SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 340

25,981 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific tier of mobile computing built around efficiency and balanced capability. This is a laptop-class configuration with a combined performance percentile of 74, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested system pairings. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 5 part running at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. The GPU is Intel's entry-level Arc A350M, based on the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm process. This combination is designed for portable systems that need solid multi-threaded performance for productivity and respectable graphics capability for light to moderate gaming, all within a 28 W CPU TDP and a 25 W GPU TDP.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI 5 340 is a Krackan Point processor, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation, utilizing a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile chip with a 4 nm process node and a die size of 195 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 shared cache. This is a notable design, as the smaller Zen 5c cores likely handle background tasks while the full Zen 5 cores manage heavier workloads, though the exact core distribution is not specified in the data. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is ample for its 6-core configuration.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of its performance class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 12,532 points in multi-core and 1,915.5 points in single-core. The multi-core score is robust for a 28 W part, indicating strong sustained throughput for a mobile chip. Single-core performance is excellent, placing it in a high tier for responsiveness and lightly-threaded tasks. Geekbench results reinforce this: a multi-core score of 9,165 and a single-core score of 2,140 show strong scaling from one to many cores.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,981, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Comparing it to nearest rivals, it trades blows with desktop-class parts. It is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-14701TE (delta -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (delta 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (delta -0.5%). It is 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11700K. This is remarkable—a 28 W mobile processor matching or beating desktop CPUs from previous generations. The Passmark suite shows specific strengths: a multi-thread score of 19,506, integer math of 63,078, and floating-point math of 39,967. Data compression scores 229,796, while encryption hits 11,470, showing solid performance for archives and secure data handling. Single-thread performance is confirmed by a Passmark score of 3,683 Jard.

For real-world workloads, this means the CPU can handle demanding compilation tasks, video encoding, and complex spreadsheet calculations with ease. The high single-core score (1,915.5 in R23) ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and even some light gaming feel snappy. The 12 threads provide enough parallelism for most productivity software, and the efficiency design means this performance is delivered within a 28 W envelope, making it well-suited for thin-and-light laptops. It is a strong showing for a mobile chip, effectively competing with older desktop i7-class parts in raw throughput while consuming a fraction of the power.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 5 340 compare to an older desktop CPU like the Intel Core i7-11700K?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 340 is effectively on par, with an average benchmark score of 25,981 versus 25,812 for the i7-11700K, putting the AMD chip 0.7% ahead. This means a modern 28 W mobile processor matches a previous-generation desktop CPU in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,647. This indicates it outperforms 70% of all GPUs in the database, positioning it as a mid-tier entry-level graphics solution.

Q: Is the Arc A350M comparable to a desktop graphics card?

A: Yes, it is comparable to several desktop cards. It is within 0.4% of an AMD Radeon RX 590, within 0.5% of an NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, and 0.8% behind an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. It edges out the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory, providing a total memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is sufficient to feed the 6-core/12-thread configuration without causing a bottleneck in most productivity tasks.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI 5 340 includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU. This allows the system to operate without the discrete Arc A350M for simple display output, potentially saving power when dedicated graphics are unnecessary.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The smaller 4 nm node contributes to the CPU's high efficiency and performance per watt.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A350M has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its entry-level performance means ray tracing is best used at lower settings or resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. It uses the DG2-128 chip built on a 6 nm TSMC process, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest memory configuration that will limit performance at high resolutions or with high-resolution textures, but is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings.

Clock speeds are a base of 1150 MHz and a boost of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 24 raster operation pipelines (ROPs). For acceleration of modern graphics features, it has 6 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, with a peak FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1). It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a TDP of 25 W.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747, with an average benchmark score of 24,647. This places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which it trails by just 0.4%, meaning the Arc A350M delivers roughly the same raw compute performance as that older desktop card. It is also within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, while leading the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%.

For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 performance of 3.379 and 6.758 TFLOPS respectively is suitable for light 3D modeling and video editing, though not for heavy GPU rendering tasks. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor; complex scenes or high-resolution textures will quickly exhaust it, causing performance drops. The 112 GB/s bandwidth is modest but sufficient for the GPU's compute power. The presence of 6 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate means the GPU can handle ray-traced effects, but given its overall performance tier, users should expect to enable such features only at 1080p with low settings or on older titles. The GPU is a capable entry-level solution for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but its small memory pool and bandwidth cap its potential.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's strong single-core performance (1,915.5 in Cinebench R23) ensures the system will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. However, the GPU's 70th percentile standing means it is suited for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in esports titles, but will likely struggle to maintain high FPS in demanding AAA games. Expect 60+ FPS in competitive shooters and lower, more variable frame rates in graphically intensive titles.

Streaming: The Ryzen AI 5 340's 12 threads provide ample headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The Passmark multi-thread score of 19,506 indicates the CPU can handle the extra load of software encoding (x264) without significantly impacting game performance. Alternatively, the GPU supports modern encoding standards, which can offload the work entirely, though specific encoder quality metrics are not provided.

Video Editing: The combination of a strong 6-core CPU and a GPU with 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is a solid pairing for 1080p video editing. The CPU's 12,532 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will handle timeline scrubbing and effects, while the GPU accelerates rendering and export. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU may limit the complexity of color grades and effects, but it is usable for standard editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU will be the primary workhorse for CPU-based rendering. Its performance is comparable to the Intel Core i7-11700K, meaning render times for single frames will be reasonable for a mobile workstation. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth, making it unsuitable for large scenes. It is best for lighter modeling and previewing rather than final frame rendering.

