SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440

41,208 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A570M

This mobile build pairs a 6-core Zen 5 processor with a discrete Intel Arc graphics solution, landing in the 88th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 88th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a consistently high-performing laptop pairing with no major weak link between the two primary components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically from the Gorgon Point generation within the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.80 GHz, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 195 mm². The processor carries a 28 W TDP, positioning it as an efficient mobile part suitable for thin-and-light laptops while still delivering substantial compute throughput.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel interface, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, which is notable for workstation-adjacent tasks where data integrity matters.

Benchmark results show a PassMark multithread score of 21,054, which places this chip at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The single-thread score of 3,785 reflects strong per-core performance from the Zen 5 architecture. Integer math scores 65,991, while floating-point math reaches 42,934, indicating balanced arithmetic capability across both integer and floating workloads. The extended instructions score of 18,456 suggests robust SIMD processing, and the data compression score of 256,420 shows strong throughput for compression workloads. Encryption performance is notable at 12,418, and the random string sorting score of 27,252 indicates efficient memory-access patterns for sorting algorithms.

The average benchmark score of 41,208 places this processor in close competition with several rivals. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41,215, a delta of 0 percent, meaning the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is statistically tied with it. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41,263, with the AMD chip trailing by 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41,376, with a 0.4 percent deficit, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40,967, with the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 ahead by 0.6 percent. These tight margins indicate the processor competes directly with upper-mid-range desktop and mobile parts from the previous generation.

For real workloads, the multithread score of 21,054 suggests strong performance in parallel compilation tasks, batch photo processing, and multi-tab browser workflows. The single-thread score of 3,785 handles responsive application launches and smooth UI interactions. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for mainstream productivity while maintaining the low 28 W power envelope that enables sustained performance in compact chassis.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile discrete GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 5 Mobile tier. The DG2-256 chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with a transistor density of 42.8 million transistors per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz effective 14 Gbps.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. For ray tracing, there are 16 dedicated RT cores. The pixel rate reaches 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU's TDP is 75 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places this GPU at the 88th percentile among all graphics cards. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, with the Arc A570M trailing by 0.3 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, with the Arc A570M ahead by 0.3 percent. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528, with the Arc trailing by 0.5 percent. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, with the Arc trailing by 0.7 percent. This places the mobile Arc A570M in the same performance class as a high-end desktop GPU from the previous generation, which is remarkable given its 75 W power envelope.

For rendering workloads, the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles 3D modeling and GPU-accelerated effects in video editors. The 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games and rendering applications. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p workloads, while the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming. The 64 ROPs deliver 83.20 GPixel/s of fill rate, which handles high-resolution displays and multi-monitor setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU both sit at the 87th and 88th percentiles respectively, with a combined percentile of 88, indicating excellent balance between the two components. Neither component dramatically outclasses the other, which means bottlenecking should be minimal in most workloads. The CPU's multithread score of 21,054 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 are both competitive within their respective peer groups, suggesting that this pairing does not create a situation where one component idles while the other struggles.

For gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,785 is strong enough to feed the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of compute throughput. The GPU's 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate are well-matched to the CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth for feeding frame data. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 1,119 indicates adequate performance for game physics at mainstream settings. The CPU's data compression score of 256,420 suggests fast level loading and asset streaming, which reduces stutter when entering new game areas.

In compute-heavy scenarios like GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU becomes the primary throughput driver, and the CPU's role shifts to feeding geometry and draw calls. The CPU's floating-point score of 42,934 supports this workload, while the GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput accelerates AI-based upscaling and denoising in supported applications. The 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP create a combined thermal envelope that is manageable in a laptop chassis, allowing both components to sustain their boost clocks during extended sessions.

Memory bandwidth is a potential constraint in some mixed workloads, as the CPU's 89.6 GB/s and the GPU's 224.0 GB/s are separate pools. In tasks that require frequent data transfer between CPU and GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x8 connection provides adequate bandwidth, though not the full x16 width found in some desktop configurations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform with no user-upgradeable processor. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel interface, with ECC support for data-integrity-sensitive workloads. The 28 W TDP indicates the platform is designed for efficient operation, and the PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides modern connectivity for storage and peripherals.

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU with a 75 W TDP, and the suggested PSU field is not specified, which is typical for laptop components where the power delivery is integrated into the system. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is standard for mobile discrete graphics. Since both components are soldered or integrated into a laptop chassis, the upgrade path is limited to external peripherals and storage rather than internal component swaps.

For a sensible next upgrade, adding an external GPU enclosure would be impractical given the laptop form factor. Instead, users should focus on maximizing system RAM capacity and ensuring fast NVMe storage to complement the existing CPU and GPU performance. The CPU's support for LPDDR5X memory means that systems built around this processor will likely ship with high-bandwidth memory, which benefits both CPU and GPU workloads. The CPU's integrated Radeon 840M graphics provides a fallback for power-saving scenarios, allowing the discrete Arc GPU to be disabled for extended battery life.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput support high-refresh gaming at 1080p in competitive titles, while the CPU's 3,785 single-thread score ensures frame pacing remains stable. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern game assets at this resolution, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents texture streaming bottlenecks.

Streaming: The CPU's multithread score of 21,054 provides headroom for encoding while gaming, and the 12 threads handle the simultaneous load of game logic and streaming software. The data encryption score of 12,418 supports secure stream delivery, while the CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock maintains low encode latency.

Video editing: The GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput accelerates effects rendering and color grading, while the CPU's floating-point score of 42,934 handles timeline scrubbing and proxy generation. The 8 GB VRAM supports 4K timeline previews, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth moves video frames efficiently between GPU memory and the editing application.

3D rendering: The GPU's 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handle ray-traced previews and final renders, while the CPU's 6 cores contribute to scene preparation and physics simulation. The combined performance in the 88th percentile places this build above the vast majority of laptops for rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 65,991 accelerates code compilation, and the multithread score of 21,054 handles parallel build systems. The data compression score of 256,420 speeds up source archive extraction and dependency installation, while the single-thread score of 3,785 ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: The 28 W CPU TDP enables all-day battery life for note-taking and document editing, while the GPU remains idle for most office tasks. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, office suites, and communication apps without performance degradation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 and the CPU's PassMark scores provide a basis for estimating gaming performance, but actual frame rates will vary by title, driver version, and thermal conditions.

Based on the GPU's 88th percentile ranking among all graphics cards, this build should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p for most modern titles at high settings. The 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is comparable to desktop GPUs that handle 1080p high-refresh gaming well, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current-generation game textures. At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate support medium-to-high settings, though some demanding titles may require adjustments. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,785 ensures that CPU-bound scenes in esports titles maintain high frame rates, while the 6 cores handle modern game engines that use multiple threads for streaming and physics. For ray-traced games, the 16 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, though the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 base means ray tracing will be most viable at 1080p with upscaling enabled.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 achieves a PassMark single-thread score of 3,785 and a multithread score of 21,054, with an average benchmark score of 41,208. This places the CPU at the 87th percentile among all processors. The closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H with an average score of 41,215, showing a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41,263, representing a 0.1 percent advantage over the AMD chip. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41,376, a 0.4 percent advantage, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40,967, which the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 beats by 0.6 percent.

The Intel Arc A570M GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392, which leads by 0.3 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, trailing the Arc by 0.3 percent. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528, leading by 0.5 percent, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, leading by 0.7 percent.

Combined, these two components achieve an 88th percentile ranking among all CPU-GPU pairs, indicating that this build outperforms 88 percent of all recorded configurations in the database. The tight delta percentages against rivals show that this pairing is highly competitive within its class, with no single component dragging down overall performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, meaning this build outperforms 88 percent of all recorded CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has an average benchmark score of 41,208, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41,215, resulting in a 0 percent delta, meaning they are statistically tied.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it mean for laptop design?

A: The CPU has a 28 W TDP, which enables thin-and-light laptop designs with effective cooling solutions while still delivering competitive performance at the 87th percentile.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M has 16 dedicated RT cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games and applications.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel interface, with ECC memory support and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58,239 on Geekbench OpenCL, while the RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, showing the Arc trailing by only 0.3 percent despite being a mobile part.

Who Should Build It

This build targets mobile users who need desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1080p seeking high refresh rates will find the GPU's 88th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance sufficient for competitive titles. Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput and the CPU's 21,054 multithread score. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 65,991 and the 12 threads for parallel builds. Students and office workers will find the 28 W CPU TDP enables long battery life while the 87th percentile CPU ranking handles multitasking effortlessly. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support for data integrity will find the CPU's capability valuable, and the integrated Radeon 840M graphics provides a power-saving fallback for non-GPU tasks. The 88th combined percentile ensures this build handles demanding applications without compromise, making it suitable for professionals who need both CPU and GPU performance in a portable package.

Build Overview

This laptop build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, a 6-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A570M, a discrete Xe-HPG mobile GPU. The CPU operates at 2.00 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU runs at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost with a 75 W TDP. The combined 88th percentile ranking places this build in the upper tier of all recorded configurations, with both components performing within 0.7 percent of their nearest rivals. The CPU's 87th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile indicate no significant imbalance, making this a well-rounded laptop configuration for gaming, content creation, and productivity workloads. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU side, combined with the CPU's 89.6 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth, provide ample data throughput for modern applications. This pairing represents a strong mid-to-high-range mobile solution that competes with previous-generation desktop parts while maintaining laptop-appropriate power consumption.