SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a desktop-class build with sharply different component standings in the database: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined percentile is 55. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from benchmark scores rather than reported from game tests.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER is a GeForce 50-series GPU built on the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors and a 378 mm² die size. Its base clock is 2295 MHz with a 2617 MHz boost clock, and the memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective transfer. The memory subsystem is 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 56.28 TFLOPS.

The only GPU benchmark in the data is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075. That score places it at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3075. In the nearest-rival comparison, the GPU is 2.8% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, whose average score is 3163, and 3.4% behind the Intel Arc Pro B60, whose average score is 3182. It is 3.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A, with an average score of 2983, and 3.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, with an average score of 2967. These are narrow deltas across a score band from 2967 to 3182, so the database places the RTX 5080 SUPER’s measured rendering performance in that immediate neighborhood rather than far above it.

For rendering workloads, the raw resources are substantial: 24 GB of VRAM, 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth, 84 RT cores for ray-traced effects, and 336 tensor cores for tensor-accelerated compute. But the benchmark result is the only measured GPU performance indicator, and it does not support a high placement. The 19th-percentile position means the GPU sits low in the overall GPU distribution, so GPU-bound rendering tasks should be expected to perform near the nearest rivals listed above rather than near the top of the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming depends on both CPU and GPU frame delivery. The CPU-side results are strong: 3DMark single-thread score is 1269, PassMark single-thread score is 4646, and the CPU has 128 MB of L3 cache. However, the GPU’s only benchmark is a 3075 Steel Nomad score at the 19th percentile, and with no measured FPS data, high-refresh estimates are not directly supported. The database suggests GPU performance near the 2967–3182 score band, which does not indicate a high-refresh ultra-settings system.

Streaming workloads benefit from ample CPU thread resources. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 56154 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737. Those numbers indicate strong headroom for running a game plus background streaming tasks, although the GPU’s low percentile remains a constraint on the frame delivery side.

Video editing combines single-thread responsiveness and multicore throughput. Geekbench single-core is 3041 and multi-core is 22884, while Cinebench R23 single-core is 6739 and multi-core is 47737. The CPU memory path provides 89.6 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth, and the GPU provides 1.02 TB/s of memory bandwidth with 24 GB of VRAM for large frames. Export and encoding work should lean on the CPU’s strong multicore results, while GPU-accelerated effects will be capped by the GPU’s measured 19th-percentile position.

3D rendering can be CPU-bound or GPU-bound depending on the renderer. For CPU-based rendering, the 47737 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 119622 PassMark floating-point math score are strong. For GPU-based rendering, the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32/FP16 figures, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores are present in the specification, but the only GPU benchmark result is 3075, so GPU-accelerated rendering should be expected to follow that low benchmark position.

Software development and compilation favor the CPU heavily. PassMark integer math is 179727, extended instructions are 55426, multithread is 56154, and the CPU has 24 threads. Data encryption scores 33282 and data compression scores 685074, suggesting parallel build and data-heavy development workloads can use the CPU’s high throughput effectively.

Student and office work is well within the CPU’s single-thread capability. PassMark single-thread is 4646, Geekbench single-core is 3041, and the CPU includes Radeon integrated graphics for display output. The dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support provide a stable memory environment for ordinary desktop productivity.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor in the 9000 series, built on Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses AMD Socket AM5 and is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process with 16,630 million transistors and a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Base clock is 4.40 GHz, boost clock is 5.50 GHz, and TDP is 120 W. The multiplier is unlocked. Cache is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel mode at 89.6 GB/s, with ECC true. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes Radeon integrated graphics. Release date is 2025-01-05T17:00:00.000Z.

The CPU’s single-thread scores are 1269 in 3DMark single-thread, 6739 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3041 in Geekbench single-core, and 4646 in PassMark single-thread. Multithread performance is represented by 3DMark 16-thread at 12490 and max-thread at 13795, Cinebench R23 multicore at 47737, Geekbench multicore at 22884, and PassMark multithread at 56154. Additional CPU results include Cinebench R15 multicore 4811 and single-core 679, Cinebench R20 multicore 20049 and single-core 2830, PassMark data compression 685074, data encryption 33282, extended instructions 55426, find prime numbers 544, floating-point math 119622, integer math 179727, physics 5340, and random string sorting 71864.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 54762, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 91. In the nearest-rival comparison, this processor is 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093, and 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, which scores 54053. It is 2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6505P, scoring 53701, and 2.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F, scoring 53620. This places the 9900X3D essentially at parity with the Core Ultra 5 245KF and slightly ahead of the other three nearby CPUs. For real workloads, the combination of high single-thread scores, 24 threads, and 128 MB of L3 cache supports responsive interactive use and heavy parallel throughput.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, dataIsMeasured is false, and pairRankByFps is null. Therefore, all FPS statements in this section are estimates based on the available benchmark scores.

For ultra-settings gaming, the CPU side is capable: 3DMark single-thread is 1269, 3DMark 16-thread is 12490, and Cinebench R23 multicore is 47737. The GPU side, however, has only the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, at the 19th percentile. Estimated frame rates would be anchored near the GPU’s nearest rivals: the RTX 5080 SUPER is 2.8% behind the Quadro P1000, 3.4% behind the Arc Pro B60, 3.1% ahead of the GeForce 820A, and 3.6% ahead of the GTX 860M. That puts expected GPU-bound performance in the score band from 2967 to 3182. Because there is no measured FPS data, no game-specific or resolution-specific FPS figures can be stated; the data only supports a qualitative estimate that the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance is clearly CPU-forward. The CPU is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined percentile is 55. In gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU is the limiting component because its only measured benchmark score is low relative to the GPU population. In CPU-heavy workloads such as compilation, data compression, and encryption, the CPU is the strong partner: PassMark multithread is 56154, integer math is 179727, and data compression is 685074.

The CPU thread scaling data supports the interpretation that the processor can feed many threads: 3DMark scores rise from 1269 single-thread to 2512 at 2 threads, 4885 at 4 threads, 9002 at 8 threads, 12490 at 16 threads, and 13795 at max threads. This shows strong scaling across the core count. No FPS scaling evidence exists because no measured FPS rows are present, so the bottleneck argument rests on the component percentiles and the CPU’s thread scaling. The power figures also point in the same direction: the CPU TDP is 120 W, while the GPU TDP is 415 W, so sustained GPU-bound workloads will be dominated by the GPU in both performance and power terms.

Who Should Build It

This build is appropriate for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who need many threads. software developers can use the CPU’s 179727 PassMark integer math score and 56154 multithread score for parallel builds. Users running CPU-based rendering or video export can rely on the 47737 Cinebench R23 multicore score. Data-focused small business workstations benefit from ECC DDR5 support, 128 MB of L3 cache, and the active AM5 platform. Students and office users will find the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4646 and integrated Radeon graphics more than sufficient for everyday tasks. Gamers should only consider this build if their target games are CPU-bound and do not require high GPU performance; the GPU’s 19th-percentile position does not support an estimate of high-refresh ultra-settings gaming. Users who need 24 GB of VRAM and 1.02 TB/s of GPU memory bandwidth for large working sets may still choose this GPU, but the measured benchmark places its compute and rendering performance near the 2967–3182 score band.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark set is extensive. 3DMark results are 12490 for 16 threads, 2512 for 2 threads, 4885 for 4 threads, 9002 for 8 threads, 13795 for max threads, and 1269 for single-thread. Cinebench R15 multicore is 4811 and single-core is 679. Cinebench R20 multicore is 20049 and single-core is 2830. Cinebench R23 multicore is 47737 and single-core is 6739. Geekbench multicore is 22884 and single-core is 3041. PassMark results are data compression 685074, data encryption 33282, extended instructions 55426, find prime numbers 544, floating-point math 119622, integer math 179727, multithread 56154, physics 5340, random string sorting 71864, and single-thread 4646. The CPU average benchmark score is 54762, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 91. It is 0.6% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, and 1.3% above the Core Ultra 5 245K, 2% above the Intel Xeon 6505P, and 2.1% above the Intel Core i7-14700F.

The GPU benchmark set is limited to one result: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3075. The GPU average benchmark score is 3075, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 19. It is 2.8% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and 3.4% behind the Intel Arc Pro B60, while 3.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A and 3.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M. The combined percentile is 55, and the pair rank by FPS is null because no measured FPS data exists. The combined picture is a very strong CPU with near-top placement in its comparison group, paired with a GPU whose only measured benchmark places it low in the GPU distribution.

FAQ

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this exact CPU/GPU pair?

A: No. The FACT PACK has no measuredFps rows for this combination, measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty, dataIsMeasured is false, and pairRankByFps is null. Any FPS discussion is therefore estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What are the CPU and GPU percentile positions?

A: The CPU percentile versus all CPUs is 91, the GPU percentile versus all GPUs is 19, and the combinedPercentile is 55. The CPU average benchmark score is 54762, and the GPU average benchmark score is 3075.

Q: How does the CPU compare with its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU average score of 54762 is 0.6% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093. It is 1.3% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54053, 2% above the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701, and 2.1% above the Intel Core i7-14700F at 53620.

Q: How does the GPU compare with its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU’s only benchmark score is 3075. That is 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 and 3.4% below the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182, while 3.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 and 3.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967.

Q: What memory support does the platform have?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC true. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

Q: What are the TDP values of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU TDP is 120 W, and the GPU TDP is 415 W. The suggestedPsu field for the GPU is null in the database, so no official PSU headroom figure is listed.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the integratedGraphics field lists Radeon Graphics. This build also includes the RTX 5080 SUPER, but the CPU can provide display output on its own.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is AMD Socket AM5, with DDR5 dual-channel memory support at 89.6 GB/s and ECC true. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, so the platform already supports current PCIe Gen 5 devices. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, and its 128 MB of L3 cache is integrated into the socket package.

The suggestedPsu field is null for the GPU, so the database does not provide an official PSU recommendation or headroom value. The GPU TDP is 415 W, while the CPU TDP is 120 W, which means the GPU dominates total system power draw and should be the focus of power-delivery planning. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade in benchmark terms is to replace or supplement the GPU side of the build. The CPU is at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is at the 19th percentile, and the combined percentile is 55. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus and the CPU’s 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes would support installing a higher-scoring GPU on the same platform. The AM5 socket and DDR5 memory support mean the CPU and memory platform can remain in place while the GPU bottleneck is addressed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, as indicated by buildClass: desktop, pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The CPU launch MSRP is $599, and the GPU launch MSRP is 999 USD. The combined percentile is 55, placing the overall tier in the middle of the database even though the CPU alone is at the 91st percentile. The CPU contributes 12 cores, 24 threads, 128 MB of L3 cache, and a 54762 average benchmark score. The GPU contributes 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, and a 3075 average benchmark score. The overall system is therefore CPU-dominant: it is best suited to CPU-heavy workloads, while GPU-bound performance is held to the GPU’s measured 19th-percentile position.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds