SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440

41,208 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific tier of mobile computing, and the data shows a clear division of labor between its two primary components. The CPU is a high-percentile performer that handles heavy processing tasks with ease, while the GPU is a more modest component that provides entry-level gaming and graphics acceleration. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, with all FPS figures treated as estimates since no measured game data exists for this exact combination.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Arc A350M is defined by a substantial capability gap. The CPU achieves an 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This 17-point percentile differential indicates that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

Benchmark results reinforce this imbalance. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 21,054 and single-thread score of 3,785 are strong figures for a mobile processor, placing it in the upper tier of laptop CPUs. In contrast, the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747 are moderate, positioning it below the performance level that would fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities in gaming scenarios. The data suggests that in CPU-bound workloads like data compression or encryption, the processor will operate near its full potential, while in GPU-bound tasks such as rasterization, the graphics card will cap overall performance.

The FPS scaling picture, although not measured, can be inferred from these scores. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance of 3,785 will help maintain high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will limit how high those rates can go. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck, as its 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus width constrain texture throughput and bandwidth-sensitive operations. This is a classic CPU-heavy, GPU-light configuration where the balance tips toward processing muscle rather than graphical fidelity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41,208, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which scores 41,215, a delta of 0 percent — the two are statistically identical. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop part, scores 41,376, just 0.4 percent higher, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H trails at 40,967, 0.6 percent behind. These close margins indicate that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 delivers desktop-class compute in a 28 W mobile package.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24,647, placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24,744, a delta of -0.4 percent, meaning the Arc A350M is essentially on par with that older desktop card. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763, 0.5 percent higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442, 0.8 percent lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 trails at 24,277, 1.5 percent behind. These results show the Arc A350M performing in the range of mid-range desktop GPUs from several generations ago.

The combined picture is a system with a combined percentile of 79, reflecting a configuration where the CPU punches well above its class while the GPU anchors the overall tier. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,785 is particularly notable, as it exceeds what many desktop processors achieve, while the GPU’s scores are adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but fall short of high-refresh or high-resolution demands. The data indicates a platform designed for productivity and light gaming rather than enthusiast-level graphics work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, as the fact pack contains no entries for measuredFpsUltraByGame. All frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results.

Based on the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,785 and the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, the system is estimated to handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at 1080p with medium to high settings, achieving frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance will keep frame times consistent, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and shadow detail in more demanding scenes.

For AAA titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage, the estimates drop to 30-45 FPS at 1080p with low to medium settings. The GPU’s 6 RT cores and 768 shading units are sufficient for entry-level ray tracing, but the 4 GB memory capacity will cause stuttering in games that exceed that budget. At 1440p, the system is estimated to struggle, with frame rates falling below 30 FPS in most modern titles due to the GPU’s 64-bit bus width and limited memory bandwidth.

The CPU’s multi-thread score of 21,054 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck in CPU-heavy games like strategy titles or simulations, where the 6 cores and 12 threads provide ample headroom. However, the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking means that graphics settings will need to be dialed back significantly to achieve playable frame rates in recent releases. For older or less demanding games, the system should handle 1080p at high settings comfortably, with estimated frame rates of 60+ FPS.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize processing power over graphical performance. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking and 28 W TDP make it ideal for professionals who need sustained multi-core performance in a portable form factor. Data analysts, software developers, and researchers who work with large datasets will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 256,420 and encryption score of 12,418, which indicate strong throughput for data-intensive tasks.

Content creators who work primarily with code, documents, and spreadsheets rather than video or 3D rendering will find this system well-suited, as the CPU’s floating-point math score of 42,934 and integer math score of 65,991 provide ample compute for compilation, scripting, and data processing. Students in STEM fields will appreciate the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,785 for responsive application usage, while the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking allows for casual gaming during downtime.

Small business workstations that rely on office productivity suites, web applications, and database management will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread score of 21,054, which handles concurrent tasks efficiently. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for dual-display setups and basic graphical acceleration, though it is not designed for CAD or video editing workloads. Gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings and accept 30-60 FPS in modern titles will find this configuration adequate, but enthusiasts seeking high-refresh or 1440p gaming should look elsewhere.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is possible in esports titles, where the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,785 can push frame rates above 100 FPS in games like CS2 or Rocket League at 1080p with low settings. However, the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS will cap performance in more demanding titles, so the system is not suitable for 144Hz monitors in AAA games.

Streaming is a viable workload, as the CPU’s 12 threads and multi-thread score of 21,054 can handle encoding overhead while maintaining game performance. The GPU’s Xe-HPG architecture supports hardware encoding, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and stream quality settings.

Video editing in applications like DaVinci Resolve will see moderate performance, with the CPU’s extended instructions score of 18,456 accelerating codec operations and the GPU’s 768 shading units providing some acceleration for effects. However, the 4 GB VRAM will be a constraint for 4K timelines or heavy color grading.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will rely heavily on the CPU, with its floating-point math score of 42,934 handling ray tracing calculations. The GPU’s 6 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest for render workloads, making the CPU the primary render engine.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s integer math score of 65,991, which accelerates compilation and code analysis. The single-thread score of 3,785 ensures responsive IDE performance, and the 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for running multiple virtual displays or preview windows.

Student and office work is well-served by this configuration, with the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking ensuring smooth multitasking across browsers, office suites, and communication tools. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking provides adequate acceleration for UI rendering and video playback, while the 28 W CPU TDP contributes to long battery life in laptops.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture and a 6 nm TSMC process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest configuration that limits performance in high-resolution or high-texture workloads. The 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute of 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU in the entry-level segment.

The 6 RT cores provide basic ray tracing acceleration, but the 70th percentile ranking suggests that RT performance is not a primary strength. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s capabilities. The 25 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, though the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit its longevity for future game releases.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point. It is manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 195 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is 28 W, making it suitable for mobile devices.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is valuable for professional workloads. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics.

The CPU’s benchmark results show strong performance across a range of workloads. The multi-thread score of 21,054 places it at the 87th percentile, while the single-thread score of 3,785 is excellent for a mobile part. The data compression score of 256,420 and encryption score of 12,418 indicate strong throughput for data-centric tasks. The floating-point math score of 42,934 and integer math score of 65,991 show balanced compute capabilities. The extended instructions score of 18,456 demonstrates good SIMD performance, while the find prime numbers score of 77 and physics score of 1,119 are modest but acceptable.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a high-end mobile CPU with an entry-level mobile GPU. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a 6-core Zen 5 processor designed for professional mobile use, while the Intel Arc A350M is an Alchemist-generation GPU from the Arc 3 Mobile lineup. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-mid tier of overall performance.

The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking indicates that this processor outperforms the vast majority of CPUs on the market, making it a strong choice for compute-heavy workloads. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking is respectable but not exceptional, positioning this system as a productivity-first device with gaming capabilities as a secondary consideration. The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP suggest a power-efficient design that prioritizes battery life over raw performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H?

A: The two processors are statistically identical, with the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scoring 41,208 and the Core Ultra 7 356H scoring 41,215, a delta of 0 percent.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for professional and scientific workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, placing this system in the upper-mid tier of overall performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Intel Arc A350M scores 24,647 while the RX 590 scores 24,744, a delta of -0.4 percent, making them essentially equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc A350M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is modest for modern gaming but sufficient for entry-level workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is designed for mobile platforms. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, suggesting a combined power draw that is well within the capabilities of standard laptop power delivery systems.

The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but given the low TDPs, a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 840M graphics provides a fallback for basic display output if the discrete GPU is disabled. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support.

A sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the Intel Arc A350M with a more powerful GPU, though this is constrained by the laptop form factor. In a desktop context, the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking would pair well with a higher-tier GPU, but the mobile socket prevents such upgrades. The CPU’s 8 MB of L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a solid foundation for future software workloads, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will become increasingly limiting as game requirements grow. The platform’s DDR5 and LPDDR5X support ensures memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck, though the 64-bit GPU bus remains a constraint.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds