SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 340

25,981 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and Intel Arc A370M pairing represents a specific compromise in the mobile landscape: a modern, efficient CPU paired with an entry-level discrete GPU. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU’s respective synthetic scores and percentile rankings, not from direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination. Consequently, the following FPS expectations are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores for each component. The Intel Arc A370M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676, combined with its 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs, suggest it is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles. For graphically intensive AAA games, users should expect to rely on upscaling technologies and lower detail presets to maintain playable frame rates, as the 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s performance, particularly its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1915.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2140, indicates it is more than capable of feeding the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The bottleneck in this system will almost always be the GPU. The data suggests that at 1080p, the Arc A370M will deliver a playable experience in esports and older titles, but the lack of measured frames means we cannot provide specific FPS figures. The GPU’s 74th percentile placement puts it in the lower mid-range tier, so expectations for high-refresh-rate gaming at maximum settings should be tempered. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause significant performance degradation, making those resolutions unsuitable for anything beyond very light or older games.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this configuration, the balance is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The Ryzen AI 5 340 sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A370M sits in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. While these percentiles appear close, the nature of the workloads differs. For gaming, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2140 is sufficient to handle game logic and draw calls without becoming a limiting factor. The data indicates that the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3683 further supports this, showing strong single-threaded performance that prevents stuttering in most scenarios.

For productivity and multi-threaded workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532, will be the workhorse. The GPU’s compute capabilities, while respectable for an entry-level part, will not significantly accelerate CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or spreadsheet calculations. The Passmark integer math score of 63078 for the CPU highlights its strength in general processing. The data shows that the GPU will only be a bottleneck when the task specifically requires graphics rendering or parallel compute that it can handle; otherwise, the CPU is the dominant component. The 28W TDP of the CPU and 35W TDP of the GPU also indicate a power-balanced system where neither component should starve the other of thermal or power headroom in a well-designed laptop chassis.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically from the Krackan Point family. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. This process node and architecture combination delivers strong efficiency. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a modest amount for modern workloads but adequate for its segment. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of its capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532 places it in a competitive position, nearly matching the Intel Core i7-11700K, which has a delta of only 0.7%. Its single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Geekbench score of 2140, indicating strong responsiveness for everyday tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 19506 and floating-point math score of 39967 show balanced performance across different instruction types. The data encryption score of 11470 and data compression score of 229796 are particularly relevant for users who handle compressed archives or encrypted files, as this CPU demonstrates significant throughput in these areas. The 78th percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms that this is a solidly above-average processor, suitable for demanding productivity tasks. Its 28W TDP classifies it as an efficient part, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops where sustained performance without excessive heat is critical.

Who Should Build It

This combination of AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and Intel Arc A370M is designed for users who prioritize CPU performance for general productivity but need more graphics power than integrated graphics offer for light gaming or creative tasks. Given the data, this system suits students and professionals who need a responsive machine for coding, data analysis, and office applications. The CPU’s high Passmark single-thread score of 3683 and Geekbench single-core score of 2140 ensure snappy application launching and smooth multitasking. For content creators, the CPU’s multi-core strength, shown by a Cinebench R23 score of 12532, will handle video encoding and photo editing reasonably well, though the GPU will accelerate some effects.

Target users are primarily 1080p gamers who play esports titles or are willing to lower settings in AAA games. The GPU’s 74th percentile performance suggests it can handle these tasks at playable, though not high, frame rates. This is not a system for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming or heavy 3D rendering, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be significant constraints. It is more suited for a secondary work machine that can also play games at moderate settings. Small business workstations that require occasional graphics acceleration for presentations or light CAD work would also find this pairing adequate, leveraging the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets and database management, as indicated by its Passmark multithread score of 19506.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system that is greater than the sum of its parts in CPU-centric tasks, but limited by its GPU in graphics-heavy scenarios. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25981, placing it in the 78th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-14701TE (delta -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (delta 0.4%), AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (delta -0.5%), and Intel Core i7-11700K (delta 0.7%). This places the Ryzen AI 5 340 in a performance tier comparable to a desktop Core i7-11700K, which is a significant achievement for a mobile 28W part. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1915 and single-core score of 242.6 support this, showing strong scaling and efficiency.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (delta -0.1%), AMD FirePro W8000 (delta -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 470 (delta 0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (delta 1%). This indicates that the Arc A370M performs similarly to a desktop Radeon RX 470, which is a several-generation-old card. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, suggesting that overall, this system outperforms a majority of configurations in the database. However, the data shows a discrepancy: the CPU is near the top of its class, while the GPU is firmly in the middle. This means the system’s overall performance in mixed workloads will be dictated by which component is more important for the specific task.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. It comes equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Its compute power is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16, indicating it can handle some light compute workloads. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673. These scores, along with its 74th percentile ranking, suggest that the A370M is a capable 1080p GPU for casual gaming. The presence of 8 RT cores means it supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but given its overall performance level, enabling this feature will likely result in a significant frame rate hit. The 4 GB VRAM is the most critical limitation, as modern games at high textures will exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or reduced texture quality. For rendering tasks, the FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest, meaning it will be slow for complex 3D scenes but adequate for basic GPU-accelerated effects in video editing software. The GPU’s 35W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is designed to be a low-power solution for thinner laptops, not a high-performance gaming chip.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the target scenario. The GPU’s 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will not sustain high frame rates at 1080p in demanding titles. Esports games like CS:GO or Valorant may run well, but AAA games will require significant settings reductions. The CPU’s strong single-core performance prevents it from being the issue, but the GPU will cap FPS well below high-refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532, can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets while gaming. The GPU’s AV1 and hardware encoding capabilities are not detailed in the data, but its compute scores suggest it can offload some encoding work, though the 4 GB VRAM might be tight when running a game and encoding simultaneously.

Video Editing: The CPU will carry this workload. The Passmark multithread score of 19506 and floating-point math score of 39967 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate previews and some effects, but it is not a powerhouse for heavy motion graphics or 4K color grading. This system can handle 1080p editing comfortably and 1440p with proxies.

3D Rendering: This is a weak area. The GPU’s low FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM will severely limit scene complexity and render times for GPU-based engines. The CPU can handle CPU-based rendering, but its 6 cores will be slower than higher-core-count alternatives. This system is only suitable for very basic 3D modeling and previewing, not final frame rendering.

Software Development: The CPU is excellent for this scenario. The Geekbench single-core score of 2140 and integer math score of 63078 ensure fast compilation times for smaller projects and smooth IDE performance. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient for most development tasks. The GPU is irrelevant here, but its presence doesn’t hurt. This is a strong choice for a developer’s laptop.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s efficiency and performance make it ideal here. The Passmark single-thread score of 3683 ensures quick application loads and responsive spreadsheets. The 78th percentile CPU ranking means it handles multitasking with many browser tabs and office apps without issue. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but it allows for light gaming during downtime. This is a very sensible configuration for a student needing one device for work and play.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no traditional upgrade path for the processor. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Users should ensure they purchase a configuration with sufficient memory capacity, as upgrading memory in a laptop is often difficult or impossible. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is allocated to the GPU and other devices.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A370M is also soldered onto the board, meaning it cannot be replaced. The system is classified as a laptop, so the entire platform is fixed. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 28 W, totaling 63 W of base power draw for these components. No suggested PSU is listed, but this low total power consumption means any standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. A sensible "next upgrade" for this platform is not a component swap but rather a full system replacement. When that time comes, users should look for a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU and more VRAM, as the 4 GB on the A370M will be the first thing to become obsolete. The CPU’s performance is strong enough to remain relevant for years, but the GPU will limit longevity for gaming.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 faster than the average CPU?

A: Yes, it ranks in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25981, placing it ahead of the majority of processors in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The data shows they are extremely close in performance. The Arc A370M has an average score of 29175, while the Radeon RX 470 is a nearest rival with a delta of just 0.6%, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming on this system?

A: Based on the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB of VRAM, 1080p is the most appropriate resolution. Higher resolutions like 1440p will likely overwhelm the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK indicates that ECC memory is not supported for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and interface?

A: The GPU has a 64-bit memory bus providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, and it connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: Is the CPU good for video encoding tasks?

A: Yes, its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12532 and Passmark multithread score of 19506 indicate strong multi-threaded performance suitable for software video encoding.