SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440

41,208 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a hardware analysis of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 paired with the Intel Arc A370M, based exclusively on the provided benchmark data. This pairing represents a mobile (laptop) configuration, with the CPU being an active production part and the GPU being end-of-life. The analysis interprets the synthetic benchmark scores, percentile rankings, and architectural specifications to provide a neutral assessment of its capabilities. It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; therefore, all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically from the "Gorgon Point" generation. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, all within a 28 W TDP. The chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Benchmark results indicate a strong all-around performer. The Passmark single-thread score is 3785, which is a critical metric for responsiveness and lightly-threaded tasks. The multithread score is 21054, positioning it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, which suggests it outperforms a significant majority of available processors. The integer math score of 65991 and floating-point math score of 42934 further quantify its computational power. The data compression score of 256420 and encryption score of 12418 are particularly relevant for file archiving and security tasks, respectively. A physics score of 1119 and an extended instructions score of 18456 round out the profile, showing capability in simulation and specialized workloads. The average benchmark score is 41208, placing it in close competition with its nearest rivals. It sits 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, showing it is a high-tier mobile processor.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU-GPU combination, meaning there is no direct data on in-game frame rates. Consequently, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The Intel Arc A370M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676 are the primary indicators of its graphics compute capability, which translates to a percentile rank of 74 among all GPUs.

Based on the GPU's performance tier, this configuration is expected to be suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles. For graphically intensive AAA games, users should anticipate needing to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and newer titles, potentially requiring reductions in texture quality. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3785 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, ensuring that the primary bottleneck will likely be the GPU itself.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this laptop configuration, the Intel Arc A370M is the clear performance bottleneck for gaming workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile, while the CPU's score of 41208 places it in the 87th percentile. This significant gap indicates that the CPU is substantially more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is to its peers. In gaming, this means the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and settings. The CPU will have ample headroom to handle game logic, physics, and background tasks without becoming a constraint.

Conversely, for CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression, encryption, or software compilation, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking ensures it will handle these workloads efficiently, while the GPU remains relatively idle. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus of the GPU further reinforce its role as the limiting component in graphics-heavy scenarios. The data shows a system where the CPU is a high-end mobile part, but the GPU is a mid-range entry-level discrete option, creating a mismatch that favors CPU-bound productivity over high-end gaming.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive productivity tasks, with gaming as a secondary, more casual activity. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440’s 87th percentile CPU score and strong multithread performance make it an excellent choice for content creators who work with photo editing, video transcoding, or 3D modeling, where the CPU is the main workhorse. Software developers compiling code or running virtual machines will also benefit from the 12 threads and robust integer and floating-point math scores. Students and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, documents, and web applications will find the performance more than adequate, with the high single-thread score ensuring a responsive experience.

For gamers, this is not a high-refresh-rate 1440p machine. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM suggest it targets 1080p gaming at medium settings. It can handle esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant well, but it will struggle with the latest AAA releases at high settings. The system is a good fit for a user who needs a powerful, efficient CPU for work and wants the ability to play lighter games in their downtime, rather than a dedicated gaming laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 41208, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X's score of 41376.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more powerful relative to their respective markets?

A: The CPU is in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, indicating the CPU is the stronger component.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Does the GPU support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 dedicated RT cores, but the performance impact is not measured in the data.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 157 mm² and a transistor count of 7,200 million. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

The graphics processor contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it includes 8 RT cores. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU has a TDP of 35 W and is described as an IGP, suggesting it is often integrated into the system board. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 29175 puts it 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, showing it competes with older, high-end parts.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data indicates this system is not ideal. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM are the limiting factors. Users can expect playable frame rates in esports and older titles, but achieving high frame rates in modern, demanding games at high settings is unlikely.

Streaming performance is a mixed scenario. The CPU has the horsepower to encode video, with its 87th percentile ranking and strong multithread score of 21054. However, the GPU is already the bottleneck in games, so streaming while gaming will likely require reducing in-game settings to lower resolutions to maintain a smooth stream.

Video editing workflows will be heavily CPU-bound. The CPU's high scores in integer math (65991) and floating-point math (42934) are beneficial for timeline scrubbing and applying effects. The GPU will assist with effects and encoding, but it is not a professional-grade rendering card, so complex projects may see slower preview times.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya will primarily rely on the CPU. The CPU's passmark multithread score of 21054 and extended instructions score of 18456 suggest it can handle moderate rendering tasks. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can accelerate certain viewport operations, but it is not a primary renderer.

Software development will be a strong suit for this system. The CPU's 12 threads, high single-thread score of 3785, and data encryption score of 12418 make it well-suited for compiling code and running containers. The GPU is adequate for basic display tasks and does not introduce bottlenecks in this workflow.

For student and office work, this is a high-performance machine. The CPU’s responsiveness, evidenced by its single-thread score, ensures smooth multitasking across documents, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The GPU is more than sufficient for graphical office tasks and video playback, and the 35 W TDP of the GPU and 28 W TDP of the CPU suggest a reasonably power-efficient system.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring a high-performance mobile CPU paired with a mid-range mobile GPU. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 5, and it is a current, active product. The Intel Arc A370M is a 4 GB graphics card based on the Alchemist architecture, and it is marked as end-of-life. The combined percentile rank for this pairing is 81, indicating that overall, it performs better than 81% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 87th percentile, while the GPU is the weaker link, ranking in the 74th percentile. This is a productivity-first machine with competent, entry-level gaming capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 achieves an average benchmark score of 41208, which places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong score, nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41263). The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197) and the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996). The combined picture shows a system with a very strong CPU that is 13 percentage points higher in its percentile rank than the GPU. This indicates that the CPU will consistently outperform the GPU in relative terms, making the GPU the primary limiting factor for graphics-intensive applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is built for the AMD Socket FP8. It supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, with no suggested PSU listed in the data pack, implying a system-level power supply rather than a discrete unit.

Given that the GPU is marked as end-of-life and the CPU is a new, active product, the most sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the Intel Arc A370M with a more powerful GPU. However, the "IGP" slot width and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs indicate that the GPU is likely soldered to the motherboard, making it non-upgradable in a traditional sense. The CPU, on the other hand, is a current platform part, so users are more likely to upgrade the entire system rather than individual components. A future laptop build with this same CPU but a higher-tier GPU would create a more balanced system, leveraging the CPU's 87th percentile performance with a graphics solution that can match it.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds