SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

27,932 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 + Intel Arc A550M: A Mobile Workstation Contradiction

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a peculiar hybrid: a low-power Zen 5 mobile processor designed for efficiency paired with a discrete GPU that carries desktop-class ambitions. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, giving the combined platform an 83rd percentile overall ranking. This is a laptop-class build, and the data shows a system that punches well above its modest 28W CPU thermal envelope, though the pairing creates interesting bottlenecks that users should understand before committing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket with no traditional desktop upgrade path. This is a soldered or BGA-style platform, meaning the CPU is not swappable in the conventional sense. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. That figure is crucial for the integrated Radeon 840M graphics, though in this build the discrete Intel Arc A550M takes over rendering duties. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile part and points to workstation-oriented design.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. The Intel Arc A550M connects through a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which means the discrete GPU gets the full CPU lane allocation. This is a clean setup for a laptop: the GPU is not starved for bandwidth, and the CPU's dual-channel memory bandwidth is sufficient for feeding the Arc's 8GB GDDR6 frame buffer. The GPU carries a 60W TDP, while the CPU sits at 28W, so the combined thermal envelope is modest by desktop standards but typical for a performance laptop.

The production status of the CPU is listed as Active, while the GPU is End-of-life. This creates an asymmetric upgrade reality: the CPU platform is current, but the GPU is a legacy part. For users looking at a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in the long term. The CPU's 4 nm TSMC process and Zen 5 architecture give it modern instruction support and efficiency, while the Arc A550M's 6 nm process and Alchemist architecture are older. The platform itself — socket, memory, PCIe — is not the bottleneck; the GPU's end-of-life status is the primary concern for future-proofing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest strong 1080p performance, but the CPU's single-thread score of 1802 in Cinebench R23 and 3758 in PassMark single-thread tests indicate it can keep up with modern game engines. The Arc A550M's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for high-refresh 1080p, though the 8GB VRAM capacity may limit texture quality in newer titles. The GPU's 49580 Geekbench Vulkan score and 49894 OpenCL score place it near desktop parts like the RX Vega 64, which historically handled 144Hz gaming well.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 11534 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Arc A550M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which includes hardware video encoding features, though the data does not specify encoder quality. The CPU's 221581 PassMark data compression score indicates solid throughput for stream encoding workloads. The 80th CPU percentile means this is not a top-tier streaming rig, but it is capable for a laptop.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units accelerate rendering tasks, while the CPU's 39662 PassMark floating-point math score handles video processing well. The 11534 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is roughly 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-12900H, a known mobile video editing workhorse. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth from the CPU side and 224.0 GB/s from the GPU side provide sufficient data movement for 4K timeline scrubbing, though heavy effects work may strain the 8GB VRAM.

3D rendering: The GPU's 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong rasterization throughput. The FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS is comparable to desktop GPUs that handle 1080p rendering well. The CPU's 1743 Cinebench R15 multi-core score and 1084 PassMark physics score suggest it can handle viewport simulations without becoming the primary bottleneck. However, the 8MB L3 cache on the CPU may limit complex scene traversal compared to larger-cache desktop parts.

Software development: The CPU's 11212 PassMark data encryption score and 15721 extended instructions score show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, which benefits compilation and code analysis. The 12 threads handle parallel builds competently, and the 63233 PassMark integer math score indicates solid general-purpose compute. The 3758 single-thread score ensures fast, responsive compilation of single translation units.

Student and office work: The 28W TDP and integrated Radeon 840M mean the system can run on battery for productivity tasks without engaging the discrete GPU. The 1802 single-core Cinebench R23 score handles spreadsheet, document, and web workloads with ease. The 80th CPU percentile is overkill for office tasks, but the efficiency of the 4 nm Zen 5 architecture means this build does not sacrifice battery life for that headroom.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, using the Zen 5 architecture from the Krackan Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, though this particular part lists all cores as Zen 5. The base clock of 2.00 GHz is modest, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, providing a 2.8 GHz dynamic range that explains the strong single-thread performance.

The cache hierarchy is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. That 8 MB L3 is small by modern desktop standards, but it is typical for a 28W mobile part. The die size is 195 mm², which is large for a 6-core chip, reflecting the integrated Radeon 840M graphics and the dual Zen 5/Zen 5c design. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27932 places it in the 80th percentile, with rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (0.1% ahead), AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (0.2% ahead), and Intel Core i9-10900K (0.2% ahead). The only rival it trails by more than a rounding error is the Intel Core i9-12900H, which is 0.3% faster.

What these benchmark scores mean for real workloads: the CPU matches a desktop Core i9-10900K in average performance, which is remarkable for a 28W mobile part. The 11534 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is achieved at a fraction of the power draw of those desktop rivals. The 1802 single-core score is likewise competitive with desktop parts from a few generations back. The data shows a CPU that trades some multi-threaded peak performance for efficiency, but the 12 threads still handle mainstream workloads without complaint. The 221581 PassMark data compression score and 63233 integer math score indicate strong throughput for data-heavy tasks, while the 74 PassMark find prime numbers score is a weak point, suggesting the CPU is not optimized for pure integer recursion workloads.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so the CPU runs at factory clocks only.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900H?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has an average benchmark score of 27932, which is 0.3% lower than the Core i9-12900H's 28003. The difference is negligible in real-world use.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M still in production?

A: No. The GPU's production status is listed as End-of-life, meaning it is no longer actively manufactured. The CPU, in contrast, is listed as Active.

Q: What API support does the Arc A550M provide?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern gaming and compute APIs.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A550M have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The CPU+GPU pairing sits at the 83rd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. At the 86th percentile, the Arc A550M outperforms the CPU's 80th percentile ranking. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming and 3D rendering, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU without becoming the limiting factor. The CPU's 1802 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 3758 PassMark single-thread score are sufficient to drive the GPU's frame output in most scenarios.

However, the bottleneck shifts in CPU-bound workloads. The 8 MB L3 cache is small, and the 6-core/12-thread configuration means heavily multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or software compilation will max out the CPU before the GPU is fully utilized. In such cases, the GPU sits idle while the CPU works through the queue. The 28W TDP limits sustained multi-core boost clocks, so prolonged rendering sessions will see the CPU settle at lower clocks than the 4.80 GHz peak.

The memory bandwidth also creates a potential bottleneck. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s is adequate for most tasks, but the GPU's 224.0 GB/s is significantly higher. In mixed workloads where data must move between CPU and GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not the constraint — the CPU's memory bandwidth is. This is typical for laptops, where dual-channel memory is the norm, but it means the system cannot fully saturate the GPU's compute capabilities in data-intensive tasks.

The FPS picture must be framed as estimated, since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Based on the benchmark scores, the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS and the CPU's competitive single-thread performance suggest the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming at 1080p, which is generally a healthy balance. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 80th means the GPU has more headroom relative to its peers, so users should expect GPU-bound frame rates in most modern titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop users who need a balance of CPU efficiency and GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking sufficient for high refresh rates in esports titles, while the CPU's single-thread performance ensures consistent frame pacing. The 8GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p with high textures, though 1440p users may need to dial back settings.

Content creators working in video editing will appreciate the CPU's competitive multi-core score (11534 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's hardware acceleration for effects and rendering. The 12 threads handle timeline editing smoothly, and the 224.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth moves frames quickly. Software developers benefit from the CPU's strong integer and encryption scores (63233 and 11212 in PassMark), which speed up compilation and code analysis.

Students and office workers are arguably over-served by this hardware, but the 28W CPU TDP and integrated graphics mean the discrete GPU can be disabled for battery-efficient productivity. Small business workstations handling data processing, spreadsheet analysis, and light 3D visualization will find the 221581 PassMark data compression score and 8MB L3 cache more than adequate. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for users running long computations where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27932, placing it at the 80th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, scores 27896, a 0.1% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28003 (0.3% behind). In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 11534 multi-core and 1802 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1743 multi-core and 276 single-core. PassMark results show 221581 in data compression, 11212 in data encryption, 15721 in extended instructions, 74 in find prime numbers, 39662 in floating-point math, 63233 in integer math, 19215 in multithread, 1084 in physics, 24334 in random string sorting, and 3758 in single-thread.

The GPU scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, 2.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 2.6% behind). The combined platform sits at the 83rd percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from these benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, a 28W mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A550M, a 60W discrete GPU. The CPU is an active production part from the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, while the GPU is end-of-life from Intel's Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 83 places this build in the upper tier of laptop configurations, though not at the flagship level. The CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile indicate a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outstrips the other.

The build is best understood as a mid-to-high-end mobile workstation or gaming laptop. The CPU brings modern Zen 5 efficiency and competitive single-thread performance, while the GPU brings desktop-class rasterization and ray tracing features. The 83rd combined percentile suggests this build outperforms roughly 83% of all laptop configurations in the benchmark database, making it a solid choice for users who need both CPU and GPU horsepower without stepping up to flagship pricing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The chip, codenamed DG2-512, uses the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation and is classified as Arc 5 Mobile. The GPU contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 900 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz, while the 8 GB GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern rendering APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a removable card.

The benchmark data shows the GPU performing at 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it at the 86th percentile, just 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. It is 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. For rendering workloads, the 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is competitive with desktop GPUs from the previous generation, meaning this mobile part can handle 1080p rendering tasks with ease. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 8GB VRAM may limit ray-traced scenes with large geometry. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is the primary constraint for high-resolution textures, but for 1080p gaming and rendering, the Arc A550M delivers performance that belies its mobile form factor.