SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

75,779 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D's position among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X3D sits at the 95th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,779. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, scores 75,738, a delta of just 0.1%, meaning the 9950X3D is effectively tied at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The AMD chip leads the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 by 0.4% in average benchmark score (75,779 vs. 75,488). This is a razor-thin margin, indicating that in multi-threaded workloads, the two processors are functionally equivalent despite the Ryzen's higher core count of 16 versus the Intel part's unspecified configuration.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B770's performance percentile?

A: The Arc B770 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. This places it in the middle of the pack, meaning it is a mainstream performer rather than a top-tier enthusiast card.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Arc B770 build is 73. This indicates that the system as a whole outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop configurations, driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional standing.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the Ryzen 9 9950X3D support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is relevant for workstation reliability in data-sensitive tasks.

Q: What PCIe generation and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X3D offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU alone. This provides ample bandwidth for the Arc B770, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and leaves headroom for additional Gen 5 storage or expansion cards.

Q: Is the Arc B770's performance measured or estimated for this build?

A: The data indicates that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this pairing.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board, anchoring this desktop build's strong overall position. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,018 in multi-core and 2,259 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it places the chip at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and the nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, trails by a mere 0.1% in average score (75,738 vs. 75,779). This means the 9950X3D is at the absolute top of the desktop heap, with no meaningful competition from any other consumer processor in average performance.

The Geekbench results reinforce this: a multi-core score of 26,736 and a single-core score of 3,064. The single-thread performance is critical for responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, and a score of 1,292 in 3DMark single-thread further confirms strong per-core capability. The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (2,549) to 4 threads (4,963) to 8 threads (9,259) shows near-linear scaling, demonstrating that the Zen 5 architecture efficiently utilizes additional cores without significant contention. At maximum threads, the score reaches 17,184, which is only slightly above the 16-thread score of 16,374, indicating that the 32 threads are fully utilized but with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads.

PassMark scores add another dimension. The multi-thread score of 70,255 and single-thread score of 4,737 show a strong balance. Data compression scores of 908,421 and encryption scores of 44,536 are particularly relevant for file archiving and security workloads. Floating-point math (159,724) and integer math (243,209) scores demonstrate robust compute capability, while the extended instructions score of 73,011 indicates solid SIMD performance for vectorized workloads.

The Intel Arc B770, by contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the data. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, with an average benchmark score of 0. This is a stark contrast to the CPU's 95th percentile standing. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance: the CPU is carrying the system's performance profile, while the GPU sits at the median of all graphics cards. In practical terms, this build combines a top-5% processor with a middle-of-the-road GPU, making the system's overall capability heavily weighted toward CPU-bound tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which represents AMD's current desktop socket. The CPU's 170W TDP is a significant power requirement, and the Arc B770's TDP is 225W, with a suggested PSU of 550W for the GPU alone. When combined, the system requires a robust power supply, though the exact total wattage is not specified in the data. The Arc B770's power connectors are a single 6-pin and a single 8-pin, which is a modest requirement for a GPU of its class.

Memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. For AM5, this is a standard configuration, and users looking to upgrade will find that the platform supports the latest DDR5 modules. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation builds where data integrity is paramount. The dual-channel bus is a slight limitation for memory-intensive workloads, but the high bandwidth partially compensates.

PCIe connectivity is extensive: the CPU provides 24 lanes of Gen 5, which is more than enough for the Arc B770's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU runs at full bandwidth, and there are still lanes available for Gen 5 NVMe storage or other expansion cards. The platform's forward compatibility is a key strength; AM5 is expected to support future AMD processors, so a user building today can potentially upgrade the CPU without changing the motherboard.

The logical next upgrade for this system is the GPU, given the CPU's dominance. The Arc B770's 50th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom for a more powerful graphics card. However, the data does not specify which GPUs are compatible or which would be a better match, so any upgrade recommendation is qualitative. The CPU's 95th percentile suggests it would not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU, making a GPU swap the most impactful change. The PSU headroom from the 550W suggested PSU for the GPU alone, combined with the 170W CPU TDP, indicates that a more power-hungry GPU would require a PSU upgrade, but the platform can handle it.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build, combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Intel Arc B770, is a workstation-first configuration. The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional: a 95th percentile standing, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,018 that is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285. This makes it ideal for content creators who rely on multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and 3D modeling. The Geekbench multi-core score of 26,736 and PassMark multi-thread score of 70,255 further confirm its suitability for heavily parallel workloads.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's compilation speed and the data encryption score of 44,536, which indicates strong cryptographic performance for secure coding tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 908,421 is useful for developers working with large codebases or data pipelines. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4,737 in PassMark ensures responsive interaction during development.

Students and small business workstations will find this build capable, but the GPU's median performance limits its appeal for graphics-intensive tasks. For general productivity, office applications, and web development, the CPU's exceptional single-thread performance (3,064 in Geekbench) ensures snappy performance. The GPU's 50th percentile is adequate for standard business applications and light photo editing, but not for professional graphics work.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will benefit most from the CPU's strength, as lower resolutions are typically CPU-bound. However, the Arc B770's 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for 1440p gaming, though the exact FPS figures are not measured. Content creators who game in their spare time will find this a balanced system, with the CPU excelling at rendering and the GPU handling gaming at reasonable settings. The build is less suited for 4K gaming, where the GPU would likely become the bottleneck, but the data does not provide specific resolution scaling.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance picture here is one of significant imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier part at the 95th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This creates a clear bottleneck situation: the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming, this means that at higher resolutions, the Arc B770 will constrain frame rates, while the CPU has ample headroom to process game logic and physics.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, as it is closer to the GPU's 50th percentile than the CPU's 95th. This suggests that the GPU is the primary determinant of overall system performance in mixed workloads. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as the 3DMark max threads score of 17,184, indicate it can handle far more than the GPU can feed it in gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as rendering, compilation, and data processing, the CPU is the star. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,018 places it at the top of the desktop stack, and the 0.1% delta with the nearest rival confirms that no other consumer CPU is meaningfully faster. The GPU plays a minimal role in these tasks, so the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, which is excellent.

The FPS scaling, though not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the CPU's thread scaling. The 3DMark scores show near-linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads (2,549 to 9,259), with diminishing returns at 16 threads (16,374) and max threads (17,184). This implies that games utilizing up to 8 threads will see strong scaling, while those using 16 or more threads will see less benefit. The GPU's 50th percentile means that in multi-threaded games, the CPU will not be the limiting factor; the GPU will cap frame rates.

For productivity, the balance is skewed toward the CPU. The PassMark multi-thread score of 70,255 and the Cinebench R23 score of 42,018 demonstrate that the CPU can handle any compute task without GPU assistance. The GPU's role in these workloads is minimal, so the bottleneck is entirely absent. Users running CPU-heavy applications will not experience any GPU-related limitations.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, on a 5nm TSMC process, with a die size of 368 mm². It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for the GPU's class, and the 16 GB capacity is well-suited for modern game textures and some content creation workloads. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU's compute resources include 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations units. It has 32 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These figures indicate a mid-range GPU, consistent with its 50th percentile ranking.

Clock speeds are a base of 2100 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The TDP is 225W, and the card requires a 550W PSU according to the suggested PSU spec. It uses a dual-slot design with a single 6-pin and a single 8-pin power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it operates at Gen 4 speeds.

The Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections. The architecture, Xe2-HPG, is the successor to the Alchemist generation, and the card is part of the Battlemage (Arc 7) generation. For rendering, the 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier ray tracing performer. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but high-end rendering tasks may strain the GPU.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It is manufactured on a 4nm TSMC process, with 16,630 million transistors across two 70.6 mm² dies. The base clock is 4.30 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The TDP is 170W, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a hallmark of the X3D line, though the data does not specify a separate vCache. The 128 MB L3 is critical for gaming performance, as it reduces memory latency and improves data locality. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC, on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Benchmark results are uniformly strong. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,018 and single-core score of 2,259 demonstrate top-tier performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 26,736 and single-core score of 3,064 confirm this. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 70,255 and a single-thread score of 4,737. The 3DMark scores show excellent scaling from 2 threads (2,549) to 16 threads (16,374), with a max-thread score of 17,184.

The CPU's percentile of 95 and its average benchmark score of 75,779 place it at the top of the desktop CPU market. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4%: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716), the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (75,488). This indicates that the 9950X3D is not significantly faster than its closest competitors, but it is the top performer. For real workloads, this translates to the fastest available desktop CPU for multi-threaded tasks, with single-thread performance that is equally competitive.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, a desktop CPU at the 95th percentile of all processors, with the Intel Arc B770, a desktop GPU at the 50th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined percentile for the system is 73, indicating it outperforms 73% of all desktop configurations. This is a desktop-class build, as specified by the `buildClass` field.

The CPU is the dominant component, with an average benchmark score of 75,779 that sets the system's performance ceiling. The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals, is the weaker link, but its 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a capable foundation for mainstream gaming and productivity. The system's overall tier, based on the combined 73rd percentile, is solidly mid-range to upper-mid-range, driven almost entirely by the CPU.

This is not a balanced build; it is a CPU-centric configuration where the processor's exceptional multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 42,018, Geekbench 26,736) overshadows the GPU's median standing. The system is best suited for workloads that leverage the CPU's strengths, such as rendering, compilation, and data processing, while the GPU handles graphics tasks at a competent, if not exceptional, level. The AM5 platform and PCIe Gen 5 support provide headroom for future GPU upgrades, making this a sensible foundation for a workstation that can evolve.

# Gaming Performance

The data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The absence of `measuredFpsUltraByGame` data means no specific game titles or resolutions have verified performance numbers.

Based on the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile, gaming performance will be GPU-limited in most scenarios. The CPU's exceptional single-thread performance (Geekbench 3,064, PassMark 4,737) ensures it will not bottleneck any game, even at high frame rates. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be moderate rather than exceptional.

At 1080p, the CPU's strength will allow the GPU to be fully utilized, and frame rates will be limited by the Arc B770's compute capability of 19.66 TFLOPS FP32. At 1440p, the GPU will work harder, and frame rates will scale down accordingly. At 4K, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, with the CPU having significant headroom. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the GPU's mid-range status means ray tracing performance will be modest.

These are estimates, not measurements, and the actual gaming experience may vary depending on the specific game, settings, and drivers. Users should expect a system that excels at CPU-bound games and handles GPU-bound titles at medium to high settings, but the data does not support claims of high-refresh-rate 4K gaming. The CPU's 128 MB of L3 cache is a known benefit for gaming, reducing latency and improving frame pacing, but this is an architectural advantage rather than a measured FPS figure.