SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G

46,187 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G pairs a 6-core Zen 5 desktop processor with Intel’s Arc A750 graphics card, creating a 1080p-oriented desktop build that sits at the 78th percentile overall. This combination targets users who want a modern AM5 platform with a discrete GPU that outperforms integrated graphics by a wide margin, though the data shows the CPU and GPU are closely matched in benchmark scores, making it a balanced pairing for mainstream workloads and gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It operates on a 4nm TSMC process with a die size of 195 mm², featuring a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache, which is modest for a modern desktop chip but sufficient for the workloads this CPU is positioned to handle.

The CPU’s benchmark results reveal a clear strength in multithreaded throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 23,487 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong parallel processing capability for its class. The integer math score of 71,251 and floating-point math score of 45,711 show balanced arithmetic performance, while the data compression score of 292,735 is notably high, suggesting excellent efficiency in file archiving and database-style workloads. The encryption score of 13,585 and extended instructions score of 20,648 further confirm solid cryptographic and SIMD performance.

Single-thread performance is also competitive, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,060. This is a strong result for everyday responsiveness, office applications, and lightly threaded games. The physics score of 1,329 and prime number finding score of 90 are lower relative to other sub-tests, which is typical for a 6-core part when compared to higher-core-count rivals. The random string sorting score of 31,106 rounds out the picture, showing good memory-bound sorting performance.

The average benchmark score of 46,187 puts the 440G in a tight cluster with several rivals. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900HX, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 440G effectively trades blows with those processors in aggregate, despite having fewer cores than some of them. The 65W TDP is moderate, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom for users who want to extract more performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is an Alchemist-generation graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 2050 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a strong figure for the card’s class.

Compute performance is substantial: the FP32 throughput is 17.20 TFLOPS, and FP16 reaches 34.41 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, indicating the card can handle high-resolution textures and pixel-heavy effects without becoming the bottleneck in most scenarios. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the card’s overall ray tracing performance is moderate relative to its rasterization strength.

In benchmark tests, the Arc A750 scores 12,534 in PassMark G3D, which places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The DirectX 12 score of 70, DirectX 11 score of 72, and DirectX 10 score of 65 are all relatively low in absolute terms, but the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 show stronger compute and API-level performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5,368 indicates solid general-purpose compute capability, while the G2D score of 732 reflects adequate 2D acceleration.

The average benchmark score of 20,582 puts the A750 in close competition with several rivals. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Arc B570, 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X. These small deltas suggest the A750 delivers performance on par with those cards in aggregate, despite being an end-of-life product. The card’s 225W TDP and dual-slot design require a 550W power supply, and it uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a desktop build at the 78th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms 78% of all recorded system configurations. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU’s 66th percentile, indicating the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46,187 is more than double the GPU’s average of 20,582, but these metrics measure different workloads — CPU scores reflect general processing, while GPU scores reflect graphics rendering.

The nearest rival comparisons reinforce this balance. The CPU is within 0.5% of four other processors, all scoring between 45,970 and 46,098, which means the 440G is effectively indistinguishable from those parts in aggregate performance. The GPU is similarly clustered, with rivals ranging from 20,480 to 20,662, a spread of less than 1%. This suggests that neither component dramatically outperforms its direct competitors, but the pairing as a whole is well-matched for 1080p gaming and productivity tasks.

The PassMark single-thread score of 4,060 for the CPU and the G3D score of 12,534 for the GPU combine to create a system that excels in lightly threaded applications and moderate graphical loads. The CPU’s high data compression score of 292,735 and encryption score of 13,585 indicate strong performance in file-heavy and security-focused workloads, while the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and multi-monitor setups without significant frame drops.

Who Should Build It

This build targets desktop users who prioritize a modern AM5 platform with upgrade potential over raw top-end performance. The 89th percentile CPU makes it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, as the multithread score of 23,487 and floating-point score of 45,711 handle compilation and encoding tasks well. The 66th percentile GPU supports 1080p gaming at high settings and entry-level 1440p, making it a fit for gamers who do not require ultra-high refresh rates at maximum detail.

Students and office workers benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,060, which ensures smooth responsiveness in web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. Small business workstations that run database applications or financial modeling will appreciate the data compression score of 292,735 and encryption score of 13,585, which accelerate routine data manipulation. The 65W CPU TDP keeps the system efficient for long working sessions, while the 225W GPU TDP is manageable in standard desktop cases.

The build is less suited for enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates in AAA titles at 4K, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 66th percentile ranking will struggle at that resolution. It is also not ideal for compute-heavy machine learning workloads, where the GPU’s FP16 performance of 34.41 TFLOPS is respectable but the lack of dedicated tensor cores limits certain acceleration paths.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,060 and the GPU’s G3D score of 12,534 should push frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles, though the 66th GPU percentile means ultra settings may require tuning. For 144Hz monitors, esports titles are achievable, but demanding games may need medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s multithread score of 23,487 provides enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p60, while the GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores can handle overlay effects. The 12 threads ensure that gameplay and encoding can run concurrently without major frame drops.

Video editing: The floating-point score of 45,711 and data compression score of 292,735 accelerate timeline scrubbing, export encoding, and project archiving. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support 1080p and modest 4K editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multithread score of 23,487 handles CPU-based rendering in Blender and similar tools, while the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated rendering. Expect slower performance in complex scenes with ray tracing, as the 28 RT cores are not top-tier.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 71,251 and single-thread score of 4,060 speed up code compilation, unit testing, and IDE responsiveness. The 12 threads handle parallel builds effectively, and the system’s 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures a snappy development environment.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,060 and the GPU’s G2D score of 732 provide smooth multitasking for word processing, spreadsheets, and video conferencing. The system’s 78th overall percentile means it handles typical academic and office workloads without noticeable lag.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark position relative to other processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46,187. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900HX and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235.

Q: How does the GPU compare to similar graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A750 is in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,582. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Arc B570 and 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile.

Q: What memory and socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses an AMD Socket AM5 with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory for workstation reliability.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A750 has 28 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Q: What is the power requirement for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a 225W TDP and requires a 550W power supply. It uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to overclock the processor beyond its 4.80 GHz boost clock, provided the cooling solution and motherboard support it.

Q: What is the overall tier of this build?

A: The build sits at the 78th combined percentile, placing it in the upper-midrange tier for desktop systems, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates the CPU is the stronger component, with an 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 66th percentile. This means in CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, and multithreaded rendering, the processor will not hold back the system. However, in GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or ray-traced rendering, the Arc A750 will be the limiting factor, as its 66th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM cap performance at 1080p or modest 1440p.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,060 is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most 1080p games, where frame rates are typically limited by the graphics card. The gap between the CPU’s 89th percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile suggests that upgrading the GPU in the future would yield a larger performance gain than upgrading the CPU. In mixed workloads like video editing, the CPU’s multithread score of 23,487 and the GPU’s compute score of 5,368 work in tandem, with neither component being an obvious bottleneck.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s for the CPU and 512.0 GB/s for the GPU are well-matched for their respective tasks, ensuring data flow does not become a constraint in most applications. The overall balance is slightly CPU-heavy, which is a favorable trait for productivity tasks, but gamers looking for higher frame rates will find the GPU is the primary upgrade target.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) combining the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G processor with the Intel Arc A750 graphics card. The CPU provides 6 cores and 12 threads on the modern AM5 platform, while the GPU offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper-midrange tier, suitable for mainstream gaming and productivity.

The pairing is notable because the CPU outperforms its direct rivals by a small margin (0.2% to 0.5%) while the GPU is similarly competitive with its peers (within 0.5% of four other cards). This creates a system where neither component is a standout performer, but the combination delivers solid all-around capability. The build is well-suited for users who want a modern platform with the option to upgrade the GPU later, as the CPU has headroom to support more powerful graphics cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses the AM5 socket, which is a current desktop platform with DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. The unlocked multiplier allows for CPU overclocking, and the 65W TDP means the processor can run on a wide range of motherboards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support.

For upgrades, the most impactful change would be replacing the Arc A750 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking provides ample headroom. The 550W suggested PSU leaves room for a GPU with a similar or slightly higher TDP, but users should verify the power connectors match. The CPU’s DDR5 memory support and ECC capability make it a viable base for a workstation, and the 8 MB L3 cache is sufficient for most current applications.

A sensible next upgrade would be adding more DDR5 memory or installing a larger NVMe SSD, as the CPU’s data compression score of 292,735 and memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s will benefit from faster storage and additional RAM. The platform’s longevity is supported by the AM5 socket, which is expected to support future AMD processors, making this a solid foundation for long-term use.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,060 suggest the system can maintain 60+ FPS in most AAA titles, with drops below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant should exceed 144 FPS at high settings, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of compute power.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. Estimated frame rates drop to 40-60 FPS at ultra settings in newer games, requiring medium settings to maintain 60 FPS. The 28 ray tracing cores enable ray-traced effects, but performance will be modest, with estimated 30-45 FPS in ray-traced titles at 1080p. For competitive gaming at 1080p with low settings, the system should deliver well over 200 FPS in popular titles, leveraging the CPU’s high single-thread score and the GPU’s rasterization power.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds