SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with an Intel Arc A350M creates one of the most extreme asymmetries in mobile computing. The data presents a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 flagship designed for maximum multi-threaded throughput, tethered to a compact entry-level graphics processor. This is not a balanced configuration; it is a system where the CPU operates in an entirely different performance tier than the GPU. The benchmark results indicate a profound bottleneck, but it is not the kind that limits gaming alone—it shapes the identity of the entire machine, making it a specialist tool for CPU-bound workloads rather than a general-purpose gaming laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear and severe imbalance. The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 97,453. In contrast, the Intel Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 24,647. The combined percentile for this pair is 83, which is pulled down significantly by the GPU. This is not a subtle gap; it is a chasm. The CPU is a top-tier part capable of competing with workstation-class processors, while the GPU is a modest entry-level mobile solution.

The bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU for any graphics-intensive task. The CPU’s immense processing power, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,161.5, can generate frames far faster than the Arc A350M can render them. In gaming, the A350M will be the limiting factor, as its 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are dwarfed by the CPU’s capability to feed it data. The CPU will spend most of its time idle, waiting for the GPU to catch up.

However, the bottleneck shifts in non-graphics workloads. For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, or data processing, the GPU is largely irrelevant. Here, the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads can run at full tilt. The PassMark multi-thread score of 62,674 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score demonstrate that this CPU is a productivity monster. In these scenarios, the system is balanced—the CPU is the engine, and the GPU simply handles display output. The data implies a machine that is incredibly fast for compute, but hobbled for gaming, creating a dual-personality system.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D a fast processor for multi-threaded tasks?

A: Yes, exceptionally so. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 38,161.5, and its PassMark multi-thread score is 62,674. It ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, placing it just 1.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX in average benchmark score.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an average benchmark score of 97,453. It is 1.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945, 1.8% faster than the AMD EPYC 4565P, and 1.9% faster than the AMD EPYC 9175F. It is only 1.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Q: What is the GPU performance level of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The Arc A350M is a modest performer, sitting in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24,546, and its Vulkan score is 24,747. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon RX 590, being just 0.4% slower.

Q: Can this system play modern games at high settings?

A: Based on the benchmark scores, high-refresh gaming is unlikely. The GPU’s low FP32 compute (3.379 TFLOPS) and limited memory bandwidth (112.0 GB/s) will constrain frame rates. It is best suited for esports titles or older games at lower settings and resolutions. The CPU is powerful enough for any game, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Q: Is this CPU+GPU combination good for video editing?

A: Yes, for the CPU-intensive parts of the workflow. Rendering and exporting timelines will be very fast due to the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads. However, effects that rely heavily on GPU acceleration may be slower, as the Arc A350M’s compute power is in the 70th percentile.

Q: What kind of memory does this CPU support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often found in workstation platforms.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and Intel Arc A350M is 83. This reflects the high CPU score being dragged down by the lower GPU score.

Benchmark Performance

The raw benchmark data paints a dualistic picture. On the CPU side, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D delivers flagship-level numbers. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,161.5 and single-core score of 2,159.5 indicate a processor that is excellent for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark suite reinforces this, with a multi-thread score of 62,674, a single-thread score of 4,511, and a floating-point math score of 144,122. The data compression score of 785,811 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in archiving and data-heavy tasks. These scores place the CPU at the 96th percentile, making it one of the most powerful mobile processors available.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are far more modest. The Intel Arc A350M scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Vulkan. These figures place it at the 70th percentile, a solidly mid-range position for a laptop GPU. Its nearest rivals are telling: it is 0.4% slower than a Radeon RX 590, 0.5% slower than an RTX A5000 Mobile, and 0.8% faster than a Radeon RX 6600 XT. This is a GPU that trades blows with older desktop parts and entry-level mobile workstation GPUs. It is not a high-performance part.

The combined picture is one of a system with a 96th-percentile brain and a 70th-percentile heart. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 97,453 is over three times higher than the GPU’s average score of 24,647. This disparity is the defining characteristic of the build. For anyone looking at this data, the message is clear: this is a compute powerhouse paired with a basic display adapter. The combined percentile of 83 is a compromise that does not reflect the true potential of either component in its respective role.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the target scenario. The Arc A350M’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 power and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth are insufficient to push high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. The CPU could easily handle the load, but the GPU will bottleneck at well below the refresh rates of high-end gaming panels. While the 96th-percentile CPU ensures no CPU-side stutters, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU makes this a compelling scenario. With 16 cores and 32 threads, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has ample headroom to encode video using x264 software encoding while simultaneously running a game. The high PassMark multi-thread score of 62,674 shows that it can handle the extra load without breaking a sweat. The GPU would handle the rendering, but its performance will dictate the game’s settings.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,161.5 will make quick work of rendering timelines and exporting final cuts. The CPU’s performance in data compression (PassMark score of 785,811) also helps with handling large media files. The GPU will accelerate previews and effects, but its mid-range performance means effects-heavy timelines may feel sluggish.

