SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Intel Arc B770 form an unusual desktop pairing: a high-end 12-core Zen 5 processor built for maximum compute and cache depth, matched with a mid-tier Battlemage GPU that is positioned by its 50th percentile standing among all GPUs. The data shows a system that is heavily CPU-forward in raw capability, while the GPU defines the practical ceiling for graphics-bound work. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not observed results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of where the constraint sits. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D posts an average benchmark score of 54762 and ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, placing it in the top decile of processors. The Intel Arc B770, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in the provided data. That percentile gap — 91 versus 50 — is the single strongest signal in this FACT PACK: the CPU is roughly twice as far up its respective performance distribution as the GPU is up its own. In any workload that stresses both components, the GPU will hit its ceiling long before the CPU breaks a sweat.

The CPU’s thread-scaling results reinforce this imbalance. In 3DMark tests, the 9900X3D scores 2512 with 2 threads, 4885 with 4 threads, 9002 with 8 threads, 12490 with 16 threads, and 13795 with max threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is 3488 points, while the jump from 16 to max threads adds only 1305 points — diminishing returns that suggest the processor’s 24 threads are more than enough for most current workloads. Meanwhile, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are fixed resources; no amount of CPU headroom changes those limits. For gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the GPU at higher resolutions, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-heavy simulations, the 9900X3D’s 128 MB L3 cache and 12 cores can carry the load.

Consider the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737. That is a heavy multi-threaded result, but it does nothing to raise the GPU’s 50th percentile position. The data implies that any application with a graphics component — games, 3D renderers with GPU acceleration, video encoders using the GPU — will be limited by the Arc B770’s mid-pack standing. Conversely, pure CPU tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 685074) or integer math (179727) will run at near-top-tier speed. The bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU is the constraint in graphics-bound scenarios, while the CPU is effectively never the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite is extensive and consistently strong. In Cinebench, the 9900X3D scores 4811 in R15 multicore, 20049 in R20 multicore, and 47737 in R23 multicore. Single-core results are equally notable: 679 in R15, 2830 in R20, and 6739 in R23. Geekbench shows 22884 multicore and 3041 single-core. The PassMark suite adds 56154 for multithread, 4646 for single-thread, 119622 for floating-point math, and 179727 for integer math. The 3DMark results, already cited, show strong scaling from 2 to 8 threads, with 16-thread and max-thread scores of 12490 and 13795 respectively. The average benchmark score of 54762 and the 91st percentile ranking confirm this is a top-decile desktop processor.

The GPU’s benchmark data is empty — no scores, no rivals, no percentile detail beyond the 50th percentile figure. That absence is itself informative: the FACT PACK provides no measured performance numbers for the Arc B770, so its standing must be inferred from its 50th percentile position and its hardware specifications. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, which sits between the CPU’s 91 and the GPU’s 50, weighted toward the stronger component. The practical reading is that this system’s overall performance tier is solidly above average, but it is not a top-tier gaming or rendering machine because the GPU holds it back from the CPU’s elite class.

The nearest rivals for the CPU are all Intel parts: the Core Ultra 5 245KF (avgScore 55093, deltaPct -0.6), the Core Ultra 5 245K (avgScore 54053, deltaPct 1.3), the Xeon 6505P (avgScore 53701, deltaPct 2), and the Core i7-14700F (avgScore 53620, deltaPct 2.1). The 9900X3D is 0.6% behind the 245KF, 1.3% ahead of the 245K, 2% ahead of the Xeon, and 2.1% ahead of the i7-14700F. These are tiny margins, meaning the 9900X3D is statistically tied with these rivals in average score, despite its much larger cache and higher core count. The GPU has no rivals listed, so no direct comparison is possible — only its 50th percentile standing.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc B770 a high-end GPU based on the data?

A: No. It sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which means it is exactly average in the distribution of GPU performance. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and no rival data is provided.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: It is 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, 1.3% ahead of the Core Ultra 5 245K, 2% ahead of the Xeon 6505P, and 2.1% ahead of the Core i7-14700F in average benchmark score. These are near-ties.

Q: What is the CPU’s strongest benchmark result?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 is the highest single benchmark number listed, followed by the PassMark multithread score of 56154 and the 3DMark max threads score of 13795.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon Graphics as an integrated GPU, per the FACT PACK. This is separate from the discrete Intel Arc B770.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the CPU offer?

A: It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is supported.

Q: Can this system handle high-refresh gaming?

A: The CPU is capable, with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread scores (6739 in Cinebench R23 single-core), but the GPU’s 50th percentile position suggests it will limit frame rates in most games, especially at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 71, which is below the CPU’s individual 91st percentile but above the GPU’s 50th percentile.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussion here is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, and these figures should be treated as approximations, not observations. The CPU’s gaming-relevant strengths include a 5.50 GHz boost clock, 128 MB of L3 cache, and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739, which is strong for game logic and physics. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor: its 50th percentile standing and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles, but it will not sustain high refresh rates in demanding AAA games at 4K.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance and large cache should allow the GPU to run near its full potential, with estimated frame rates in the playable range for most games. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current titles, but the 50th percentile position implies average performance relative to other GPUs. At 4K, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, with frame rates dropping below what the CPU could otherwise support. The combined percentile of 71 suggests a system that is above average for gaming, but not exceptional — the CPU is overkill for the GPU’s capabilities in most graphics-bound scenarios.

For esports titles or older games, the CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost and 1269 single-thread 3DMark score should push frame rates high if the GPU can keep up. For modern AAA games with ray tracing, the GPU’s 32 RT cores are present, but its 50th percentile standing means ray-traced performance will be modest. The data does not support claims of elite gaming performance; it supports a solid mid-range gaming experience with CPU headroom to spare.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 24 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-bandwidth storage and next-generation GPUs. The socket is current for AMD’s desktop lineup, and the 9000 series is an active production platform, so motherboard availability is not a concern. The CPU’s TDP is 120 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 225 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W for the GPU alone — a system with this CPU and GPU would likely need a PSU in the 550 W to 750 W range, though the FACT PACK only specifies 550 W as the GPU’s suggested PSU.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, so no bottleneck there. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which is standard for a 225 W card. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is dual-channel DDR5, which is adequate for 12 cores but not extraordinary. ECC memory support is a plus for workstation use.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom — its 91st percentile ranking means it will not be the limiting factor in any graphics upgrade for several generations. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU can accommodate a high-bandwidth GPU, and the 16 GB of VRAM on the current GPU is already generous, so the upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU, replace the GPU when a higher-tier option becomes available. The platform’s DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 are both current, so no motherboard or memory change is needed for a GPU swap.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, on a 5 nm TSMC process with a 368 mm² die. It has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs. The RT cores number 32, and while tensor cores are not listed, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU’s clocks are 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS. FP16 is 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The 50th percentile standing among all GPUs means it is average in the overall GPU performance distribution. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for this class and suggests the card can handle large textures and high resolutions without running out of memory. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 16 GB of VRAM, but not exceptional. The 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 is a mid-range figure, roughly matching what the percentile suggests. For rendering, the 32 RT cores and 4096 shading units mean it can do hardware ray tracing and general compute, but the 50th percentile position implies it will not compete with top-tier GPUs in ray-traced scenes or heavy GPU rendering.

The display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, which is modern and supports high refresh rates on compatible monitors. The card is dual-slot and requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The TDP is 225 W. The API support is complete for modern games, with DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU’s predecessor is Alchemist, and its production status is not listed, but the release date is 2025-12-31, indicating a recent or upcoming launch. No benchmark scores are provided for this GPU, so the 50th percentile is the only performance metric available.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 16,630 million transistors on a 2x 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 4.40 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.50 GHz. The TDP is 120 W, and the socket is AMD Socket AM5. Cache is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 128 MB L3 total. Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 24 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, and the launch MSRP is $599. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a basic display output capability.

The benchmark scores place it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average score of 54762. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 is a strong result for a 12-core part, and the single-core score of 6739 is excellent, indicating high per-thread performance. The 3DMark results show good scaling from 2 threads (2512) to 8 threads (9002), with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads (12490) to max threads (13795). This suggests that 12 cores and 24 threads are well-balanced for most current workloads, though heavily threaded applications will still benefit.

The nearest rivals are all Intel parts with nearly identical average scores, meaning the 9900X3D does not lead its class by a wide margin in aggregate benchmarks. The PassMark results highlight specific strengths: data compression at 685074, integer math at 179727, and floating-point math at 119622 are all high figures. The find prime numbers score of 544 is lower, indicating that not all workloads benefit equally. The single-thread PassMark score of 4646 is solid but not class-leading. For real workloads, the 9900X3D excels at multithreaded compute, data-heavy tasks, and single-thread responsiveness, making it a versatile high-end desktop CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with the Intel Arc B770. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is average at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this mismatch: the system is above average overall, but it is not a balanced high-end machine. The CPU is capable of elite-level compute, as evidenced by its 47737 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 91st percentile ranking, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position means graphics performance is mid-pack. This is a CPU-first build where the processor is the dominant component, and the GPU is adequate but not exceptional.

The class is desktop, and the overall tier from the percentiles is upper-mid-range. The CPU’s 91st percentile puts it in the top 10% of processors, but the GPU’s 50th percentile drags the combined score down. The 128 MB L3 cache and 12 cores make this a powerful workstation or content-creation CPU, while the GPU is sufficient for mainstream gaming and light rendering. The system is not a top-tier gaming rig, but it is a capable desktop for a wide range of tasks, with the CPU providing ample headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who prioritize CPU-intensive games — such as strategy titles, simulators, or MMOs — will benefit from the 9900X3D’s 5.50 GHz boost clock and 128 MB L3 cache. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are enough for these resolutions, and the CPU will not bottleneck. Content creators who work with video encoding, 3D rendering on the CPU, or data compression will see strong performance from the 12 cores, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 47737 and PassMark data compression at 685074. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and high multithread scores, such as the 3DMark max threads result of 13795.

Students and small business users who need a responsive desktop for office work, web browsing, and light multitasking will find the CPU’s single-thread performance (6739 in Cinebench R23 single-core) more than sufficient, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming or heavy GPU rendering, as the GPU’s 50th percentile position limits those workloads. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, this build makes sense as a CPU-first investment. For those who need balanced performance today, the GPU will be the weak link.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost and 1269 3DMark single-thread score suggest strong frame pacing, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position will cap frame rates in demanding titles. At 1080p, estimated performance is good for esports and older games; at 1440p, it is playable but not elite.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with a PassMark multithread score of 56154. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can handle the streaming pipeline, but its mid-pack performance means game settings may need adjustment to maintain smooth streams.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and encoding will be fast, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 47737 and PassMark floating-point math at 119622. GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Arc B770’s 50th percentile standing, so expect average GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be strong, given the 12 cores and 128 MB L3 cache. GPU rendering using the Arc B770’s 4096 shading units and 19.66 TFLOPS will be mid-range — capable, but not competitive with top-tier GPUs.

Software development: Compilation and parallel builds will benefit from the 24 threads and high multithread scores, including 3DMark 16-thread at 12490 and PassMark integer math at 179727. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU is massively overqualified, with single-thread performance (4646 PassMark single-thread) that handles any office application instantly. The GPU adds 16 GB of VRAM and modern API support, but it is unnecessary for this use case. The 120 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP mean the system runs efficiently for a desktop.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds