SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + Intel Arc A370M

This pairing combines AMD's flagship mobile 16-core Zen 5 processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, creating a laptop configuration where the CPU is in the 96th percentile of all processors while the GPU sits in the 74th percentile of all graphics cards. The data shows an extreme performance asymmetry: the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D delivers workstation-class multi-threaded throughput, while the Arc A370M provides modest 1080p-class gaming capability. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Fire Range codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4nm process node. It packs 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with each die measuring 70.6 mm². The base clock runs at 2.50 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache—this large L3 pool is the hallmark of the X3D branding, designed to reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark results place this chip firmly in elite territory. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,161.5 points and single-core score of 2,159.5 points indicate strong scaling across all 16 cores as well as excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark multithread score of 62,674 and single-thread score of 4,511 reinforce this dual strength. The processor's average benchmark score of 97,453 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 96% of all processors in the database. Compared to its nearest rivals, it trails the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX by just 1.1% in average score, while leading the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 by 1.4%, the AMD EPYC 4565P by 1.8%, and the AMD EPYC 9175F by 1.9%. These deltas are remarkably tight, suggesting the 9955HX3D trades blows with high-end workstation and server parts despite being a mobile chip.

The specialized PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths. Data compression scores 785,811, which is exceptionally high and indicates strong performance in archiving, database compression, and file-system tasks. Floating-point math scores 144,122, integer math scores 222,503, and extended instructions score 62,813—all pointing to robust scientific and financial computing capability. The random string sorting score of 83,497 suggests solid text-processing and data-manipulation throughput. Encryption scores 39,446 and physics scores 4,687, with prime-number finding at 525. The memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface, which is standard for mobile platforms but modest compared to the L3 cache capacity that can mitigate bandwidth limitations in many workloads.

For real-world use, the Cinebench R15 scores of 6,042.5 multicore and 332 single-core further confirm that this CPU sustains high multi-threaded throughput, making it suitable for video rendering, code compilation, and simulation tasks. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is strong enough for responsive everyday use and lightly-threaded applications. The unlocked multiplier means overclocking is possible if the laptop's cooling and power delivery allow it, though the 55 W TDP suggests thermal constraints in a mobile chassis.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation with the DG2-128 chip, built on TSMC's 6nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 8 ray-tracing cores. The base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s—this is a significant bottleneck for modern games and rendering workloads.

The compute capabilities are modest: FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, FP16 is 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), and pixel/texture rates are 65.60 GPixel/s and 131.2 GTexel/s respectively. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it can handle modern graphics APIs including hardware ray tracing (through the 8 RT cores) and mesh shaders. However, the 4 GB VRAM capacity and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture quality and resolution in demanding titles.

Benchmark results show the Arc A370M scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. This places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable for an entry-level mobile part but far from high-end. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close in average score: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is 0.1% faster, the AMD FirePro W8000 is 0.1% faster, the AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.6% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 1.0% slower. The fact that a high-end mobile GPU like the RX 6800M scores nearly identically in these specific tests suggests the A370M's architecture performs well in compute-oriented benchmarks, but the 4 GB VRAM and narrow memory bus will constrain real-world gaming at higher settings. The production status is end-of-life, indicating this GPU is a legacy part.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 97,453 versus the GPU's average of 29,175 creates a clear hierarchy: the processor is the dominant component by a wide margin. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile means that, in the combined system, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload—it has headroom to feed even a much faster GPU. The combined percentile for this pairing is 85, reflecting the overall system tier when both components are considered together.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 38,161.5 indicates the CPU can handle heavily parallelized tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding with ease, while the single-core score of 2,159.5 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 suggests it can handle compute tasks like image processing or light machine-learning inference, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly an order of magnitude below what a desktop high-end GPU would offer. The gap between the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 62,674 and the GPU's average of 29,175 highlights the imbalance—the CPU is more than twice as powerful in raw aggregate performance.

The nearest-rival deltas tell an interesting story. The CPU is within 1.9% of three different EPYC and Threadripper parts, meaning this mobile chip genuinely competes with server-class silicon in average benchmark scores. The GPU, meanwhile, is within 1.0% of four very different GPUs (a Vega M, a FirePro, a Polaris-based RX 470, and a high-end RX 6800M), suggesting that the Arc A370M's benchmark scores cluster around a performance plateau that spans multiple generations and market segments. For the combined system, the practical implication is that CPU-bound tasks will run at near-desktop-workstation speeds, while GPU-bound tasks will be limited to entry-level laptop graphics performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap playable settings at low-to-medium in most modern titles at 1080p. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can push 60+ FPS in esports titles but will struggle with AAA games at high refresh rates. The CPU's 96th percentile ensures no CPU-side bottlenecks, but the GPU will be the ceiling.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads with a PassMark multithread score of 62,674 provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The GPU's 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support can offload some encoding tasks, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit the ability to run a game plus streaming software with high-quality textures.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,161.5 makes CPU-based rendering in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve fast, and the 128 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and effect processing. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will slow GPU-accelerated effects and 4K timeline playback, making this a CPU-heavy editing workstation rather than a GPU-accelerated one.

3D rendering: In Blender or similar CPU-renderers, the 9955HX3D will deliver near-workstation performance, as evidenced by its 1.1% delta to the Threadripper PRO 5965WX. GPU rendering with the Arc A370M is possible but will be slow due to the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM, which limits scene complexity.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 785,811 and integer math score of 222,503 indicate fast code compilation and data processing. The CPU's 16 cores will dramatically reduce build times for large projects, while the GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks unless CUDA or OpenCL compute is needed.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 4,511 and 96th percentile CPU ranking make everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis feel instantaneous. The GPU is more than adequate for 2D desktop workloads, and the 55 W TDP suggests reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D scores in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms approximately 96% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 97,453 is within 1.9% of several EPYC and Threadripper workstation parts.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A370M's average score of 29,175 places it in the 74th percentile. It is 0.1% slower than the Radeon RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, 0.6% faster than the Radeon RX 470, and 1.0% faster than the Radeon RX 6800M in these specific benchmark tests.

Q: What is the total L3 cache on the CPU?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of L3 cache total, along with 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core. This large L3 cache is a key feature of the X3D branding and helps reduce memory latency.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU only.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A370M has an end-of-life production status. It was released in March 2022 and is now a legacy part.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, reflecting the overall system tier. The CPU is in the 96th percentile while the GPU is in the 74th, so the system sits between them.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated Radeon 610M graphics, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket, and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability. The memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, and the platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs but means the system cannot leverage the CPU's Gen 5 lanes for the GPU. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 35 W, so the combined power draw is modest by gaming-laptop standards; there is no suggested PSU figure in the data, but the low TDPs imply that a standard laptop power adapter will suffice.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, since the CPU has significant headroom. Replacing the Arc A370M with a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the CPU's 96th-percentile performance, particularly for gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. However, the laptop form factor (buildClass is "laptop") means the GPU is likely soldered and not user-upgradeable, so the practical upgrade path is limited to external GPU enclosures via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, or replacing the entire laptop. The CPU itself is at the top of its class, so upgrading the processor would yield minimal gains; the bottleneck is clearly on the GPU side. The 128 MB L3 cache and 16 cores mean the CPU will remain relevant for years, making the GPU the primary upgrade target if the chassis allows it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a severe imbalance: the CPU is in the 96th percentile while the GPU is in the 74th percentile, with a combined percentile of 85. In CPU-bound workloads—such as code compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering—the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D will perform at near-workstation levels, as evidenced by its 1.1% delta to the Threadripper PRO 5965WX. The GPU will not interfere with these tasks. In GPU-bound workloads—such as gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated effects—the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor, capping performance at entry-level laptop levels. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause texture thrashing in modern games at 1080p high settings, while the CPU sits idle waiting for frames.

The PassMark physics score of 4,687 and floating-point math score of 144,122 suggest the CPU can handle physics simulations and scientific computing without issue, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 means any GPU-compute task will be slow. The FPS scaling in gaming will be dictated almost entirely by the GPU; the CPU's single-thread score of 4,511 ensures it can feed even high-refresh displays in CPU-light scenes, but the GPU will drop frames in GPU-heavy scenes regardless of CPU capability. The practical bottleneck is the GPU in all graphics-intensive scenarios, while the CPU is the star in productivity and compute tasks. This is a configuration where the user must choose between leveraging the CPU's massive multi-threaded power or accepting the GPU's modest graphics performance—there is no balance point where both components are equally utilized.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") pairing AMD's top-tier mobile CPU with Intel's entry-level discrete GPU. The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 processor with 128 MB L3 cache, scoring in the 96th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 97,453. The Intel Arc A370M is a 4 GB GDDR6 GPU with 1,024 shading units and 8 RT cores, scoring in the 74th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 29,175. The combined percentile of 85 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, though the GPU is clearly the weaker link. The CPU's performance rivals that of desktop workstation processors like the Threadripper PRO 5965WX (within 1.1% in average score), while the GPU performs similarly to mid-range desktop parts from several generations ago. This is a CPU-first build where the processor dominates the system's identity and capability.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers who play at 1080p with low-to-medium settings and favor esports titles over AAA graphics showcases will find the Arc A370M sufficient, while the CPU ensures no frame drops from processor limitations. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering—such as video editors using software encoders or 3D artists using CPU renderers—will benefit from the 16 cores and 128 MB L3 cache, with the GPU serving as a secondary accelerator for preview and light effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will see dramatic build-time reductions, as the PassMark data compression score of 785,811 and multithread score of 62,674 indicate rapid parallel processing. Students and office workers in technical fields (engineering, data science, finance) will appreciate the CPU's single-thread score of 4,511 for responsive applications and its multicore power for simulations or data analysis. Small business workstations running databases or virtualization will leverage the CPU's 16 cores and ECC memory support, while the GPU handles basic display output. Users who need GPU-heavy workloads—like machine learning training, high-end gaming, or GPU-accelerated 3D rendering—should look elsewhere, as the 4 GB VRAM and 74th-percentile GPU will be a constant limitation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA titles will likely run between 30-50 FPS, with esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant potentially reaching 60-90 FPS due to lower GPU demands. At 1440p, expect a significant drop—likely 20-35 FPS in AAA games—as the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM become severe constraints. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking places it in the same performance class as the Radeon RX 470 (0.6% slower in average score), which historically handles 1080p medium settings at 60 FPS in older titles. The CPU's 96th-percentile performance ensures that frame rates will be GPU-limited in virtually all scenarios; the 5.40 GHz boost clock and 128 MB L3 cache eliminate any CPU-side stutter or frame-pacing issues. For ray-traced games, the 8 RT cores provide the hardware capability, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute will result in low ray-tracing performance, likely requiring DLSS or FSR upscaling to maintain playable frame rates. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming system for medium settings in modern titles, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades if the laptop chassis allows.