SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and Intel Arc A770M pairing represents a curious study in contrasts. This laptop configuration pairs a top-tier, 16-core mobile processor with a mid-range mobile graphics solution, creating a system whose computational ceiling is far higher than its graphical one. The data indicates a build engineered for heavy multi-threaded productivity and development work, rather than for pushing maximum frame rates in demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the clear anchor of this system. Built on the Zen 5 architecture and codenamed Fire Range, this processor is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads. The chip operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it is specified with a TDP of 55 W, a figure that suggests a focus on efficiency within the mobile envelope. The silicon itself is substantial, with 16,630 million transistors spread across a dual-die design of 2x 70.6 mm².

The cache hierarchy is a defining feature of this CPU. Each core has 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 cache, but the headline specification is the 128 MB of L3 cache. This massive pool of fast memory is the "3D" element of the X3D branding, and it has profound implications for workloads that are sensitive to memory latency and data reuse. The benchmark results reflect this design. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 38,161.5 points in the multi-core test, while the single-core score is 2,159.5 points. The multi-core result is particularly strong, placing the chip in a position to rival desktop workstation processors.

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, the picture is one of near-parity with some of AMD's most powerful non-X3D parts. The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an average benchmark score of 97,453. This places it 1.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (avg score 98,504) and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 (avg score 96,083). The delta is even larger against the AMD EPYC 4565P, where the X3D part leads by 1.8%, and the AMD EPYC 9175F, where it leads by 1.9%. This data suggests that the 9955HX3D, despite being a mobile chip with a 55 W TDP, is delivering performance that is statistically indistinguishable from or better than high-end desktop and server processors in aggregate benchmark scores.

The PassMark suite of tests provides further granularity on the CPU's capabilities. The multi-thread score of 62,674 is formidable, driven by strong integer math (222,503), floating-point math (144,122), and data compression (785,811) results. The single-thread score of 4,511 is also competitive, indicating strong per-core performance that is essential for many legacy applications and games. The processor's percentile ranking of 96 versus all CPUs places it in the top 4% of all processors ever benchmarked, an elite status. The arithmetic here is clear: for a laptop, this CPU offers a level of multi-core compute power that was, until recently, the exclusive domain of large desktop workstations.

Balance and Bottleneck

This configuration presents a significant imbalance in raw compute power. The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is in the 96th percentile for CPU performance, while the Intel Arc A770M sits in the 62nd percentile for GPUs. The data strongly suggests that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU has a far higher ceiling than the GPU can reach, meaning that in gaming scenarios, the frame rate will almost certainly be dictated by the Arc A770M's rendering capabilities, not the CPU's processing speed.

The combined percentile for this pair is 79, which is a reflection of the lower-performing component dragging the average down. The CPU's massive 128 MB L3 cache can help feed the GPU data more efficiently in some scenarios, potentially mitigating stutter and improving frame pacing, but it cannot compensate for a fundamental lack of GPU shading power. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D scene processing, the CPU will operate at near-full capacity, and the GPU will be largely idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming, the CPU will be underutilized, waiting on the GPU to finish rendering each frame.

The data implies a system that is a specialist. It is unbalanced for gaming, but that imbalance is a feature for productivity. A user running a complex simulation or rendering a 4K video will see the CPU working at its full potential, with the GPU handling only the final output or preview tasks. The bottleneck is not a flaw; it is a design choice that prioritizes compute throughput over graphics performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It is a large GPU, but its performance class is distinctly mid-range. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clocks run at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

The GPU's compute resources include 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output pipelines. It also has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The clock speeds are a base of 1650 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 262.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 524.8 GTexel/s. The raw FP32 compute is rated at 16.79 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 33.59 TFLOPS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs and features like hardware ray tracing.

The benchmark scores for the Arc A770M are a mixed bag. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 2,278 points, which is a measure of modern game rendering performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,494 and Vulkan score of 74,422 indicate strong general-purpose compute and graphics API performance. However, the PassMark G3D score of 11,774 and the lower scores in legacy DirectX tests (DirectX 9: 178, DirectX 10: 56, DirectX 11: 69, DirectX 12: 70) suggest that the driver overhead or architecture may not be optimized for older APIs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 18,383, which places it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database are telling. The Intel Arc A770M is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460 (avg 18,373) and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (avg 18,159). It is 0.8% behind the AMD FirePro D500 (avg 18,533) and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (avg 18,189). This places the Arc A770M's overall compute performance in the same league as these older or less powerful cards. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset for content creation and AI workloads, but the raw shader throughput is not in the same tier as the CPU it is paired with.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the CPU's specifications. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. This means the upgrade path is essentially non-existent in the traditional sense; the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. The system is a laptop, and as such, upgrades are limited to what the chassis allows.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a professional-grade feature often sought after for workstation reliability. The processor provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for future high-speed NVMe storage or external GPU enclosures, though the internal GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU also includes an integrated Radeon 610M GPU, which is a useful fallback for basic display output or troubleshooting.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W. The combined thermal and power draw is significant for a laptop, but the system is a fixed configuration. A sensible "upgrade" for this platform would not be swapping components, but rather ensuring the system has a robust cooling solution and enough RAM to keep the 16-core CPU fed. The data implies that the platform is a closed, high-performance workstation, not a modular gaming rig.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a processor that vastly outclasses its graphics partner. The CPU's average benchmark score is 97,453, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 18,383, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 79, which is a weighted average that pulls the system down from the CPU's elite tier.

The CPU's specific scores are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,161.5 is a high-end desktop figure, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 62,674 confirms this. The CPU is 1.4% faster than the Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 and 1.8% faster than the EPYC 4565P, making it a top-tier compute engine.

The GPU's scores are more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 and the PassMark G3D score of 11,774 place it in the performance tier of a mid-range desktop card from a previous generation. The GPU is statistically tied with the RTX 3060 Mobile, being 1.2% faster, but it is a far cry from the performance level of the CPU. The combined picture is a system that will excel at tasks that stress the CPU and will be merely acceptable at tasks that stress the GPU.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the data for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 and its 62nd percentile ranking indicate that it is a capable, but not high-end, gaming GPU.

Based on the GPU's performance parity with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (1.2% faster in aggregate benchmarks), frame rate expectations should follow that class of hardware. At 1080p resolution with Ultra settings, the Arc A770M would likely provide playable frame rates in most esports and older titles, but would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU would be the clear bottleneck, and users would need to lower settings to medium or high to achieve smooth gameplay. The 16 GB VRAM is a unique asset that helps with high-resolution textures, but the raw processing power is not there to drive high refresh rates at high resolutions.

The CPU's gaming performance is a non-issue, as the 9955HX3D is in the 96th percentile and would not be a limiting factor in any title. The system's gaming capability is entirely dictated by the Arc A770M. The data suggests this is not a high-refresh gaming laptop, but rather a machine where gaming is a secondary function.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a specific user: the professional who needs extreme multi-core compute power on the go. The data suggests that this build is for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex models, or engineers performing simulations. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and its performance advantage over workstation-class chips like the EPYC 4565P (1.8% faster) and Threadripper PRO 5965WX (1.1% slower) make it a compelling mobile workstation.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU's power for their coursework, but the GPU is more than sufficient for their needs. Small business workstations that require heavy data processing, such as financial modeling or video transcoding, would also find this a capable tool. Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding titles would find the system adequate, but they are not the primary audience. The system is built for the CPU, and the GPU is a supporting player for visualization and light rendering tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that combines the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, a flagship mobile CPU, with the Intel Arc A770M, a mid-range mobile GPU. The pairing is unusual, creating a system with an extreme performance disparity. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs.

The overall tier of the system, based on the combined percentile of 79, is solid upper-mid-range. This is not a budget system, nor is it a top-tier gaming machine. It is a specialized tool that prioritizes processor performance. The data shows a system that is a compute monster with a graphics card that is merely average. It is a workstation in a laptop chassis, and its performance profile is skewed heavily toward tasks that leverage the CPU's 16 cores and 128 MB of L3 cache.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945?

A: The 9955HX3D has an average benchmark score of 97,453, which is 1.4% higher than the Ryzen 9 PRO 9945's score of 96,083. This indicates the X3D chip holds a slight performance edge in aggregate computing tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A770M is in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. This means it performs better than 62% of all GPUs in the database, placing it in the mid-range tier for graphics processing.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have and why is it significant?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of L3 cache. This large pool of fast memory reduces latency for frequently accessed data, which is a major factor in its strong benchmark scores and its ability to handle complex, data-heavy workloads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, provided by its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The GPU is in the 62nd percentile, while the CPU is in the 96th percentile. In gaming, the Arc A770M's rendering speed will dictate frame rates, not the CPU's processing power.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. This advanced node contributes to its high performance and a TDP of only 55 W.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the primary use case. The GPU's 62nd percentile ranking and performance parity with the RTX 3060 Mobile suggest 1080p gaming at medium-high settings is realistic, but high-refresh 1440p gaming is not achievable on this hardware.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are more than capable of handling game capture and encoding while playing. The x264 encoding workload would be trivial for the 9955HX3D, though the game's frame rate would still be limited by the Arc A770M.

Video Editing: This is an excellent scenario. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,161.5 will accelerate timeline rendering and export times significantly. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is also a benefit for previewing effects and handling larger project files.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 62,674 and 128 MB L3 cache will handle CPU-based rendering engines with ease. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering, but its compute score (PassMark G3D of 11,774) is not its strong suit.

Software Development: The build is ideal for developers. Compiling large codebases will be extremely fast, and the 32 threads allow for massive parallel builds. The CPU's performance is 1.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4565P, a server chip, making it a top-tier choice for this task.

Student and Office Work: This scenario is overkill. The CPU's power is wasted on word processing and spreadsheets. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU would be sufficient for these tasks, making the discrete Arc A770M an unnecessary addition for basic productivity. The system excels at heavy lifting, not light office tasks.