SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

27,932 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop-class pairing that sits at the 75th percentile for combined performance, a figure that places it above the median but below the enthusiast tier. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 5 part, delivers an average benchmark score of 27,932, while the GPU, an entry-level Alchemist mobile chip, averages 24,647. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame of gaming performance is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, alongside 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. Clock speeds range from a base of 1150 MHz to a boost of 2200 MHz, with the memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 frame buffer sits on a 64-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s—a figure that will be the primary constraint in higher-resolution rendering scenarios.

Compute throughput is modest: the GPU delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance via a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The A350M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is feature-complete for modern API requirements, including hardware-accelerated ray tracing through its 6 RT cores.

Benchmark results place the A350M at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747. Its closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24,744—a delta of just 0.4%—making the two statistically indistinguishable. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 0.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT trails by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 sits 1.5% behind. These tight margins indicate the A350M occupies a well-defined performance band: it is competitive with older desktop mid-range cards and entry-level mobile workstation GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM capacity is the most limiting factor. The 112 GB/s bandwidth supports 1080p texture-heavy scenes but will struggle with 1440p or 4K assets. The ray tracing cores exist and support the feature set, but with only 6 RT units and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, ray-traced effects should be considered a novelty rather than a primary rendering method. The pixel and texture rates suggest the GPU can handle basic rasterization at moderate settings, but complex shader workloads will quickly saturate its compute resources.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench results establish a clear performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 11,534 multi-core and 1,802 single-core. The R15 scores are 1,743 multi-core and 276 single-core. The multi-core R23 score is particularly telling: it represents a 6-core/12-thread chip that can hold its own against desktop parts from a few generations ago. PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread score is 19,215, single-thread is 3,758, and the average overall benchmark score is 27,932.

The CPU sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, placing it in the upper quintile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27,896—a delta of 0.1% that puts the two essentially at parity. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27,887 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27,872 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28,003 (0.3% ahead). This grouping shows the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 punching above its mobile weight class, matching desktop processors from previous generations.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24,647 places it at the 70th percentile. When combined with the CPU’s 80th percentile, the pairing yields a 75th combined percentile. The A350M’s Vulkan score of 24,747 is slightly higher than its OpenCL score of 24,546, indicating strong driver optimization for Vulkan-based titles. The estimated gaming performance, derived from these scores, suggests the system is capable of 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios.

The combined picture is one of balance at the low end: the CPU is comparatively stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, but neither component drags the system into unusable territory. The CPU’s 80th percentile rank against all CPUs is impressive for a 28 W mobile part, while the GPU’s 70th percentile is respectable for an entry-level discrete mobile GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The A350M’s 70th percentile GPU rank and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are insufficient for high-refresh 1440p gaming. At 1080p, the estimated frame rates from the Vulkan score of 24,747 suggest playable performance in esports titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution scaling. The CPU’s 1,802 single-core R23 score prevents it from being a limiting factor in most competitive titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 19,215 PassMark multi-thread score provide ample headroom for software encoding of a 1080p stream while gaming. The 6 Zen 5 cores handle concurrent encoding and gaming workloads without significant degradation, though the GPU lacks dedicated NVENC-class hardware, so encoding will fall to the CPU. The 28 W TDP keeps thermal headroom available for sustained encoding sessions.

Video editing: The CPU’s 11,534 R23 multi-core score and 39,662 PassMark floating-point math score indicate strong performance for timeline editing and effect rendering. The GPU’s 24,546 OpenCL score can accelerate some effects, but the 4 GB VRAM limits working resolution. Export times will be CPU-dominated, and the 6 cores will handle 1080p timelines comfortably, with 4K timelines requiring patience.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 1,743 R15 multi-core score translates to solid performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles (via CPU) or V-Ray. The GPU’s 6 ray tracing cores can accelerate RT workloads, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means GPU rendering will be slower than CPU rendering in most cases. The 8 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support moderate scene complexity.

Software development: The 12 threads and 22,1581 PassMark data compression score support fast compilation of small-to-medium codebases. The 11,212 data encryption score and 15,721 extended instructions score indicate strong cryptography and SIMD performance, useful for build servers and development workstations. The 80th percentile CPU rank means developer tools like IDEs, compilers, and debuggers will run responsively.

Student and office work: The 3,758 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking in office suites. The 24,334 random string sorting score and 63,233 integer math score handle spreadsheet calculations and database queries efficiently. The 28 W TDP contributes to long battery life, making this a practical choice for all-day academic use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile platform with no socketed upgrade path. This is a soldered, BGA-style package, meaning the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a 25 W TDP. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined 53 W TDP of CPU and GPU (28 W + 25 W) means a standard laptop power adapter of 65 W or higher will provide sufficient headroom. The GPU is also soldered (slot width is listed as IGP), so there is no discrete upgrade path for the graphics component.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not the CPU or GPU, which are fixed, but rather the memory. The platform supports LPDDR5X, so moving from a smaller-capacity configuration to a larger one can improve performance in memory-bound workloads. The 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a hard ceiling, but ensuring dual-channel operation and higher-capacity modules will prevent capacity-related stuttering in multitasking scenarios. External GPU support is not indicated by the data, so users should plan for this system to remain as configured.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group. The CPU’s 80th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 70th percentile creates a natural imbalance: the CPU can feed the GPU more data than the GPU can process. In gaming workloads, this means the A350M will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenes, particularly at higher resolutions where its 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth become constraints.

However, the bottleneck shifts in compute workloads. In tasks like data encryption (11,212 PassMark score) or extended instruction processing (15,721), the CPU’s throughput is the ceiling. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS cannot accelerate these workloads, so the CPU’s 80th percentile performance is the sole determinant of speed. Conversely, in Vulkan-based rendering tasks, the GPU’s 24,747 score becomes the limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom.

The FPS scaling estimation from the benchmark scores indicates that at 1080p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most games. At lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU’s 1,802 R23 single-core score becomes more relevant, but it is unlikely to be the limiting factor. The 0.1-0.3% delta between the CPU and its nearest rivals shows that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is not leaving performance on the table; it is the GPU that defines the system’s gaming ceiling.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but only moderate GPU performance for light gaming or acceleration. The 75th combined percentile indicates a system that handles everyday tasks with ease and can dip into gaming at 1080p with medium settings. Content creators working with 1080p video or moderate 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 11,534 R23 multi-core score, while gamers at 1080p will find the A350M sufficient for esports and older titles.

Students and office workers get the most value from the CPU’s 80th percentile rank, which ensures responsive multitasking across documents, browsers, and communication tools. Software developers will appreciate the 12 threads and fast data compression (221,581 PassMark) for builds and version control operations. Small business workstations that run database queries (63,233 integer math) or encryption workloads (11,212) will perform admirably, though the 4 GB GPU VRAM limits any GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

The system is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming, nor for professional GPU rendering workloads. Users with those needs should look at configurations with higher GPU percentiles. But for a balanced laptop that prioritizes CPU throughput while maintaining a capable discrete GPU, this pairing hits a sweet spot just above the median.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Krackan Point. It is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, though the specific core configuration here is not broken out by the data. The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is 28 W—a low-power mobile design.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile chip: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC capability. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and integrated graphics are provided by Radeon 840M, though this is secondary to the discrete Arc A350M.

Benchmark performance is strong for the power class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,534 is competitive with desktop chips from a few years ago, and the single-core score of 1,802 shows excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: floating-point math (39,662), integer math (63,233), and data compression (221,581) are all standout figures. The physics score of 1,084 and find prime numbers score of 74 are lower, indicating this is not a compute-heavy part for those specific workloads.

The 80th percentile rank against all CPUs places it in the top fifth of every processor tested, mobile or desktop. Its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, is a desktop gaming chip with 3D V-Cache, yet the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 matches it within 0.1%. The 0.3% deficit to the Intel Core i9-12900H, a high-performance mobile H-series chip, is negligible. This CPU is a serious performer that outclasses its 28 W TDP suggests.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing AMD’s Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 with Intel’s Arc A350M. The combined percentile is 75, meaning this system outperforms three-quarters of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is the standout component, ranking at the 80th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile—a modest but not embarrassing position.

The pairing represents a productivity-first design with gaming as a secondary consideration. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, provide the compute muscle for demanding productivity workloads. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level discrete specifications, placing it in the same performance tier as the AMD Radeon RX 590 and ahead of the GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%.

The system’s overall tier is upper-midrange for laptops, with the 75th combined percentile indicating it can handle most tasks thrown at it, save for high-end gaming or professional GPU rendering. The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so all gaming estimates are derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 80th percentile and the GPU’s 70th percentile create a system that is greater than the sum of its parts for productivity, but limited by its graphics component in gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, meaning this laptop configuration outperforms 75% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 compare to the Intel Core i9-12900H?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 has an average benchmark score of 27,932, which is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-12900H’s score of 28,003.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU, and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s via a 64-bit bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, which limits high-resolution texture loading.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU boosts to 4.80 GHz from a 2.00 GHz base clock, with a 28 W TDP. The GPU has a 25 W TDP, for a combined 53 W thermal envelope.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Arc A350M scores 24,647 on average, while the RX 590 scores 24,744, a delta of -0.4% that places them at statistical parity.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 11,534 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s average score.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and the memory controller supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.