SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + Intel Arc A350M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's flagship 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, creating a system defined by extreme CPU dominance and modest graphics capability. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors with an average benchmark score of 91,199, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24,647. The combined build percentile of 83 reflects a configuration where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics solution, making this a workstation-first platform with gaming as a secondary consideration. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming platform. The Intel Arc A350M, with its 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, sits at the 70th GPU percentile and trades blows with the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% slower) and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% slower) in Geekbench scores. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s place it firmly in entry-level territory. Expect 1080p gaming at medium-to-low settings in demanding titles, with 1440p and 4K largely out of reach for smooth frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's massive multithreading capabilities — 16 cores, 32 threads, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 — provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171 and data encryption score of 37,330 indicate strong parallel processing for encoding workloads. However, the GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores and has only 6 RT cores, so hardware-accelerated encoding via the GPU will be limited; the CPU can handle the encoding load without bottlenecking gameplay at acceptable settings.

Video Editing: The Ryzen 9 9955HX excels in this role. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 puts it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon 654 and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus by 2.8%. The PassMark floating point math score of 136,682 and integer math score of 212,598 demonstrate strong number-crunching for video effects and rendering. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits timeline performance with high-resolution footage, but export and rendering tasks will fly on the CPU.

3D Rendering: This is where the combination shines brightest. The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5,905 and R23 multi-core score of 37,159 indicate rendering performance that rivals server-class Xeon parts. The PassMark physics score of 2,720 and find prime numbers score of 287 reflect strong computational throughput. The GPU's 768 shading units and 48 texture mapping units provide some acceleration for viewport rendering, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest; expect CPU-based rendering to dominate.

Software Development: The 16-core/32-thread configuration with 64 MB of shared L3 cache provides exceptional parallel compilation performance. The PassMark data compression score of 731,998 and random string sorting score of 77,890 indicate rapid file processing and data manipulation. The single-thread score of 4,393 (Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,174) ensures responsive IDE interactions and fast single-threaded build steps. The 89.6 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth supports large codebases and virtual machines.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overpowered for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance at the 96th percentile ensures snappy application launches and document processing, while the GPU easily handles spreadsheet rendering and presentation graphics. The 55 W TDP for the CPU and 25 W TDP for the GPU suggest reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop, though the 4 GB GPU memory is more than sufficient for office applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is stark. The Ryzen 9 9955HX ranks at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This 26-percentage-point gap means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload; the GPU will bottleneck gaming and graphics-intensive tasks first.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture quality and resolution before CPU performance becomes relevant. The GPU's nearest rival comparisons — 0.4% slower than the RX 590 and 0.5% slower than the RTX A5000 Mobile — place it in last-generation mainstream territory, while the CPU outperforms server-class Xeon processors. For CPU-bound games at low resolutions, the processor will deliver high frame rates, but the GPU will cap performance at higher settings.

For productivity workloads like rendering, video editing, and data processing, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171 versus the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 illustrates that the CPU handles most compute tasks more effectively than the GPU can accelerate them. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS is dwarfed by the CPU's aggregate compute capability across 16 cores.

Memory bandwidth presents another potential bottleneck. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is shared with the integrated Radeon 610M graphics and system tasks, while the discrete GPU has its own dedicated 112.0 GB/s. For workloads that stress both components simultaneously, the system memory bandwidth could become a limiting factor, though the dedicated GPU memory mitigates this for graphics tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 9955HX delivers outstanding benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 37,159 and single-core score of 2,174 position it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 91,199 places it 0.5% above the Intel Xeon 654 (90,717) and 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (90,541), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus by 2.8% (93,785) and Intel Xeon 6520P by 2.8% (93,786).

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's strength: multi-thread score of 56,171, single-thread score of 4,393, integer math at 212,598, floating point math at 136,682, and extended instructions at 57,946. The data encryption score of 37,330 and data compression score of 731,998 indicate strong security and archival workloads. The physics score of 2,720 and prime number finding at 287 round out a comprehensive compute profile.

The Intel Arc A350M GPU posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747, averaging 24,647. This places it 0.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744) and 0.5% below the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763), while 0.8% above the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) and 1.5% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277). The 70th percentile ranking reflects a capable entry-level discrete GPU that outperforms integrated solutions but trails mainstream gaming GPUs.

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the CPU contributes approximately 79% of the total compute average (91,199 CPU versus 24,647 GPU), highlighting the extreme imbalance. The combined percentile of 83 reflects the CPU's dominance pulling up the overall ranking.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: Gamers targeting 1080p with medium settings will find this configuration workable, though the GPU's 70th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit headroom. The CPU ensures no processor bottleneck, but the GPU will set the performance ceiling.

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit most from this pairing. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 deliver rendering performance rivaling Xeon workstations, while the GPU provides adequate viewport acceleration and hardware encoding support.

Software Developers: The 16-core/32-thread configuration with 64 MB L3 cache excels at parallel builds, container orchestration, and data processing. The PassMark data compression score of 731,998 and random string sorting of 77,890 indicate rapid file I/O processing.

Students in STEM Fields: Engineering and computer science students running simulations, compiling code, or processing large datasets will leverage the CPU's compute power. The 4 GB GPU memory is sufficient for CAD viewport work and basic GPU computing.

Small Business Workstations: For workloads like financial modeling, database management, and data analysis, the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171 and encryption score of 37,330 provide enterprise-class performance. The system handles multi-tasking with dozens of applications without strain.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node with 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die configuration. Base clock is 2.50 GHz with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, operating within a 55 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support, connecting via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported platforms. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provides basic display output and hardware acceleration when the discrete GPU is idle or for power-saving modes.

Benchmark interpretation: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 indicates performance comparable to desktop enthusiast processors, with the 2.8% deficit to the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus being negligible in real-world workloads. The single-core score of 2,174 ensures responsive single-threaded applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,393 places it among the fastest mobile processors for per-core performance.

The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports memory-intensive workloads like large database operations and complex simulations. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, improving gaming performance and scientific computing. The 4 nm process with 16,630 million transistors indicates a dense, power-efficient design suitable for high-performance laptops.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. The base clock is 1150 MHz with a 2200 MHz boost clock. Memory consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective) delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute performance includes 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Power consumption is 25 W TDP, and the production status is end-of-life with an IGP slot width.

Benchmark interpretation: The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747 place this GPU in the same performance tier as the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% slower) and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% slower). The 70th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of GPUs, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus limit high-resolution texture loading and modern game requirements.

The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the modest FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS will struggle with ray-traced workloads at playable frame rates. The 25 W TDP makes this an efficient GPU for thin-and-light laptops, trading absolute performance for battery life and thermal management.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which supports the Ryzen 9 9000 series mobile processors. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with ECC capability, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 25 W TDP combine for 80 W of component power draw, well within the capability of most laptop power delivery systems. The GPU's end-of-life status and IGP form factor (integrated into the motherboard) mean upgrades would require a full system replacement rather than component swaps.

A sensible next upgrade path involves moving to a higher-tier Arc or competing GPU in a future laptop platform, as the CPU has significant headroom for more powerful graphics. The 16-core processor can easily drive a GPU with 2-3 times the performance before becoming a bottleneck. For users needing more GPU memory, the 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation, and upgrading to a system with 8 GB or more would unlock higher resolutions and texture quality.

The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure the platform remains current for several years. The unlocked multiplier allows CPU overclocking on supported motherboards, though laptop thermal constraints may limit practical overclocking headroom.

FAQ

Q: Is this configuration suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The Intel Arc A350M GPU has 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, with a 70th percentile ranking. The FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS is insufficient for 4K gaming at acceptable frame rates. The CPU's 96th percentile performance cannot compensate for the GPU's memory and compute limitations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to server-class processors?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX has an average benchmark score of 91,199, placing it 0.5% above the Intel Xeon 654 (90,717) and 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (90,541). It trails the Intel Xeon 6520P by 2.8% (93,786), but the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 demonstrates workstation-level rendering capability.

Q: Can this system handle video editing workloads?

A: Yes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 and PassMark floating point math score of 136,682 provide strong export and rendering performance. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit timeline performance with high-resolution footage, but the 16-core/32-thread CPU handles most video editing tasks effectively.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 6 RT cores, providing entry-level ray tracing support. However, the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM will limit ray-traced gaming to low resolutions and settings. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware ray tracing where game implementations allow.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. This is shared between the CPU and integrated Radeon 610M graphics, while the discrete GPU has its own dedicated 112.0 GB/s bandwidth from its 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck in gaming. The CPU ranks at the 96th percentile while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture quality and resolution, while the CPU has ample headroom to drive much more powerful graphics solutions.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is active in production with a release date of January 5, 2025, while the GPU is end-of-life with a release date of March 29, 2022. The GPU's end-of-life status means it is no longer in active production, though it remains available in existing laptop designs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications, not measured results.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking suggests playable frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,174) helps maintain high frame rates. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate provide adequate fill for moderate graphical loads.

For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, expect frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for older games, with more demanding recent releases dropping below 30 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and reduced quality settings in titles requiring more memory. The GPU's 0.4% performance deficit versus the RX 590 (a 2018 mainstream card) provides a reference point: this is last-generation 1080p performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. Expect reduced settings and frame rates in the 25-40 FPS range for optimized titles, with significant compromises required for newer games. The 4 GB VRAM will be a hard constraint for high-resolution textures.

At 4K, the GPU is not viable for gaming. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain the bandwidth required for 4K rendering, and the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for modern game engines at this resolution. Users should target 1080p for gaming with this configuration.

The CPU's gaming performance is excellent; at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, the Ryzen 9 9955HX's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache ensure high minimum frame rates and smooth gameplay in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU will cap overall gaming performance in most modern titles, making this a productivity-first laptop with casual gaming capability.