SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G

46,187 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380 is a 6 GB GDDR6 card on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. That is a modest figure by modern standards, but it is paired with a 2000 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost clock on the DG2-128 chip. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. Its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The card draws 75 W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector.

The A380 includes 8 RT cores, which places it in the entry-level ray tracing tier. There are no tensor cores listed in the data, meaning AI acceleration is not a hardware focus for this GPU. The architecture is Xe-HPG from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3), built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API coverage is current. The card has dual-slot width and measures 222 mm in length, 114 mm in height, and 42 mm in width.

Benchmark results place the A380 at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 8558. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 808. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 38224 and 36736, respectively. PassMark G3D is 6252, while G2D is 610. The DirectX 12 score is 35, DirectX 11 is 38, DirectX 10 is 37, and DirectX 9 is 73. Compute performance via PassMark GPU Compute is 2762. The nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8595 average score, which is 0.4% ahead. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M is 1.1% behind, the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 1.2% behind, and the AMD Radeon 880M is 1.4% behind.

For rendering workloads, the 6 GB VRAM is the hard ceiling. At 1080p with high texture settings, 6 GB is workable for many games, but it will limit texture quality in titles that exceed that footprint. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the 1024 shading units, but it is not a high-bandwidth design. The 8 RT cores provide basic ray tracing capability, but the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS suggests that heavy RT workloads will be slow. The 44th percentile ranking confirms this is an entry-level discrete GPU, not a performance tier product. The A380's DirectX 12 score of 35 is notably lower than its DirectX 9 score of 73, indicating that the card is better suited to legacy APIs or lighter DX12 titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 is a low figure, reflecting the card's position well below mainstream gaming GPUs.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform. This is a desktop socket with DDR5 memory support and a dual-channel memory bus. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU itself. The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M, which is a capable fallback if the discrete GPU is removed.

The TDP is 65 W, which is a mainstream desktop power envelope. The Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W, and the suggested PSU for that GPU is 250 W. Combined, the CPU and GPU draw roughly 140 W under load, so a 250 W PSU recommendation leaves headroom for the rest of the system. The A380 uses a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard for entry-level cards. The GPU is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a half-width interface, but on a PCIe Gen 4 platform that is not a bottleneck for a card of this performance class.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the A380 with a higher-tier GPU. The AM5 platform supports PCIe Gen 4, so any modern graphics card will work. The CPU has 12 PCIe lanes from the CPU, which is enough for a single GPU plus NVMe storage. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means there is thermal headroom for a more powerful GPU without changing the power supply, provided the PSU has sufficient wattage. The suggested 250 W PSU for the A380 is modest; upgrading to a GPU with a higher TDP would require a corresponding PSU upgrade.

The memory support for DDR5 is a future-proofing element. The dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for gaming and productivity, and ECC support is a plus for workstation use. The AM5 socket is currently active, and the CPU's production status is Active, so the platform will have longevity. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking if the motherboard supports it. The 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for a single GPU plus one or two NVMe drives.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz. It is built on the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. The process node is 4 nm from TSMC, and the die size is 195 mm². The cache hierarchy is 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3 total. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and ECC is enabled.

Benchmark scores show a strong all-round performer. The PassMark multithread score is 23487, and the single-thread score is 4060. Integer math scores 71251, floating point math scores 45711, and extended instructions score 20648. Data encryption scores 13585, data compression scores 292735, and random string sorting scores 31106. Physics scores 1329, and finding prime numbers scores 90. The average benchmark score is 46187, placing the CPU at the 89th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of the 440G's average score. The Intel Core i9-13900HX is 0.2% ahead, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is 0.3% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 4364P is 0.5% ahead. This is a remarkable result for a 6-core desktop chip, as it is matching or beating higher-core-count mobile and server parts in average benchmark score.

For real workloads, the single-thread score of 4060 indicates strong per-core performance, which matters for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The multithread score of 23487 is solid for a 6-core/12-thread chip, handling video encoding, compilation, and multitasking well. The data compression score of 292735 is exceptionally high, suggesting the CPU is well-suited for file archiving and compression tasks. The encryption score of 13585 indicates good AES performance, useful for VPNs and disk encryption. The extended instructions score of 20648 shows strong SIMD throughput, beneficial for scientific computing and media processing.

The 4 nm process and 65 W TDP make this an efficient chip. The 4.80 GHz boost clock is high for a 65 W part, indicating good thermal design. The 8 MB L3 cache is modest, but the Zen 5 architecture mitigates this with strong prefetching and low latency. The 89th percentile ranking places it in the top tier of desktop CPUs, which is impressive given the core count.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 67, placing the system in the upper-midrange tier of desktop builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 440G has an average benchmark score of 46187, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-13900HX, 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth via dual-channel DDR5. The GPU has 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth via its 96-bit GDDR6 bus.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A380 has 8 RT cores, but its FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS limits ray tracing performance.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 75 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W.

Q: What is the production status of each component?

A: The CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life. The GPU's successor is Battlemage.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380 had a launch MSRP of 149 USD.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and Intel Arc A380 targets users who need strong CPU performance with entry-level discrete graphics. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes it a compelling choice for productivity workloads. Data compression scores of 292735 and integer math scores of 71251 indicate that this system excels at file management, database work, and general office tasks. The single-thread score of 4060 ensures responsive application performance in everyday use.

Content creators working with photos and light video editing will find the 6-core/12-thread CPU adequate, though the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 will limit heavy 3D rendering. The 44th percentile GPU ranking means this is not a workstation-class graphics solution. For students and small business workstations, the combination offers a balanced platform: the CPU handles compilation, spreadsheet work, and multitasking, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for modern APIs.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the A380 sufficient for esports titles and older games. The DirectX 9 score of 73 is higher than the DirectX 12 score of 35, suggesting that legacy titles run better than modern ones. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p texture settings, but not for high-resolution texture packs. Developers will appreciate the CPU's 89th percentile performance for code compilation, and the Vulkan 1.4 support on the GPU enables modern graphics programming. The ECC memory support on the CPU is a niche feature that appeals to users running memory-intensive computations where data integrity is critical.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and frame rates are qualitative estimates.

The Intel Arc A380's PassMark G3D score of 6252 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 indicate entry-level gaming performance. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the A380 should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant at playable frame rates, based on its DirectX 11 score of 38 and DirectX 9 score of 73. The higher DirectX 9 score suggests that older games and lighter esports titles will perform better than modern AAA games.

For modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the A380 will struggle. The DirectX 12 score of 35 is low, and the 6 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor for texture-heavy games. The 44th percentile GPU ranking places it below the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 by 1.2% and the AMD Radeon 880M by 1.4%, so it is in the same performance class as integrated graphics from the previous generation. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4060 will not compensate for the GPU's limitations in GPU-bound scenarios.

Ray tracing is technically supported via the 8 RT cores, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means RT effects will severely impact frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 reflects this, as that benchmark includes modern rendering features. For competitive gaming at 1080p with competitive settings, the A380 is adequate. For immersive single-player titles, a GPU upgrade is recommended. The 250 W suggested PSU leaves room for a more powerful card without changing the power supply.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is a 89th percentile CPU, while the Intel Arc A380 is a 44th percentile GPU. This creates a significant imbalance: the CPU is capable of feeding a much more powerful GPU than the A380. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, and integer math, the system will perform at a high level. In GPU-bound workloads like modern gaming at high settings, the A380 will be the limiting factor.

The PassMark multithread score of 23487 for the CPU versus the GPU's G3D score of 6252 illustrates this disparity. The CPU can handle multiple background tasks while gaming, but the GPU will bottleneck frame rates in graphically intensive scenes. The 6 GB VRAM on the A380 is a hard limit for texture quality, and the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is not sufficient for high-resolution textures. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is ample for its core count, but the GPU's bandwidth is modest for its 1024 shading units.

In productivity workloads, the balance is better. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it handles compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and multitasking with ease. The GPU's compute score of 2762 in PassMark is low, so GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or machine learning will be slow. The CPU's data compression score of 292735 is a standout, making this system excellent for file archiving and backup tasks. The bottleneck in this pairing is clearly the GPU, and any upgrade path should prioritize a faster graphics card.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system featuring the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Arc A380. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread part with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, built on the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture at 4 nm. The GPU is an entry-level discrete card with 6 GB GDDR6, 1024 shading units, and 8 RT cores. The combined percentile is 67, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of desktop builds.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU's 44th percentile ranking is the weak point. This is a system where the CPU is overqualified for the GPU, but the platform is solid: AM5 socket, DDR5 memory, and PCIe Gen 4. The 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP keep power requirements low, and the 250 W suggested PSU is easy to accommodate.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with a dedicated monitor and peripherals. The GPU's dual-slot width and 222 mm length fit in most mid-tower cases. The CPU's integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. The overall tier is upper-midrange, driven by the CPU's strong performance and the GPU's adequate entry-level capability.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G achieves an average benchmark score of 46187, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HX, scores 46098, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (0.3% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.5% lower). The CPU's PassMark multithread score is 23487, single-thread is 4060, integer math is 71251, floating point math is 45711, extended instructions is 20648, data encryption is 13585, data compression is 292735, random string sorting is 31106, physics is 1329, and prime numbers is 90.

The Intel Arc A380 achieves an average benchmark score of 8558, placing it at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, scores 8595 (0.4% higher). The AMD Radeon HD 8870M scores 8462 (1.1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 scores 8458 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 8436 (1.4% lower). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808, Geekbench OpenCL is 38224, Geekbench Vulkan is 36736, PassMark G3D is 6252, PassMark G2D is 610, DirectX 12 is 35, DirectX 11 is 38, DirectX 10 is 37, DirectX 9 is 73, and GPU Compute is 2762.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and an entry-level GPU. The combined percentile of 67 reflects this asymmetry. In CPU-heavy tasks, this system performs at the 89th percentile level, matching or beating much more expensive CPUs. In GPU-heavy tasks, it performs at the 44th percentile level, similar to integrated graphics from the previous generation. The 0.2% gap to the Core i9-13900HX in CPU average score is negligible, meaning the 440G is effectively at parity with a high-end mobile i9. The GPU's 1.4% gap to the AMD Radeon 880M shows that the A380 is only marginally faster than a modern integrated GPU, which is a critical consideration for buyers expecting discrete GPU performance. The data shows that this pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to accept entry-level graphics capability.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds