SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G

46,187 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Gorgon Point architecture, utilizing a 4 nm TSMC process. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and it draws 65 W of power. The CPU is paired here with an Intel Arc A310, a 4 GB GDDR6 graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, which is noted as an end-of-life product from the Alchemist generation. This combination forms a desktop build that sits at the 65th percentile overall, indicating a mid-range pairing where a strong processor is matched with a more modest graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G presents a balanced core configuration for modern desktop workloads. With 6 physical cores and 12 threads, it provides enough parallelism for demanding applications like video encoding and software compilation, while its high boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures responsive performance in tasks that rely on single-thread speed. The architecture, listed as Zen 5 / Zen 5c, suggests a hybrid approach that can handle both performance and efficiency demands, though the specific core distribution is not detailed in the data.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and an 8 MB L3 cache. This setup helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in compute-heavy scenarios. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, achieving a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is ample for feeding the 6-core processor and its integrated Radeon 840M graphics, should that be used as a fallback.

Benchmark data shows a strong all-around performer. The PassMark multithread score of 23,487 indicates robust multi-core capabilities, while the single-thread score of 4,060 places it well above average for desktop processors. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46,187 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing for a 65 W part. In integer math, it scores 71,251, and in floating-point math, 45,711, demonstrating solid computational throughput for both general and scientific workloads. Data compression and encryption scores are 292,735 and 13,585 respectively, showing efficient handling of data-intensive tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI 5 440G holds a commanding position. It edges out the Intel Core i9-13900HX by 0.2%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 4364P by 0.5% in average score. These deltas are small, but they place the 440G at the top of this list, suggesting it is competitive with higher-tier mobile and server parts despite its desktop classification. For real workloads, this translates to a processor that can handle heavy multitasking, 3D rendering, and code compilation without becoming the primary bottleneck in a system.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this pairing show a clear asymmetry between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s average score of 46,187 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating a high-performance processor that will not struggle with most computational tasks. The GPU, on the other hand, has an average score of 7,550, which puts it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, a mid-to-low tier position. The combined percentile for this build is 65, reflecting the GPU’s drag on the overall system performance.

The CPU’s specific scores reinforce its high standing. It achieves a PassMark physics score of 1,329 and a prime number finding score of 90, which are moderate but consistent with its core count. The extended instructions score of 20,648 and random string sorting score of 31,106 show strong performance in specialized tasks. The single-thread score of 4,060 is particularly notable, as it indicates snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

On the GPU side, the Arc A310 shows its limitations in the benchmark suite. Its PassMark G3D score is 5,433, and its DirectX 12 score is a mere 29, indicating weak performance in modern graphics APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30,607 and Vulkan score of 28,964 are more respectable but still reflect a GPU that is suited for entry-level gaming or basic compute tasks rather than high-end rendering. The G2D score of 625 suggests adequate 2D performance for desktop use.

The combined picture is one of a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but falls short in GPU-intensive scenarios. For users who prioritize processor performance—such as developers or data analysts—this pairing is effective. For gamers seeking high frame rates, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as evidenced by its low percentile ranking relative to the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is a compact graphics card built on the DG2-128 chip, featuring the Xe-HPG architecture. It has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 1750 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory is connected via a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

This specification set yields a pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is listed at 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These numbers indicate a GPU that can handle light 3D rendering and casual gaming but will struggle with modern titles at high settings. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but their performance is constrained by the overall low compute throughput; ray tracing workloads are likely to be impractical at playable frame rates.

The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation in 2025 and beyond, as many games require more memory for high-resolution textures. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth further restrict performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect this: the PassMark G3D score of 5,433 places it in the 40th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (0.1% faster), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (0.4% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (1% slower), and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (1.4% slower). This puts the A310 in the same performance class as older entry-level cards, making it suitable for esports titles at 1080p with low-to-medium settings.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern software APIs. It has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, and it draws only 30 W of power, requiring a suggested power supply of 200 W. The card is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, and it was released in October 2022. For rendering tasks, the A310 is not recommended for serious 3D work, as its FP32 performance and memory capacity are insufficient for complex scenes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Arc A310 is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 40th percentile creates a clear bottleneck scenario: the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU is more than capable of feeding it data. This is typical of a budget-oriented build where the processor is prioritized for general productivity.

In gaming, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,060 ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-limited in most titles, but the GPU’s low G3D score of 5,433 means that graphical settings must be lowered to achieve playable frame rates. The data suggests that at 1080p with medium settings, the A310 can handle esports titles, but for AAA games, users will need to accept significant compromises.

For compute and productivity workloads, the balance is reversed. The CPU’s strong multithread score of 23,487 and high average benchmark score of 46,187 make it the dominant component for tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The GPU’s compute score of 2,157 in PassMark is low, so any GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow, but CPU-based tasks will proceed without issue.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. However, based on the GPU’s 40th percentile and the CPU’s 89th percentile, it is reasonable to estimate that the GPU will cause frame rates to drop significantly in demanding games, while the CPU will remain underutilized. For a balanced system, a more powerful GPU would be needed to match the CPU’s capabilities, but for a budget build, this pairing is acceptable for light gaming and heavy productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Arc A310 is 1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, with an average score of 7,550 versus 7,472.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU boosts up to 4.80 GHz from a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile is 65, indicating a mid-range overall performance level.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A310 is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is not ideal. The GPU’s low G3D score of 5,433 and 4 GB VRAM will limit frame rates, and the lack of measured FPS data means expectations must be tempered. Users can estimate playable frame rates in esports titles at 1080p with low settings, but high-refresh monitors will not be fully utilized.

Streaming is a viable use case, as the CPU’s strong multithread score of 23,487 can handle encoding while gaming. The GPU’s limitations will affect game performance, but the CPU’s headroom ensures that the stream itself will run smoothly.

Video editing benefits significantly from the CPU’s high average score of 46,187. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth will handle 4K timeline edits, though rendering may be slow due to the GPU’s limited compute power.

3D rendering is CPU-bound, and the Ryzen AI 5 440G excels here with its strong integer and floating-point scores. The GPU’s low FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS means GPU-accelerated renders will be slow, but CPU-based rendering will be efficient.

Software development is a strong suit, with the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,060 and multithread score of 23,487 providing fast compilation times. The GPU’s performance is irrelevant for coding, making this a good pairing for developers.

Student and office work is more than adequately served. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance in productivity suites, and the GPU’s 30 W power draw keeps the system quiet and cool. This is a capable machine for daily tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings will find the Arc A310 acceptable for esports and older titles, but those seeking high-fidelity visuals should look elsewhere. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering and encoding.

Developers and software engineers will benefit from the CPU’s fast compilation speeds and responsive single-thread performance. Students and office workers will appreciate the system’s efficiency and low power draw, though the GPU is overkill for basic tasks. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like data analysis or accounting software will perform well.

The GPU’s end-of-life status and 40th percentile ranking suggest that this build is not future-proof for gaming. However, for users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, the CPU provides a solid foundation. The build is best suited for those who understand its limitations and prioritize processor power.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 card with 768 shading units. The combination sits at the 65th percentile overall, reflecting a strong CPU paired with a weak GPU.

The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of processors, while the GPU’s 40th percentile is below average. This makes the build a CPU-centric system, ideal for productivity and compute tasks but limited for gaming. The desktop class ensures easy upgradability, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps thermal requirements modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, and supports ECC memory. The platform is modern and offers a clear upgrade path to higher-end AM5 processors in the future.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and draws only 30 W, with a suggested power supply of 200 W. This leaves ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card; users could upgrade to a mid-range GPU without changing the power supply. The single-slot design and lack of power connectors make the A310 easy to replace.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more capable GPU, as the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking can support a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The AM5 platform also allows for CPU upgrades to higher-core-count models, extending the system’s lifespan. Memory can be expanded via the dual-channel DDR5 slots.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,060 suggests it will not bottleneck frame rates in most games, but the GPU’s low G3D score of 5,433 and 4 GB VRAM will severely limit graphical settings.

At 1080p with low settings, the Arc A310 can likely handle esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends at playable frame rates. For AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering and low frame rates at medium settings. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 29 indicates poor performance in modern APIs, so older DirectX 9 and 11 titles may run better.

The 40th percentile ranking places the A310 in the same class as the GTX 1650, which is a known entry-level gaming card. Users should expect 30-60 FPS in older or less demanding games, and below 30 FPS in modern titles at high settings. The lack of measured data means these are educated guesses, but the benchmark scores provide a clear picture of the GPU’s capabilities.