SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the Intel Arc B570 is a desktop build that occupies a distinct position in the performance hierarchy, with the CPU ranking in the 91st percentile and the GPU in the 65th percentile. This combination creates a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component, capable of feeding the graphics card in most scenarios but leaving significant headroom for future GPU upgrades. The data shows a pairing that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate esports and competitive gaming at 1080p, while also providing substantial multi-core muscle for productivity tasks, albeit with a graphics solution that will be the limiting factor in graphically demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is exceptional at 1080p, particularly in competitive and esports titles. The measured frame rates show Counter-Strike 2 running at 133 FPS and Valorant at an outstanding 304 FPS at 1920x1080, with the latter still exceeding 200 FPS at 4K. This indicates the system can fully utilize high-refresh-rate monitors in these genres, where the CPU's single-thread performance and large cache keep frame times low. The Arc B570 is less stressed in these scenarios, and the data confirms that the CPU is the enabler of these high frame rates.

Streaming is a viable workload for this configuration, as the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 24 threads provide ample parallel processing capacity to handle game capture and encoding simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47,737 points and PassMark multithread score of 56,154 suggest that the CPU can manage both gaming and streaming workloads without significant contention. The Arc B570's lack of a dedicated hardware encoder is not a factor in the analysis, but the CPU's strength in multi-threaded PassMark tests, such as integer math at 179,727, indicates it can handle software encoding tasks without compromising game performance.

Video editing and 3D rendering are strong suits for this system, driven almost entirely by the CPU. The Geekbench multicore score of 22,884 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20,049 place this processor in the top tier for content creation, with the 12 cores and 24 threads providing substantial computational throughput. The GPU's contribution to rendering is more modest, with an FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS, which is adequate for real-time previews but will be the bottleneck for final frame renders in GPU-accelerated engines. For CPU-based rendering, the 47,737-point Cinebench R23 multicore score demonstrates that this build can handle professional workloads effectively.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The PassMark data compression score of 685,074 and extended instructions score of 55,426 indicate rapid code compilation and execution of complex instruction sets. The single-thread score of 4,646 in PassMark and 1,269 in 3DMark single-thread suggest quick response times for interactive development tools and IDE operations. The 128 MB of L3 cache is particularly beneficial for large codebases and database operations, reducing memory latency and improving overall system responsiveness.

Student and office work is handled with ease, though the hardware is overkill for these tasks. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,512 and 4-thread score of 4,885 show that even lightly-threaded applications receive excellent performance. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 661 and G3D score of 14,195 ensure smooth desktop compositing and 2D acceleration. For typical productivity suites and web browsing, the system is never the bottleneck, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring snappy application launches and the 10 GB of VRAM providing ample space for multiple high-resolution displays.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate benchmark picture is strong, with an average benchmark score of 54,762 and a percentile ranking of 91 among all CPUs. This places it just ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55,093 and represents a 0.6% delta, effectively making them performance peers. The AMD processor is also 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053) and 2.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620). The 3DMark results are revealing: the max threads score of 13,795 is only 10.4% higher than the 16-thread score of 12,490, indicating that the chip scales well but has diminishing returns beyond 16 threads. The single-thread score of 1,269 is notably strong, representing the 91st percentile performance class.

The GPU's benchmark results tell a different story, with an average score of 20,556 and a 65th percentile ranking. The Arc B570 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a 0.1% delta from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534) and a 0.1% delta from the Intel Arc A750 (20,582). This indicates that the B570 is positioned in the mid-range of desktop GPUs, trading blows with last-generation mobile flagship and desktop mid-range parts. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 provides a modern API benchmark, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,514 and Vulkan score of 96,844 show consistent performance across different compute APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 14,195 is the most comprehensive gaming metric, and the compute score of 7,281 indicates the GPU's parallel processing capability.

The combined picture is one of imbalance, with the CPU being a top-tier performer and the GPU being a solid mid-range option. The combined percentile of the build is 78, which is dragged down by the GPU's lower standing. The pair rank by FPS is 3,018 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 87. This rank indicates that while the system performs well in many games, it is not in the top tier for overall gaming performance, primarily due to the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions and in more demanding titles.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the BMG-G21 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but can become a limiting factor at 4K with high-resolution textures. The GPU's clock speeds are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. The 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines provide a raw compute throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 23.04 TFLOPS for FP16 operations.

The GPU includes 18 ray tracing cores, which is a relatively low count compared to the shading unit count, suggesting that ray tracing performance will be modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 is the key metric for modern rendering performance, and it places the GPU in the mid-range tier. The texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s are respectable for its class, allowing for smooth texturing and rasterization in most games. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 72 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 118, which could indicate driver optimization issues or architectural differences in how the GPU handles the newer API.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS is the key metric for real-time 3D viewports in applications like Blender or Autodesk Maya. The compute score of 7,281 in PassMark suggests that GPU-accelerated rendering tasks, such as those in OctaneRender or V-Ray, will be slower than what a higher-tier GPU would offer. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p and 1440p scenes but may struggle with very large texture sets or complex scenes that exceed this capacity. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's needs, with the 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth being the more critical constraint for rendering performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54,762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55,093) and 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053). It is 2.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620), indicating it is statistically tied with these processors in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for smooth 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the measured frame rates, but can become a bottleneck at 4K in games that require large memory transfers, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 which drops to 18 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming performance is limited. While titles like Valorant (207 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (136 FPS) are playable at 3840x2160, demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (19 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (18 FPS) are not. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking and 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance are the primary constraints.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance classification?

A: The CPU's single-thread scores are strong, with a 3DMark score of 1,269, a Cinebench R23 score of 6,739, and a Geekbench score of 3,041. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,646 places it in the top percentile for single-threaded responsiveness, which is critical for gaming and office applications.

Q: How does the GPU's ray tracing performance compare to its general rendering performance?

A: The GPU has 18 ray tracing cores, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 72 is lower than the DirectX 11 score of 118, suggesting that ray tracing workloads may be less efficient. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 indicates that general DX12 rendering is competent, but ray tracing at high settings will likely be challenging.

Q: What is the significance of the CPU's 128 MB of L3 cache?

A: The 128 MB L3 cache is a key feature of the 3D V-Cache design, and it directly benefits gaming performance by reducing memory latency. This is evident in the high frame rates in CPU-bound games like Counter-Strike 2 (133 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (304 FPS at 1080p), where cache hit rates are critical.

Q: What is the power consumption profile of this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which accounts for the combined system draw. This is a relatively modest power profile that allows for efficient operation without requiring an oversized power supply.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and is part of the 9000 series. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 4.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and it has a TDP of 120 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and supports ECC memory. It has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy is a defining feature, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a massive 128 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is the hallmark of the 3D V-Cache design and is the primary reason for the CPU's exceptional gaming performance. The benchmark results show this advantage clearly: the 3DMark 16-thread score of 12,490 and max threads score of 13,795 are excellent, but the single-thread score of 1,269 is where the high boost clock and cache shine. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47,737 is a strong indicator of professional workload performance, while the single-core score of 6,739 ensures responsive everyday use.

The PassMark results provide insight into specialized workloads. The data encryption score of 33,282 and extended instructions score of 55,426 suggest strong cryptographic and SIMD performance for security and scientific applications. The floating-point math score of 119,622 is nearly double the integer math score of 179,727, indicating that the CPU is particularly well-suited for scientific computing and financial modeling that relies heavily on floating-point operations. The physics score of 5,340 is a direct measure of game physics capability, and the prime number finding score of 544 is a test of pure integer throughput. The 91st percentile ranking across all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier processor for both gaming and productivity.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh-rate monitors will find this build ideal, especially those who prioritize competitive esports titles. The measured frame rates in games like Valorant (304 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike 2 (133 FPS at 1080p) show that the system can push well beyond 144 Hz, and the CPU's single-thread performance ensures that even the most CPU-intensive games will not be bottlenecked. For 4K gaming, this is not the right choice, as the GPU's 65th percentile ranking and the sub-30 FPS results in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (19 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (18 FPS) demonstrate.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, and software compilation will benefit from the 24 threads and the 47,737-point Cinebench R23 multicore score. The GPU can handle real-time previews and light GPU-accelerated effects, but for heavy GPU rendering, a more powerful graphics card would be necessary. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation speeds indicated by the PassMark data compression score of 685,074 and the large cache for large code repositories.

Students and office workers will find this build more than sufficient, though it is overkill for these tasks. The single-thread performance ensures snappy application response, and the 24 threads provide ample headroom for running multiple virtual machines or data analysis tools. Small business workstations that require a balance of compute performance and graphics output, such as for financial modeling or CAD drafting, would benefit from the CPU's floating-point performance and the GPU's 10 GB of VRAM for large datasets. However, the system's strengths are clearly in CPU-intensive workloads and competitive gaming, not in high-end graphics rendering.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data across 50 games at three resolutions provides a comprehensive picture of gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 87 FPS across all games, with many titles exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. Esports titles perform exceptionally well: Valorant leads with 304 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 181 FPS. These games are clearly CPU-bound, and the 128 MB L3 cache and high boost clock are the primary drivers of this performance.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to around 60% of the 1080p values, which is expected as the GPU becomes more stressed. Call of Duty: Warzone remains highly playable at 161 FPS, and Valorant still hits 259 FPS. However, more demanding titles begin to struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 12 FPS. This resolution is a reasonable compromise for the system, with many games hitting 60 FPS, but the GPU is clearly the limiting factor in the most demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations are fully exposed. Only a few games maintain playable frame rates: Valorant (207 FPS), Call of Duty: Warzone (136 FPS), and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (119 FPS). Most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and The Medium at 18 FPS. The 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, confirming that this build is not designed for 4K gaming. The data clearly shows that the system is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers excellent performance in a wide range of titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, a flagship-level CPU in the 91st percentile of all processors, with the Intel Arc B570, a mid-range GPU in the 65th percentile. The combined percentile of the build is 78, which reflects the significant gap between the two components. The CPU is designed for maximum gaming and productivity performance with its 12 cores, 24 threads, and 128 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU is positioned as a competent 1080p and 1440p gaming solution.

The build's overall tier is best described as a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that excels in CPU-bound workloads and competitive gaming but is limited in GPU-accelerated tasks and high-resolution gaming. The average FPS across all games is 87, and the pair rank of 3,018 out of 3,732 pairs places it in the upper half of all CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently at the top of its class, while the GPU's scores are competitive with other mid-range options, but the delta between the two components is clear.

This configuration is not a balanced pairing in the traditional sense, but it serves a specific purpose: it provides a high-performance computing platform that can be upgraded with a more powerful GPU later without needing to replace the CPU. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures that it will not become a bottleneck for several generations of GPU releases, making this a strategic foundation for a content creation or high-end gaming system that can evolve over time.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance in this system, with the CPU being the dominant component and the GPU being the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile ranking shows a 26-percentile-point gap, which translates to the CPU being capable of much higher frame rates than the GPU can deliver. This is most evident in CPU-bound games like Valorant, where the GPU is not stressed and the CPU's performance determines the frame rate (304 FPS at 1080p).

In GPU-bound scenarios, the GPU is the limiting factor. At 4K, the system's average frame rate drops significantly, and demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (19 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (18 FPS) are unplayable. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient for these workloads. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent drop of approximately 35-40% at each resolution step, which is typical of a GPU-bound system, but the absolute values at 4K are too low for a satisfying experience.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is clearly the driver, and the GPU's role is secondary. The PassMark compute score of 7,281 suggests that GPU-accelerated tasks will be slower than what a top-tier GPU would offer, but the CPU's multicore performance ensures that CPU-based tasks are not bottlenecked. The system's bottleneck is therefore workload-dependent: the CPU is the star in computing tasks, while the GPU is the constraint in graphics-heavy applications. The practical implication is that users should pair this CPU with a stronger GPU to unlock its full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern desktop platform with support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU and fast NVMe storage. The dual-channel DDR5 memory controller supports a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and the platform supports ECC memory for increased reliability in workstation environments. This platform is designed for longevity, and the CPU's high performance ensures that it will remain relevant for several years.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, which is well within the capability of most modern power supplies, and the CPU's TDP of 120 W means that the total system power draw is manageable. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, making it compatible with most ATX cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc B570 with a higher-performance GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support much faster graphics cards. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean that it can fully utilize a top-tier GPU without bottlenecking. The platform also supports future AM5 processors, so users can upgrade the CPU later without changing the motherboard. The 450 W suggested PSU provides some headroom, but a more powerful GPU would likely require a higher-wattage power supply. The memory support for DDR5 and ECC provides flexibility for both gaming and professional workloads, and the 128 MB L3 cache is a feature that will continue to benefit gaming performance for years to come.