SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

74,640 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X paired with the Intel Arc A770 is a desktop combination that pairs a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 flagship with a 16 GB GDDR6 graphics card built on Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 90th percentile of all graphics cards, giving the pair a combined percentile of 92. This is a configuration built on raw computational throughput from the processor side and substantial memory bandwidth on the graphics side, but it is not a pairing where measured gaming frames are available. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this specific combination, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A770 is a 6 nm chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, featuring 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps across a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. That capacity and bandwidth figure is significant for rendering workloads because it allows large textures and complex scenes to reside in local memory without spilling to system RAM, which is a common bottleneck in high-resolution content creation.

The GPU includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, and while the tensor core count is not listed, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 19.66 TFLOPS and FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures place the Arc A770 in a competitive position for its class, though the benchmark scores tell the story more directly. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the card scores 2969 points; in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 109175, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 94284. These results indicate that the GPU is well-suited for rasterization-heavy workloads, with the Vulkan score suggesting strong performance in modern cross-platform engines.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Arc A770 sits within a narrow band. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX has an average score of 69000, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel card’s 68809 average. The AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 is 0.4% lower at 68562, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is 1.5% higher at 69870, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 is 1.7% higher at 69986. This means the Arc A770 is not a top-tier performer in absolute terms, but it is within roughly 2% of a cluster of professional and mining-oriented cards, which speaks to its balanced compute capability. For rendering, the combination of 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is the standout feature, as it enables handling of large datasets that would otherwise be constrained by memory limits on lower-capacity cards.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread performance is the anchor: the Ryzen 9 9950X scores 1293 in 3DMark single-thread and 2202 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which are strong figures for feeding frames to the GPU. The Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy titles, but the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests that very high refresh rates at 1440p will be GPU-limited in demanding titles. The estimated FPS range for esports titles is solid, but for AAA releases at ultra settings, the expectation is moderate refresh rates rather than extreme framerates.

Streaming on this platform is a dual-core workload in practice, and the CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2543 indicates strong responsiveness for encoding tasks alongside gaming. The 16 cores and 32 threads provide massive headroom for simultaneous game, encoder, and broadcast software, while the GPU’s hardware-accelerated encoding via the Xe-HPG architecture offloads the stream encoding burden. The PassMark data encryption score of 44366 also suggests that the CPU can handle encryption overhead without impacting frame pacing, which is relevant for secure streaming setups.

Video editing benefits from both components: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 and Geekbench multicore score of 25616 accelerate timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM handles large preview buffers and effects layers. The Arc A770’s 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 performance is particularly relevant for video processing, as many effects and transitions leverage half-precision compute. The PassMark integer math score of 242097 and floating point math score of 159063 further indicate strong compute for encoding and decoding workloads.

3D rendering is where this combination excels, given the CPU’s 16-core/32-thread configuration and the GPU’s 16 GB memory capacity. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 6335 and R23 multicore score of 40924 position the CPU for CPU-based rendering engines, while the GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance support GPU-accelerated renderers. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969, while not a direct rendering benchmark, indicates that the GPU can handle modern DX12 workloads with ray tracing enabled.

Software development workloads, particularly compilation and testing, are heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 66030 and 3DMark max-thread score of 16780 show strong parallel throughput. The 64 MB L3 cache and 1 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for frequently accessed code, while the GPU’s compute capability can be leveraged for parallel processing tasks like data analysis or machine learning inference. The PassMark extended instructions score of 71564 indicates robust SIMD performance for scientific and engineering code.

For student and office work, this configuration is massively overprovisioned, but the single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and responsiveness. The Geekbench single-core score of 3029 and PassMark single-thread score of 4737 are excellent for everyday tasks, while the integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side supports heavy multitasking with many browser tabs and office documents, but the power draw of both components makes this a less practical choice for purely office-bound machines.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Ryzen 9 9950X is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation socket with support for DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU itself, which provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and expansion cards. The socket is a stable foundation for future upgrades, as the AM5 platform is designed to support multiple generations of processors, meaning a future CPU drop-in is plausible without a motherboard change.

The Intel Arc A770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the card will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU’s TDP is 225 W, and the suggested power supply is 550 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 170 W. This leaves a combined TDP of 395 W for the two primary components, which means a 550 W PSU is sufficient but leaves modest headroom for other components like storage, fans, and peripherals. A sensible upgrade path would be to a higher-tier GPU if more rasterization performance is needed, as the CPU has significant headroom to drive faster graphics cards.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, which is a requirement for the AM5 platform, and the dual-channel bus provides 89.6 GB/s bandwidth from the CPU side. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are a future-proofing feature, as they allow for next-generation NVMe SSDs that can exceed the bandwidth of PCIe 4.0 drives. The platform also supports the Radeon Graphics integrated GPU, which provides a basic display output and can serve as a diagnostic tool if the discrete GPU is removed.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and high multi-thread scores indicate it is not the bottleneck in most scenarios. The Arc A770, at the 90th percentile, is a capable card, but its nearest rivals are within 2% of its average score, suggesting that a GPU with a higher percentile would yield measurable gains in GPU-bound workloads. The CPU’s 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes also support multiple high-bandwidth devices, so adding a second GPU or a high-speed storage array is feasible without exceeding the platform’s capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

In this pairing, the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, sitting at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly in tasks that are purely graphics-bound. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 74640, while the GPU’s is 68809, and the combined percentile is 92, which suggests a reasonably balanced system overall, but with a slight skew toward CPU dominance.

For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 are solid, but not exceptional, and at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be fully utilized while the CPU has idle cores. The CPU’s single-thread performance, however, ensures that frame pacing is consistent, as the 3DMark single-thread score of 1293 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2202 indicate strong per-core capabilities that prevent CPU-side frame drops.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU plays a supporting role. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 and PassMark multithread score of 66030 show that the CPU can handle massive parallel workloads, while the GPU’s compute capabilities are secondary. The PassMark data compression score of 896544 is a clear indicator that the CPU dominates in data-heavy tasks, and the GPU’s role is limited to tasks that explicitly leverage its shading units or ray tracing cores.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: for frame generation and rasterization, the GPU limits FPS, but for physics simulation and AI inference, the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are the primary resource. The PassMark physics score of 3279 and find prime numbers score of 345 are relatively low compared to the integer and floating point scores, which suggests that the CPU’s strength is in sustained multi-threaded throughput rather than latency-sensitive single-thread tasks. The GPU, on the other hand, excels at parallel floating point operations, as shown by its 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 rating.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The chip has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. It features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache, totaling 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that is exceptional in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 is a strong indicator of rendering performance, while the single-core score of 2202 shows that the architecture is not sacrificing per-core performance for core count. The Geekbench multicore score of 25616 and single-core score of 3029 align with this, suggesting that the CPU can handle both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks with equal aplomb. The 3DMark scores are particularly telling: the max-thread score of 16780 and 16-thread score of 16263 are nearly identical, which indicates that the CPU scales well up to 16 threads, but the 8-thread score of 9298 and 4-thread score of 4958 show linear scaling, meaning the architecture does not suffer from diminishing returns as thread count increases.

In real workloads, this translates to fast compile times, quick video exports, and smooth multitasking. The PassMark scores reinforce this: integer math at 242097, floating point math at 159063, and extended instructions at 71564 all indicate high throughput for computational tasks. The data compression score of 896544 is particularly impressive, suggesting that the CPU can handle archival and storage tasks with ease. The single-thread score of 4737 in PassMark is also strong, which is important for legacy applications that do not leverage multiple cores.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 (average score 74761, 0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 (74496, 0.2% lower), the AMD EPYC 4545P (75373, 1.0% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (75488, 1.1% higher). These deltas are small, indicating that the 9950X is competitive with the best that both AMD and Intel offer in this segment, though it trails the EPYC and Core Ultra 9 by a single percentage point. This positions the 9950X as a top-tier desktop processor, but not the absolute fastest in every metric.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This combination is best suited for content creators who work with large datasets, such as video editors and 3D artists. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM make it ideal for rendering complex scenes and editing high-resolution footage, where the memory capacity prevents out-of-memory errors and the CPU’s multi-threading reduces export times. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that textures and geometry load quickly, which is critical for real-time previews.

Gamers at 1440p will find this to be a capable, if not top-tier, gaming system. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1293 in 3DMark ensures that frame times are consistent, while the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle most titles at high settings. For 4K gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but the 16 GB VRAM allows for high-resolution textures without stuttering. Esports gamers at 1080p will see high framerates, but the system is overkill for this use case, as the CPU’s massive multi-thread capability is not fully utilized.

Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases or running multiple virtual machines, will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache. The PassMark multithread score of 66030 indicates fast compilation, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running builds. The GPU’s compute capability can be used for parallel testing or machine learning tasks, though it is not a dedicated accelerator.

Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU’s floating point math score of 159063 useful for simulations, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can handle data visualization tasks. The system is also suitable for small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for tasks like financial modeling or database management, where the CPU’s data encryption score of 44366 provides a measure of security without a significant performance hit. The combined percentile of 92 ensures that this system is well above average for most professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 74640, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, scores 74761, which is 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 74496, 0.2% lower. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75373 (1.0% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488 (1.1% higher). This places the 9950X in a tight cluster at the top of the desktop CPU market, with the largest gap to the leader being just over one percentage point.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 68809, placing it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69000, which is 0.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68562 (0.4% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 69870 (1.5% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 scores 69986 (1.7% higher). The GPU is therefore within 1.7% of its nearest competitors, indicating a well-rounded card that does not excel in any single area but is consistently competitive.

The combined percentile for this pair is 92, which is slightly lower than the CPU’s individual percentile but higher than the GPU’s, reflecting the fact that the CPU is the stronger component. The CPU’s key benchmark scores include a 3DMark max-thread score of 16780, a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924, and a Geekbench multicore score of 25616. The GPU’s key scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284. Together, these scores indicate a system that is well-suited for heavy multi-threaded workloads and capable of handling modern graphics tasks.

The CPU’s single-thread performance is also notable: a 3DMark single-thread score of 1293, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2202, and a Geekbench single-core score of 3029. These figures ensure that the system does not feel sluggish in everyday use, even though it is designed for demanding workloads. The overall picture is one of a high-performance desktop platform where the CPU leads, the GPU provides solid support, and the combined capabilities are above the 90th percentile for both components.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the estimated gaming performance for this combination?

A: There are no measured FPS figures for this exact CPU and GPU pairing in the data pack. Based on the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1293 and the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance, gaming performance is estimated to be solid at 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU being the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 92, with the CPU at the 94th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU at the 90th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X supports ECC memory, and it uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A770 is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 170 W.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data pack, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The data clearly indicates that this is a system where the CPU is the stronger component, so gaming performance will be largely dictated by the GPU’s rasterization and compute capabilities.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1293 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2202 suggest that the CPU will not be a bottleneck, and the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance should allow for high refresh rates in games like Counter-Strike or Valorant. Estimated framerates could exceed 144 FPS at medium-to-high settings, but these are estimates, not measured results.

For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are the key assets, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 indicates that the GPU is not a top-tier performer. Estimated framerates at ultra settings would likely fall in the 60-80 FPS range for demanding titles, with drops below 60 FPS in the most graphically intensive scenes. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores can handle ray-traced effects, but enabling them will reduce framerates further.

At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, and estimated framerates would likely be below 60 FPS in most AAA titles at ultra settings. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the GPU’s raw compute power is not enough to maintain high framerates at this resolution. The CPU’s multi-thread performance does not help in this scenario, as gaming is primarily a single-thread and GPU-bound workload. These estimates are based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not definitive measurements.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds