SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440

41,208 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A550M: Database Analysis

This pairing combines a 6-core Zen 5 mobile processor with a discrete Intel Arc GPU in a laptop configuration, targeting the upper-middle tier of the hardware spectrum. The CPU holds an 87th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, placing this build firmly in the top 15% of available hardware. The combined percentile of 87 reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other, though the benchmark data reveals distinct strengths in specific workload categories.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H?

A: The two processors are statistically inseparable in average benchmark scores. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 averages 41,208 points, while the Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41,215, a delta of 0%. This places them as direct performance equivalents in aggregate workloads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The CPU scores 3,785 in PassMark single-thread tests, which is a strong result for a 6-core mobile part. This score indicates excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and older games that rely on one or two cores.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M averages 49,737 in Geekbench tests, while the RTX 5070 Ti scores 49,957, a delta of -0.4%. This places the two GPUs within a fraction of a percent of each other in compute benchmarks, despite their different architectural generations.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This bandwidth capacity supports the 6-core Zen 5 architecture effectively for memory-intensive tasks like data compression and encryption workloads.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A550M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes DirectX Raytracing. The GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 for broad API compatibility.

Q: What is the multithreaded performance of the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The CPU scores 21,054 in PassMark multithread tests, which is approximately 5.6 times its single-thread score. This scaling indicates good thread utilization across its 12 threads for parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering.

Q: How does the Arc A550M's Vulkan performance compare to its OpenCL performance?

A: The GPU scores 49,580 in Vulkan and 49,894 in OpenCL, showing near-identical performance across both APIs. This consistency suggests well-optimized drivers for both compute interfaces and predictable behavior in cross-platform applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU operate in complementary performance bands. The CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are nearly identical, suggesting that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other in most workloads. However, the nature of bottlenecking varies by application type and requires examining the specific benchmark scores.

In CPU-bound scenarios like data compression, the processor's PassMark score of 256,420 demonstrates exceptional throughput that far exceeds what the GPU needs for typical compute tasks. Conversely, in graphics-heavy applications, the Arc A550M's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides substantial rendering power that can outpace the CPU's 6-core configuration in certain parallel workloads.

The CPU's floating-point math score of 42,934 and integer math score of 65,991 indicate strong arithmetic processing that supports gaming physics and AI workloads. Meanwhile, the GPU's texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s suggest it can feed displays at high resolutions without starving the CPU of frame data.

For gaming, the balance depends heavily on resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU's 3,785 single-thread score becomes the limiting factor for achieving maximum frame rates in CPU-intensive titles. At higher resolutions, the GPU's compute capabilities dominate, and the 6-core processor provides sufficient headroom for background tasks.

In productivity applications that use both components, such as video editing with GPU acceleration, the data shows neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's multithread score of 21,054 handles encoding while the GPU's 49,737 average Geekbench score accelerates effects and rendering, creating a pipeline where both work near their limits.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 achieves an average benchmark score of 41,208 across all tested workloads, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. This performance level is essentially identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41,215, 0% delta) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41,263, -0.1% delta). The processor also matches the desktop-class AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41,376, -0.4% delta), demonstrating that modern mobile architectures have closed the gap with older high-end desktop parts.

In specific PassMark sub-tests, the CPU shows varied strengths. The data compression score of 256,420 is exceptional, indicating strong memory subsystem performance and efficient instruction execution. The random string sorting score of 27,252 and integer math score of 65,991 both reflect solid general-purpose compute. The floating-point math score of 42,934 supports scientific and engineering workloads, while the extended instructions score of 18,456 shows capable SIMD processing.

The Intel Arc A550M averages 49,737 in Geekbench tests, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957, -0.4% delta), a remarkable comparison given the different market positions of these cards. The GPU also closely matches the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001, -0.5% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951, -2.4% delta), while outperforming the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477, 2.6% delta).

The combined picture shows a laptop-class build that delivers desktop-class performance in aggregate benchmarks. The CPU's 87th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile both indicate top-tier placement, and the combined percentile of 87 suggests that when used together, this system ranks among the top 13% of all hardware configurations in the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,785 and the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest this build can drive high-refresh displays in esports titles at moderate settings. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports texture streaming, while the CPU's 12 threads handle game logic and physics. At 1080p with competitive settings, this pairing should achieve frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, though the exact figures depend on game optimization and driver maturity.

Streaming: The CPU's multithread score of 21,054 provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The 6-core/12-thread configuration can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets while maintaining gameplay performance. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and its 16 ray tracing cores also enable hardware-accelerated encoding and effects, offloading work from the CPU.

Video Editing: The combination of the CPU's 42,934 floating-point score and the GPU's 49,737 Geekbench average provides strong performance for timeline editing, color grading, and export. The 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU supports large project files and multiple effects layers, while the CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth moves data efficiently between components.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 compute and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate viewport previews and final renders in GPU-accelerated engines. The CPU's 21,054 multithread score handles CPU-based rendering tasks, and its 8 MB of L3 cache supports complex scene graphs. The 6-core configuration may lag behind higher-core-count rivals in pure CPU rendering, but the GPU compensates in hybrid pipelines.

Software Development: The CPU's integer math score of 65,991 and data compression score of 256,420 accelerate compilation, code analysis, and version control operations. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the GPU's compute capabilities support testing GPU-accelerated applications. The 4 nm process node and 28 W TDP also make this suitable for sustained developer workloads on battery power.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,785 ensures snappy response in web browsers, document editors, and spreadsheet applications. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a fallback for light visual tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, and the 28 W TDP contributes to long battery life. The 87th percentile CPU ranking means this system handles any academic workload without perceptible lag.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process node. It belongs to the Gorgon Point generation and the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The base clock of 2.00 GHz boosts up to 4.80 GHz, providing a wide frequency range that balances power efficiency with peak performance.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the processor's 89.6 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth with DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory. The CPU also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation and reliability-focused applications.

The PassMark benchmark results reveal the processor's character. The single-thread score of 3,785 is strong for a mobile part, indicating excellent per-core IPC from the Zen 5 architecture. The multithread score of 21,054 demonstrates good scaling across the 12 threads, though the 6-core configuration limits absolute throughput compared to higher-core-count parts.

The floating-point math score of 42,934 and integer math score of 65,991 show balanced arithmetic performance. The extended instructions score of 18,456 indicates capable SIMD processing for multimedia and scientific workloads. The data compression score of 256,420 is particularly impressive, suggesting a memory subsystem that handles large data sets efficiently.

The CPU's 87th percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database, comparable to desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41,376, -0.4% delta). This performance comes at a 28 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops that require sustained compute without excessive heat or power draw.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It belongs to the Alchemist generation of Arc 5 Mobile products and is marked as end-of-life, though it remains a capable performer in its class.

The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units.

Compute performance is substantial: 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 with 2:1 ratio. The 16 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 provide modern API coverage. The GPU's pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering with detailed textures.

In Geekbench tests, the GPU scores 49,894 in OpenCL and 49,580 in Vulkan, averaging 49,737 overall. This places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, directly competitive with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957, -0.4% delta) and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951, -2.4% delta). The GPU's 60 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for mobile integration.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's FP32 and FP16 throughput supports real-time previews and final-frame rendering in GPU-accelerated engines. The 8 GB VRAM accommodates large textures and complex scenes, while the ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated shadows, reflections, and global illumination in supported titles.

Who Should Build It

This laptop-class build targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without sacrificing portability. The 87th combined percentile indicates top-tier placement, making it suitable for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high settings, where the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS and CPU's strong single-thread performance combine for smooth frame rates.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's multithread score of 21,054 and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM for video editing and 3D rendering. The floating-point score of 42,934 supports simulation and effects work, while the GPU's FP16 throughput accelerates AI-assisted tools in creative applications.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 65,991 for compilation and the 12 threads for parallel builds. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces data movement bottlenecks.

Students and office workers get a system that handles all productivity tasks with margin to spare. The 3,785 single-thread score ensures responsive applications, while the 28 W CPU TDP contributes to all-day battery life. The GPU's 60 W TDP is modest for a discrete part, keeping total system power reasonable.

Small business workstations benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 256,420 for database and archival tasks, and the GPU's compute performance accelerates spreadsheet calculations, financial modeling, and data visualization. The production status of the CPU is active, ensuring ongoing availability and support.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the build class. The combination targets the upper-middle tier of mobile hardware, with the CPU at the 87th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile among their respective categories.

The CPU brings 6 Zen 5 cores with 12 threads, a 4.80 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP, making it a power-efficient yet capable processor for mobile use. The GPU contributes 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 2048 shading units, and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, delivering desktop-class graphics performance in a 60 W package.

The combined percentile of 87 places this build in the top 13% of all configurations in the database. This is a high-performance laptop suitable for demanding applications, though it does not reach the extreme upper echelon occupied by flagship desktop parts with higher core counts and larger GPUs.

The pairing is notably balanced: neither component dramatically outperforms the other, and the delta between their percentiles is minimal. This balance ensures that users get consistent performance across a wide range of workloads without encountering severe bottlenecks in either direction.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 interface, which supports the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series processors. This socket is exclusive to mobile platforms, meaning upgrades are typically limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping the processor. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported for reliability.

The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connections to the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully supported by the CPU's lane allocation. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is idle or disabled.

The CPU's TDP of 28 W and the GPU's TDP of 60 W combine for a total of 88 W of component power draw, which is modest for a laptop with discrete graphics. This allows for a relatively compact power delivery system and adequate cooling in most chassis designs. The GPU's suggested PSU is not specified, but the 60 W TDP indicates it can be powered by standard mobile power delivery.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU's 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for memory-intensive workloads. Users could also consider external GPU enclosures via the PCIe interface for additional graphics performance, though the laptop form factor limits internal expansion.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component specifications. The data is not measured but rather inferred from the CPU's 3,785 single-thread score and the GPU's 49,737 average Geekbench score.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS compute should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. These games are typically CPU-bound, and the 3,785 single-thread score provides ample headroom for high refresh rates.

In AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth should support 60-100 FPS in most games, depending on optimization. The CPU's 12 threads handle game logic and background tasks without bottlenecking the GPU. Games with heavy ray tracing may see performance drops due to the 16 ray tracing cores being less powerful than dedicated RT hardware in newer GPUs.

At 1440p, the GPU's 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate become more significant factors. Frame rates in the 50-80 FPS range are estimated for demanding AAA titles at high settings, with lighter games reaching higher figures. The 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation in titles with very high-resolution textures, potentially requiring reduced texture quality settings.

At 4K, the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are likely insufficient for high settings in most modern games. Estimated frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for optimized titles, with significant compromises needed for playable performance. Users seeking 4K gaming should consider this build's 86th percentile GPU ranking as indicating mid-range 4K capability at best.