Software Development: The CPU's 12 threads and high single-core speed are excellent for code compilation. The Passmark data compression score of 229,796 indicates fast handling of large codebases and archives. The system is well-suited for running IDEs, containers, and local build servers without performance degradation, making it a strong choice for developers on the go.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is highly capable for general productivity. The CPU's single-core performance (2,140 Geekbench) ensures snappy application loading and multitasking in office suites. The low TDP of 28 W for the CPU and 25 W for the GPU means long battery life potential, though the 4 GB GPU memory is irrelevant for standard office tasks. It handles spreadsheets, documents, and web research with ease.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is aimed at users who need a portable laptop that excels at both productivity and light gaming. The 74th combined percentile indicates it is a well-balanced system for its class. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M sufficient, as it performs within 0.8% of an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. Content creators who edit 1080p video or do light 3D modeling will benefit from the 12-thread CPU and GPU acceleration. Software developers will appreciate the strong compilation performance, with the CPU matching the Intel Core i7-11700K.

Students will find this a versatile machine for coursework, research, and casual gaming during downtime. Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for data analysis or financial modeling will be well-served by the CPU's 78th percentile standing. It is not a system for users seeking high-end 1440p or 4K gaming, nor is it suitable for professional 3D rendering or machine learning workloads that demand more VRAM. The 4 GB GPU memory is the primary limitation, making this a system for users who prioritize portability and efficiency over raw graphics muscle.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the data is explicitly marked as not measured. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components and their percentile positions.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 and its position in the 70th percentile, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming. The GPU's performance is comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590, trailing it by a mere 0.4%. In practical terms, this suggests that at 1080p with Ultra settings, the system can handle older or less demanding titles at 60+ FPS. For example, esports games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant should easily exceed 100 FPS. For modern AAA titles, expect 40-60 FPS at medium to high settings, with dips below 60 FPS in the most graphically intense scenes.

The CPU's high single-core score of 1,915.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, even at higher frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint; games with high-resolution texture packs will likely cause stuttering or require reduced texture quality. The 64-bit memory bus and 112 GB/s bandwidth further cap performance at higher resolutions. While the system can output to higher resolutions, the data indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot. Ray tracing is possible with the 6 RT cores, but performance will be limited, so it is best used sparingly or on older titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen AI 5 340 and the Arc A350M is tipped in favor of the CPU for most workloads. The CPU, sitting in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, is significantly stronger relative to its class than the GPU, which sits in the 70th percentile. This means that in productivity tasks like video editing, software compilation, and data processing, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU will rarely be the limiting factor. The CPU's 12,532 Cinebench R23 score and 19,506 Passmark multi-thread score indicate it can push through heavy multi-threaded workloads without waiting on the GPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints. Even though the CPU could theoretically feed more frames, the GPU's compute power (3.379 TFLOPS) and memory subsystem will cap frame rates in demanding titles. The deltaPct comparisons show the GPU is within 1.5% of its nearest rivals, indicating it is a known quantity in the entry-level segment. The lack of measured FPS data makes exact bottleneck analysis impossible, but the percentile gap suggests that for gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, while for heavy multi-threaded tasks, the CPU leads the way.

The system is not perfectly balanced. It is a CPU-heavy configuration that is adequate for gaming at 1080p but will not push high frame rates in AAA titles. The 25 W GPU TDP limits its performance ceiling, while the 28 W CPU TDP provides excellent efficiency. This is a system where the CPU outshines the GPU, making it a better choice for productivity-focused users who game occasionally rather than dedicated gamers.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 with the Intel Arc A350M. It represents a specific tier of mobile computing focused on efficiency and balanced capability. The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, meaning it performs better than 74% of all tested system combinations in the database. This places it in the upper-midrange for laptops, offering a strong blend of CPU and GPU power for a portable form factor.

The CPU is a high-efficiency, high-performance 6-core/12-thread Zen 5 part, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete solution from Intel. Neither component is a flagship, but their combination creates a system that is greater than the sum of its parts for general use. The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP indicate a design philosophy prioritizing battery life and thermal management. This is not a gaming behemoth or a rendering workstation; it is a versatile all-rounder. Users get desktop-class CPU performance (matching the Intel Core i7-11700K) with a capable, if modest, discrete GPU.

The system is best described as an efficient productivity laptop with gaming capability. The 74th percentile ranking suggests it will handle almost any task thrown at it, from office work to software development to 1080p gaming, with reasonable competence. It confirms modern chip design that a 28 W CPU can match older desktop processors. This pairing is ideal for users who want a single device that can do everything well without excelling in any one category, and who prioritize portability and efficiency over raw performance.

Benchmark Performance

The individual benchmark scores for this pair show a clear hierarchy. The CPU leads with an average benchmark score of 25,981, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its strongest results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,532 and a single-core score of 1,915.5. Geekbench scores are 9,165 multi-core and 2,140 single-core. The GPU, meanwhile, has an average benchmark score of 24,647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24,546 and Vulkan is 24,747.

The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-14701TE, which scores 26,013, just 0.1% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scores 25,880, 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26,106, 0.5% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-11700K scores 25,812, 0.7% behind. This shows the CPU is firmly in a competitive cluster with these parts. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24,744, 0.4% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763, 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442, 0.8% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277, 1.5% behind.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is the star, operating at a level comparable to desktop CPUs from a few generations ago. The GPU is a competent but secondary component, matching the performance of an older desktop graphics card. The 74th combined percentile reflects a system that is well above average, with the CPU carrying most of the weight. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU's 12,532 R23 multi-core score is the headline figure, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance dictates its 1080p gaming ceiling. This is a balanced system with a distinct lean towards CPU-intensive work.