SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 340

25,981 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and Intel Arc A570M form a mobile pairing designed for a specific balance of processing power and graphical capability. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 5 part, while the GPU is an 8 GB Alchemist-series discrete solution. Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, all gaming performance discussion herein is framed as an estimate derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The combined percentile rank of 83 places this pairing above the vast majority of laptop configurations, indicating strong overall capability for a portable system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the CPU and GPU are relatively well matched, but the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. The CPU’s percentile rank of 78 against all CPUs, combined with the GPU’s higher percentile rank of 88 against all GPUs, suggests that the graphics processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming scenarios, this typically means the GPU will be the primary limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the graphical load increases. The Arc A570M’s performance, sitting within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL benchmarks, provides a substantial amount of graphics horsepower that a 6-core mobile processor can generally feed, but the CPU’s 8 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s could become a constraint in CPU-bound titles or at lower resolutions.

For productivity and compute tasks, the balance tips the other way. The Ryzen AI 5 340’s multi-threaded scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 12532, are respectable for a 28 W TDP part, but the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth can accelerate certain workloads like rendering or data processing. The PassMark data encryption score of 11470 and integer math score of 63078 are strong indicators of CPU capability, but the GPU’s dedicated hardware for ray tracing and its 2048 shading units will take over for tasks that can leverage parallel processing. The data shows a system where neither component is a clear, permanent bottleneck; instead, the limiting factor is workload-dependent. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU and the GPU’s x8 interface provide sufficient bandwidth for most tasks, but the 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest a power-constrained design where sustained all-core and all-GPU loads might be limited by thermal or power delivery headroom.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results paint a clear picture of a modern, efficient mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multi-core score of 12532 and a single-core score of 1915.5. Its Geekbench scores are 9165 for multi-core and 2140 for single-core. These results place the CPU in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25981. Direct comparisons show it is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-14701TE, which has an average score of 26013, a delta of -0.1%. It also sits within a narrow band of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE and AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, with deltas of 0.4% and -0.5% respectively. The single-threaded PassMark score of 3683 indicates strong per-core performance, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications.

The GPU, meanwhile, delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This score is remarkably close to that of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, with the Arc A570M trailing by only 0.3%. It also outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 0.3% and the NVIDIA P102-100 by 0.5%. This indicates that the Arc A570M offers desktop-class compute performance in a mobile form factor. The combined picture is one of a system that excels in both CPU and GPU intensive tasks. The CPU’s 78th percentile ranking ensures it won’t hold back the GPU in most scenarios, while the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking provides a high level of graphical fidelity and compute acceleration. The overall combined percentile of 83 for the pair underscores the synergy, suggesting a laptop that can handle a wide range of demanding applications without a significant weak link.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is built on the Zen 5 architecture and is part of the Krackan Point codename family, manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 8 MB of L3 cache. This configuration, with a 28 W TDP, is clearly designed for power efficiency without sacrificing modern performance. The die size of 195 mm² is substantial for a 6-core part, indicating a complex design with integrated Radeon 840M graphics. The lack of a vCache3d feature and a locked multiplier confirm this is a mainstream mobile processor, not an enthusiast overclocking part.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with excellent single-thread performance and solid multi-thread capability for its power class. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1915.5 is high, translating to snappy application launches and responsive gameplay in titles that are not heavily multi-threaded. The multi-core score of 12532, while lower than high-core-count desktop parts, is competitive with the listed rivals, including the Intel Core i7-11700K, which it edges out by 0.7%. The PassMark results show specific strengths: the data compression score of 229796 is very high, indicating strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. The floating-point math score of 39967 and integer math score of 63078 are balanced, suggesting capabilities in both scientific and general-purpose compute. The extended instructions score of 16440 shows good support for modern SIMD workloads. The data suggests this CPU is a capable all-rounder, ideal for a thin-and-light laptop where power draw is a primary concern, but it will not match the multi-core throughput of larger, higher-TDP workstation chips.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who need a portable system that can handle both productivity and gaming without compromise. The CPU’s 78th percentile rank and strong single-core score of 3683 in PassMark make it ideal for students and office workers who run spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers with many tabs; the responsiveness will be immediate. For software developers, the 12 threads and 6 cores are sufficient for compiling code and running virtual machines, with the PassMark data encryption score of 11470 providing a boost for secure coding tasks. The strong data compression score of 229796 is a boon for anyone who regularly works with large archives or datasets.

Content creators, particularly those working on video editing or 3D modeling, will find the GPU’s 88th percentile rank and OpenCL score of 58239 to be a significant asset. The GPU can accelerate rendering times and effect processing in applications that support OpenCL or DirectX 12 Ultimate. Gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p will find this a capable system, as the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates. The data indicates the GPU is within 0.3% of a Radeon RX 6950 XT in compute, so it should handle most modern titles at high settings. However, this is not a system for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming, as the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB of VRAM may become limiting factors. Small business workstations that require a balance of CPU and GPU power for tasks like CAD, financial modeling, or graphic design will also find this configuration appropriate, given the high combined percentile rank of 83.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, operating on a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is standard for mobile discrete GPUs. The 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP are fixed power targets, and the suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined 103 W TDP is low enough for a standard laptop power brick.

Given the soldered nature of both the CPU and GPU, the upgrade path is essentially non-existent for the core components. The only practical upgrade is increasing the system memory, provided the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots, and adding or replacing storage drives using the PCIe Gen 4 lanes. A sensible next upgrade for a user with this system would be to ensure they have ample, fast storage, as the PCIe Gen 4 interface can take full advantage of the latest NVMe SSDs. For users considering a future laptop purchase, the data suggests that a similarly balanced CPU-GPU pairing is more important than chasing a higher core count or a more powerful GPU, as the bottleneck shifts based on the workload. The platform’s support for modern memory standards ensures it is not outdated, but the lack of CPU or GPU upgradeability is a key limitation to consider.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data suggests this system will deliver strong frame rates. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 indicates a high level of compute throughput, which translates to good rasterization performance. The CPU’s single-core score of 3683 in PassMark ensures that the processor can keep up with the GPU in most titles, minimizing CPU-bound frame drops. Expect high settings in most games, though the 8 GB VRAM might require texture quality reductions in the most demanding titles.

For streaming, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for encoding a 1080p stream while gaming, though the lack of a dedicated encoder on the GPU means the CPU will handle the encoding workload. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19506 indicates the CPU has enough headroom to manage both the game and the encoding process, but users may need to adjust encoding presets to maintain smooth performance.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see a significant boost from the GPU. The Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will accelerate effects, transitions, and timeline rendering. The CPU’s strong multi-core score of 12532 in Cinebench R23 will handle timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently.

3D rendering workloads, such as Blender or Cinema 4D, will also benefit from the GPU. The 11,500 million transistors and 2048 shading units provide a significant parallel compute resource. While the CPU can render scenes using its 12 threads, the GPU will be several times faster for viewport and final frame rendering in most cases.

Software development tasks, including compiling large codebases, will be well-served by the CPU’s 12 threads and high single-thread performance. The PassMark integer math score of 63078 indicates strong performance in logical operations, which are common in code compilation. The 8 MB of L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency.

For student and office work, this system is overkill, but the performance is welcome. The CPU’s high single-core score ensures that document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing are instant. The integrated Radeon 840M provides a backup for basic graphics tasks, and the discrete GPU remains idle to save power. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than sufficient for these workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which places it in the 88th percentile and within 0.3% of a desktop Radeon RX 6950 XT, suggests that the Arc A570M is a very capable 1080p gaming GPU. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the data implies frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with high settings, as these games are often CPU-bound and the CPU’s strong single-core performance will shine.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the estimate is high to ultra settings at 60-100 FPS, depending on the optimization of the game. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p, but some games with high-resolution textures might approach this limit. At 1440p, the GPU will still perform well, but users should expect to lower settings to high or medium to maintain 60 FPS, as the memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and the 128-bit bus width become more significant limiting factors. The GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores provide support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the performance hit is expected to be substantial, so users should use this feature judiciously. The CPU’s 4.80 GHz boost clock and 12 threads ensure that it will not be a bottleneck in GPU-limited scenarios, but in CPU-heavy titles like strategy games, the 6 cores might be a limiting factor at very high frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile rank for this pairing is 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to a desktop Intel Core i7-11700K?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 340 has an average benchmark score of 25981, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i7-11700K’s average score of 25812.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket.

Q: Can the system support hardware-accelerated ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M is equipped with 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: How does the GPU compare to an AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: In OpenCL benchmarks, the Arc A570M scores 58239, which is 0.3% lower than the Radeon RX 6950 XT’s score of 58392.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and L3 cache size?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz and a total of 8 MB of L3 cache.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture and is part of the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps, which yields a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The base clock is 900 MHz, with a boost clock of 1300 MHz.

The benchmark data shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which is an exceptional result for a mobile GPU. This score places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs and within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop card. This indicates that the Arc A570M offers compute performance that rivals desktop components from a previous generation. The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are strong metrics for a mobile part, ensuring fill-rate heavy tasks are handled efficiently. The FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS is substantial for rendering and compute workloads, while the FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio suggests good throughput for AI and machine learning inference tasks that use reduced precision. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad compatibility with modern games and applications. The 75 W TDP is a moderate power draw, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate data transfer speeds. In practical terms, this GPU is the star of the show. Its high percentile rank means it will deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and even 1440p, and its compute capabilities extend beyond gaming to accelerate video encoding, 3D rendering, and other professional workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation at very high resolutions or with heavy texture packs, but for the target audience of this laptop, it is a balanced amount of memory.