3D Rendering: This is where the system shines. CPU-based rendering engines will perform exceptionally well, as the 16-core/32-thread processor is a rendering beast. The PassMark floating-point math score of 144,122 is a strong indicator of its compute capabilities. The GPU’s contribution to rendering is minimal compared to the CPU, so its lower percentile is less of a concern.

Software Development: The CPU is ideal for this. Compilation tasks will be extremely fast, thanks to the high multi-threaded throughput. The data encryption score of 39,446 and integer math score of 222,503 are relevant for code processing and cryptography. The system can handle large codebases, virtual machines, and parallel builds with ease.

Student and Office Work: This is vastly overkill for the CPU. The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D provides far more power than any document editing or spreadsheet task requires. The system is not a practical choice for this use case due to its extreme CPU power being wasted on light workloads. The GPU is sufficient for basic display tasks, but the overall platform is a specialist tool, not a general-purpose office machine.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range. It is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process node and features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The chip has a substantial L3 cache of 128 MB, which is a significant factor in its high performance. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and also supports ECC memory.

The benchmark scores reflect a processor designed for maximum throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,161.5 places it in the top echelon of mobile CPUs, while the single-core score of 2,159.5 indicates strong per-thread performance. The PassMark results are equally impressive, with a multi-thread score of 62,674 and a single-thread score of 4,511. The data compression score of 785,811 is a standout, suggesting that the large L3 cache is highly effective in reducing latency for repeated data access patterns.

This is a workstation-class CPU in a laptop form factor. Its 96th-percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of desktop and mobile processors. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which it trails by only 1.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945, which it beats by 1.4%. This positioning suggests that the 9955HX3D is not just a gaming chip, but a serious tool for professionals who need maximum compute power on the go. The 55 W TDP is noteworthy, as it indicates the high performance is achieved within a power envelope that is manageable for a laptop.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data indicates that gaming performance will be entirely constrained by the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU’s potential to generate frames is immense, but the GPU’s 70th-percentile performance will be the limiting factor.

The Arc A350M’s FP32 compute of 3.379 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern AAA titles. Esports titles like CS or League of Legends should run at high frame rates, but demanding games will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS on high settings. The 4 GB VRAM is also a limitation for modern textures at higher resolutions. In contrast, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 2,159.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not be a source of frame rate dips in CPU-bound scenarios. The system will be stable, but the visual experience will be modest.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is for professionals and power users who primarily need extreme CPU compute power and only require basic graphics acceleration. The target user is a developer, data analyst, or engineer who runs heavy multi-threaded workloads such as compiling large codebases, running simulations, or processing large datasets. The 96th-percentile CPU performance is the main draw, making this a portable workstation for CPU-heavy tasks.

It is not for gamers. The 70th-percentile GPU is a bottleneck for any modern gaming at high settings. While it can handle light or older games, it is not a gaming machine. A user who wants to game and do occasional work would be better served by a more balanced system with a stronger GPU. The target user is also likely in a small business or academic setting where the CPU power is used for server-like tasks in a mobile form factor. For students, it is overkill, but for a researcher running complex models, the CPU is a necessity.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile part in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of this pairing is 83, reflecting the significant gap between the two components.

The system is a specialist tool. Its performance profile is heavily skewed towards CPU-bound tasks. The data shows a machine that can outperform many desktop workstations in multi-threaded workloads, but offers only entry-level graphics performance. It is a mobile compute server with a basic display output. This is not a balanced multimedia machine; it is a niche product for a specific type of user who values CPU horsepower above all else.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the AMD Socket FL1 platform and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. It also supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in server and workstation platforms. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which offers high bandwidth for future expansion. The TDP is 55 W, which is relatively low for a 16-core processor, and the suggested PSU is not specified, but the low TDP means a standard laptop power adapter should be sufficient.

The upgrade path for this laptop is limited. As a mobile platform, the CPU and GPU are likely soldered to the motherboard, making component-level upgrades impossible. A sensible next upgrade would be to a new system entirely. Given the CPU’s power, the bottleneck is the GPU. A future upgrade would involve moving to a laptop with a similar high-end CPU but a significantly more powerful GPU, such as one in the 90th percentile or higher. However, the platform itself is a dead end for performance improvements.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process. It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz.

The benchmark results place the A350M in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench scores (OpenCL: 24,546, Vulkan: 24,747) are comparable to older desktop parts like the Radeon RX 590 and GTX 1630. The FP32 compute of 3.379 TFLOPS is modest, indicating limited raw shader performance. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall compute power will result in poor performance in ray-traced titles.

For rendering, the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS is a small fraction of what a high-end desktop GPU offers. It is suitable for light 3D work and hardware acceleration in video editing, but it is not a rendering powerhouse. The memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is also a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. In summary, the A350M is a functional GPU for basic tasks and light gaming, but it is completely outclassed by the CPU in this build.