SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

74,640 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Intel Arc A310 pairing represents an extreme mismatch of computational resources, combining one of the most powerful desktop processors available with a low-power entry-level graphics card. This analysis is based entirely on the benchmark data provided, which measures the individual capabilities of the CPU and GPU but does not include any measured FPS data for this specific combination. All gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern desktop standard that supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform provides 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and the CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. The processor connects to the rest of the system via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the fastest storage devices and expansion cards available.

The Intel Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the Ryzen platform's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU's power requirements are remarkably low, with a TDP of 30 W and a suggested power supply of 200 W. This means the graphics card draws power directly from the motherboard slot and requires no external power connectors, simplifying installation and cable management. The system's overall power draw is dominated entirely by the CPU, which has a TDP of 170 W.

The upgrade path from this configuration is straightforward and heavily skewed toward graphics. The Ryzen 9 9950X is a flagship-tier processor that will not be the limiting factor in any workload for years to come. The most sensible next upgrade is replacing the Arc A310 with a significantly more powerful GPU, as the CPU has ample PCIe lanes and bandwidth to feed even the fastest graphics cards. The platform's DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure that storage and memory are not bottlenecks, so a GPU swap is the single most impactful change a user can make.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the two components. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X achieves an average benchmark score of 74640, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, which scores 74761, a difference of only -0.2% in favor of the rival. Another close competitor is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475, which scores 74496, putting the 9950X 0.2% ahead. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75373, making it 1% faster than the 9950X, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, which is 1.1% faster.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 9950X is exceptional, scoring 40924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6335 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 66030 and Geekbench multi-core score of 25616 reinforce this position. Single-threaded performance is equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 2202, Geekbench single-core scoring 3029, and PassMark single-thread scoring 4737.

The Intel Arc A310, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon R7 250, which scores 7557, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 scores 7580, making it 0.4% faster, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7472, which is 1% slower than the A310. The AMD Radeon HD 8850M scores 7447, putting it 1.4% behind.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is in the top 6% of all processors, while the GPU is in the bottom 60% of all graphics cards. This creates a combined percentile of 67, which is dragged down significantly by the weak GPU. The average benchmark scores tell the same story: the CPU's 74640 is nearly ten times higher than the GPU's 7550.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the Intel Arc A310 is the primary bottleneck in this system for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's scores across all benchmarks are in the top percentile, while the GPU's scores are in the 40th percentile. This means that in any workload that relies on the GPU—such as gaming, 3D rendering, or video encoding—the Arc A310 will be the limiting factor, preventing the CPU from demonstrating its full potential.

The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3279 and its floating-point math score of 159063 indicate massive computational headroom that the GPU cannot leverage. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and its DirectX 12 score of 29 show that even when the GPU is fully utilized, its output is minimal compared to the CPU's capabilities. The GPU's compute score of 2157 in PassMark GPU compute further confirms this imbalance.

In CPU-bound workloads, the system performs admirably, as the Arc A310 is not involved. The 9950X's 16 cores and 32 threads handle multi-threaded tasks with ease, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40924. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the system's performance is capped by the Arc A310's capabilities. The FPS scaling in games would be limited by the GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and its 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, which are entry-level figures.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The data clearly shows that the Intel Arc A310 will be the deciding factor in gaming performance, as its 40th percentile ranking among GPUs places it in the entry-level category.

The GPU's PassMark DirectX 10 score of 31, DirectX 11 score of 33, and DirectX 12 score of 29 indicate very low performance in modern gaming APIs. The DirectX 9 score of 69 is higher but still low in absolute terms. For gaming at 1080p resolution, the A310 would likely deliver playable frame rates only in older titles or at low graphics settings. At 1440p or 4K resolution, the GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would be severely insufficient, causing texture loading issues and very low frame rates.

For esports titles that are not graphically demanding, the system might achieve acceptable frame rates at lower settings, but the GPU's 768 shading units and 16 ROPs limit its fill rate to 28.00 GPixel/s. The CPU's impressive single-threaded performance would help in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU would still be the limiting factor in most games. The system is not suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming or for playing modern AAA titles at high settings, as the GPU's benchmark scores put it in the same performance class as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which is an older entry-level card.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a very specific user: someone who requires extreme CPU performance for work but has minimal or no graphics requirements. The Ryzen 9 9950X's 94th percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 896544 and data encryption score of 44366 show that the CPU excels at data-intensive tasks.

Software developers would benefit greatly from the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, as compilation tasks are highly parallel. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40924 demonstrates that it can handle large compilation jobs quickly. Students and researchers working with simulation software or data analysis would also benefit from the CPU's multithreaded performance.

Small business workstations that run database servers, virtual machines, or heavy spreadsheet calculations would find the CPU's capabilities more than sufficient. However, the Intel Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking means that this system is not suitable for graphic designers, video editors who rely on GPU acceleration, or gamers. Its 4 GB of VRAM is insufficient for modern creative applications, and its low compute scores would slow down GPU-accelerated effects.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 74640.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Arc A310 is 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but 0.4% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing is 67, reflecting the strong CPU and weak GPU.

Q: Does the GPU require external power connectors?

A: No, the Intel Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested power supply of 200 W.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X uses the AMD Socket AM5.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The Intel Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 29 mean that frame rates would be low even at 1080p. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance cannot compensate for the GPU's lack of graphics processing power.

Streaming: The CPU can handle game streaming encoding with its 16 cores and 32 threads, as evidenced by its PassMark multi-thread score of 66030. However, the GPU would struggle to render games at playable frame rates, making the overall streaming experience poor.

Video editing: The CPU is excellent for video editing, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40924 and a PassMark floating-point math score of 159063. The GPU, however, would bottleneck GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, making it a poor choice for this workload.

3D rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU's 94th percentile ranking makes it ideal for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU's low compute score of 2157 in PassMark would severely limit GPU-accelerated rendering performance.

Software development: This is an excellent scenario for this build. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, and the GPU is largely irrelevant for code editing and building. The PassMark integer math score of 242097 supports this use case.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for typical student and office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's performance is far beyond what these tasks require, and the GPU is sufficient for 2D desktop rendering, as indicated by its PassMark G2D score of 625.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a flagship-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Arc A310 is a low-power graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the significant disparity between its components. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking places it at the top of the desktop processor market, while the GPU's 40th percentile ranking places it at the bottom of the graphics card market. The combined percentile of 67 reflects this imbalance, indicating a system that is far more powerful in CPU-bound tasks than in GPU-bound tasks. This is a workstation-oriented build for users who prioritize processor performance above all else.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is the centerpiece of this build, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads. Its base clock is 4.30 GHz, and it boosts up to 5.70 GHz. The processor has a TDP of 170 W and uses the AMD Socket AM5. It is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge, part of the Ryzen 9 generation, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC with 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm².

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory and has an integrated Radeon Graphics solution. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes ensures fast connectivity to storage and expansion devices.

Benchmark results show the CPU's dominance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark scores scale from 1293 in single-thread to 16780 in max-threads, demonstrating excellent multi-core scaling. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2202 and multi-core score of 40924 highlight its balanced performance. In Geekbench, it scores 3029 single-core and 25616 multi-core. The PassMark suite shows strong performance in integer math (242097), floating-point math (159063), and extended instructions (71564). The CPU's average benchmark score of 74640 places it in the 94th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 at 74761, a difference of just -0.2%.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds