaming and hardware-accelerated video encoding, rather than intensive 3D rendering tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds