SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration anchored by a 12-core Zen 5 processor and a 12 GB Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU, part of the 9000 series built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, supported by a 120 W TDP. Its architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, includes 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design with a 2x 70.6 mm² die size. The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a massive 128 MB of L3 cache, which is critical for gaming workloads that benefit from large, fast pools of data.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong scaling from two threads to maximum threads. The 3DMark results show a progression from 2512 at 2 threads to 9002 at 8 threads, and finally 13795 at max threads, indicating excellent multi-threaded expansion. The single-thread score of 1269 in 3DMark, paired with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739, places it among the top-tier consumer processors for lightly-threaded tasks. Multi-core Cinebench R23 results reach 47737, which is a robust figure for rendering and compilation workloads. The Geekbench scores of 3041 single-core and 22884 multi-core reinforce this positioning, with the multi-core result suggesting strong performance in heavily parallelized applications like video encoding or 3D scene rendering.

The PassMark suite provides granular insights into specific workloads. The integer math score of 179727 and floating-point math score of 119622 indicate high throughput for both general-purpose and scientific computing. Data compression at 685074 and encryption at 33282 show the CPU handles archiving and security tasks efficiently. The extended instructions score of 55426 highlights the benefit of the Zen 5 architecture’s SIMD capabilities. The average benchmark score of 54762 places the CPU in the 91st percentile of all processors, meaning it outperforms 91% of its peers. Compared to its nearest rivals, it sits just 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093, and 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, which scores 54053. The delta against the Intel Xeon 6505P is 2%, and against the Intel Core i7-14700F it is 2.1%, both in favor of the 9900X3D. These margins are narrow, but the 9900X3D’s large L3 cache provides a distinct advantage in latency-sensitive workloads that synthetic benchmarks may not fully capture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and the RTX 4070 is heavily workload-dependent, with the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 81st percentile suggesting the processor has more headroom relative to the graphics card. In gaming, the data indicates that at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, the GPU often becomes the limiting factor, especially in graphically intensive titles. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate at 1920x1080 is 75 FPS, dropping to 56 FPS at 2560x1440 and 37 FPS at 3840x2160. This scaling pattern shows that as resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows, and the CPU’s role diminishes. Conversely, in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, the 1080p frame rate of 254 FPS and 1440p of 168 FPS indicate that the CPU can push very high frame rates, but the GPU still has the capacity to handle these less demanding titles without becoming a bottleneck.

The PassMark physics score of 5340 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 12490 illustrate the CPU’s capability in game physics and logic, which are often single-thread or low-thread-count tasks. The data suggests that in a game like Ark: Survival Ascended, which is known for heavy CPU usage, the 1080p frame rate of 37 FPS is likely constrained by the game’s engine rather than the hardware, as the CPU’s single-thread performance is high. The GPU’s passmark directx_12 score of 103 and directx_11 score of 244 are relatively low compared to its G3D score of 26927, but this discrepancy is typical of synthetic API tests that do not reflect real-world game performance. The combined percentile of 86 for the build indicates that the pairing is well-matched for most scenarios, with the CPU providing a solid foundation for the GPU to operate at its full potential. In productivity tasks, the CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-core scores ensure that it can feed the GPU with data in rendering workloads, but the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor in high-resolution texture-heavy scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU’s benchmark scores reveal a capable mid-to-high-range card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of graphics cards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 and Vulkan score of 174152 show strong compute performance, which is beneficial for non-gaming tasks like machine learning inference or video processing. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 is a solid result for rasterized rendering, while the GPU compute score of 14720 highlights its parallel processing capabilities. The average benchmark score of 37648 puts it in close competition with its nearest rivals: the NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628 (0.1% difference), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507 (0.4% difference), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 (-1.3% difference). The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, which is 1.3% behind. These tight margins suggest that the RTX 4070 is a well-optimized card that sits in a competitive performance tier, though it does not dominate its direct competitors.

The CPU’s benchmark profile shows a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R20 scores of 20049 multi-core and 2830 single-core are indicative of strong rendering capabilities, while the Geekbench single-core score of 3041 is among the highest for consumer desktop CPUs. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56154 and single-thread score of 4646 confirm that the 9900X3D is a top-tier performer, with the 91st percentile ranking placing it in the top 9% of all CPUs. The pair’s combined percentile of 86 reflects a system that is above average in both compute and graphics, though the GPU’s lower percentile means it is the weaker link in the overall performance equation. The pair rank by FPS of 883 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 162.2 across games, underscores that this configuration delivers high frame rates in a wide variety of titles, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream socket for AMD Ryzen processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a feature beneficial for workstation applications that require data integrity. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth connections to the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. The motherboard compatibility for AM5 ensures that users have a clear upgrade path within the same platform, as future Ryzen processors are expected to support this socket. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, and the 550 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom for the system’s combined power draw of 120 W for the CPU and 200 W for the GPU.

For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider adding more RAM or a higher-end GPU, as the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking indicates it has significant headroom to support a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 12 GB VRAM on the RTX 4070 is sufficient for current games at 1440p, but for 4K gaming or heavy content creation, a GPU with more VRAM would be a logical upgrade. The CPU’s support for DDR5 memory means that users can also upgrade to faster memory kits to improve performance in memory-sensitive applications. The motherboard’s Gen 5 PCIe support ensures that future graphics cards and storage devices will be able to operate at their full potential, making the platform future-proof for several years. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, which means the CPU has a longer support window for driver and BIOS updates, whereas the GPU’s successor, the GeForce 50 series, is already available for those seeking the latest features.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system’s gaming performance at ultra settings across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and older titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 561 FPS and Valorant hitting 582 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 302 FPS, and Roblox runs at 328 FPS, indicating that the CPU and GPU combination is more than capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors in competitive games. For triple-A titles, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 75 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 68 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 92 FPS, all at 1080p, which are solid figures for demanding games. The frame rates scale predictably with resolution, with 1440p showing a significant drop in some titles, such as Ark: Survival Ascended at 23 FPS and The Medium at 45 FPS, while others like Call of Duty: Warzone maintain playable rates at 161 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with the most demanding titles, with Ark: Survival Ascended dropping to 12 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 to 37 FPS, which is borderline playable but not ideal for a smooth experience. Less demanding games like Valorant still achieve 397 FPS at 4K, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 94 FPS. The data shows that the sweet spot for this configuration is 1440p, where most games run at 60 FPS or higher, with only a few exceptions like The Medium (45 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (51 FPS) falling below that threshold. The average FPS across all tested games is 162.2, which is a high figure driven by the excellent performance in lighter titles. This suggests that for a balanced gaming experience, users should target 1080p or 1440p monitors, with 4K reserved for less demanding games or those willing to lower settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a chip designated AD104. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, which are the core building blocks for rasterized rendering. For ray tracing, it includes 46 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 184 tensor cores, which are essential for DLSS and other AI-based features.

The pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s indicate the GPU’s fill rate capabilities, which affect performance in high-resolution and texture-heavy scenes. The FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS is a measure of its raw compute power for general-purpose shader work, while the FP16 performance is the same at 29.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, which is useful for certain compute workloads. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking places it above the majority of graphics cards, but its nearest rivals are closely matched, with the RTX 4080 Mobile being 1.3% faster and the RX Vega 56 being 0.4% slower. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 indicate that the GPU is well-suited for 1440p gaming and capable of handling 4K in less demanding titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 is particularly strong, suggesting good performance in Vulkan-based games, which are becoming more common. For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM may be a limitation for extremely large scenes, but the tensor cores provide acceleration for AI-based denoising and upscaling, which can offset some of the VRAM pressure.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, as the measured FPS data shows strong performance in most titles at these resolutions. Esports enthusiasts will find the system ideal, with Valorant and CS:GO exceeding 500 FPS at 1080p, ensuring that high-refresh-rate monitors are fully utilized. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 47737 indicating fast rendering times. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance also make it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender, though users with very large scenes may need to manage VRAM usage carefully.

Students and small business workstations will find the system capable of handling office tasks, data analysis, and light programming with ease, given the CPU’s high single-thread performance of 3041 in Geekbench and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The ECC memory support is a plus for workstations that require error-free data processing. For developers, the CPU’s high multi-thread score of 22884 in Geekbench means faster compilation times for large codebases, and the PCIe Gen 5 support allows for fast NVMe storage, reducing I/O bottlenecks. The 91st percentile CPU ranking and 81st percentile GPU ranking mean this system is a high-tier desktop build that can handle most tasks without compromise, though it is not the absolute top-of-the-line for 4K gaming or extreme compute workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, is a high-end processor that ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is in the top tier for both single-thread and multi-thread performance. The GPU, while ranking in the 81st percentile, is a solid mid-to-high-range card that excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming. The combined percentile of 86 places this build in the upper echelon of systems, though it is not the absolute fastest available. The pair’s rank of 883 out of 3732 pairs by FPS shows that it is above average in gaming performance, with an average FPS of 162.2 across a wide range of titles.

The build is well-balanced for its intended use, with the CPU providing ample headroom for the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s large 128 MB L3 cache is a standout feature that benefits gaming performance, and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games at 1440p. The system’s class is desktop, meaning it is designed for stationary use with the ability to upgrade components. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, but this does not affect current performance. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $599, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. This build is a strong choice for users who want a high-performance system for gaming and productivity without stepping into the highest price tiers of CPUs and GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance compared to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 6739 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 47737 in multi-core, showing strong performance in both, but the multi-core score is approximately 7 times higher, reflecting its 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: How does the GPU perform in 4K gaming?

A: The GPU’s measured FPS at 3840x2160 shows it can handle less demanding games at playable rates, such as Valorant at 397 FPS, but struggles with AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 37 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 12 FPS.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1440p gaming and most 4K titles, but the 12 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes at high resolutions.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 120 W, which requires a capable air cooler or a basic liquid cooler to maintain optimal temperatures under load, given its high boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The CPU is 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF in average benchmark score, but its 128 MB L3 cache provides an advantage in gaming workloads that are sensitive to cache size.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM size and is it enough for future games?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, which is adequate for current games at 1440p, but may become insufficient for future titles that demand more VRAM for high-resolution textures.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation applications where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. Measured FPS in Counter-Strike 2 reaches 254 at 1080p and 168 at 1440p, while Valorant hits 582 and 496 respectively, ensuring that 240 Hz and 165 Hz monitors are fully utilized in competitive titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and strong multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 47737 allow for smooth game streaming and video encoding simultaneously, while the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate encoding tasks, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit some streaming features at 4K.

Video Editing: The CPU’s high multi-core performance in Geekbench (22884) and Cinebench R23 (47737) accelerates video editing tasks like rendering and exporting, while the GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 GB VRAM provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading in applications like DaVinci Resolve.

3D Rendering: In rendering workloads, the CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, along with the GPU’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, make this a capable system for Blender and similar software. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4811 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 indicate solid performance for both CPU and GPU rendering paths.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3041 in Geekbench and multi-thread score of 22884 support fast code compilation, while the 128 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, making this a productive system for developers working on large projects.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, the CPU’s high single-thread performance (4646 in PassMark single-thread) ensures snappy response in office applications, and the GPU’s compute capabilities can handle data visualization tasks, though the system is overkill for basic word processing and web browsing.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds