SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

75,779 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D with the Intel Arc A750 is a study in extremes. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop powerhouse built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The chip packs a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, alongside a 170 W TDP. This is a processor designed to dominate multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its benchmark scores. Its 3dmark_16_threads score of 16374 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 17184 show remarkable scaling as more threads are utilized, while the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1292 indicates strong per-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018 is a clear indicator of its rendering muscle, and the Geekbench multicore score of 26736 reinforces its position as a top-tier productivity processor.

The data shows that the 9950X3D sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, which is a near-flagship positioning. Its average benchmark score of 75779 places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It is a mere 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 8224P. Interestingly, it is only 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285. This suggests that while the 9950X3D leads the pack, the margin over its closest competitors in aggregate performance is razor-thin, meaning real-world application wins will depend heavily on the specific workload and software optimization. The Passmark scores further illustrate its strengths: a multithread score of 70255, a floating-point math score of 159724, and an integer math score of 243209. The data encryption score of 44536 and data compression score of 908421 also point to its capability in security and data-handling tasks, making it a versatile choice for demanding professional environments.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this pairing present a clear narrative of CPU dominance paired with mid-range GPU capability. The CPU's performance is stellar, with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 6536 and a single-core score of 350. The Geekbench single-core score of 3064 is respectable for modern workloads. Looking at the 3DMark CPU tests, the scaling from 2 threads (2549) to 4 threads (4963) and 8 threads (9259) shows excellent thread utilization, culminating in the max threads score of 17184. The Passmark single-thread score of 4737 is a strong number for lightly-threaded tasks like gaming and general desktop responsiveness. The CPU's overall percentile rank of 95 means it outperforms 95% of all CPUs in the database, cementing its high-end status. Its average benchmark score of 75779 is the foundation for its position, and the deltaPct values against its rivals—all under 0.5%—indicate that the 9950X3D is at the very top of its class, but not in a league of its own.

In stark contrast, the Intel Arc A750 GPU presents a different picture. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612, and its Passmark G3D score is 12534. The GPU sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which is solidly mid-range. Its average benchmark score of 20582 places it in very close competition with the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.4% behind). This indicates that the A750 is a competent performer at its tier, but it is a generation behind the top-tier cards. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU build is 81, which reflects the high CPU performance pulling the average up. The data implies a system that can blaze through productivity tasks but will be constrained in high-end gaming scenarios by the GPU. For the CPU, the 3dmark_16_threads score of 16374 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018 are the headline numbers, showing it is a monster for rendering and compilation. The Geekbench multicore score of 26736 reinforces this. The GPU, with its Passmark G3D score of 12534, is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p card, but it will not drive the highest frame rates at 4K in demanding titles.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It houses 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. For hardware acceleration, it includes 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU's raw compute capabilities are rated at 17.20 TFLOPS for FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1). Its pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores indicate that the A750's performance is competitive within its class. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 suggest that the GPU can handle compute and rendering tasks reasonably well. However, the Passmark DirectX scores are oddly low, with DirectX 11 at 72, DirectX 12 at 70, and DirectX 9 at 181. These numbers might not fully represent gaming performance, as the Passmark G3D score of 12534 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 are more indicative of its actual graphics rendering ability. The GPU compute score of 5368 is modest. In terms of its rivals, the A750 is nearly identical in average score to the Intel Arc B570 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, but it is slightly ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M. This suggests that for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads, the A750 is a solid option, though its 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute power will limit it in heavy 3D rendering or 4K gaming scenarios. The 28 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the performance will be significantly lower than dedicated high-end RT cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical. The CPU also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, ensuring high-speed connectivity for the latest SSDs and graphics cards. The Intel Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 550 W; however, given the CPU's 170 W TDP, a system with both components would likely need a more robust power supply to handle peak loads. The CPU's TDP of 170 W combined with the GPU's 225 W suggests a total system power draw that a high-quality 550 W PSU might barely handle, but a 650 W or 750 W unit would provide safer headroom for overclocking and transient spikes.

Looking at the upgrade path, the CPU is a current-generation, top-tier product with an active production status, so it is not likely to need an upgrade for several years. The GPU, however, is marked as end-of-life, with its successor, Battlemage, already listed. This makes the Arc A750 the clear bottleneck in the system. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model that can match the CPU's high performance. The motherboard, assuming it is a premium AM5 board, would support a wide range of GPUs, including those using PCIe 4.0 or 5.0. The CPU's 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes would allow for a future GPU upgrade without any platform restrictions. For memory, the system is limited to DDR5, so users looking to upgrade from an older platform would need to purchase new memory. The CPU's unlocked multiplier and support for ECC memory make it a versatile platform for both enthusiasts and professionals. The data suggests the platform is future-proof for the CPU side, but the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users who require extreme CPU performance but have a more moderate GPU budget. The data clearly shows a 95th percentile CPU against a 66th percentile GPU. This build is perfect for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the CPU is the primary workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018 and the Geekbench multicore score of 26736 indicate that tasks like rendering a 4K video timeline or compiling a large codebase will be exceptionally fast. Software developers will benefit from the high multithreaded performance and the ECC memory support, which can prevent data corruption in long-running compute jobs. The Passmark data encryption score of 44536 also makes it suitable for tasks involving data security and encryption.

For students and small business workstations, this build is overkill on the CPU side but provides a balanced GPU for general productivity and light graphics work. The single-thread performance of 4737 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The bottleneck is the GPU for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A750 sufficient for high settings in many titles, but those looking for 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming will be disappointed. The system is best suited for a professional workstation that can also handle some gaming on the side. The 16 cores and 32 threads are a boon for virtualization and multi-tasking, allowing a developer to run multiple VMs or containers simultaneously. The high L3 cache of 128 MB also helps in workloads with large datasets that fit in cache, reducing memory latency.

Gaming Performance

It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The data shows the CPU is in the 95th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile. In gaming, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor at higher resolutions. Based on the Arc A750's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 and its Passmark G3D score of 12534, it is a solid 1080p performer. For esports titles and less demanding games, the A750 should be able to push high frame rates at 1080p with high settings, likely exceeding 100 FPS in many cases. For AAA titles, you can expect 60-80 FPS at 1080p on high settings, but you may need to lower settings to maintain a stable 60 FPS in the most demanding games.

At 1440p, the GPU will start to struggle. The 8 GB VRAM may also be a limitation in some modern titles with high-resolution textures. Expect 40-60 FPS in AAA games at 1440p on medium to high settings. At 4K, the Arc A750 is not recommended for high-refresh gaming; you would likely need to drop to low settings to achieve playable frame rates around 30-45 FPS. The CPU's performance will never be the bottleneck in gaming, as even its single-thread score of 1292 in 3DMark is high. The 128 MB of L3 cache and 16 cores ensure that the CPU can easily feed the GPU with data. The estimated gaming experience is that of a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, meaning the GPU will dictate the gaming ceiling. If the goal is high-refresh 1080p gaming, this build will deliver a good experience. For higher resolutions, the GPU will need to be upgraded.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 81, reflecting the high CPU performance against the mid-range GPU.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 75779, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285's score of 75488.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and type supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A750 still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A750 is classified as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Arc A750, and what power supply is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU for it alone is 550 W.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 9950X3D have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Arc A750 is 289 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class pairing a flagship 16-core CPU with a mainstream 8 GB GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a top-tier processor, sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A750 is a mid-range graphics card in the 66th percentile. The build's combined percentile is 81, placing it in the upper echelon of systems, primarily driven by the CPU's exceptional processing power. The CPU is a Zen 5 architecture part on the AM5 socket, with a boost clock of 5.70 GHz and 128 MB of L3 cache. The GPU is an Alchemist generation card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 28 ray tracing cores. This is a pairing that prioritizes compute and productivity over raw gaming frame rates. The data shows a system that is a productivity monster, a capable 1080p gaming machine, and a platform with excellent upgrade potential for the GPU. It is not a balanced system in terms of CPU and GPU tiers, but it is a highly capable one for specific use cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in this build. The CPU is in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile. For CPU-bound workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and data processing, the system will perform exceptionally well. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018 and the Passmark multithread score of 70255 indicate that the CPU can handle almost any productivity task with ease. However, for GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the Arc A750 will be the bottleneck. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 and its Passmark G3D score of 12534 are modest compared to the CPU's raw power. In gaming, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor, even at 1080p, meaning the frame rates will be dictated by the GPU. The FPS scaling would show that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p would result in a significant frame rate drop, purely due to the GPU's limitations. The 8 GB VRAM may also cause stutters in texture-heavy games. For a balanced system, the GPU would need to be upgraded to a model that sits in a higher percentile to match the CPU's output. This build is a classic example of a CPU-first configuration where the processor's potential is waiting to be unleashed by a more powerful graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the Arc A750 can deliver high frame rates in esports and older titles, but the CPU's 95th percentile performance ensures that it will never be the cause of frame drops. The GPU's 66th percentile rank means it will be the limiting factor in demanding AAA games, where you may need to lower settings to achieve high refresh rates.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 32 threads of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D are excellent for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The CPU can handle the encoding load without impacting game performance, as its max threads score of 17184 shows ample headroom. The GPU can handle the rendering, providing a smooth streaming experience.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 159724 make this CPU ideal for video editing. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export will be extremely fast. The GPU will assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but its mid-range performance may slow down some high-end effects.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, this is a top-tier system. The 128 MB of L3 cache and high core count will render complex scenes efficiently. For GPU-based rendering, the Arc A750's 8 GB VRAM and compute score of 5368 will be limiting, making it only suitable for smaller scenes or lower-quality previews.

Software Development: The high multithreaded performance, with a 3dmark_16_threads score of 16374, is perfect for compiling large codebases. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long build processes. The fast data compression and encryption scores also help with package management and secure development.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread performance of 4737 in Passmark ensures that the system feels incredibly responsive for everyday tasks like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The GPU is more than sufficient for office applications. This is an overpowered build for this scenario, but it will handle any student or office workload without breaking a sweat.