SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 340

25,981 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 + Intel Arc A550M: A Mobile Pairing That Punches Above Its Weight

This laptop build combines AMD's 6-core Zen 5 processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU, landing at the 82nd percentile overall among all system pairings. The data here is clear: this is a mobile platform that sits comfortably above the median, with the CPU holding the 78th percentile against all processors and the GPU reaching the 86th percentile against all graphics cards. However, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data. Treat the gaming numbers as directional guidance, not lab-verified results.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, gaming expectations must be inferred from the underlying component scores. The Intel Arc A550M delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. That position suggests strong 1080p capability and respectable 1440p performance in most titles, though the 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain ultra-texture workloads at higher resolutions.

The CPU side matters for gaming too. The Ryzen AI 5 340 posts a Geekbench single-core score of 2140 and multi-core of 9165, which translates to solid frame pacing and enough thread headroom for modern game engines that scale beyond six cores. In CPU-bound scenarios, the single-thread performance keeps minimum frame rates healthy, while the 12 threads handle background tasks without stealing cycles from the game render thread.

For esports and lighter titles, this pairing should comfortably exceed 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings in most cases, based on the GPU's raw compute of 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and the CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock. At 1440p, expect some settings reductions in AAA games — the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the likely bottleneck for high-resolution texture streaming, not the shader throughput. The Arc A550M's 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs provide ample geometry and texture processing for mainstream resolutions.

Ray tracing is present via 16 dedicated RT cores, but given the GPU's position relative to rivals like the RX Vega 64 (deltaPct -0.5%) and RX 6800 XT (deltaPct 2.6%), expect playable but not exceptional RT performance at 1080p. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures feature compatibility, but the 8 GB VRAM will limit RT effects that require large scene buffers. In short, treat this as a 1080p-focused gaming machine with 1440p headroom in less demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark average?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 340 has an average benchmark score of 25981, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-14701TE (26013, deltaPct -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (26106, deltaPct -0.5%). It edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (25880, deltaPct 0.4%) and Intel Core i7-11700K (25812, deltaPct 0.7%). This places the CPU in a tight cluster where performance differences are within 1% — effectively a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to desktop cards it competes with?

A: The Intel Arc A550M's average benchmark score is 49737, putting it at the 86th percentile. It sits within 2.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, deltaPct 2.6%) and trails the RX 6900 XT by 2.4% (50951). It also trades blows with the RTX 5070 Ti (49957, deltaPct -0.4%) and RX Vega 64 (50001, deltaPct -0.5%). For a mobile part, matching desktop flagship-class cards from previous generations is notable.

Q: Is this laptop good for content creation workloads?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532 and single-core of 1915.5 indicate strong rendering capability for a 28 W TDP part. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance suggests good acceleration for half-precision compute tasks common in AI inference and some creative filters. The combination should handle photo editing, 1080p video editing, and moderate 3D rendering without significant bottlenecks.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the system have, and does it matter?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. This is adequate for the 6-core processor but lower than the GPU's 224.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth. For gaming, the GPU's memory bandwidth is the limiting factor, not the system memory. For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score 229796), the memory bandwidth is sufficient to feed the cores.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded workloads?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 1915.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2140 in Geekbench single-core. These numbers indicate excellent per-core performance for a mobile chip, thanks to the Zen 5 architecture boosting to 4.80 GHz. This translates to snappy application launches, responsive web browsing, and strong performance in lightly-threaded games.

Q: Is the GPU production status a concern?

A: The Arc A550M is marked as "End-of-life," meaning Intel has likely ceased active production. The CPU is listed as "Active," so the processor will continue to be available. For buyers, this means the GPU may become harder to source over time, and driver optimization may slow. However, current benchmark scores show it remains competitive with desktop parts like the RX 6800 XT.

Q: What is the combined system percentile, and what does it indicate?

A: This pairing sits at the 82nd combined percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly 82% of all laptop configurations in the database. That places it firmly in the upper-midrange tier, suitable for serious gaming and productivity without reaching flagship territory. The GPU contributes more to this ranking than the CPU, given its higher individual percentile (86 vs 78).

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a reasonably balanced pairing with the GPU slightly ahead of the CPU in relative performance. The GPU's 86th percentile versus the CPU's 78th means that in GPU-bound scenarios — typically high-resolution gaming — the Arc A550M will be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation (PassMark physics score 1095) or integer math (63078), the processor dictates performance.

FPS scaling evidence comes from the GPU's compute metrics: 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, where pixel throughput (131.2 GPixel/s) is less demanding, the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes the bottleneck, as larger frame buffers require more frequent memory access. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s system memory bandwidth is not directly involved in GPU frame rendering but supports asset streaming.

For multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532 indicates it can sustain heavy parallel loads. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 shows it can offload compute from the CPU when available, but not all applications use OpenCL or Vulkan compute. In gaming, expect the GPU to be the primary limiter at higher quality settings, while the CPU handles physics, AI, and game logic without becoming a drag.

The PassMark data compression score of 229796 and encryption score of 11470 suggest the CPU is strong in data-heavy tasks, meaning productivity workflows will be CPU-bound only if the GPU is idle. When both are active — like gaming while streaming — the CPU's 12 threads provide enough headroom to encode video (via the integrated Radeon 840M or discrete GPU) without severe frame drops.

Who Should Build It

This laptop targets gamers at 1080p who want high settings in AAA titles without paying flagship prices. The GPU's 86th percentile and 8 GB VRAM make it suitable for modern titles at that resolution, with room to drop to 1440p in less demanding games. Esports players will find the combination more than adequate, as the CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench 2140) ensures high frame rates in competitive shooters.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video editing will benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532. The GPU's FP16 performance (16.79 TFLOPS) accelerates effects that use half-precision, though 8 GB VRAM limits larger compositions. Developers compiling code will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 63078, which indicates strong throughput for build tasks.

Students and small business users running productivity suites, web applications, and light data analysis will find the CPU's single-threaded performance (PassMark single-thread 3683) more than sufficient. The 28 W CPU TDP means better battery life under light loads compared to higher-power parts, though the 60 W GPU will draw more when active. This is not a workstation replacement for heavy 3D rendering or large dataset processing — the 8 MB L3 cache and 6 cores cap that potential.

For travel professionals who need a balance of performance and portability, this pairing offers a strong compromise. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a low-power fallback for basic tasks, while the Arc A550M handles demanding workloads on demand.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process with Zen 5 architecture. It belongs to the Krackan Point codename family and the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores — though this specific SKU uses 6 Zen 5 cores. The die size is 195 mm², which is substantial for a mobile part, reflecting the integrated Radeon 840M graphics and memory controller.

Base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 28 W. This power envelope is typical for ultraportable gaming and productivity laptops, allowing for thin designs while maintaining competitive performance. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth — sufficient for the 6-core design but not exceptional.

In benchmarks, the CPU delivers strong results for its class. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532 and single-core of 1915.5 place it near desktop processors from a few generations ago. Geekbench multi-core 9165 and single-core 2140 reinforce this picture. The PassMark multithread score of 19506 and single-thread of 3683 show balanced performance across synthetic tests.

Real-world workloads benefit from the 4.80 GHz boost and 8 MB L3 cache. The cache is modest for a 6-core part, but the high clock speeds compensate in latency-sensitive tasks. Data compression (229796) and encryption (11470) scores indicate strong throughput for archiving and secure communications. The floating-point math score of 39967 and integer math of 63078 show the CPU handles both scientific and integer-heavy workloads competently.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-14701TE, AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, and Intel Core i7-11700K — all within 0.7% deltaPct. This means buyers choosing between these processors for a laptop should base decisions on price, platform features, and power efficiency rather than raw performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile GPU based on the DG2-512 chip using Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile) and is now marked as End-of-life production. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed.

Clock speeds are a base of 900 MHz and boost of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is the GPU's primary limitation — while the shader count and clocks are competitive, the narrow bus and moderate VRAM cap high-resolution performance.

Compute capabilities include 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate strong fill-rate performance for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM will force texture quality reductions in some titles at 1440p with ultra settings.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. Ray tracing is enabled via 16 RT cores, though performance will be modest given the GPU's overall compute level. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is standard for discrete mobile GPUs.

In benchmarks, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 place it at the 86th percentile. The average benchmark score of 49737 puts it within 2.6% of the desktop AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and just 0.4% behind the RTX 5070 Ti — an impressive showing for a mobile part. It also edges out the RX Vega 64 by 0.5% and trails the RX 6900 XT by 2.4%.

The GPU's 60 W TDP is moderate for a discrete mobile GPU, suggesting it can be cooled adequately in larger laptops. The "IGP" slot width indicates it's designed for integrated placement on the motherboard rather than a removable MXM module. Display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning laptop manufacturers determine the ports.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25981, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered tightly: the Intel Core i7-14701TE (26013, deltaPct -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (26106, deltaPct -0.5%), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (25880, deltaPct 0.4%), and Intel Core i7-11700K (25812, deltaPct 0.7%). This indicates the Ryzen AI 5 340 is a solid mid-upper tier mobile processor that competes directly with recent desktop and mobile parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, deltaPct -0.4%), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, deltaPct -0.5%), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, deltaPct -2.4%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, deltaPct 2.6%). This shows the Arc A550M performs like a high-end desktop GPU from the previous generation, which is remarkable for a 60 W mobile part.

Combined, the system sits at the 82nd percentile, indicating that this pairing outperforms most laptop configurations. The GPU's higher percentile (86) versus the CPU (78) means the graphics card is the stronger component relative to its peers. This asymmetry favors gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads over pure CPU-bound tasks.

The overall picture is a balanced, upper-midrange laptop that excels in gaming at 1080p and handles productivity with ease. The CPU's performance is mainstream-competitive, while the GPU punches well above its mobile class. This is a system that will not embarrass itself in any common workload, though it won't lead any benchmark charts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the processor is likely soldered to the motherboard, making CPU upgrades impractical or impossible. The GPU is also an integrated discrete part with "IGP" slot width, further limiting upgradeability. Buyers should treat this as a fixed configuration rather than a platform for future component swaps.

Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The maximum capacity and speed depend on the laptop manufacturer's implementation. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, matching the CPU's lane allocation.

The CPU's TDP is 28 W, and the GPU's TDP is 60 W, totaling 88 W for the core compute components. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU, meaning power supply sizing is at the laptop manufacturer's discretion. Given the 88 W combined TDP, a 100-150 W power adapter would be typical, but no specific recommendation is available from the data.

The production status is "Active" for the CPU and "End-of-life" for the GPU. This means the processor will continue to be available, but the GPU may become harder to source. For a laptop purchase, this is less relevant since the components are pre-installed. Driver updates for the Arc A550M may slow over time as Intel focuses on newer architectures.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be more system memory if the laptop supports it, as 8 GB VRAM and dual-channel DDR5 are both adequate but not generous by modern standards. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe are also viable. However, given the soldered CPU and integrated GPU, the practical upgrade path is limited to memory and storage — not the core compute components.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M mobile GPU. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 5 part with 12 threads, boosting to 4.80 GHz, while the GPU offers 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 2048 shading units. Both are designed for mobile use, with the CPU at 28 W TDP and the GPU at 60 W TDP.

The system ranks at the 82nd combined percentile, with the GPU at 86th and CPU at 78th individually. This places the build in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations — not a flagship, but well above average. For gaming, expect strong 1080p performance and acceptable 1440p with settings tuned down. For productivity, the CPU handles multi-threaded workloads capably, and the GPU accelerates compute tasks when software supports it.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and Intel Arc A550M pairing is an unusual combination of manufacturers, but the benchmark data shows they work well together. The CPU's single-thread performance prevents gaming bottlenecks, and the GPU's compute power exceeds what most mobile parts deliver. This is a practical choice for users who want a single laptop for gaming and work without paying for a flagship. Just keep expectations realistic: the 8 GB VRAM and 6 cores are the limits, not the highlights.