SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435

28,128 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Arc A350M combine to form a laptop-class build with a strong CPU and a mid-range mobile GPU. The dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance statements below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct frame-rate testing.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS figures exist for this pairing, we must infer gaming capability from the component benchmarks. The Intel Arc A350M produces a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the data are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% lower average score), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% lower), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% higher), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% higher). These deltas indicate that the A350M sits in a band slightly below the RX 6600 XT, a card known for 1080p gaming, but it is not far from that performance level.

The CPU side contributes strong single-thread performance: a PassMark single-thread score of 3734 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1816. This single-thread strength helps maintain consistent frame pacing in games that rely on a primary thread. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 11333 in Cinebench R23 and 19000 in PassMark multi-thread indicates it can handle background tasks while gaming, but the GPU remains the limiting factor for raw FPS. With only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU is suited for 1080p resolution with moderate settings; 1440p or 4K would likely strain the memory capacity and bandwidth. The Arc A350M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern game APIs, but its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest a focus on low-to-medium detail at 1080p. The CPU’s 80th percentile rank versus 70th for the GPU further suggests that in gaming, the GPU is the first bottleneck, especially at higher detail settings. Overall, the estimated FPS range for this pairing would place it in the “playable 1080p” category for most titles, with competitive e-sports titles likely hitting high refresh rates at reduced settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture (Gorgon Point) on a 4 nm TSMC process node.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have?

A: It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 75, meaning it outperforms about 75% of all recorded laptop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU, which can serve as a fallback or for basic display output.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: What is the GPU’s RT core count?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 6 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate’s ray tracing features.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU scores place it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 11333, and the single-core score is 1816. In PassMark, the single-thread score is 3734, while the multi-thread score is 19000. Additional PassMark scores include 61026 for integer math, 40627 for floating point, 225374 for data compression, 11110 for data encryption, 16197 for extended instructions, 58 for prime numbers, 1075 for physics, 24891 for random string sorting, and an overall average benchmark score of 28128. This average is remarkably close to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i5-13490F has an average score of 28185 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28032 (0.3% lower). These deltas show the Ryzen AI 5 435 sits in the same performance band as those mainstream desktop and mobile chips, despite being a 6-core mobile part.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan score is 24747, giving it an average benchmark score of 24647 and a 70th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 with an average of 24744 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile with 24763 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT with 24442 (0.8% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 with 24277 (1.5% lower). The GPU’s performance is thus closely matched with the RX 590 and GTX 1630, slightly above the RX 6600 XT, and slightly below the RTX A5000 Mobile. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms the GPU in percentile terms (80 vs. 70), indicating the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This asymmetry suggests that the build can handle CPU-heavy workloads well but may be limited by the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

The Ryzen AI 5 435 with Arc A350M is best suited for users who need a capable laptop CPU with solid multi-thread performance and a discrete GPU that can handle 1080p gaming and light content creation. Given the CPU’s 6 cores, 12 threads, and strong single-thread PassMark score of 3734, it is a good fit for software developers who compile code, run virtual machines, or use IDEs that benefit from multi-threading. The 80th percentile CPU rank means it outperforms most CPUs in the database, making it a reliable choice for students or small business workstations that run productivity suites, spreadsheets, and web development tools. The GPU, while not top-tier, is at the 70th percentile and supports modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for entry-level 3D design, CAD viewing, or light video editing with 4 GB VRAM. For gamers, the build targets 1080p at moderate settings; the CPU’s high single-thread performance helps keep frame rates stable, while the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS compute provides a baseline for non-competitive titles. This is not a workstation for heavy 3D rendering or professional video editing, but it is a balanced mainstream laptop for students, developers, and professionals who game occasionally.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and a TDP of 28 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a 4 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 840M, which can handle basic display output and light tasks.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11333 and single-core of 1816 indicate a strong single-thread performance that is only slightly behind its multi-thread advantage. The PassMark single-thread score of 3734 is high, and the multi-thread score of 19000 is solid for a 6-core part. The integer math score of 61026 and floating point of 40627 show the CPU can handle compute-heavy workloads. Data compression and encryption scores of 225374 and 11110 respectively, highlight efficiency in these specific tasks. The physics score of 1075 is moderate, while the prime number score of 58 is low, but that test is sensitive to memory latency. The extended instructions score of 16197 indicates good SIMD performance. Overall, the CPU’s 80th percentile rank reflects its ability to compete with desktop CPUs in the same performance band, as evidenced by its near-identical average score to the Intel Core i5-13490F (0.2% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (0.3% difference). For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle everyday productivity, software compilation, and moderate 3D rendering without being the bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread PassMark of 3734 is ample for driving high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS and 112 GB/s bandwidth limit the final FPS. The GPU is at the 70th percentile, which suggests it can handle e-sports titles at high refresh with lower settings, but heavy games will likely hit 60 FPS on medium.

Streaming: The CPU has 12 threads, and the multi-thread score of 19000 can handle encoding overhead, but the GPU does not have a dedicated encoder mentioned. The GPU’s Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 Ultimate support may help, but no hardware encoder is specified. Thus, streaming is possible with CPU-based x264 encoding, but the 6-core 12-thread might be stressed if the game is also heavy.

Video editing: The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 1080p editing, and its 3.379 TFLOPS helps with effects. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 11333 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle timeline scrubbing and previews. However, 4K or complex multi-layer projects will likely exceed the VRAM.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 12 threads and 19000 PassMark multi-thread score provide a capable base for CPU rendering in Blender or similar, but the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS is not intended for heavy GPU rendering. The 6 RT cores may assist with ray-traced previews, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores make it ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and handling Docker containers. The 12 threads and 4 MB L3 cache, plus the 4 MB L3, provide fast memory access. The GPU is not a factor, so the CPU’s 80th percentile rank ensures smooth compilation times.

Student and office work: With a combined TDP of 53 W, this build is efficient for a laptop. The CPU’s 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost handle office suites and web apps easily. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics can handle display output when the discrete GPU is idle, saving power. The 12 threads are overkill for word processing, but the performance headroom ensures longevity.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 24 render output units, and 6 ray tracing cores. It supports pixel rates of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rates of 105.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a TDP of 25 W. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 24586 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24753 in Vulkan, averaging 24647. This places it at the 70th percentile, with the nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% higher), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% higher). These results show that the Arc A350M is a mid-range GPU that is competitive with older desktop cards like the RX 590. The 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games at high textures, but it is sufficient for 1080p medium settings. The 6 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the raw compute is low for heavy RT workloads. The GPU’s 25 W TDP and IGP slot width suggest it is designed for thin-and-light laptops, trading performance for power efficiency. For rendering, the FP32 3.379 TFLOPS is adequate for basic 2D/3D acceleration, but not for high-end CAD or video rendering.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (build class: laptop) that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile, with a combined percentile of 75. This means the build is above average in performance, but not in the top tier. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 5 processor with a 4.50 GHz boost, while the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 mobile graphics solution. The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is a higher-tier component relative to the GPU, which is mid-range. This results in a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks such as compilation, multi-threaded productivity, and code execution, while the GPU handles light to moderate gaming and graphics work. The combined TDP of 53 W makes it suitable for a laptop chassis. The build’s 75th percentile overall indicates it is a well-rounded mainstream laptop, but not a gaming monster or a professional workstation. It is best for users who need a strong CPU for daily work and occasional gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s percentile rank of 80 is higher than the GPU’s 70, indicating the CPU is the more capable component. In CPU-bound workloads, the CPU will perform well, but in GPU-bound workloads, the GPU will limit overall performance. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3734 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1816 suggest that for gaming, the CPU can handle high frame rates without being the bottleneck. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 is close to the RX 590, which is a 1080p GPU; thus, in games, the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher settings. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 112 GB/s and 4 GB VRAM are also lower than the CPU’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, but for graphics, the GPU’s bandwidth is more critical. The CPU’s 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide ample bandwidth to the GPU, but the GPU is only x8, which is fine. In mixed workloads, the CPU will perform above average, but the GPU will cap the frame rate. For example, in a game, the CPU might deliver 90 FPS, but the GPU may only output 60 FPS. For non-gaming tasks like video transcoding, the CPU’s 12 threads will do the heavy lifting, and the GPU may assist only if the software supports it. Overall, the system is balanced for productivity but the GPU is the weaker link for gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is soldered to the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket, so there is no upgrade path for the CPU; you cannot swap it for a newer chip. The GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a slot width of "IGP," meaning it is also fixed to the motherboard and cannot be replaced. Therefore, this laptop build has no traditional upgrade options. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, but the memory is likely soldered on the laptop. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 14 lanes provides connectivity for an SSD, but there is no room for a discrete GPU upgrade. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the TDP of the CPU (28 W) and GPU (25 W) total 53 W, which is within the power delivery of a typical laptop. Since there is no upgrade path for the CPU or GPU, the only potential upgrades are storage and memory, which are also often soldered. This build is a closed system; users should choose the configuration at purchase time. The platform’s memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X means future laptops with the same socket might support faster memory, but the CPU is fixed. The PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface for the GPU is not a bottleneck for the current GPU, but a newer GPU would need a higher bandwidth, which is not available. In short, this is a fixed performance laptop; the only sensible next upgrade is to a new laptop with a more powerful CPU and GPU.