SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + Intel Arc A730M

This pairing combines a 16-core Zen 5 flagship mobile processor with a 12 GB Intel Arc discrete GPU in a laptop-class build, placing the combination at the 90th percentile overall. The CPU is a dominant force — its 96th percentile ranking among all processors puts it in elite company — while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile, a capable but less exceptional partner. The data reveals a system with enormous compute headroom for CPU-bound tasks, paired with a GPU that handles modern graphics workloads competently but will not match the CPU's level of dominance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is built on the Zen 5 architecture using the Fire Range codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz that boosts up to 5.40 GHz. The chip integrates 128 MB of L3 cache, alongside 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. This massive L3 pool is the defining feature of the X3D lineup, and it shows in the benchmark data.

The CPU's transistor count stands at 16,630 million spread across a dual-die design with each die measuring 70.6 mm². It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically associated with workstation-class reliability. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, and it includes integrated Radeon 610M graphics as a fallback. The TDP is rated at 55 W, which is remarkably modest for a 16-core part, though the multiplier is unlocked for enthusiast tuning. The CPU released on January 5, 2025, and remains in active production.

Benchmark results underscore the CPU's strength. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 38,161.5 points, while the single-core score is 2,159.5. Cinebench R15 scores are 6,042.5 multicore and 332 single-core. PassMark results show a multithread score of 62,674, a single-thread score of 4,511, and an average benchmark score of 97,453. The percentile rank against all CPUs is 96, meaning this processor outperforms 96% of all CPUs in the database.

The nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 98,504, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 scores 96,083, 1.4% lower. The AMD EPYC 4565P scores 95,764, 1.8% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9175F scores 95,615, 1.9% lower. This positions the 9955HX3D directly in the company of high-core-count workstation and server parts, despite being a mobile processor. The implication is clear: this CPU delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a laptop form factor.

For real workloads, the 128 MB L3 cache matters most in scenarios where data fits within that pool — database queries, scientific simulations, and certain game engines benefit disproportionately. The single-core score of 4,511 in PassMark indicates strong per-thread performance, which translates to snappy application responsiveness and solid gaming frame pacing. The data compression score of 785,811 and integer math score of 222,503 suggest heavy lifting in file archiving and general computation. The floating-point score of 144,122 supports 3D rendering and scientific computing. This is a processor that does not bottleneck easily in any CPU-bound task.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 97,453, placing it at the 96th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 45,592, at the 84th percentile. The combined build sits at the 90th percentile, reflecting a CPU-heavy balance. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows — so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,732, which is a moderate result for a mobile part. Geekbench scores are more revealing: OpenCL reaches 70,352 and Vulkan reaches 64,693. These numbers indicate that the GPU handles compute workloads reasonably well, with Vulkan performance slightly trailing OpenCL. The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384 (0.5% higher), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972 (0.8% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45,152 (1% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46,043 (1% lower). The Arc A730M sits squarely in the middle of this group, meaning it trades blows with professional and high-end mobile GPUs.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. The CPU is near the top of the entire processor hierarchy, while the GPU is solidly mid-high range. In CPU-intensive workloads like compilation, rendering, or data processing, the system will feel exceptionally fast. In GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or heavy ray tracing, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 90th percentile combined ranking suggests that for most users, this system will feel premium, but the gap between the two components' percentiles (96 vs 84) is worth noting for anyone planning to push graphics-heavy tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture under the Alchemist generation, using the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². It features 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The GPU includes 24 ray tracing cores, though tensor core counts are not listed in the data.

Memory configuration is substantial: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 1100 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. Raw compute performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS for FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 80 W, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Production status is marked as end-of-life, which affects long-term availability but not current performance.

The benchmark scores place the GPU at the 84th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,732 is a modern DX12 test that stresses the GPU with realistic workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 70,352 and Vulkan score of 64,693 indicate that the GPU performs better in compute-oriented tasks than in pure rasterization, which is consistent with Intel's architectural focus on compute. The 12 GB VRAM is generous for a mobile GPU and will handle high-resolution textures without running out of memory in most scenarios. The 336 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional, which means memory-bound workloads may show some limitation.

For rendering, the 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the overall FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS suggests that heavy ray tracing will be challenging at high resolutions. The FP16 performance of 25.19 TFLOPS is useful for AI-accelerated workloads and certain compute tasks, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means the GPU relies on general-purpose shader hardware for such tasks. The GPU's position between the Radeon Pro 5500 XT and RTX A2000 in average score suggests it performs similarly to professional workstation GPUs, which is a favorable comparison for a mobile part.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 4,511 and the GPU's 84th percentile ranking suggest this system can drive high-refresh displays at 1080p, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance minimizes frame pacing issues. The GPU will likely be the constraint at higher refresh rates, but the 12 GB VRAM and 336 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for most competitive titles. Expect smooth performance in esports and moderate settings in AAA games.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU with a multithread score of 62,674 can handle simultaneous encoding and gaming without significant impact on frame rates. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it has ample spare capacity for software encoding, which is preferable to relying on the GPU's encoder. The 128 MB L3 cache helps maintain consistent performance when multiple tasks compete for resources.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,161.5 indicates excellent rendering performance in video editing software that utilizes multiple cores. The GPU's OpenCL score of 70,352 supports GPU-accelerated effects and previews. Timeline scrubbing and export tasks will benefit from the CPU's strength, while the GPU handles effects processing adequately. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing timelines with multiple effects layers.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 144,122 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS combine for respectable rendering performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The 128 MB L3 cache is advantageous for scene data that fits within that pool. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the Arc A730M's moderate compute throughput, but the CPU can compensate in hybrid workflows.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 39,446 and extended instructions score of 62,813 indicate strong performance in cryptographic operations and SIMD-heavy code. Compilation tasks will fly with 16 cores and 32 threads, and the high single-thread score of 4,511 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 128 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases, making this an excellent development machine.

Student and office work: The CPU's 96th percentile ranking is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the efficiency of the 55 W TDP means the laptop can run cool and quiet. The integrated Radeon 610M provides a fallback for battery-saver modes, while the Arc A730M handles any graphics-accelerated office applications. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running data analysis tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 96th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile provide a basis for these estimates.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,732 suggests it can handle most modern titles at playable frame rates, likely 60+ FPS in optimized games but dipping below in demanding titles. The CPU's single-core strength ensures that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle more, with frame rates dropping as pixel count increases. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p textures, but the 336 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in texture-heavy scenes.

Ray tracing performance is constrained by the 24 RT cores and 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Expect ray-traced effects to be usable at 1080p with upscaling, but not at native high resolutions. The FP16 performance of 25.19 TFLOPS could assist with some upscaling techniques that use half-precision compute. Competitive esports titles will run well, likely exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, thanks to the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's adequate rasterization power.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers who play at 1080p with high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance, ensuring the GPU is the only bottleneck. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the 16-core CPU transformative for their workflows. The 96th percentile CPU ranking means this system outperforms the vast majority of available processors in multi-threaded tasks.

Developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or work with data-intensive applications will appreciate the 128 MB L3 cache and 32 threads. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running compute jobs. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's power, though the GPU is more than adequate for coursework. Small business workstations that handle database operations, financial modeling, or scientific computing will see significant performance gains from the CPU's capabilities.

The GPU's position at the 84th percentile means it is not the strongest mobile GPU available, but it is competitive with professional workstation parts like the RTX A2000. Users who need CUDA acceleration should look elsewhere, as the Arc A730M does not support NVIDIA's ecosystem. However, for users who rely on OpenCL or Vulkan compute, the GPU performs well. The 12 GB VRAM is a strong asset for machine learning inference and large dataset visualization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile with an average score of 97,453, while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile with an average score of 45,592. This 12-percentage-point gap means the CPU will frequently be waiting on the GPU in graphics-intensive workloads. The combined 90th percentile ranking reflects this asymmetry — the system is strong overall, but the GPU is the weaker link.

In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will dominate and the GPU will have minimal impact. The PassMark multithread score of 62,674 confirms this. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU's 84th percentile ranking will limit frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,732 indicates moderate DX12 performance, which will be the ceiling for modern games.

The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, making the GPU the bottleneck. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes even more of a constraint. The 336 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential limiting factor in high-resolution textures, while the CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than sufficient for its needs. For balanced performance, the GPU should be upgraded to a higher-percentile part, though the current pairing remains functional for most tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A730M, a 12 GB Xe-HPG mobile GPU. The CPU is a flagship-tier part from the 9000 series, released in early 2025 and still in active production. The GPU is from the Alchemist generation and is marked as end-of-life, which means it is being phased out but remains available in existing systems.

The combined performance tier is high: the 90th overall percentile places this system above the vast majority of builds in the database. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking is exceptional, while the GPU's 84th percentile is solidly above average. The pairing is unusual — a top-tier CPU with a mid-high-tier GPU — which suggests a system designed for CPU-intensive tasks with graphics as a secondary consideration. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP combine for a total thermal envelope that is manageable for a laptop chassis.

The build class is explicitly laptop, meaning the components are designed for mobile use with power and thermal constraints. The CPU's unlocked multiplier offers tuning potential, though laptop cooling may limit overclocking headroom. The GPU's 80 W TDP is modest for a discrete part, which is typical for mobile implementations. Overall, this is a workstation-class laptop CPU paired with a capable mid-range gaming GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's strongest benchmark result?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 97,453, placing it at the 96th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,161.5 is particularly strong.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average score of 45,592 is 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, 0.8% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation, 1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, and 1% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A2000.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this build?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and type?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s and an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. It has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Q: What is the production status of each component?

A: The CPU is marked as active production, while the GPU is marked as end-of-life.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes provides substantial bandwidth for storage and expansion. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, which is low for a 16-core part, leaving thermal headroom for potential power tuning.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU's TDP is 80 W, and no suggested PSU is listed in the data, which is typical for laptop components where power delivery is integrated into the system. The GPU's end-of-life status means future availability will diminish, but the 12 GB VRAM remains relevant for current workloads.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as it is the weaker component at the 84th percentile. Replacing the Arc A730M with a higher-percentile mobile GPU would balance the system and improve gaming performance. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it will not need upgrading for several generations. The 128 MB L3 cache and 16 cores provide long-term relevance for CPU-bound tasks.

The platform's DDR5 memory support means users can upgrade to higher-capacity or higher-speed kits, though the dual-channel configuration caps bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes support future NVMe storage upgrades with extreme throughput. The unlocked multiplier offers tuning potential for enthusiasts, though laptop cooling will limit practical gains. The CPU's active production status ensures continued BIOS and driver support, while the GPU's end-of-life status means driver updates will eventually cease, which is a consideration for long-term use.