SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

74,640 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the Intel Arc A750 is a 6 nm Xe-HPG graphics card from the Alchemist generation. This pairing combines one of the highest-performing CPUs on the market with a mid-range GPU that sits at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, creating a desktop system where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics component in raw compute potential.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9950X operates with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, drawing a 170 W TDP. Its 16 cores and 32 threads are backed by a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support for workstation-grade reliability. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark data shows the CPU’s scaling from light to heavy workloads. In 3DMark tests, the 2-thread score is 2543, the 4-thread score is 4958, the 8-thread score is 9298, and the 16-thread score is 16263, with the max-thread score reaching 16780. The single-thread 3DMark result is 1293. Cinebench R23 scores are 40924 multicore and 2202 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 6335 multicore and 344 single-core. Geekbench reports 25616 multicore and 3029 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 66030, a single-thread score of 4737, integer math at 242097, floating-point math at 159063, and data compression at 896544. The CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs is 94, placing it in the top 6% of all processors.

The nearest rivals show how tightly the 9950X competes at the top. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 scores 74761, which is just 0.2% higher than the 9950X’s average score of 74640. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 74496, a 0.2% deficit. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75373, 1% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, 1.1% higher. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 9950X trades blows with the fastest server and mobile chips available, though it does so as a desktop part. The 16,630 million transistors spread across a 2x 70.6 mm² die size indicate a dense, modern design that excels in both bursty single-threaded tasks and sustained multi-threaded loads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Ryzen 9 9950X’s single-core performance is exceptional, with a Geekbench single-core score of 3029 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4737, both of which are critical for high-FPS gaming. However, the Intel Arc A750, with its 66th percentile rank, will limit frame rates in most titles, so the CPU’s speed will only matter at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2543 confirms strong low-thread performance for game logic.

Streaming: With 16 cores and 32 threads, the 9950X has ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 suggests the CPU can handle simultaneous game rendering and x264 encoding without stuttering. The PassMark multithread score of 66030 reinforces that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in a streaming workflow, though the GPU will be for game rendering itself.

Video editing: The multicore might here is substantial. The Geekbench multicore score of 25616 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 159063 indicate strong performance for video codecs and effects. The 64 MB L3 cache and DDR5 bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s support smooth timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The CPU’s 94th percentile rank means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in rendering and export workloads.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore at 40924 is a direct indicator of 3D rendering capability. The 3DMark max-thread score of 16780 and PassMark integer math at 242097 show that ray tracing and physics calculations will complete quickly. The 9950X’s performance here is near the top of the stack, with rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 only 1.1% faster, making this CPU a high-end choice for rendering farms or individual workstations.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from multi-core scaling, and the PassMark data compression score of 896544 and random string sorting at 94368 suggest fast build times. The 16 threads will handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds. The single-thread score of 4737 also ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overqualified for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 2-thread 3DMark score of 2543 and single-thread PassMark of 4737 mean everyday tasks will be instantaneous. However, the 170 W TDP and the need for a discrete GPU make this an inefficient choice for basic office use, where a lower-power chip would suffice.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Arc A750 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612. Its Geekbench scores are 98554 for OpenCL and 85631 for Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 12534, a G2D score of 732, GPU compute at 5368, and DirectX 11 at 72, DirectX 12 at 70, DirectX 10 at 65, and DirectX 9 at 181. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 with an average score of 20556 (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.2% lower), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.4% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.5% higher). These small deltas mean the A750 sits in a tightly contested mid-range band, performing essentially on par with a mobile RTX 3070 and just below a desktop R9 M390X.

The combined picture is starkly imbalanced. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 74640, while the GPU’s is 20582, a ratio of roughly 3.6 to 1. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile, the GPU at the 66th, and the combined system percentile is 80. This means the overall build is strong, but the CPU is doing the heavy lifting in any compute-bound scenario, while the GPU holds the system back in graphics-bound tasks. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, is 0.2% faster, but that difference is imperceptible in real use. The GPU’s rival, the Arc B570, is 0.1% slower, so the A750 is competitively positioned within its own segment.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: The Arc A750’s 66th percentile rank suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, but the 9950X’s 94th percentile CPU rank will be largely wasted at this resolution unless frame rates are uncapped. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, so gamers should expect CPU headroom to go unused.

Content creators at 4K: For video editors and 3D artists, the 9950X’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 and Geekbench multicore score of 25616 will drastically reduce render times. The Arc A750’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 4K previews, but its compute score of 5368 in PassMark means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on higher-tier cards.

Software developers: The 9950X’s PassMark multithread score of 66030 and integer math at 242097 make it ideal for compiling large codebases. The ECC memory support is a bonus for server-like development environments. The GPU is sufficient for driving multiple displays, with outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

Students and small business workstations: This build is overpowered for typical student tasks, but the 9950X’s 94th percentile rank ensures longevity for demanding engineering or data science coursework. The Arc A750’s dual-slot design and 225 W TDP require a robust case and power supply, which the suggested 550 W PSU covers, but it is not an energy-efficient choice for light workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the Intel Arc A750 is the bottleneck in most workloads. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 16780 dwarfs the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612, indicating that any 3D rendering or gaming task will be limited by the GPU. In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark 4737) can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, meaning the A750 will cap FPS in almost all scenarios. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534, compared to its rival’s scores around 20500, shows it is a mid-range part, while the CPU is top-tier.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like data compression (896544 in PassMark) or encryption (44366 in PassMark), the GPU is irrelevant, and the 9950X delivers near-best-in-class performance. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU in these tasks, and the GPU sits idle. For mixed workloads like video editing, the CPU handles encoding while the GPU accelerates effects, but the GPU’s compute score of 5368 will lag behind the CPU’s throughput, creating a pipeline stall. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this imbalance: the system is better than 80% of all builds, but it is held back from the top tier by the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes. The 170 W TDP means the CPU requires a capable cooler, but the socket is current and active, so future Ryzen 9000 series or later processors could be drop-in upgrades. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, so the A750 will not bottleneck the interface. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 170 W, so a 550 W power supply is adequate for the current build, but a higher-wattage unit would be wise if the GPU is upgraded.

The Intel Arc A750 is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage, so its upgrade path is clear: replace it with a newer Intel GPU or switch to another vendor. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus are sufficient for 1080p and some 1440p gaming, but a future GPU with more memory and higher compute will better match the 9950X’s capabilities. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking can extend its life, but the GPU is the component that will need replacing first to balance the system. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a plus for workstation use, and the dual-channel DDR5 interface is standard for the AM5 socket.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A750’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and PassMark G3D score of 12534 suggest it can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most titles, but at 1440p or 4K, performance will drop significantly. The GPU’s 66th percentile rank places it below the median of high-end cards, so gamers should expect around 60 FPS in demanding AAA titles at 1080p, with lighter esports titles reaching higher frame rates thanks to the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4737.

The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 9298 indicates it can handle game physics and AI without breaking a sweat, so frame drops will be GPU-induced, not CPU-induced. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 and Vulkan score of 85631 (Geekbench) show it performs better in modern APIs, so games using DX12 or Vulkan will see better results than DX11 titles, where the score is 72. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is decent for 1080p textures, but the 8 GB capacity may be a limit in newer games with high-resolution texture packs. Overall, the gaming experience will be smooth at 1080p, but the CPU is capable of driving far more powerful GPUs if the user chooses to upgrade.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, a 16-core desktop CPU with a 94th percentile rank, with the Intel Arc A750, a desktop GPU at the 66th percentile. The combined system percentile is 80, placing it in the top 20% of all builds. The CPU is a top-tier part, launching at an MSRP of $649, while the GPU launched at 289 USD, but both are now mature products on the market. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 74640 is nearly four times the GPU’s average of 20582, making this a CPU-centric build where the processor dominates the performance profile.

The build class is desktop, and the architecture is Zen 5 for the CPU and Xe-HPG for the GPU. The CPU is production-active, while the GPU is end-of-life, meaning the platform has a clear upgrade path for the GPU but the CPU will remain relevant for years. This is a system for users who prioritize compute-heavy workloads like rendering, compiling, and video encoding, but it is also capable of 1080p gaming where the GPU’s mid-range performance is sufficient. The imbalance is the defining characteristic: the CPU is a flagship, the GPU is a mid-ranger, and the system’s overall tier is high but not elite.

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A750 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, while the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, making the A750 0.1% faster.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 9 9950X and Intel Arc A750 is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all builds.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X supports ECC memory, and it uses DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the Intel Arc A750?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A750 is 550 W, while the GPU itself has a TDP of 225 W and the CPU has a TDP of 170 W.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds