SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435

37,762 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 + Intel Arc A350M: A Mobile Duo with Surprising Headroom

This laptop pairing combines AMD's Zen 5-based Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 processor with Intel's entry-level Arc A350M discrete GPU, creating a system that punches well above its class in CPU-centric tasks while offering a more modest but capable graphics experience. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 70th percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 78 that places this build firmly in upper-midrange laptop territory. The processor's 6 cores and 12 threads on a 4nm TSMC process, paired with the Arc A350M's Xe-HPG architecture on 6nm, makes for an intriguing study in asymmetric capability — a CPU that can handle demanding productivity workloads paired with a GPU that targets 1080p gaming at reasonable settings.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, and fabricated on TSMC's 4nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, drawing a modest 28W TDP that makes it well-suited for thin-and-light laptops without sacrificing substantial compute capability. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest by desktop standards but appropriate for a mobile part targeting efficiency.

The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support — a feature that points toward professional and workstation use cases where data integrity is paramount. It also integrates Radeon 840M graphics, providing a fallback iGPU when the discrete Arc A350M is not needed, and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in specific workloads. The passmark_multithread score of 19,091 and passmark_single_thread score of 3,757 indicate strong performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded scenarios. The integer math score of 60,879 and floating point math score of 41,114 show balanced arithmetic capability, while the data compression score of 232,803 is particularly impressive — suggesting the CPU handles compression workloads exceptionally well relative to its other metrics. The find prime numbers score of 57 is notably lower, indicating that this processor is not optimized for certain single-threaded integer loops, but this is unlikely to affect real-world productivity tasks significantly.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,762 places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are fascinating: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600K scores 37,685 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0.4% higher). The proximity of these scores — all within 0.4% of each other — indicates that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 delivers desktop-class compute performance in a 28W mobile envelope, essentially matching a desktop Core i5-13600K in aggregate benchmark output. The data implies that for productivity workloads like compilation, spreadsheet manipulation, and database operations, this CPU will feel snappy and responsive, with headroom to handle sustained multi-threaded tasks without thermal throttling concerns.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's comprehensive benchmark suite paints a picture of a well-rounded mobile processor. The passmark_data_encryption score of 11,267 suggests the AES-NI and related cryptographic instructions are effective for disk encryption and secure communications. The extended instructions score of 16,724 indicates solid SIMD and vector processing capability, which benefits multimedia encoding and scientific computing. The random string sorting score of 24,936 points to strong memory access patterns and cache efficiency, while the physics score of 995 is moderate, reflecting the 4 MB L3 cache limitation in certain gaming physics simulations.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A350M, delivers Geekbench scores of 24,546 in OpenCL and 24,747 in Vulkan, averaging 24,647 — placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% higher at 24,744), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% higher at 24,763), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% lower at 24,442), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% higher at 24,277). The tight clustering — all within 1.5% — shows that the Arc A350M delivers performance comparable to a desktop RX 590 or a mobile RTX A5000, which is surprisingly strong for a 25W GPU with only 4 GB of VRAM.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in relative standing (86th vs 70th percentile). This asymmetry means the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in most workloads; instead, the GPU will define the ceiling for graphics-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this balance, positioning the build as a capable all-rounder that prioritizes CPU throughput while still offering respectable graphics performance for its class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-bound workloads. With the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile, there is a 16-percentage-point gap that manifests in gaming and 3D rendering scenarios where the Arc A350M will reach its limits before the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 breaks a sweat. In CPU-heavy tasks like data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded productivity, the processor operates at near-desktop levels, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth constrain texture-heavy workloads.

However, the bottleneck is not severe in aggregate. The GPU's average score of 24,647 nearly matches the RX 590's 24,744, meaning it can drive modern titles at 1080p with adjusted settings. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient to feed the GPU's 112 GB/s demand in most scenarios, though the GPU's 64-bit bus width and 4 GB frame buffer will cause stutter in games that exceed VRAM capacity. The data implies that in balanced workloads — such as gaming while streaming or rendering while compiling — the system will prioritize CPU tasks smoothly while the GPU handles graphics with occasional frame pacing issues at higher resolutions or quality presets. The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield significant improvements, as the GPU has headroom in raw compute (3.379 TFLOPS FP32) but is constrained by memory bandwidth and capacity.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 compare to a desktop processor?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,762 is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-13600K's 37,685, meaning it delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 28W mobile package.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to discrete graphics?

A: The Arc A350M's average score of 24,647 places it at the 70th percentile, nearly matching the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744) and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763), which are full desktop-class GPUs.

Q: Is the 4 GB VRAM sufficient for modern gaming?

A: The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 112 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the data indicates the VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and future titles.

Q: What workloads does this CPU excel at?

A: The passmark data compression score of 232,803 is exceptionally strong, and the integer math score of 60,879 suggests excellent performance in database operations, software compilation, and general productivity.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computation.

Q: How does the Arc A350M perform in Vulkan versus OpenCL?

A: The GPU scores 24,747 in Vulkan and 24,546 in OpenCL, showing slightly better performance in Vulkan, which benefits modern games and compute applications that leverage this API.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The system holds a combined percentile of 78, reflecting the CPU's 86th percentile standing and the GPU's 70th percentile, indicating an upper-midrange laptop configuration.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile) using TSMC's 6nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are modest figures that align with its entry-level positioning, but the FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) show that compute workloads — particularly those leveraging half-precision — can be served adequately. The 6 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the data suggests this capability is limited by the overall compute throughput and memory bandwidth.

The GPU's benchmark scores of 24,546 (OpenCL) and 24,747 (Vulkan) are remarkably consistent, indicating stable driver performance across APIs. The 70th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of GPUs in the database, and its proximity to the RX 590 (0.4% gap) and RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% gap) demonstrates that the A350M offers desktop-class rasterization performance in a 25W mobile form factor. However, the 4 GB VRAM capacity is the defining constraint — for rendering workloads that require large textures or geometry buffers, the GPU will fall short despite its raw compute capability. The data suggests that for 1080p gaming, esports titles, and light 3D rendering, the Arc A350M is a competent performer, but it is not suitable for 4K textures or high-fidelity ray tracing at playable frame rates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average score of 24,647, positioned between the RX 590 (24,744) and RX 6600 XT (24,442), implies 1080p gaming performance comparable to a desktop RX 590 — meaning esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should run at high frame rates with reduced settings, while AAA titles will require medium presets to maintain smooth gameplay.

The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,757 ensures that frame pacing will be consistent in CPU-bound scenarios, while the 4 MB L3 cache may cause occasional dips in physics-heavy games. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation: at 1080p with high-texture settings, games that exceed 4 GB will experience stuttering as assets stream from system memory. The 112 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p, but the 64-bit bus width becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data suggests that 1440p gaming is possible for lighter titles but will strain the GPU's memory subsystem, and 4K is not a realistic target for modern games. For a laptop in this class, the expected experience is smooth 1080p gaming at medium-high settings for most titles, with reduced settings required for the most demanding releases.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU capability. Software developers and data analysts will benefit from the processor's 86th percentile standing, with the data compression score of 232,803 indicating exceptional performance for build pipelines, database queries, and file archiving. Students in computer science or engineering programs will find the multi-threaded score of 19,091 sufficient for compiling code and running simulations, while the ECC memory support makes it suitable for financial modeling or research workloads where data integrity is non-negotiable.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks — such as video encoding, audio processing, or photo batch editing — will appreciate the processor's throughput, while the GPU's 70th percentile performance enables light 3D rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. Gamers who play at 1080p with moderate settings will find the Arc A350M adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or high-fidelity experiences should look elsewhere. Small business workstations that run office suites, accounting software, and collaboration tools will be well-served by this build, as the CPU's single-thread performance of 3,757 ensures responsive application usage, and the integrated Radeon 840M can handle display output when the discrete GPU is unnecessary for power savings.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing AMD's Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 mobile processor with Intel's Arc A350M discrete GPU. The CPU, based on Zen 5 architecture with 6 cores and 12 threads on a 4nm process, represents the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation (Gorgon Point) and targets professional mobile workloads with its 28W TDP and ECC memory support. The GPU, based on Xe-HPG architecture with 768 shading units and 4 GB GDDR6, is an entry-level Arc 3 Mobile part that has reached end-of-life status.

The system's combined percentile of 78 places it in the upper-midrange of all laptop configurations, with the CPU at the 86th percentile dominating the overall perception. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,762 nearly matches desktop processors like the Core i5-13600K, making this a productivity-first laptop that happens to include a capable discrete GPU. The GPU's 70th percentile standing and average score of 24,647 ensure that the system is not a slouch in graphics tasks, but the 4 GB VRAM clearly positions it as a 1080p gaming solution rather than a high-end rendering workstation. This pairing is best described as a "workstation-class CPU with an entry-level gaming GPU," offering a balanced experience for users who need serious compute power without sacrificing the ability to play games at reasonable settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,757 ensures high minimum frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 70th percentile and 4 GB VRAM limit the system to 1080p at medium-high settings. Competitive games like shooters and MOBAs should achieve 60-100+ FPS, while AAA titles will hover around 60 FPS at medium presets.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 28W TDP, provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming — the multi-thread score of 19,091 suggests the processor can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads without significant frame drops, though the GPU's limitations will cap game quality.

Video editing: The data compression score of 232,803 and floating point math score of 41,114 indicate strong performance in video codec operations and effects processing. The GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerates preview rendering and export in applications that leverage half-precision compute, making this suitable for 1080p editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and integer math score of 60,879 provide solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing — though the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity and texture resolution in GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The processor's 12 threads and strong single-thread performance (3,757) excel at compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for developers working on data-intensive applications where memory errors could corrupt results.

Student and office work: The CPU's 86th percentile ensures snappy performance in office suites, web browsers, and communication tools, while the 28W TDP contributes to long battery life. The integrated Radeon 840M can handle display output for productivity tasks, preserving power when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform — meaning upgrades are limited to replacing the entire motherboard or system. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capabilities, so upgrading memory capacity or speed is possible within the laptop's constraints. The CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving potential bandwidth headroom for storage devices like NVMe SSDs.

The GPU has a 25W TDP with no suggested PSU listed, indicating that power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power system. Since the Arc A350M is end-of-life, a sensible next upgrade would be to a newer mobile GPU with more VRAM — the 4 GB capacity is the primary limitation — though this would require a new laptop or motherboard. For the CPU, the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation supports the FP8 socket, so a future upgrade to a higher-tier Ryzen AI PRO processor with more cores or higher clocks would be possible if the laptop's thermal and power delivery systems permit. The 28W CPU TDP suggests that the platform has headroom for a more powerful processor, as many mobile platforms support up to 45W or higher TDPs. The data indicates that the most impactful upgrade would be to a GPU with 8 GB or more VRAM, as the current 4 GB allocation will increasingly bottleneck modern games and rendering workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds