SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

27,932 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4nm process node, featuring a Zen 5 architecture under the Krackan Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The chip operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.80 GHz, while maintaining a 28W TDP—a figure that positions it firmly in the efficient mobile segment. The die size measures 195 mm², and the processor uses the AMD Socket FP8 interface.

Cache topology follows a per-core design: 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 8 MB L3 pool. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. An integrated Radeon 840M GPU handles graphics when the discrete adapter is idle. The processor supports a 2.00 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost, with a 28W TDP.

Benchmark results show a strong balance between single-thread and multi-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 11534 in multi-core and 1802 in single-core; the older R15 test yields 1743 multi-core and 276 single-core. PassMark results reinforce the picture: multi-thread score is 19215, single-thread is 3758, integer math hits 63233, and floating-point math reaches 39662. Data compression scores 221581, data encryption 11212, extended instructions 15721, and random string sorting 24334. Physics simulation scores 1084, while prime number finding is a modest 74.

The CPU sits at the 80th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 27932. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27896 (0.1% higher), followed by the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U at 27887 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872 (0.2% higher). On the other side, the Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28003, which is 0.3% higher than this chip. The deltaPct values are tight—within a fraction of a percent—indicating that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 trades blows with desktop-class and high-end mobile parts from previous generations.

For real workloads, the single-core score of 1802 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and coding. The multi-core score of 11534 indicates capable throughput for compile jobs, video encoding, and 3D scene building, though it is not a workstation-class monster. The 28W TDP means sustained all-core loads will be limited by thermals and power delivery in a thin chassis, but the efficiency of Zen 5 on 4nm helps maintain competitive scores.

# FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340?

A: The average benchmark score is 27932, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 compare to the Intel Core i9-12900H?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i9-12900H's 28003.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the processor include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU, but the discrete Intel Arc A370M is the primary graphics solution in this build.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The boost clock is 4.80 GHz, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU perform in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: It scores 11534 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong result for a 28W mobile chip.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for this CPU?

A: The CPU is built on a 4nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm².

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combination of a 6-core/12-thread CPU at the 80th percentile and a GPU at the 74th percentile creates a system where neither component is overwhelmingly dominant. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27932 is within 0.3% of several rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel Core i9-10900K, indicating that it can feed data to the GPU without becoming a drag in most scenarios. However, the GPU's average score of 29175 is just 1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, a high-end mobile part, which suggests the A370M is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads.

In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (221581 in PassMark), the processor demonstrates ample headroom. The multi-thread score of 19215 and integer math score of 63233 show that the CPU can handle encoding and compilation work while the GPU waits. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios such as gaming at high resolutions or rendering with ray tracing, the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain performance, as the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is far lower than what modern titles require for high-detail textures.

The FPS scaling data is absent—there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, any frame rate expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance (1802 in Cinebench R23) is sufficient for 60 FPS gaming in most titles, but the GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s suggest that 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is realistic, while 1440p would stress the GPU heavily.

The 28W CPU TDP and 35W GPU TDP mean that the system is power-limited, not thermal-limited, in a typical laptop chassis. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared with the GPU, which uses 112.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth—this separation prevents memory contention in most workloads. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 12 threads and 28W envelope provide enough headroom for encoding overhead, while the GPU handles rendering.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop-class build targets users who need a portable system for everyday productivity and light-to-medium creative work. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers who compile code frequently; the multi-thread score of 19215 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 score of 11534 indicate that build times will be reasonable for small-to-mid-sized projects. Students will benefit from the 28W TDP for long battery life, and the single-thread score of 3758 in PassMark ensures snappy UI response in office suites and web browsers.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing will find the CPU adequate for proxy-based workflows, given the integer math score of 63233 and data compression score of 221581. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of effects and color grading. Small business workstations that run accounting software, spreadsheets, and database queries will see strong performance, as the CPU's data encryption score of 11212 and random string sorting score of 24334 handle these tasks efficiently.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings form the primary audience, based on the GPU's 74th percentile ranking. Esports titles and older AAA games will run smoothly, but the A370M's 4 GB VRAM means texture quality must be dialed down for newer releases. The system is not suited for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, as the GPU's bandwidth and FP32 throughput are insufficient. For users who prioritize portability and efficiency over raw graphics power, this pairing offers a balanced compromise.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 paired with the Intel Arc A370M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 places it at the 74th percentile, while the CPU's score of 27932 at the 80th percentile ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the graphics card in most gaming scenarios.

Based on the GPU's specifications, 1080p gaming at high settings is the realistic ceiling. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s suggest that modern AAA titles will achieve 30-50 FPS at 1080p with medium-to-high presets, while esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant could push 60-90 FPS due to their lighter rendering demands. The CPU's single-thread score of 1802 in Cinebench R23 supports high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause stuttering in texture-heavy games at higher settings.

At 1440p, performance will drop significantly—the pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s are not sufficient for sustained high-detail rendering at that resolution. Users should expect 20-35 FPS in demanding titles at 1440p with low settings. The GPU's ray tracing capabilities, with 8 RT cores, enable basic ray-traced effects in supported games, but the performance hit will be severe given the modest compute throughput. DLSS-like upscaling is not available since the GPU uses Intel Xe-HPG architecture, but Intel's XeSS could provide some headroom if supported by the game.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It uses the DG2-128 chip, built on a 6nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth—a figure that is modest by modern standards.

Compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU features 8 RT cores for ray tracing, though the absence of tensor cores means AI acceleration relies on DP4a instructions. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The TDP is 35W, and the card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show an OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, with an average benchmark score of 29175. This places the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197 (0.1% higher), followed by the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (0.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% lower). The AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874, which is 1% lower—an unusual result given that the RX 6800M is a high-end part, but the deltaPct reflects the benchmark methodology.

For rendering workloads, the A370M's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is adequate for entry-level 3D modeling and rendering in Blender or similar applications, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity and texture resolution. Ray tracing performance is present but will be slow due to the modest RT core count and bandwidth. The GPU's production status is listed as end-of-life, which means driver optimization may slow in the future, but the DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure compatibility with current software.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27932, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 11534 and single-core score of 1802 demonstrate a strong balance for a 28W mobile part. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 19215 and single-thread score of 3758, with integer math at 63233 and floating-point math at 39662. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, scores 27896 (0.1% higher), while the Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28003 (0.3% higher). These deltas are negligible in real-world use.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. OpenCL score is 29676 and Vulkan score is 28673. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29197 (0.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996 (0.6% lower). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, indicating that the system sits above the majority of laptops but below the top tier of gaming or workstation machines.

When combining the two, the CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile create a system that is more CPU-heavy in relative terms. The CPU's multi-thread score of 19215 in PassMark is robust for a 28W chip, while the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 is modest. In mixed workloads like video editing, the CPU will handle encoding (thanks to integer math of 63233) while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. The tight deltaPct values among the CPU's rivals—all within 0.3%—suggest that this processor is a well-tuned middleweight, not a class leader.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 CPU with the Intel Arc A370M GPU. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 5 part on a 4nm process with a 28W TDP, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 Mobile part with 4 GB GDDR6 and a 35W TDP. The combined percentile is 77, which places this system in the upper-midrange tier of laptops—above average for general productivity and light gaming, but not a high-end gaming or workstation machine.

The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking indicate a balanced pairing where the processor has slightly more headroom than the graphics card. This means that in CPU-bound tasks like compilation or spreadsheet processing, the system will perform admirably; in GPU-bound tasks like gaming or rendering, the A370M will be the limiting factor. The 28W CPU TDP and 35W GPU TDP suggest a thin-and-light form factor with adequate cooling for sustained workloads, though the GPU's end-of-life status may affect long-term driver support.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate support 60-90 FPS in esports titles with low-to-medium settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth restrict ultra textures. The CPU's single-thread score of 1802 in Cinebench R23 ensures frame pacing is stable.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and multi-thread score of 19215 in PassMark handle software encoding at 1080p60, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 ensures game capture overhead is minimal. The 28W TDP keeps thermals in check during extended streams.

Video editing: In 1080p timelines, the CPU's integer math score of 63233 accelerates h.264/h.265 encoding, and the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 assists with effects and transitions. The 4 GB VRAM limits 4K editing with heavy color grades.

3D rendering: The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 provides entry-level rendering in Blender or Maya, but the 4 GB VRAM restricts scene size. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11534 offers additional CPU-based rendering headroom.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3758 in PassMark and multi-thread score of 19215 make it ideal for code compilation, with the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reducing build times for large projects.

Student and office work: The 28W TDP and 6-core design deliver strong battery life and responsive performance for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets, backed by a PassMark single-thread score of 3758.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds